Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2009

01-07-2009 | Original Article

Guidelines for Genetic Risk Assessment of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Early Disagreements and Low Utilization

Authors: Douglas E. Levy, PhD, Judy E. Garber, MPH, Alexandra E. Shields, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 7/2009

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

BRCA1/2 testing is one of the most well-established genetic tests to predict cancer risk. Guidelines are available to help clinicians determine who will benefit most from testing.

OBJECTIVE

To identify women at high risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and estimate their awareness of and experience with genetic testing for cancer risk.

DESIGN

Analyses of the 2000 and 2005 National Health Interview Surveys.

PARTICIPANTS

Women with no personal history of breast or ovarian cancer (n = 35,116).

MEASUREMENTS

Risk of hereditary breast or ovarian cancer based on self-reported family history of cancer and national guidelines; self-reported awareness of genetic testing for cancer risk; discussion of genetic testing for cancer risk with a health professional; having undergone genetic testing for breast/ovarian cancer risk.

RESULTS

Using guideline criteria, 0.96% of women were identified as being at high risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Among high-risk women, 54.04% were aware of genetic testing for cancer risk, 10.39% had discussed genetic testing with a health professional, and 1.41% had undergone testing for breast/ovarian cancer risk. Adjusting for survey year, high-risk women were more likely than average-risk women to have heard of genetic testing for cancer risk (RR, 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4), to have discussed genetic testing with a health professional (RR 5.2, 95% CI 3.6-7.4), and to have undergone genetic testing for breast/ovarian cancer risk (RR 6.8, 95% CI 2.6-18.0).

