Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2012

01-10-2012 | Original Research

Professional Language Interpretation and Inpatient Length of Stay and Readmission Rates

Authors: Mary Lindholm, MD, J. Lee Hargraves, PhD, Warren J. Ferguson, MD, George Reed, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 10/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The population of persons seeking medical care is linguistically diverse in the United States. Language barriers can adversely affect a patient’s ability to explain their symptoms. Among hospitalized patients, these barriers may lead to higher readmission rates and longer hospitalizations. Trained interpreters help overcome communication barriers; however, interpreter usage among patients is suboptimal.

Objective

To investigate differences among patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) in their length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission rate associated with their receiving professional interpretation at admission or discharge.

Design

We analyzed the rates of interpretation at admission and discharge of all LEP patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital over a three-year period. We calculated length of stay in days and as log of LOS. We also examined 30-day readmission. Using multivariable regression models, we explored differences among patients who received interpretation at admission, discharge, or both, controlling for patient characteristics, including age, illness severity, language, and gender.

Participants

All LEP patients admitted between May 1, 2004 and April 30, 2007.

Main Measures

Length of hospital stay as related to use of professional interpreters; readmission to the hospital within 30 days.

Key Results

Of the 3071 patients included in the study, 39 % received language interpretation on both admission and discharge date. Patients who did not receive professional interpretation at admission or both admission/discharge had an increase in their LOS of between 0.75 and 1.47 days, compared to patients who had an interpreter on both day of admission and discharge (P < 0.02). Patients receiving interpretation at admission and/or discharge were less likely than patients receiving no interpretation to be readmitted with 30 days.

Conclusions

The length of a hospital stay for LEP patients was significantly longer when professional interpreters were not used at admission or both admission/discharge.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference U.S. Census Bureau. Language use and English speaking ability. 2008. U.S. Census Bureau. Language use and English speaking ability. 2008.
2.
go back to reference Flores G. The impact of medical interpreter services on the quality of health care: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev. 2005;62(3):255–299.PubMedCrossRef Flores G. The impact of medical interpreter services on the quality of health care: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev. 2005;62(3):255–299.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference David R, Rhee M. The impact of language as a barrier to effective health care in an underserved urban Hispanic community. Mt Sinai J Med. 1998;65:393–97.PubMed David R, Rhee M. The impact of language as a barrier to effective health care in an underserved urban Hispanic community. Mt Sinai J Med. 1998;65:393–97.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Baker D, Parker R, Williams M, Coates W, Pitkin K. Use and effectiveness of interpreters in an emergency department. JAMA. 1996;275:783–88.PubMedCrossRef Baker D, Parker R, Williams M, Coates W, Pitkin K. Use and effectiveness of interpreters in an emergency department. JAMA. 1996;275:783–88.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Karliner L, Jacobs E, Chen A, Mutham S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care? A systematic review of the literature. Heal Serv Res. 2007;42(2):727–754.CrossRef Karliner L, Jacobs E, Chen A, Mutham S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care? A systematic review of the literature. Heal Serv Res. 2007;42(2):727–754.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ebden P, Bhatt A, Carey O, Harrison B. The bilingual consultation. Lancet. 1988;331(8581):347.CrossRef Ebden P, Bhatt A, Carey O, Harrison B. The bilingual consultation. Lancet. 1988;331(8581):347.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Flores G, Laws M, Mayo S, et al. Errors in medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences in pediatric encounters. Pediatrics. 2003;111(1):6–14.PubMedCrossRef Flores G, Laws M, Mayo S, et al. Errors in medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences in pediatric encounters. Pediatrics. 2003;111(1):6–14.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference John-Baptiste A, Naglie G, Tomlinson G, et al. The effect of English language proficiency on length of stay and in-hospital mortality. J Gen Inter Med. 2004;19:221–228.CrossRef John-Baptiste A, Naglie G, Tomlinson G, et al. The effect of English language proficiency on length of stay and in-hospital mortality. J Gen Inter Med. 2004;19:221–228.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Karliner LS, Kim SE, Meltzer DO, Auerbach AD. Influence of language barriers on outcomes of hospital care for general medicine inpatients. J Hosp Med. 2010;5(5):276–282.PubMedCrossRef Karliner LS, Kim SE, Meltzer DO, Auerbach AD. Influence of language barriers on outcomes of hospital care for general medicine inpatients. J Hosp Med. 2010;5(5):276–282.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jacobs E, Sadowski L, Rathouz P. The impact of an enhanced interpreter service intervention on hospital costs and patient satisfaction. J Gen Inter Med. 2007;22(Suppl 2):306–11.CrossRef Jacobs E, Sadowski L, Rathouz P. The impact of an enhanced interpreter service intervention on hospital costs and patient satisfaction. J Gen Inter Med. 2007;22(Suppl 2):306–11.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Benbassat J, Taragin M. Hospital readmissions as a measure of quality of health care: Advantages and limitations. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1074–1081.PubMedCrossRef Benbassat J, Taragin M. Hospital readmissions as a measure of quality of health care: Advantages and limitations. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1074–1081.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference García-Pérez L, Linertová R, Lorenzo-Riera A, Vázquez-Díaz JR, Duque-González B, Sarría-Santamera A. Risk factors for hospital readmissions in elderly patients: a systematic review. QJM. 2011;104(8):639–651.PubMedCrossRef García-Pérez L, Linertová R, Lorenzo-Riera A, Vázquez-Díaz JR, Duque-González B, Sarría-Santamera A. Risk factors for hospital readmissions in elderly patients: a systematic review. QJM. 2011;104(8):639–651.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Baker D, Hayes R, Fortier J. Interpreter use and satisfaction with interpersonal aspects of care for Spanish-speaking patients. Med Care Res Rev. 1998;36:1461–70. Baker D, Hayes R, Fortier J. Interpreter use and satisfaction with interpersonal aspects of care for Spanish-speaking patients. Med Care Res Rev. 1998;36:1461–70.
14.
go back to reference Diamond L, Schenker Y, Curry L, Bradley E, Fernandez A. Getting by: Underuse of interpreters by resident physicians. J Gen Inter Med. 2008;24(2):256–62.CrossRef Diamond L, Schenker Y, Curry L, Bradley E, Fernandez A. Getting by: Underuse of interpreters by resident physicians. J Gen Inter Med. 2008;24(2):256–62.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Professional Language Interpretation and Inpatient Length of Stay and Readmission Rates
Authors
Mary Lindholm, MD
J. Lee Hargraves, PhD
Warren J. Ferguson, MD
George Reed, PhD
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2041-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2012

Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2012 Go to the issue