Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Perspective

How Bioethics Principles Can Aid Design of Electronic Health Records to Accommodate Patient Granular Control

Authors: Eric M. Meslin, PhD, Peter H. Schwartz, MD, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Special Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

Ethics should guide the design of electronic health records (EHR), and recognized principles of bioethics can play an important role. This approach was recently adopted by a team of informaticists who are designing and testing a system where patients exert granular control over who views their personal health information. While this method of building ethics in from the start of the design process has significant benefits, questions remain about how useful the application of bioethics principles can be in this process, especially when principles conflict. For instance, while the ethical principle of respect for autonomy supports a robust system of granular control, the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence counsel restraint due to the danger of patients being harmed by restrictions on provider access to data. Conflict between principles has long been recognized by ethicists and has even motivated attacks on approaches that state and apply principles. In this paper, we show how using ethical principles can help in the design of EHRs by first explaining how ethical principles can and should be used generally, and then by discussing how attention to details in specific cases can show that the tension between principles is not as bad as it initially appeared. We conclude by suggesting ways in which the application of these (and other) principles can add value to the ongoing discussion of patient involvement in their health care. This is a new approach to linking principles to informatics design that we expect will stimulate further interest.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Spriggs M, Arnold MV, Pearce CM, et al. Ethical questions must be considered for electronic health records. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:535–9.PubMedCrossRef Spriggs M, Arnold MV, Pearce CM, et al. Ethical questions must be considered for electronic health records. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:535–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Caine K, Hanania R. Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records. J Am Med Informatics Soc. 2013;20:7–15.CrossRef Caine K, Hanania R. Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records. J Am Med Informatics Soc. 2013;20:7–15.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Al-Ubaydli M. Patients must have control of their medical records. BMJ. 2012;345 Al-Ubaydli M. Patients must have control of their medical records. BMJ. 2012;345
5.
go back to reference Gunter T, Terry N. The Emergence of National Electronic Health Record Architectures in the United States and Australia: Models, Costs, and Questions. Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e3. doi:10.2196/jmir.7.1.e3.CrossRef Gunter T, Terry N. The Emergence of National Electronic Health Record Architectures in the United States and Australia: Models, Costs, and Questions. Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e3. doi:10.​2196/​jmir.​7.​1.​e3.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Showell, CM, Citizens, patients and policy: a challenge for Australia’s national electronic health record, Health Information Management Journal, 40, (2) pp. 39–43. ISSN 1833–3583 (2011)http://ecite.utas.edu.au/7438 Showell, CM, Citizens, patients and policy: a challenge for Australia’s national electronic health record, Health Information Management Journal, 40, (2) pp. 39–43. ISSN 1833–3583 (2011)http://​ecite.​utas.​edu.​au/​7438
7.
go back to reference Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
8.
go back to reference Gillon R, Lloyd A, eds. Principles of Health Care Ethics. Chichester: Wiley; 1994. Gillon R, Lloyd A, eds. Principles of Health Care Ethics. Chichester: Wiley; 1994.
10.
go back to reference Goodman KW, ed. Ethics, Computing, and Medicine: informatics and the transformation of health care. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998. Goodman KW, ed. Ethics, Computing, and Medicine: informatics and the transformation of health care. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
11.
go back to reference Goodman KW, Miller RA. Ethics and health informatics: users, standards, and outcomes. In: Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ, eds. Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. 3rd ed. New York: Springer New York; 2006:379–402.CrossRef Goodman KW, Miller RA. Ethics and health informatics: users, standards, and outcomes. In: Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ, eds. Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. 3rd ed. New York: Springer New York; 2006:379–402.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Meslin EM, Alpert SA, Carroll AE, Odell JD, Tierney WM, Schwartz PH. Giving patients granular control of personal health information: Using an ethics ‘Points to Consider’ to inform informatics system designers. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82:1136–43.PubMedCrossRef Meslin EM, Alpert SA, Carroll AE, Odell JD, Tierney WM, Schwartz PH. Giving patients granular control of personal health information: Using an ethics ‘Points to Consider’ to inform informatics system designers. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82:1136–43.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems. Records, computers and the rights of citizens. DHEW Publication No. (OS) 73–94, Stock No. 1700–00116. Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office. Washington, DC, July 31, 1973. Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems. Records, computers and the rights of citizens. DHEW Publication No. (OS) 73–94, Stock No. 1700–00116. Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office. Washington, DC, July 31, 1973.
14.
go back to reference Tierney WM, Alpert SA, Byrket A, et al. Patient Control of Access to their Electronic Health Records: Real World Experience in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med doi:10.1007/s11606-014-3061-0 Tierney WM, Alpert SA, Byrket A, et al. Patient Control of Access to their Electronic Health Records: Real World Experience in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med doi:10.​1007/​s11606-014-3061-0
15.
go back to reference Caine K, Kohn S, Lawrence C, Hanania R, Meslin EM, Tierney WM. Designing a patient-centered User Interface for Access Decisions about EHR Data: Implications from Patient Interviews. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-3049-9 Caine K, Kohn S, Lawrence C, Hanania R, Meslin EM, Tierney WM. Designing a patient-centered User Interface for Access Decisions about EHR Data: Implications from Patient Interviews. doi:10.​1007/​s11606-014-3049-9
16.
go back to reference Schwartz PH, Caine K, Alpert SA, Meslin EM, Carroll AE, Tierney WM. Patient Preferences to Control Access to Their Electronic Health Records in a Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-3054-z Schwartz PH, Caine K, Alpert SA, Meslin EM, Carroll AE, Tierney WM. Patient Preferences to Control Access to Their Electronic Health Records in a Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care. doi:10.​1007/​s11606-014-3054-z
17.
20.
go back to reference Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician–patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267:2221–6.PubMedCrossRef Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician–patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267:2221–6.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.
22.
go back to reference Committee on Approaching Death. Institute of Medicine. Dying in America. Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. National Academies Press, September 2014. (Accessed September 25, 2014) Committee on Approaching Death. Institute of Medicine. Dying in America. Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. National Academies Press, September 2014. (Accessed September 25, 2014)
25.
go back to reference Were MC, Meslin EM. Ethics of implementing electronic health records in developing countries: Points to Consider. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:1499–505.PubMedCentralPubMed Were MC, Meslin EM. Ethics of implementing electronic health records in developing countries: Points to Consider. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:1499–505.PubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
How Bioethics Principles Can Aid Design of Electronic Health Records to Accommodate Patient Granular Control
Authors
Eric M. Meslin, PhD
Peter H. Schwartz, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue Special Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3062-z

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2015

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine