Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2009

01-11-2009 | Original Article

The Economic Consequences of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Hormonal Treatments

Authors: Liliana E. Pezzin, PhD, JD, Mallory B. O’Niel, BA, Ann B. Nattinger, MD, MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Special Issue 2/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

RATIONALE

Adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) based on tamoxifen (TX) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) has become the standard of care for treating hormone receptor -positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) over the past 20 years. Based on clinical trial results, AI use is recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology for treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer. AIs, however, are significantly more expensive than TX, raising concerns about access and use of effective treatment among women of lower socio-economic status.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between adjuvant HT modality and experience of financial hardship among a cohort of older BC survivors. Also, to examine the extent to which financial concerns affect the probability of switching between adjuvant HT modalities.

DESIGN

Population-based, prospective survey study.

PARTICIPANTS

Elderly (65+) women who had an incident BC surgery in 2003 and who reported receiving adjuvant HT during the first 12 months post-surgery.

METHODS

Multivariate regression models.

RESULTS

Use of AIs was associated with a significantly higher probability of financial hardship. Women who had taken only an AI were more likely to experience financial difficulty than women who took only TX (OR = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1–1.7), but women who switched between TX and AI were not more likely to experience financial difficulty. Breast cancer survivors with no drug coverage (OR = 4.5; 95% CI: 3.3–5.9) or partial drug coverage (OR = 3.6; 95% CI: 2.8–4.5) were more likely to experience financial difficulty compared to those with full coverage. Lack of drug coverage was also the main factor associated with the likelihood that BC survivors did not switch adjuvant HT modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant HTs have important economic consequences for BC survivors. These consequences are ameliorated by full, but not partial, drug coverage.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coates AS. Five years of letrozole compared with tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: update of study BIG 1–98. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):486–92.CrossRefPubMed Coates AS. Five years of letrozole compared with tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: update of study BIG 1–98. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):486–92.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) Trialists’ Group. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 100-month analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:45–53.CrossRef The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) Trialists’ Group. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 100-month analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:45–53.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boccardo, Francesco, et al. Switching to an aromatase inhibitor provides mortality benefit in early breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2007;109(6):1060–7.CrossRefPubMed Boccardo, Francesco, et al. Switching to an aromatase inhibitor provides mortality benefit in early breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2007;109(6):1060–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Coombes RC, FMedSci. Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2–3 years’ tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9561):559–70.CrossRefPubMed Coombes RC, FMedSci. Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2–3 years’ tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9561):559–70.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Winer EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Status report 2004. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:619–29.CrossRefPubMed Winer EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Status report 2004. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:619–29.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 2004 Incidence and Mortality. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2007. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 2004 Incidence and Mortality. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2007.
9.
go back to reference Anderson WF, Chatterjee N, Ershler WB, Brawley OW. Estrogen receptor breast cancer phenotypes in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;76:27–36.CrossRefPubMed Anderson WF, Chatterjee N, Ershler WB, Brawley OW. Estrogen receptor breast cancer phenotypes in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;76:27–36.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yasui Y, Potter JD. The shape of age-incidence curves of female breast cancer by hormone-receptor status. Canc Causes Contr. 1999;10:431–7.CrossRef Yasui Y, Potter JD. The shape of age-incidence curves of female breast cancer by hormone-receptor status. Canc Causes Contr. 1999;10:431–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Anderson WF, et al. Tumor variants by hormone receptor expression in white patients with node-negative breast cancer from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:18–27.PubMed Anderson WF, et al. Tumor variants by hormone receptor expression in white patients with node-negative breast cancer from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:18–27.