Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2013

01-02-2013 | Perspectives

Physicians, Social Media, and Conflict of Interest

Author: Matthew DeCamp, MD, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

Physicians and patients increasingly use social media technologies, such as Facebook, Twitter, and weblogs (blogs), both professionally and personally. Amidst recent reports of physician misbehavior online, as well as concerns about social media’s potential negative effect on trust in the medical profession, several national-level physician organizations have created professional guidelines on social media use by physicians. Missing from these guidelines is adequate attention to conflict of interest. Some guidelines do not explicitly mention conflict of interest; others recommend only disclosure. Recommending disclosure fails to appreciate the unique features of social media that make adequate disclosure difficult to accomplish. Moreover, in emphasizing disclosure alone, current guidelines are inconsistent with medicine’s general trend toward management or elimination, not just disclosure, of potential conflicts. Because social media sites typically rely on physicians’ voluntary compliance with professional norms, physicians necessarily play a major role in shaping these norms’ content and scope. To achieve the benefits of social media and ensure the veracity of social media content while preserving trust in the profession, physicians must reaffirm their commitment to disclose potential conflicts; advocate for better electronic disclosure mechanisms; and develop concrete management strategies—including, where necessary, the elimination of conflicts altogether.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Thompson LA, Dawson K, Ferdig R, et al. The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):954–7.PubMedCrossRef Thompson LA, Dawson K, Ferdig R, et al. The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):954–7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Manhattan Research LLC. Taking the Pulse: Physicians and Emerging Information Technologies. New York, NY: Manhattan Research; April 2010. Manhattan Research LLC. Taking the Pulse: Physicians and Emerging Information Technologies. New York, NY: Manhattan Research; April 2010.
3.
go back to reference Fox S. The Social Life of Health Information. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington DC: Pew Research Center; 2011. Fox S. The Social Life of Health Information. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington DC: Pew Research Center; 2011.
5.
go back to reference Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR. The patient–doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;26(10):1168–74.CrossRef Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR. The patient–doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;26(10):1168–74.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Merchant RM, Elmer S, Lurie N. Integrating social media into emergency-preparedness efforts. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:289–91.PubMedCrossRef Merchant RM, Elmer S, Lurie N. Integrating social media into emergency-preparedness efforts. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:289–91.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wicks P, Vaughan TE, Massagli MP, Heywood J. Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(5):411–4.PubMedCrossRef Wicks P, Vaughan TE, Massagli MP, Heywood J. Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(5):411–4.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Maier A, Holm T, Wicks P, et al. Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: a prospective trial. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2012;13(2):210–6.PubMedCrossRef Maier A, Holm T, Wicks P, et al. Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: a prospective trial. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2012;13(2):210–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yamout SZ, Glick ZA, Lind DS, Monson RA, Glick PL. Using social media to enhance surgeon and patient education and communication. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2011;96(7):7–15.PubMed Yamout SZ, Glick ZA, Lind DS, Monson RA, Glick PL. Using social media to enhance surgeon and patient education and communication. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2011;96(7):7–15.PubMed
11.
go back to reference George DR. “Friending Facebook?” A minicourse on the use of social media by health professionals. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011;31(3):215–9.PubMedCrossRef George DR. “Friending Facebook?” A minicourse on the use of social media by health professionals. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011;31(3):215–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Greysen SR, Kind T, Chretien KC. Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:1227–9.PubMedCrossRef Greysen SR, Kind T, Chretien KC. Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:1227–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chretien KC. Should I be “friends” with my patients on social networking web sites? Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(1):105. 108.PubMed Chretien KC. Should I be “friends” with my patients on social networking web sites? Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(1):105. 108.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Guseh JS 2nd, Brendel RW, Brendel DH. Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(9):584–6.PubMedCrossRef Guseh JS 2nd, Brendel RW, Brendel DH. Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(9):584–6.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T. Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA. 2009;302:1308–15.CrossRef Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T. Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA. 2009;302:1308–15.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference MacDonald J, Sohn S, Ellis P. Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: a dilemma for young doctors. Med Educ. 2010;44(8):805–13.PubMedCrossRef MacDonald J, Sohn S, Ellis P. Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: a dilemma for young doctors. Med Educ. 2010;44(8):805–13.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shore R, Halsey J, Shah K, Crigger BJ, Douglas SP, AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (CEJA). Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: professionalism in the use of social media. J Clin Ethics. 2011;22(2):165–172.PubMed Shore R, Halsey J, Shah K, Crigger BJ, Douglas SP, AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (CEJA). Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: professionalism in the use of social media. J Clin Ethics. 2011;22(2):165–172.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Snyder L, American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism, and Human Rights Committee. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual, Sixth Edition. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:73–104.PubMed Snyder L, American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism, and Human Rights Committee. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual, Sixth Edition. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:73–104.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Mansfield SJ, Morrison SG, Stephens HO, et al. Social media and the medical profession. Med J Aust. 2011;194(12):642–4.PubMed Mansfield SJ, Morrison SG, Stephens HO, et al. Social media and the medical profession. Med J Aust. 2011;194(12):642–4.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Derse AR, Miller TE. Net effect: professional and ethical challenges of medicine online. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2008;17(4):453–64.PubMedCrossRef Derse AR, Miller TE. Net effect: professional and ethical challenges of medicine online. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2008;17(4):453–64.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mostaghimi A, Crotty BH. Professionalism in the digital age. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(8):560–562.PubMed Mostaghimi A, Crotty BH. Professionalism in the digital age. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(8):560–562.PubMed
