Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2010

01-07-2010 | Perspectives

Supporting Patient Autonomy: The Importance of Clinician-patient Relationships

Authors: Vikki A. Entwistle, PhD, Stacy M. Carter, PhD, Alan Cribb, PhD, Kirsten McCaffery, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 7/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Personal autonomy is widely valued. Recognition of its vulnerability in health care contexts led to the inclusion of respect for autonomy as a key concern in biomedical ethics. The principle of respect for autonomy is usually associated with allowing or enabling patients to make their own decisions about which health care interventions they will or will not receive. In this paper, we suggest that a strong focus on decision situations is problematic, especially when combined with a tendency to stress the importance of patients’ independence in choosing. It distracts attention from other important aspects of and challenges to autonomy in health care. Relational understandings of autonomy attempt to explain both the positive and negative implications of social relationships for individuals’ autonomy. They suggest that many health care practices can affect autonomy by virtue of their effects not only on patients’ treatment preferences and choices, but also on their self-identities, self-evaluations and capabilities for autonomy. Relational understandings de-emphasise independence and facilitate well-nuanced distinctions between forms of clinical communication that support and that undermine patients’ autonomy. These understandings support recognition of the value of good patient-professional relationships and can enrich the specification of the principle of respect for autonomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
2.
go back to reference Pellegrino ED, Thomasma D. The virtues in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. Pellegrino ED, Thomasma D. The virtues in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
3.
go back to reference Sherwin S. A relational approach to autonomy in healthcare. In: Sherwin S, and the Feminist Health Care Ethics Research Network, eds. The politics of women's health: exploring agency and autonomy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1998:19–47. Sherwin S. A relational approach to autonomy in healthcare. In: Sherwin S, and the Feminist Health Care Ethics Research Network, eds. The politics of women's health: exploring agency and autonomy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1998:19–47.
4.
go back to reference Schneider CE. The practice of autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. Schneider CE. The practice of autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
5.
go back to reference Dodds S. Choice and control in feminist bioethics. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, eds. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:213–35. Dodds S. Choice and control in feminist bioethics. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, eds. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:213–35.
6.
go back to reference O’Neill O. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.CrossRef O’Neill O. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kukla R. Conscientious autonomy: displacing decisions in healthcare. Hastings Center Report. 2005;35(2):34–44.CrossRefPubMed Kukla R. Conscientious autonomy: displacing decisions in healthcare. Hastings Center Report. 2005;35(2):34–44.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Walker RL. Medical ethics needs a new view of autonomy. J Med Phil. 2009;33:594–608.CrossRef Walker RL. Medical ethics needs a new view of autonomy. J Med Phil. 2009;33:594–608.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, Barry M, Col NF, Eden KD, Entwistle VA, Fiset V, Holmes-Rovner M, Khangura S, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner D. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009 issue 1. O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, Barry M, Col NF, Eden KD, Entwistle VA, Fiset V, Holmes-Rovner M, Khangura S, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner D. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009 issue 1.
11.
go back to reference Davies M, Elwyn G. Advocating mandatory patient ‘autonomy’ in healthcare: adverse reactions and side effects. Health Care Analysis. 2008;16:315–28.CrossRefPubMed Davies M, Elwyn G. Advocating mandatory patient ‘autonomy’ in healthcare: adverse reactions and side effects. Health Care Analysis. 2008;16:315–28.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Naik AD, Dyer CB, Kunik ME, McCullough LB. Patient autonomy for the management of chronic conditions: a two component re-conceptualization. Am J Bioethics. 2009;9(2):23–30.CrossRef Naik AD, Dyer CB, Kunik ME, McCullough LB. Patient autonomy for the management of chronic conditions: a two component re-conceptualization. Am J Bioethics. 2009;9(2):23–30.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mackenzie C, Stoljar N (Eds) Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Mackenzie C, Stoljar N (Eds) Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
14.
go back to reference Meyers DT. Self, society and personal choice. New York: Columbia University Press; 1989. Meyers DT. Self, society and personal choice. New York: Columbia University Press; 1989.
15.
go back to reference Meyers DT. De-centralizing autonomy: five faces of selfhood. In: Christman J, Anderson J, eds. Autonomy and the challenges to liberalism: new essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005:27–55.CrossRef Meyers DT. De-centralizing autonomy: five faces of selfhood. In: Christman J, Anderson J, eds. Autonomy and the challenges to liberalism: new essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005:27–55.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference McLeod C. Self trust and reproductive autonomy. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002. McLeod C. Self trust and reproductive autonomy. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002.
17.
go back to reference Benson P. Feeling crazy’: self worth and the social character of responsibility. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, eds. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:72–93. Benson P. Feeling crazy’: self worth and the social character of responsibility. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, eds. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:72–93.
18.
go back to reference Carel H. Illness: the cry of the flesh. Stocksfield: Acumen; 2008. Carel H. Illness: the cry of the flesh. Stocksfield: Acumen; 2008.
19.
go back to reference Roe D, Davidson L. Self and narrative in schizophrenia: time to author a new story. In: Rapport F, Wainwright P, eds. The self in health and illness. Oxford: Routledge; 2006:83–95. Roe D, Davidson L. Self and narrative in schizophrenia: time to author a new story. In: Rapport F, Wainwright P, eds. The self in health and illness. Oxford: Routledge; 2006:83–95.
20.
go back to reference Wirtz V, Cribb A, Barber N. Patient-doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation: a critical analysis of models. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:116–24.CrossRefPubMed Wirtz V, Cribb A, Barber N. Patient-doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation: a critical analysis of models. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:116–24.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Dudzinski DM. Compounding vulnerability: pregnancy and schizophrenia. Am J Bioethics. 2006;6(2):W1–14.CrossRef Dudzinski DM. Compounding vulnerability: pregnancy and schizophrenia. Am J Bioethics. 2006;6(2):W1–14.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Beach MC, and the Relationship Centred Care Research Network. Relationship-centred care: a constructive reframing. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:S3–8.CrossRefPubMed Beach MC, and the Relationship Centred Care Research Network. Relationship-centred care: a constructive reframing. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:S3–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Entwistle VA, Prior M, Skea ZC, Francis J. Involvement in decision-making: a qualitative investigation of its meaning for people with diabetes. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:362–75.CrossRefPubMed Entwistle VA, Prior M, Skea ZC, Francis J. Involvement in decision-making: a qualitative investigation of its meaning for people with diabetes. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:362–75.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Mol A. The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice. Abingdon: Routledge; 2008. Mol A. The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice. Abingdon: Routledge; 2008.
Metadata
Title
Supporting Patient Autonomy: The Importance of Clinician-patient Relationships
Authors
Vikki A. Entwistle, PhD
Stacy M. Carter, PhD
Alan Cribb, PhD
Kirsten McCaffery, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 7/2010
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2010

Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2010 Go to the issue