Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2012

Open Access 01-10-2012 | Reviews

Failure to Follow-Up Test Results for Ambulatory Patients: A Systematic Review

Authors: Joanne L. Callen, PhD, Johanna I. Westbrook, PhD, Andrew Georgiou, PhD, Julie Li, BAppSc (HIM) (Hons1)

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 10/2012

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Serious lapses in patient care result from failure to follow-up test results.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review evidence quantifying the extent of failure to follow-up test results and the impact for ambulatory patients.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Inspec and the Cochrane Database were searched for English-language literature from 1995 to 2010.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies which provided documented quantitative evidence of the number of tests not followed up for patients attending ambulatory settings including: outpatient clinics, academic medical or community health centres, or primary care practices.

DATA EXTRACTION

Four reviewers independently screened 768 articles.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and reported wide variation in the extent of tests not followed-up: 6.8% (79/1163) to 62% (125/202) for laboratory tests; 1.0% (4/395) to 35.7% (45/126) for radiology. The impact on patient outcomes included missed cancer diagnoses. Test management practices varied between settings with many individuals involved in the process. There were few guidelines regarding responsibility for patient notification and follow-up. Quantitative evidence of the effectiveness of electronic test management systems was limited although there was a general trend towards improved test follow-up when electronic systems were used.

LIMITATIONS

Most studies used medical record reviews; hence evidence of follow-up action relied upon documentation in the medical record. All studies were conducted in the US so care should be taken in generalising findings to other countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Failure to follow-up test results is an important safety concern which requires urgent attention. Solutions should be multifaceted and include: policies relating to responsibility, timing and process of notification; integrated information and communication technologies facilitating communication; and consideration of the multidisciplinary nature of the process and the role of the patient. It is essential that evaluations of interventions are undertaken and solutions integrated into the work and context of ambulatory care delivery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Hickner JM, Fernald DH, Harris DM, Poon EG, Elder NC, Mold JW. Issues and initiatives in the testing process in primary care physician offices. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31(2):81–9.PubMed
2.
Casalino LP, Dunham D, Chin MH, Bielang R, Kistner EO, Karrison TG, et al. Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1123–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
World Alliance for Patient Safety. World Health Organisation. Summary of the Evidence on Patient Safety: Implications for Research. In: Jha A, ed; 2008:1–118.
4.
Schiff GD. Getting Results—Reliably Communicating and Acting on Critical Test Results: Joint Commission Resources; 2006.
5.
Elder NC, Graham D, Brandt E, Dovey S, Phillips P, Ledwith J, et al. The Testing Process in Family Medicine: Problems Solutions and Barriers as Seen by Physicians and Their Staff. A study of the American Academy of Family Physicians' National Research Network. J Patient Saf. 2006;2(1):25–32.
6.
Boohaker EA, Ward RE, Uman JE, McCarthy BD. Patient notification and follow-up of abnormal test results. A physician survey. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(3):327–31.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Murff HJ, Gandhi TK, Karson AK, Mort EA, Poon EG, Wang SJ, et al. Primary care physician attitudes concerning follow-up of abnormal test results and ambulatory decision support systems. Int J Med Inform. 2003;71(2–3):137–49.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Meza JP, Webster DS. Patient preferences for laboratory test results notification. Am J Manag Care. 2000;6(12):1297–300.PubMed
9.
Keren R, Muret-Wagstaff S, Goldmann DA, Mandl KD. Notifying emergency department patients of negative test results: pitfalls of passive communication. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003;19(4):226–30.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Hickner J, Graham DG, Elder NC, Brandt E, Emsermann CB, Dovey S, et al. Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):194–200.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Bates DW. Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1180–9.CrossRef
12.
Elder NC, Hickner J, Graham D. Quality and safety in outpatient laboratory testing. Clin Lab Med. 2008;28(2):295–303. vii.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Poon EG, Gandhi TK, Sequist TD, Murff HJ, Karson AS, Bates DW. "I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(20):2223–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Poon EG, Wang SJ, Gandhi TK, Bates DW, Kuperman GJ. Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient Results Manager. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36(1–2):80–91.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Wahls TL, Cram PM. The frequency of missed test results and associated treatment delays in a highly computerized health system. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:32.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, Ladak-Merchant Z, Johnson RE, Maviglia SM, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(2):121–8.PubMed
17.
Gandhi TK. Fumbled handoffs: one dropped ball after another. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(5):352–8.PubMed
18.
Bird S. Missing test results and failure to diagnose. Aust Fam Physician. 2004;33(5):360–1.PubMed
19.
Berlin L. Malpractice and radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980;135(3):587–91.PubMed
20.