CONCLUSIONS

We find low provision of guideline-recommended advice to women for whom testing may be appropriate and of significant clinical benefit.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Society of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(12):2397–406.CrossRef American Society of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(12):2397–406.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian V.1.2007. Fort Washington, PA; 2007. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian V.1.2007. Fort Washington, PA; 2007.
3.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Taskforce. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(5):355–61. US Preventive Services Taskforce. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(5):355–61.
4.
go back to reference Myriad Genetics. Myriad Genetics Awarded Three US Patents And Eight International Patents. Salt Lake City, UT; 2001:News release. Myriad Genetics. Myriad Genetics Awarded Three US Patents And Eight International Patents. Salt Lake City, UT; 2001:News release.
5.
7.
go back to reference American Cancer Society. Leading sites of new cancer cases and deaths—2008 estimates.; 2008. American Cancer Society. Leading sites of new cancer cases and deaths—2008 estimates.; 2008.
8.
go back to reference Nelson HD, Huffman LH, Fu R, Harris EL. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(5):362–79.PubMed Nelson HD, Huffman LH, Fu R, Harris EL. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(5):362–79.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(5):1117–30.PubMedCrossRef Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(5):1117–30.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Neuhausen SL, et al. Mortality after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(3):223–9.PubMedCrossRef Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Neuhausen SL, et al. Mortality after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(3):223–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Abeliovich D, Kaduri L, Lerer I, et al. The founder mutations 185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2 appear in 60% of ovarian cancer and 30% of early-onset breast cancer patients among Ashkenazi women. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60(3):505–14.PubMed Abeliovich D, Kaduri L, Lerer I, et al. The founder mutations 185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2 appear in 60% of ovarian cancer and 30% of early-onset breast cancer patients among Ashkenazi women. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60(3):505–14.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Frank TS, Deffenbaugh AM, Reid JE, et al. Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 10,000 individuals. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(6):1480–90.PubMedCrossRef Frank TS, Deffenbaugh AM, Reid JE, et al. Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 10,000 individuals. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(6):1480–90.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference American Society of Clinical Oncology. Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, Adopted on February 20, 1996. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(5):1730–6; discussion 1737-40. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, Adopted on February 20, 1996. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(5):1730–6; discussion 1737-40.
14.
go back to reference Daly M. NCCN Practice Guidelines: Genetics/Familial High-Risk Cancer Screening. Oncology. 1999;13(11A):161–183. Daly M. NCCN Practice Guidelines: Genetics/Familial High-Risk Cancer Screening. Oncology. 1999;13(11A):161–183.
15.
go back to reference American College of Medical Genetics Foundation. Genetic Susceptibility to Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Assessment, Counseling and Testing Guidelines. 1999. American College of Medical Genetics Foundation. Genetic Susceptibility to Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Assessment, Counseling and Testing Guidelines. 1999.
16.
go back to reference Rosenthal TC, Puck SM. Screening for genetic risk of breast cancer. Am Fam Physician. 1999;59(1):99–104, 106.PubMed Rosenthal TC, Puck SM. Screening for genetic risk of breast cancer. Am Fam Physician. 1999;59(1):99–104, 106.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Birkhead GS. Letter to physicians: Genetic Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: Information for Health Care Professionals, NYS Dept. of Health, Center for Community Health, August 22, 2007. Birkhead GS. Letter to physicians: Genetic Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: Information for Health Care Professionals, NYS Dept. of Health, Center for Community Health, August 22, 2007.
18.
go back to reference Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):702–6.PubMedCrossRef Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):702–6.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference McClain MR, Palomaki GE, Hampel H, Westman JA, Haddow JE. Screen positive rates among six family history screening protocols for breast/ovarian cancer in four cohorts of women. Fam Cancer. 2008. McClain MR, Palomaki GE, Hampel H, Westman JA, Haddow JE. Screen positive rates among six family history screening protocols for breast/ovarian cancer in four cohorts of women. Fam Cancer. 2008.
20.
go back to reference Scheuer L, Kauff N, Robson M, et al. Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(5):1260–8.PubMedCrossRef Scheuer L, Kauff N, Robson M, et al. Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(5):1260–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. Jama. 1999;282(15):1458–65.PubMedCrossRef Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. Jama. 1999;282(15):1458–65.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mouchawar J, Valentine Goins K, Somkin C, et al. Guidelines for breast and ovarian cancer genetic counseling referral: adoption and implementation in HMOs. Genet Med. 2003;5(6):444–50.PubMed Mouchawar J, Valentine Goins K, Somkin C, et al. Guidelines for breast and ovarian cancer genetic counseling referral: adoption and implementation in HMOs. Genet Med. 2003;5(6):444–50.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Shields AE, Blumenthal D, Weiss KB, Comstock CB, Currivan D, Lerman C. Barriers to translating emerging genetic research on smoking into clinical practice. Perspectives of primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(2):131–8.PubMedCrossRef Shields AE, Blumenthal D, Weiss KB, Comstock CB, Currivan D, Lerman C. Barriers to translating emerging genetic research on smoking into clinical practice. Perspectives of primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(2):131–8.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Suther S, Goodson P. Barriers to the provision of genetic services by primary care physicians: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med. 2003;5(2):70–6.PubMedCrossRef Suther S, Goodson P. Barriers to the provision of genetic services by primary care physicians: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med. 2003;5(2):70–6.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wideroff L, Vadaparampil ST, Greene MH, Taplin S, Olson L, Freedman AN. Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians. J Med Genet. 2005;42(10):749–55.PubMedCrossRef Wideroff L, Vadaparampil ST, Greene MH, Taplin S, Olson L, Freedman AN. Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians. J Med Genet. 2005;42(10):749–55.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sabatino SA, McCarthy EP, Phillips RS, Burns RB. Breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: provider attitudes, practices, and barriers. Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(5):375–83.PubMedCrossRef Sabatino SA, McCarthy EP, Phillips RS, Burns RB. Breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: provider attitudes, practices, and barriers. Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(5):375–83.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference US task force clarifies who should be screened for BRCA mutations. Reuters Health Medical News 2005 September 6, 2005. US task force clarifies who should be screened for BRCA mutations. Reuters Health Medical News 2005 September 6, 2005.
28.
go back to reference Bristol N. High-Risk Testing. The Washington Post 2005 September 27, 2005;F02. Bristol N. High-Risk Testing. The Washington Post 2005 September 27, 2005;F02.
29.
go back to reference McCullough M. Breast cancer tests get new guidelines. Philadelphia Inquirer 2005 September 7, 2005;A03. McCullough M. Breast cancer tests get new guidelines. Philadelphia Inquirer 2005 September 7, 2005;A03.
30.
go back to reference Rubin R. Genetic predisposition is reason to screen, new guidelines say. USA Today 2005 September 6, 2005;7D. Rubin R. Genetic predisposition is reason to screen, new guidelines say. USA Today 2005 September 6, 2005;7D.
31.
go back to reference Mechanic D, McAlpine DD, Rosenthal M. Are patients’ office visits with physicians getting shorter? N Engl J Med. 2001;344(3):198–204.PubMedCrossRef Mechanic D, McAlpine DD, Rosenthal M. Are patients’ office visits with physicians getting shorter? N Engl J Med. 2001;344(3):198–204.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Burke W. Taking family history seriously. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(5):388–9.PubMed Burke W. Taking family history seriously. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(5):388–9.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Blumenthal D. Stimulating the Adoption of Health Information Technology. N Engl J Med. 2009. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the Adoption of Health Information Technology. N Engl J Med. 2009.
34.
go back to reference Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742–52.PubMed Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742–52.PubMed
35.
go back to reference DesRoches C, Campbell E, Rao S, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care - a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:50–60.PubMedCrossRef DesRoches C, Campbell E, Rao S, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care - a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:50–60.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Emery J, Walton R, Murphy M, et al. Computer support for interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care: comparative study with simulated cases. Bmj. 2000;321(7252):28–32.PubMedCrossRef Emery J, Walton R, Murphy M, et al. Computer support for interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care: comparative study with simulated cases. Bmj. 2000;321(7252):28–32.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Bmj. 2005;330(7494):765.PubMedCrossRef Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Bmj. 2005;330(7494):765.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Qureshi N, Wilson B, Santaguida P, et al. Collection and use of cancer family history in primary care. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007;(159):1–84. Qureshi N, Wilson B, Santaguida P, et al. Collection and use of cancer family history in primary care. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007;(159):1–84.
39.
go back to reference Armstrong K, Micco E, Carney A, Stopfer J, Putt M. Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Jama. 2005;293(14):1729–36.PubMedCrossRef Armstrong K, Micco E, Carney A, Stopfer J, Putt M. Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Jama. 2005;293(14):1729–36.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Gwyn K, Vernon SW, Conoley PM. Intention to pursue genetic testing for breast cancer among women due for screening mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(2):96–102.PubMed Gwyn K, Vernon SW, Conoley PM. Intention to pursue genetic testing for breast cancer among women due for screening mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(2):96–102.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Armstrong K, Weiner J, Weber B, Asch DA. Early adoption of BRCA1/2 testing: who and why. Genet Med. 2003;5(2):92–8.PubMed Armstrong K, Weiner J, Weber B, Asch DA. Early adoption of BRCA1/2 testing: who and why. Genet Med. 2003;5(2):92–8.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB, Duteau-Buck C, et al. Psychosocial predictors of BRCA counseling and testing decisions among urban African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(12):1579–85.PubMed Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB, Duteau-Buck C, et al. Psychosocial predictors of BRCA counseling and testing decisions among urban African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(12):1579–85.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Hall MA, McEwen JE, Barton JC, et al. Concerns in a primary care population about genetic discrimination by insurers. Genet Med. 2005;7(5):311–6.PubMed Hall MA, McEwen JE, Barton JC, et al. Concerns in a primary care population about genetic discrimination by insurers. Genet Med. 2005;7(5):311–6.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Lerman C, Hughes C, Lemon SJ, et al. What you don’t know can hurt you: adverse psychologic effects in members of BRCA1-linked and BRCA2-linked families who decline genetic testing. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(5):1650–4.PubMed Lerman C, Hughes C, Lemon SJ, et al. What you don’t know can hurt you: adverse psychologic effects in members of BRCA1-linked and BRCA2-linked families who decline genetic testing. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(5):1650–4.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Velicer CM, Taplin S. Genetic testing for breast cancer: where are health care providers in the decision process? Genet Med. 2001;3(2):112–9.PubMed Velicer CM, Taplin S. Genetic testing for breast cancer: where are health care providers in the decision process? Genet Med. 2001;3(2):112–9.PubMed
46.
go back to reference Johnson A. Genetic privacy. Genetics Brief. 2002(4). Johnson A. Genetic privacy. Genetics Brief. 2002(4).
47.
go back to reference Mulholland WF, Jaeger AS. Genetic privacy and discrimination: a survey of state legislation. Comment. Jurimetrics. 1999;39(3):317–26. Mulholland WF, Jaeger AS. Genetic privacy and discrimination: a survey of state legislation. Comment. Jurimetrics. 1999;39(3):317–26.
Metadata
Title
Guidelines for Genetic Risk Assessment of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Early Disagreements and Low Utilization
Authors
Douglas E. Levy, PhD
Judy E. Garber, MPH
Alexandra E. Shields, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1009-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2009 Go to the issue

Case Reports/Clinical Vignettes

A Sore Throat—Potentially Life-Threatening?

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.