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Arozullah AM, Calhoun EA, Wolf M, Finley DK, Fitzner KA, Heckinger EA, Gorby NS, Schumock GT, Bennett CL. The financial burden of cancer: estimates from a study of insured women with breast cancer. [Comparative Study. Evaluation Studies. Journal Article. Research Support, Non-U.S. Government. Research Support, U.S. Government, Non-P.H.S.]. The Journal of Supportive Oncology. 2004;2(3):271–8.PubMed Arozullah AM, Calhoun EA, Wolf M, Finley DK, Fitzner KA, Heckinger EA, Gorby NS, Schumock GT, Bennett CL. The financial burden of cancer: estimates from a study of insured women with breast cancer. [Comparative Study. Evaluation Studies. Journal Article. Research Support, Non-U.S. Government. Research Support, U.S. Government, Non-P.H.S.]. The Journal of Supportive Oncology. 2004;2(3):271–8.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Nattinger AB, Laud P, Sparapani R, Pezzin LE. The care and outcomes after breast surgery survey: recruiting a HIPAA-era sample of medicare subjects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;(in press). Nattinger AB, Laud P, Sparapani R, Pezzin LE. The care and outcomes after breast surgery survey: recruiting a HIPAA-era sample of medicare subjects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;(in press).
15.
go back to reference Rice JB, Pezzin LE, Kasper J. A comparative analysis of Medicaid long-term care policies and their effects on elderly dual enrollees. Health Econ. 2009;18(3):275–90.CrossRefPubMed Rice JB, Pezzin LE, Kasper J. A comparative analysis of Medicaid long-term care policies and their effects on elderly dual enrollees. Health Econ. 2009;18(3):275–90.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, et al. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:1258–67.CrossRefPubMed Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, et al. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:1258–67.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Berndt ER. The Practice of Econometrics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company., Inc., 1991. Berndt ER. The Practice of Econometrics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company., Inc., 1991.
18.
go back to reference Bosanquet N, Sikora K. The economics of cancer care in the UK. Lancet. 2004;5(9):568–74.CrossRef Bosanquet N, Sikora K. The economics of cancer care in the UK. Lancet. 2004;5(9):568–74.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Malfair-Taylor SC. “C” is for costs, and cancer, and conference: Highlights of the First European Conference on the Economics of Cancer. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 1998;4(2):125–8.CrossRef Malfair-Taylor SC. “C” is for costs, and cancer, and conference: Highlights of the First European Conference on the Economics of Cancer. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 1998;4(2):125–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Will BP, Le Petit C, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for nonmetastastic breast cancer in Canada, and their associated costs. Br J Cancer. 1999;79(9–10):1428–36.CrossRefPubMed Will BP, Le Petit C, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for nonmetastastic breast cancer in Canada, and their associated costs. Br J Cancer. 1999;79(9–10):1428–36.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Brown M. Estimating health care costs related to cancer treatment from the SEER-Medicare data. Med Care. 2002;40:104–17.CrossRef Brown M. Estimating health care costs related to cancer treatment from the SEER-Medicare data. Med Care. 2002;40:104–17.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference USA Today, Kaiser Family Foundation & Harvard School of Public Health. “The Public on Prescription Drugs and Pharmaceutical Companies.” March 2008. USA Today, Kaiser Family Foundation & Harvard School of Public Health. “The Public on Prescription Drugs and Pharmaceutical Companies.” March 2008.
23.
go back to reference Singh GK, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Edwards BK. Area Socioeconomic Variations in US Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Stage, Treatment, and Survival, 1975–1999. NCI Cancer Surveillance Monograph Series, Number 4. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2003. NIH Publication No. 03–5417. Singh GK, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Edwards BK. Area Socioeconomic Variations in US Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Stage, Treatment, and Survival, 1975–1999. NCI Cancer Surveillance Monograph Series, Number 4. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2003. NIH Publication No. 03–5417.
24.
go back to reference Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C. Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:490–6.PubMed Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C. Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:490–6.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Hadley J, Hargrave E, Cubanksi J, Neuman T. The Medicare Part D Coverage Gap: Costs and Consequences in 2007. Kaiser Family Foundation report. Washington, DC. 2008. Hadley J, Hargrave E, Cubanksi J, Neuman T. The Medicare Part D Coverage Gap: Costs and Consequences in 2007. Kaiser Family Foundation report. Washington, DC. 2008.
26.
go back to reference Reuters. Drug Cuts Recurrence Risk in Breast Cancer Patients. New York Times. March 11, 2008. Reuters. Drug Cuts Recurrence Risk in Breast Cancer Patients. New York Times. March 11, 2008.
Metadata
Title
The Economic Consequences of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Hormonal Treatments
Authors
Liliana E. Pezzin, PhD, JD
Mallory B. O’Niel, BA
Ann B. Nattinger, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-11-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue Special Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1079-5

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2009

Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2009 Go to the issue