Berlin L. Malpractice issues in radiology: res ipsa loquitur. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(6):1475–80.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Potchen EJ, Bisesi MA, Sierra AE, Potchen JE. Mammography and malpractice. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(3):475–80.PubMed
22.
Graber M. Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31(2):106–13.PubMed
23.
24.
Parker D, Lawton R. Psychological contribution to the understanding of adverse events in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(6):453–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Hodges B, Regehr G, Martin D. Difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence: novice physicians who are unskilled and unaware of it. Acad Med. 2001;76(10 Suppl):S87–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Callen J, Georgiou A, Li J, Westbrook JI. The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(2):194–9.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Cram P, Rosenthal GE, Ohsfeldt R, Wallace RB, Schlechte J, Schiff GD. Failure to recognize and act on abnormal test results: the case of screening bone densitometry. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31(2):90–7.PubMed
28.
Schiff GD, Kim S, Krosnjar N, Wisniewski MF, Bult J, Fogelfeld L, et al. Missed hypothyroidism diagnosis uncovered by linking laboratory and pharmacy data. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(5):574–7.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Chen ZJ, Kammer D, Bond JH, Ho SB. Evaluating follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results: lessons learned. J Healthc Qual: Promot Excell Healthc. 2007;29(5):16.
30.
Chen ET, Eder M, Elder NC, Hickner J. Crossing the finish line: follow-up of abnormal test results in a multisite community health center. J Natl Med Assoc. 2010;102(8):720–5.PubMed
31.
Choksi VR, Marn CS, Bell Y, Carlos R. Efficiency of a semiautomated coding and review process for notification of critical findings in diagnostic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(4):933–6.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Ealovega MW, Tabaei BP, Brandle M, Burke R, Herman WH. Opportunistic screening for diabetes in routine clinical practice. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(1):9–12.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Elder NC, McEwen TR, Flach JM, Gallimore JJ. Management of test results in family medicine offices. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(4):343–51.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Elder NC, McEwen TR, Flach J, Gallimore J, Pallerla H. The management of test results in primary care: does an electronic medical record make a difference? Fam Med. 2010;42(5):327–33.PubMed
35.
Kern LM, Callahan MA, Brillon DJ, Vargas M, Mushlin AI. Glucose testing and insufficient follow-up of abnormal results: a cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:87.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Moore C, Wisnivesky J, Williams S, McGinn T. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(8):646–51.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Moore CR, Lin JJ, O'Connor N, Halm EA. Follow-up of markedly elevated serum potassium results in the ambulatory setting: implications for patient safety. Am J Med Qual. 2006;21(2):115–24.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Moore C, Lin J, McGinn T, Halm E. Factors associated with time to follow-up of severe hyperkalemia in the ambulatory setting. Am J Med Qual. 2007;22(6):428–37.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Singh H, Arora HS, Vij MS, Rao R, Khan MM, Petersen LA. Communication outcomes of critical imaging results in a computerized notification system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(4):459–66.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Singh H, Thomas EJ, Mani S, Sittig D, Arora H, Espadas D, et al. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1578–86.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Singh H, Thomas EJ, Sittig DF, Wilson L, Espadas D, Khan MM, et al. Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med. 2010;123(3):238–44.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Stelfox HT, Ahmed SB, Fiskio J, Bates DW. An evaluation of the adequacy of outpatient monitoring of thyroid replacement therapy. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(4):525–30.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Etzioni DA, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, Lee ML, Ko CY, Brook RH, et al. Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: the importance of follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(7):1002–10.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Edelman D. Outpatient diagnostic errors: unrecognized hyperglycemia. Eff Clin Pract. 2002;5(1):11–6.PubMed
45.
Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Brennan TA, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(7):488–96.PubMed
46.
Poon EG, Haas JS, Louise Puopolo A, Gandhi TK, Burdick E, Bates DW, et al. Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(4):316–23.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Romano MJ, Stafford RS. Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(10):897–903.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B, Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1400–5.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223–38.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742–52.PubMed
51.
O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Rush WA, Johnson PE, Amundson GH, Asche SE, et al. Impact of electronic health record clinical decision support on diabetes care: a randomized trial. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(1):12–21.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(25):2526–34.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Bates DW. Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):788–91.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Kuperman GJ, Teich JM, Tanasijevic MJ, Ma'Luf N, Rittenberg E, Jha A, et al. Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6(6):512–22.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Greenes DS, Fleisher GR, Kohane I. Potential impact of a computerized system to report late-arriving laboratory results in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2000;16(5):313–5.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Callen J, Paoloni R, Georgiou A, Prgomet M, Westbrook J. The rate of missed test results in an emergency department: an evaluation using an electronic test order and results viewing system. Methods Inf Med. 2010;49(1):37–43.PubMed
