Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Original Research

Patient Preferences in Controlling Access to Their Electronic Health Records: a Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care

Authors: Peter H. Schwartz, MD, PhD, Kelly Caine, PhD, Sheri A. Alpert, PhD, MPA, Eric M. Meslin, PhD, Aaron E. Carroll, MD, MS, William M. Tierney, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Special Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Previous studies have measured individuals’ willingness to share personal information stored in electronic health records (EHRs) with health care providers, but none has measured preferences among patients when they are allowed to determine the parameters of provider access.

Methods

Patients were given the ability to control access by doctors, nurses, and other staff in a primary care clinic to personal information stored in an EHR. Patients could restrict access to all personal data or to specific types of sensitive information, and could restrict access for a specific time period. Patients also completed a survey regarding their understanding of and opinions regarding the process.

Results

Of 139 eligible patients who were approached, 105 (75.5 %) were enrolled, and preferences were collected from all 105 (100 %). Sixty patients (57 %) did not restrict access for any providers. Of the 45 patients (43 %) who chose to limit the access of at least one provider, 36 restricted access only to all personal information in the EHR, while nine restricted access of some providers to a subset of the their personal information. Thirty-four (32.3 %) patients blocked access to all personal information by all doctors, nurses, and/or other staff, 26 (24.8 %) blocked access by all doctors and/or nurses, and five (4.8 %) denied access to all doctors, nurses, and staff.

Conclusions

A significant minority of patients chose to restrict access by their primary care providers to personal information contained in an EHR, and few chose to restrict access to specific types of information. More research is needed to identify patient goals and understanding of the implications when facing decisions of this sort, and to identify the impact of patient education regarding information contained in EHRs and their use in the clinical care setting.
Literature
1.
go back to reference President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Report to the President realizing the full potential of health information technology to improve health care for Americans: the path forward. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.; 2010. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Report to the President realizing the full potential of health information technology to improve health care for Americans: the path forward. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.; 2010.
2.
go back to reference Pritts J. The importance and value of protecting the privacy of health information: roles of HIPAA privacy rule and the Common Rule in health research. Inst Med. 2008. Pritts J. The importance and value of protecting the privacy of health information: roles of HIPAA privacy rule and the Common Rule in health research. Inst Med. 2008.
4.
go back to reference Meslin EM, Alpert SA, Carroll AE, Odell JD, Tierney WM, Schwartz PH. Giving patients granular control of personal health information: using an ethics ‘points to consider’ to inform informatics system designers. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(12):1136–43.PubMedCrossRef Meslin EM, Alpert SA, Carroll AE, Odell JD, Tierney WM, Schwartz PH. Giving patients granular control of personal health information: using an ethics ‘points to consider’ to inform informatics system designers. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(12):1136–43.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leventhal JC, Cummins JA, Schwartz PH, Martin DK, Tierney WM. Designing a system for patients controlling providers’ access to their electronic health records: organizational and technical challenges. JGIM. In press (Supplement). Leventhal JC, Cummins JA, Schwartz PH, Martin DK, Tierney WM. Designing a system for patients controlling providers’ access to their electronic health records: organizational and technical challenges. JGIM. In press (Supplement).
6.
go back to reference Caine K, Hanania R. Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(1):7–15.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Caine K, Hanania R. Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(1):7–15.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Whiddett R, Hunter I, Engelbrecht J, Handy J. Patients’ attitudes towards sharing their health information. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75(7):530–41.PubMedCrossRef Whiddett R, Hunter I, Engelbrecht J, Handy J. Patients’ attitudes towards sharing their health information. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75(7):530–41.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Teixeira PA, Gordon P, Camhi E, Bakken S. HIV patients’ willingness to share personal health information electronically. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):e9–12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Teixeira PA, Gordon P, Camhi E, Bakken S. HIV patients’ willingness to share personal health information electronically. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):e9–12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tierney WM, Alpert SA, Byrket A, et al. Provider responses to patients controlling access to their electronic health records: a prospective cohort study in primary care. JGIM. In press In press (Supplement). Tierney WM, Alpert SA, Byrket A, et al. Provider responses to patients controlling access to their electronic health records: a prospective cohort study in primary care. JGIM. In press In press (Supplement).
10.
go back to reference Rolfe A, Cash-Gibson L, Car J, Sheikh A, McKinstry B. Interventions for improving patients’ trust in doctors and groups of doctors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3, CD004134.PubMed Rolfe A, Cash-Gibson L, Car J, Sheikh A, McKinstry B. Interventions for improving patients’ trust in doctors and groups of doctors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3, CD004134.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kozubal DE, Samus QM, Bakare AA, Trecker CC, Wong H-W, Guo H, Cheng J, Allen PX, Mayer LS, Jamison KR, Kaplin AI. Separate may not be equal: a preliminary investigation of clinical correlates of electronic psychiatric record accessibility in academic medical centers.”. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(4):260–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kozubal DE, Samus QM, Bakare AA, Trecker CC, Wong H-W, Guo H, Cheng J, Allen PX, Mayer LS, Jamison KR, Kaplin AI. Separate may not be equal: a preliminary investigation of clinical correlates of electronic psychiatric record accessibility in academic medical centers.”. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(4):260–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient Preferences in Controlling Access to Their Electronic Health Records: a Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care
Authors
Peter H. Schwartz, MD, PhD
Kelly Caine, PhD
Sheri A. Alpert, PhD, MPA
Eric M. Meslin, PhD
Aaron E. Carroll, MD, MS
William M. Tierney, MD
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue Special Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3054-z

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2015

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.