30.
go back to reference McGee SJ. To friend or not to friend. Is that the question for healthcare? Am J Bioeth. 2011;8:2–5. McGee SJ. To friend or not to friend. Is that the question for healthcare? Am J Bioeth. 2011;8:2–5.
31.
go back to reference Leiker M. When to ‘friend’ a patient: social media tips for healthcare professionals. WMJ. 2011;110(1):42–3.PubMed Leiker M. When to ‘friend’ a patient: social media tips for healthcare professionals. WMJ. 2011;110(1):42–3.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Watkins C, Moore L, Harvey I, Carthy P, Robinson E, Brawn R. Characteristics of general practitioners who frequently see drug industry representatives: national cross sectional study. BMJ. 2003;326:1178–9.PubMedCrossRef Watkins C, Moore L, Harvey I, Carthy P, Robinson E, Brawn R. Characteristics of general practitioners who frequently see drug industry representatives: national cross sectional study. BMJ. 2003;326:1178–9.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Shrank WH, Choudhry NK, Swanton K, et al. Variations in structure and content of online social networks for patients with diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(17):1589–91.PubMedCrossRef Shrank WH, Choudhry NK, Swanton K, et al. Variations in structure and content of online social networks for patients with diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(17):1589–91.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Greene JA, Choudhry NK, Kilabuk E, Shrank WH. Online social networking by patients with diabetes: a qualitative evaluation of communication with Facebook. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(3):287–92.PubMedCrossRef Greene JA, Choudhry NK, Kilabuk E, Shrank WH. Online social networking by patients with diabetes: a qualitative evaluation of communication with Facebook. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(3):287–92.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326(7400):1167–70.PubMedCrossRef Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326(7400):1167–70.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Ramo DE, Prochaska JJ. Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adult substance use. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(1):e28.PubMedCrossRef Ramo DE, Prochaska JJ. Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adult substance use. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(1):e28.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Zipkin DA, Steinman MA. Interactions between pharmaceutical representatives and doctors in training. A thematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(8):777–86.PubMedCrossRef Zipkin DA, Steinman MA. Interactions between pharmaceutical representatives and doctors in training. A thematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(8):777–86.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Farnan JM, Paro JA, Higa JT, Reddy ST, Humphrey HJ, Arora VM. Commentary: The relationship status of digital media and professionalism: it’s complicated. Acad Med. 2009;84(11):1479–81.PubMedCrossRef Farnan JM, Paro JA, Higa JT, Reddy ST, Humphrey HJ, Arora VM. Commentary: The relationship status of digital media and professionalism: it’s complicated. Acad Med. 2009;84(11):1479–81.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Lagu T, Kaufman EJ, Asch DA, Armstrong K. Content of weblogs written by health professionals. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(10):1642–1646.PubMedCrossRef Lagu T, Kaufman EJ, Asch DA, Armstrong K. Content of weblogs written by health professionals. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(10):1642–1646.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(22):2618–24.PubMedCrossRef Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(22):2618–24.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Loewenstein G, Cain DM, Sah S. The limits of transparency: pitfalls and potential of disclosing conflicts of interest. AER Papers Proc. 2011;101(3):423–428.CrossRef Loewenstein G, Cain DM, Sah S. The limits of transparency: pitfalls and potential of disclosing conflicts of interest. AER Papers Proc. 2011;101(3):423–428.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Compilation of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 111th Congress, 2nd session. Title VI. Subtitle A. Section 6002. May 1, 2010. Compilation of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 111th Congress, 2nd session. Title VI. Subtitle A. Section 6002. May 1, 2010.
48.
go back to reference Bovi AM, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association. Use of health-related online sites. Am J Bioeth. 2003;3(3):W-IF3.PubMed Bovi AM, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association. Use of health-related online sites. Am J Bioeth. 2003;3(3):W-IF3.PubMed
49.
go back to reference Gibbons RV, Landry FJ, Blouch DL, et al. A comparison of physicians’ and patients’ attitudes toward pharmaceutical industry gifts. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(3):151–4.PubMedCrossRef Gibbons RV, Landry FJ, Blouch DL, et al. A comparison of physicians’ and patients’ attitudes toward pharmaceutical industry gifts. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(3):151–4.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Lo B, Field MJ, for the Committee on Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2009. Lo B, Field MJ, for the Committee on Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
52.
go back to reference Steinman MA, Landefeld CS, Baron RB. Industry support of CME—are we at the tipping point? N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1069–71.PubMedCrossRef Steinman MA, Landefeld CS, Baron RB. Industry support of CME—are we at the tipping point? N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1069–71.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Loewenstein G, Sah S, Cain DM. The unintended consequences of conflict of interest disclosure. JAMA. 2012;307:669–70.PubMedCrossRef Loewenstein G, Sah S, Cain DM. The unintended consequences of conflict of interest disclosure. JAMA. 2012;307:669–70.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Lesser CS, Lucey CR, Egener B, Braddock CH 3rd, Linas SL, Levinson W. A behavioral and systems view of professionalism. JAMA. 2010;304:2732–7.PubMedCrossRef Lesser CS, Lucey CR, Egener B, Braddock CH 3rd, Linas SL, Levinson W. A behavioral and systems view of professionalism. JAMA. 2010;304:2732–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Physicians, Social Media, and Conflict of Interest
Author
Matthew DeCamp, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2251-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2013 Go to the issue