57.
Singh H, Naik AD, Rao R, Petersen LA. Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(4):489–94.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Piva E, Sciacovelli L, Zaninotto M, Laposata M, Plebani M. Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;131(3):432–41.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Plebani M. Interpretative commenting: a tool for improving the laboratory-clinical interface. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404(1):46–51.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Couchman GR, Forjuoh SN, Rascoe TG, Reis MD, Koehler B, Walsum KLv. E-mail communications in primary care: what are patients' expectations for specific test results? Int J Med Inform. 2005;74(1):21–30.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Berg M, Langenberg C, vd Berg I, Kwakkernaat J. Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context. Int J Med Inform. 1998;52(1-3):243–51.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Callen JL, Braithwaite J, Westbrook JI. Contextual implementation model: a framework for assisting clinical information system implementations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(2):255–62.PubMedCrossRef
63.
O'Leary KJ, Liebovitz DM, Feinglass J, Liss DT, Evans DB, Kulkarni N, et al. Creating a better discharge summary: Improvement in quality and timeliness using an electronic discharge summary. J Hosp Med. 2009;4(4):219–25.PubMedCrossRef
64.
van Walraven C, Seth R, Austin PC, Laupacis A. Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(3):186–92.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Bolton P, Mira M, Kennedy P, Lahra MM. The quality of communication between hospitals and general practitioners: an assessment. J Qual Clin Pract. 1998;18(4):241–7.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Callen J, McIntosh J, Li J. Accuracy of medication documentation in hospital discharge summaries: A retrospective analysis of medication transcription errors in manual and electronic discharge summaries. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(1):58–64.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Berlin L. Communicating results of all outpatient radiologic examinations directly to patients: the time has come. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(3):571–3.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Berlin L. Communicating results of all radiologic examinations directly to patients: has the time come? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(6):1275–82.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Hammerman HJ. Communicating imaging results to patients: OnSite results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(4):852–3.PubMedCrossRef
70.
71.
Kilpatrick ES. Use of computer terminals on wards to access emergency test resutls: a retrospective audit. Br Med J. 2001;322:3.CrossRef
72.
Graber M. The physician and the laboratory: partners in reducing diagnostic error related to laboratory testing. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;126(Suppl 1):S44–7.
73.
Unruh KT, Pratt W. Patients as actors: the patient's role in detecting, preventing, and recovering from medical errors. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(Suppl 1):S236–44.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Wald JS, Burk K, Gardner K, Feygin R, Nelson E, Epstein M, et al. Sharing electronic laboratory results in a patient portal–a feasibility pilot. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):18–22.PubMed
75.
76.
77.
78.
Priyanath A, Feinglass J, Dolan NC, Haviley C, Venta LA. Patient satisfaction with the communication of mammographic results before and after the Mammography Quality Standards Reauthorization Act of 1998. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(2):451–56.PubMed
79.
Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Wachter RM, Taylor SL, Dy SM, Foy R, et al. Advancing the science of patient safety. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(10):693–6.PubMed
80.
Leape LL, Berwick DM, Bates DW. What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety. JAMA. 2002;288(4):501–7.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Wachter RM. Why diagnostic errors don't get any respect–and what can be done about them. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(9):1605–10.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Failure to Follow-Up Test Results for Ambulatory Patients: A Systematic Review
Authors
Joanne L. Callen, PhD
Johanna I. Westbrook, PhD
Andrew Georgiou, PhD
Julie Li, BAppSc (HIM) (Hons1)
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1949-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2012

Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2012 Go to the issue

Original Research

Quality of Care in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Application of Quality Measures to Understand Gaps in Care

Original Research

A Community and Culture-Centered Approach to Developing Effective Cardiovascular Health Messages

Clinical Practice: Clinical Images

DNR Tattoos: A Cautionary Tale

Original Research

Impact of Automated Alerts on Follow-Up of Post-Discharge Microbiology Results: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Erratum

Erratum to: Effect of Patient- and Medication-Related Factors on Inpatient Medication Reconciliation Errors

Letters

Comorbidities, Treatment and Survival

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Cardiology Video

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Watch now

Watch official videos from the ACC congress summarizing key highlights from the last year in heart failure, cardiomyopathies, valvular disease, pulmonary vascular disease, and pediatric cardiology.

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits