Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2017

01-02-2017 | 2015 SSAT Controversy in GI Surgery Debate

Buried Barrett Metaplasia After Endoluminal Ablation: a Ticking Time Bomb or Much Ado About Nothing?

Authors: Yoshihiro Komatsu, Rodney Landreneau, Blair A. Jobe

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is defined as a condition of intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus that replaces normal squamous epithelium with columnar epithelium including goblet cells. BE is associated with an increase risk for the development esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The incidence of EAC has increased by more than fivefold since 1970. Most patients with BE have non-dysplastic intestinal metaplasia. However, with continued and uncontrolled inflammation from gastroesophageal reflux disease, BE can progress to more abnormal histologic features ranging from low-grade to high-grade dysplasia. Although the incidence of developing dysplasia from non-dysplastic BE remains less than 2 %, patients with high-grade dysplasia have an EAC risk of more than 10 % per patient-year. Until recently, esophagectomy has been employed as the standard treatment option in patients with high-grade dysplasia. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mashimo H. Subsquamous intestinal metaplasia after ablation of Barrett’s esophagus: frequency and importance. Current opinion in gastroenterology. 2013;29(4):454–459.CrossRefPubMed Mashimo H. Subsquamous intestinal metaplasia after ablation of Barrett’s esophagus: frequency and importance. Current opinion in gastroenterology. 2013;29(4):454–459.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gupta N, Mathur SC, Dumot JA, et al. Adequacy of esophageal squamous mucosa specimens obtained during endoscopy: are standard biopsies sufficient for postablation surveillance in Barrett’s esophagus? Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2012;75(1):11–18.CrossRefPubMed Gupta N, Mathur SC, Dumot JA, et al. Adequacy of esophageal squamous mucosa specimens obtained during endoscopy: are standard biopsies sufficient for postablation surveillance in Barrett’s esophagus? Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2012;75(1):11–18.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Shaheen NJ, Sharma P, Overholt BF, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. The New England journal of medicine. 2009;360(22):2277–2288.CrossRefPubMed Shaheen NJ, Sharma P, Overholt BF, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. The New England journal of medicine. 2009;360(22):2277–2288.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chennat J, Ross AS, Konda VJ, et al. Advanced pathology under squamous epithelium on initial EMR specimens in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma: implications for surveillance and endotherapy management. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2009;70(3):417–421.CrossRefPubMed Chennat J, Ross AS, Konda VJ, et al. Advanced pathology under squamous epithelium on initial EMR specimens in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma: implications for surveillance and endotherapy management. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2009;70(3):417–421.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cobb MJ, Hwang JH, Upton MP, et al. Imaging of subsquamous Barrett’s epithelium with ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography: a histologic correlation study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2010;71(2):223–230.CrossRefPubMed Cobb MJ, Hwang JH, Upton MP, et al. Imaging of subsquamous Barrett’s epithelium with ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography: a histologic correlation study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2010;71(2):223–230.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Buried Barrett Metaplasia After Endoluminal Ablation: a Ticking Time Bomb or Much Ado About Nothing?
Authors
Yoshihiro Komatsu
Rodney Landreneau
Blair A. Jobe
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3240-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2017 Go to the issue