Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2009

01-07-2009 | Original Article

Physicians’ Decisions About Continuing or Stopping Colon Cancer Screening in the Elderly: A Qualitative Study

Authors: Carmen L. Lewis, MD, MPH, Jennifer Griffith, DrPH, MPH, Michael P. Pignone, MD, MPH, Carol Golin, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 7/2009

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Experts suggest an individualized approach to colon cancer screening to take into account variation in older adults’ life expectancies and potential to benefit from screening. However, little is known about how physicians make decisions about colon cancer screening in adults age 75 and older.

OBJECTIVE

To understand whether physicians employ individualized decision making for colon cancer screening in older adults, and, if so, to determine the individual factors they believed were important to consider in making such decisions.

DESIGN

Qualitative research using focus groups and individual interviews

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen primary care physicians practicing in community settings participated in three focus groups and two interviews.

APPROACH

We used two clinical vignettes of 78-year-old women in fair and poor health states to stimulate discussions about clinical decision making for CRC screening in older adults.

RESULTS

Physicians considered a wide range of factors, including clinical factors, such as age, life expectancy, co-morbidities, and functional status, as well as individual factors, such as personality, previous screening behavior, family support, and the relationship with the patient. Physicians reported difficulty with these decisions because of their complexity and because they involve life expectancy estimates. Their approach and discussion with patients seemed to be dependent on the degree of certainty they perceived regarding their clinical assessment as to whether the patient had the potential to benefit from screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Colorectal cancer screening decision making is complex. Physicians reported using a range of clinical and individual factors to decide about colorectal cancer screening in older adults.
Literature
2.
go back to reference AGS. Health screening decisions for older adults: AGS position paper. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(2):270–1.CrossRef AGS. Health screening decisions for older adults: AGS position paper. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(2):270–1.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Flaherty JH, Morley JE, Murphy DJ, Wasserman MR. The development of outpatient Clinical Glidepaths. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(11):1886–901.PubMedCrossRef Flaherty JH, Morley JE, Murphy DJ, Wasserman MR. The development of outpatient Clinical Glidepaths. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(11):1886–901.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA. 2001;285(21):2750–6.PubMedCrossRef Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA. 2001;285(21):2750–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, et al. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(22):1603–7.PubMedCrossRef Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, et al. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(22):1603–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002;137(2):132–41.PubMed Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002;137(2):132–41.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Burack RC, Gurney JG, McDaniel AM. Health status and mammography use among older women. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(6):366–72.PubMedCrossRef Burack RC, Gurney JG, McDaniel AM. Health status and mammography use among older women. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(6):366–72.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Heflin MT, Oddone EZ, Pieper CF, Burchett BM, Cohen HJ. The effect of comorbid illness on receipt of cancer screening by older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(10):1651–8.PubMedCrossRef Heflin MT, Oddone EZ, Pieper CF, Burchett BM, Cohen HJ. The effect of comorbid illness on receipt of cancer screening by older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(10):1651–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kiefe CI, Funkhouser E, Fouad MN, May DS. Chronic disease as a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(6):357–65.PubMedCrossRef Kiefe CI, Funkhouser E, Fouad MN, May DS. Chronic disease as a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(6):357–65.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Frame PS, Meadow A, Jones E, Nadel M, Vernon SW. A national survey of primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Preventive Medicine. 2003;36(3):352–62.PubMedCrossRef Klabunde CN, Frame PS, Meadow A, Jones E, Nadel M, Vernon SW. A national survey of primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Preventive Medicine. 2003;36(3):352–62.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Fortinsky RH, Hapke R, Landefeld CS. Primary care physician recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. Patient and practitioner factors. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(17):1946–50.PubMedCrossRef Cooper GS, Fortinsky RH, Hapke R, Landefeld CS. Primary care physician recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. Patient and practitioner factors. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(17):1946–50.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Heflin MT, Pollak KI, Kuchibhatla MN, Branch LG, Oddone EZ. The impact of health status on physicians’ intentions to offer cancer screening to older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(8):844–50.PubMed Heflin MT, Pollak KI, Kuchibhatla MN, Branch LG, Oddone EZ. The impact of health status on physicians’ intentions to offer cancer screening to older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(8):844–50.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Schonberg MA, Ramanan RA, McCarthy EP, Marcantonio ER. Decision Making and Counseling around Mammography Screening for Women Aged 80 or Older. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(9):979–85.PubMedCrossRef Schonberg MA, Ramanan RA, McCarthy EP, Marcantonio ER. Decision Making and Counseling around Mammography Screening for Women Aged 80 or Older. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(9):979–85.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lewis CL, Moore CG, Golin CE, Griffith J, Tytell-Brenner A, Pignone MP. Resident Physicians’ Life Expectancy Estimates and Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations in Elderly Patients. Med Decis Making. 2008. Lewis CL, Moore CG, Golin CE, Griffith J, Tytell-Brenner A, Pignone MP. Resident Physicians’ Life Expectancy Estimates and Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations in Elderly Patients. Med Decis Making. 2008.
15.
go back to reference ATLAS.ti Version 5.0. Berlin: Scientific Software; 2004. ATLAS.ti Version 5.0. Berlin: Scientific Software; 2004.
16.
go back to reference Krueger RA, Casey MA. FOCUS GROUPS—A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 3rd ed. California Sage: Thousand Oaks; 2000. Krueger RA, Casey MA. FOCUS GROUPS—A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 3rd ed. California Sage: Thousand Oaks; 2000.
17.
go back to reference Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences R. Qualitative Methods in Research: Opportunities and Considerations In Application and Review; 2000. Contract. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences R. Qualitative Methods in Research: Opportunities and Considerations In Application and Review; 2000. Contract.
18.
go back to reference Patton MO. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, California: Sage; 1990. Patton MO. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, California: Sage; 1990.
19.
go back to reference Dresselhaus TR, Peabody JW, Lee M, Wang MM, Luck J. Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical record. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(11):782–8.PubMedCrossRef Dresselhaus TR, Peabody JW, Lee M, Wang MM, Luck J. Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical record. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(11):782–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283(13):1715–22.PubMedCrossRef Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283(13):1715–22.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Physicians’ Decisions About Continuing or Stopping Colon Cancer Screening in the Elderly: A Qualitative Study
Authors
Carmen L. Lewis, MD, MPH
Jennifer Griffith, DrPH, MPH
Michael P. Pignone, MD, MPH
Carol Golin, MD
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1006-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2009 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

FUO and Biopsy-Negative GCA

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine