Skip to main content
Top
Published in: HAND 4/2015

01-12-2015

Satisfaction and functional outcome with “self-care” for the management of fifth metacarpal fractures

Authors: David Gamble, Paul J. Jenkins, Martyn J. Edge, Alisdair Gilmour, Iain C. Anthony, Margaret Nugent, Lech A. Rymaszewski

Published in: HAND | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Fifth metacarpal fractures are common and comprise a significant proportion of traditional orthopaedic fracture clinic workload. We reviewed the functional outcome and the satisfaction of patients managed with a new protocol that promoted “self-care” and resulted in the discharge of most of these patients from the emergency department with no further follow-up.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed of patients discharged with a fifth metacarpal fracture between April 2012 to October 2012. A postal questionnaire was sent to each patient, followed by a telephone call. Patient-reported outcome measures (EQ-5D, QuickDASH) and patient satisfaction were assessed. Of the 167 patients eligible for the study, 5 were excluded. Of the remaining 162, 64 were uncontactable or declined to participate. The mean follow-up time was 21.6 months (SD 1.9, range 18.1 to 24.7).

Results

The median EQ-5D health index score was 0.87 (IQR 0.74 to 1.00), and the median QuickDASH score was 2.3 (IQR 0 to 6.8). Seventy-nine (80.6 %) patients were satisfied with the outcome of their injury, while 83 (84.9 %) reported being satisfied with the process. There was no difference between those with a fracture or those without a fracture in EQ-5D (p = 0.307) or QuickDASH (p = 0.820).

Conclusion

Fifth metacarpal fractures can be managed effectively through an Emergency Department protocol without any formal orthopaedic follow-up. This pathway lead to excellent patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction. This protocol has reduced unnecessary hospital attendances for patients and increased the time available for clinicians to deal with more challenging injuries.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arafa M, Haines J, Noble J, et al. Immediate mobilization of fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal. Injury. 1986;17:277–88.CrossRefPubMed Arafa M, Haines J, Noble J, et al. Immediate mobilization of fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal. Injury. 1986;17:277–88.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bansal R, Craigen MA. Fifth metacarpal neck fractures: is follow-up required? J Hand Surg Br. 2007;32:69–7.CrossRef Bansal R, Craigen MA. Fifth metacarpal neck fractures: is follow-up required? J Hand Surg Br. 2007;32:69–7.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1038–46.CrossRefPubMed Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1038–46.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Braakman M, Oderwald EE, Haentjens MH. Functional taping of fractures of the 5th metacarpal results in a quicker recovery. Injury. 1998;29:5–9.CrossRefPubMed Braakman M, Oderwald EE, Haentjens MH. Functional taping of fractures of the 5th metacarpal results in a quicker recovery. Injury. 1998;29:5–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Breddam M, Hansen TB. Subcapital fractures of the fourth and fifth metacarpals treated without splinting and reposition. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1995;29:269–70.CrossRefPubMed Breddam M, Hansen TB. Subcapital fractures of the fourth and fifth metacarpals treated without splinting and reposition. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1995;29:269–70.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ford DJ, Ali MS, Steel WM. Fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck: is reduction or immobilisation necessary? J Hand Surg Br. 1989;14:165–7.CrossRefPubMed Ford DJ, Ali MS, Steel WM. Fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck: is reduction or immobilisation necessary? J Hand Surg Br. 1989;14:165–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Harding IJ, Parry D, Barrington RL. The use of a moulded metacarpal brace versus neighbour strapping for fractures of the little finger metacarpal neck. J Hand Surg Br. 2001;26:261–3.CrossRefPubMed Harding IJ, Parry D, Barrington RL. The use of a moulded metacarpal brace versus neighbour strapping for fractures of the little finger metacarpal neck. J Hand Surg Br. 2001;26:261–3.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hunter JM, Cowen NJ. Fifth metacarpal fractures in a compensation clinic population. A report on one hundred and thirty-three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1159–65.PubMed Hunter JM, Cowen NJ. Fifth metacarpal fractures in a compensation clinic population. A report on one hundred and thirty-three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1159–65.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Jayram PR, Bahattacharyya R, Jenkins PJ, et al. Patient satisfaction following management of radial head and neck fractures in a virtual fracture clinic. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23:297–301.CrossRef Jayram PR, Bahattacharyya R, Jenkins PJ, et al. Patient satisfaction following management of radial head and neck fractures in a virtual fracture clinic. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23:297–301.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Konradsen L, Nielsen PT, Albrecht-Beste E. Functional treatment of metacarpal fractures 100 randomized cases with or without fixation. Acta Orthop Scand. 1990;61:531–4.CrossRefPubMed Konradsen L, Nielsen PT, Albrecht-Beste E. Functional treatment of metacarpal fractures 100 randomized cases with or without fixation. Acta Orthop Scand. 1990;61:531–4.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kuokkanen HO, Mulari-Keranen SK, Niskanen RO, et al. Treatment of subcapital fractures of the fifth metacarpal bone: a prospective randomised comparison between functional treatment and reposition and splinting. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999;33:315–7.CrossRefPubMed Kuokkanen HO, Mulari-Keranen SK, Niskanen RO, et al. Treatment of subcapital fractures of the fifth metacarpal bone: a prospective randomised comparison between functional treatment and reposition and splinting. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999;33:315–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference McKerrell J, Bowen V, Johnston G, et al. Boxer’s fractures—conservative or operative management? J Trauma. 1987;27:486–90.CrossRefPubMed McKerrell J, Bowen V, Johnston G, et al. Boxer’s fractures—conservative or operative management? J Trauma. 1987;27:486–90.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Poolman RW, Goslings JC, Lee JB, et al. Conservative treatment for closed fifth (small finger) metacarpal neck fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3:CD003210-CD003210. Poolman RW, Goslings JC, Lee JB, et al. Conservative treatment for closed fifth (small finger) metacarpal neck fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3:CD003210-CD003210.
15.
16.
go back to reference Rabin R, De Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337–43.CrossRefPubMed Rabin R, De Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337–43.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sorensen JS, Freund KG, Kejla G. Functional fracture bracing in metacarpal fractures: the Galveston metacarpal brace versus a plaster-of-Paris bandage in a prospective study. J Hand Ther. 1993;6:263–5.CrossRefPubMed Sorensen JS, Freund KG, Kejla G. Functional fracture bracing in metacarpal fractures: the Galveston metacarpal brace versus a plaster-of-Paris bandage in a prospective study. J Hand Ther. 1993;6:263–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Statius Muller MG, Poolman RW, van Hoogstraten MJ, et al. Immediate mobilization gives good results in boxer’s fractures with volar angulation up to 70 degrees: a prospective randomized trial comparing immediate mobilization with cast immobilization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123:534–7.CrossRefPubMed Statius Muller MG, Poolman RW, van Hoogstraten MJ, et al. Immediate mobilization gives good results in boxer’s fractures with volar angulation up to 70 degrees: a prospective randomized trial comparing immediate mobilization with cast immobilization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123:534–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference TARMED Suisse, volume 2006. Bern: TARMED Suisse; 2006. TARMED Suisse, volume 2006. Bern: TARMED Suisse; 2006.
20.
go back to reference ten Berg PW, Ring D. Patients lost to follow-up after metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(1):42–6.CrossRefPubMed ten Berg PW, Ring D. Patients lost to follow-up after metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(1):42–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Theeuwen GA, Lemmens JA, van Niekerk JL. Conservative treatment of boxer’s fracture: a retrospective analysis. Injury. 1991;22:394–6.CrossRefPubMed Theeuwen GA, Lemmens JA, van Niekerk JL. Conservative treatment of boxer’s fracture: a retrospective analysis. Injury. 1991;22:394–6.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Van Aaken J, Kampfen S, Berli M, et al. Outcome of boxer’s fractures treated by a soft wrap and buddy taping: a prospective study. Hand (N Y). 2007;2(4):212–7.CrossRef Van Aaken J, Kampfen S, Berli M, et al. Outcome of boxer’s fractures treated by a soft wrap and buddy taping: a prospective study. Hand (N Y). 2007;2(4):212–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Westbrook AP, Davis TR, Armstrong D, et al. The clinical significance of malunion of fractures of the neck and shaft of the little finger metacarpal. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008;33:732–9.CrossRef Westbrook AP, Davis TR, Armstrong D, et al. The clinical significance of malunion of fractures of the neck and shaft of the little finger metacarpal. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008;33:732–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Satisfaction and functional outcome with “self-care” for the management of fifth metacarpal fractures
Authors
David Gamble
Paul J. Jenkins
Martyn J. Edge
Alisdair Gilmour
Iain C. Anthony
Margaret Nugent
Lech A. Rymaszewski
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
HAND / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1558-9447
Electronic ISSN: 1558-9455
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-015-9749-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

HAND 4/2015 Go to the issue