Skip to main content
Top
Published in: HSS Journal ® 2/2018

Open Access 01-07-2018 | Review Article/CME

Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review

Authors: Cynthia A. Kahlenberg, MD, Benedict U. Nwachukwu, MD, MBA, Alexander S. McLawhorn, MD, MBA, Michael B. Cross, MD, Charles N. Cornell, MD, Douglas E. Padgett, MD

Published in: HSS Journal ® | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background:

The quality and state of satisfaction reporting after total knee replacement (TKR) is variable.

Questions/Purposes:

The purposes of this systematic review were (1) to examine the available literature on patient satisfaction after TKR, (2) to evaluate the quality of available evidence, and (3) to identify predictors of patient satisfaction after TKR.

Methods:

A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was performed. The initial search yielded 1219 studies. The inclusion criteria were English language, clinical outcome study with primary outcome related to TKR for osteoarthritis, and patient-reported satisfaction included as an outcome measure. Studies were assessed for demographics, methodology for reporting satisfaction, and factors influencing satisfaction.

Results:

Two hundred eight studies, including 95,560 patients who had undergone TKR, met all inclusion and exclusion criteria; 112 (53.8%) of these studies were published in the past 3 years. Satisfaction was most commonly measured using an ordinal scale. Twenty-seven studies (13%) used a validated satisfaction survey. Eighty-three percent of studies reported more than 80% satisfaction. The most commonly reported predictor of satisfaction was post-operative patient-reported functional outcome. Pre-operative anxiety/depression was the most common pre-operative predictor of dissatisfaction.

Conclusion:

There are numerous studies reporting patient satisfaction after TKR, and publication on the topic has been increasing over the past decade. However, the majority of studies represent lower levels of evidence and use heterogeneous methods for measuring satisfaction, and few studies use validated satisfaction instruments. In general, the majority of studies report satisfaction rates ranging from 80 to 100%, with post-operative functional outcome and relief of pain being paramount determinants for achieving satisfaction.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ali A, Lindstrand A, Sundberg M, Flivik G. Preoperative anxiety and depression correlate with dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 186 patients, with 4-year follow-up. J. Arthroplasty. 2017;32:767–770.CrossRefPubMed Ali A, Lindstrand A, Sundberg M, Flivik G. Preoperative anxiety and depression correlate with dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 186 patients, with 4-year follow-up. J. Arthroplasty. 2017;32:767–770.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Baker PN, Rushton S, Jameson SS, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan DJ. Patient satisfaction with total knee replacement cannot be predicted from pre-operative variables alone: a cohort study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J . 2013;95–B:1359–65. Baker PN, Rushton S, Jameson SS, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan DJ. Patient satisfaction with total knee replacement cannot be predicted from pre-operative variables alone: a cohort study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J . 2013;95–B:1359–65.
3.
go back to reference Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–63.CrossRefPubMed Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–63.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Clement ND, MacDonald D, Burnett R. Primary total knee replacement in patients with mental disability improves their mental health and knee function: a prospective study. Bone Joint J. 2013;95–B:360–6.CrossRefPubMed Clement ND, MacDonald D, Burnett R. Primary total knee replacement in patients with mental disability improves their mental health and knee function: a prospective study. Bone Joint J. 2013;95–B:360–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Graham B, Green A, James M, Katz J, Swiontkowski M. Measuring patient satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2015;97:80–84.CrossRefPubMed Graham B, Green A, James M, Katz J, Swiontkowski M. Measuring patient satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2015;97:80–84.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12.CrossRefPubMed Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Johnson JA, Luo N, Shaw JW, Kind P, Coons SJ. Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different? Med Care 2005;43:221–228.CrossRefPubMed Johnson JA, Luo N, Shaw JW, Kind P, Coons SJ. Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different? Med Care 2005;43:221–228.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, Ferraro RA, Schairer WW, Steinhaus ME, Allen AA. How are we measuring patient satisfaction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Orthop J Sport Med . 2016;4:2325967116673971.CrossRef Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, Ferraro RA, Schairer WW, Steinhaus ME, Allen AA. How are we measuring patient satisfaction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Orthop J Sport Med . 2016;4:2325967116673971.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, Schairer WW, McCormick F, Ranawat AS. Patient satisfaction reporting for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:1693–1699.CrossRefPubMed Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, Schairer WW, McCormick F, Ranawat AS. Patient satisfaction reporting for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:1693–1699.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, Schairer WW, Steinhaus ME, Cross MB. Patient satisfaction reporting after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthopedics. 2017;40:e400-e404.CrossRefPubMed Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, Schairer WW, Steinhaus ME, Cross MB. Patient satisfaction reporting after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthopedics. 2017;40:e400-e404.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Knies S, Evers SMAA, Candel MJJM, Severens JL, Ament AJHA. Utilities of the EQ-5D. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27:767–779.CrossRefPubMed Knies S, Evers SMAA, Candel MJJM, Severens JL, Ament AJHA. Utilities of the EQ-5D. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27:767–779.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2007;89:780–785.PubMed Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2007;89:780–785.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Mahomed N, Gandhi R, Daltroy L, Katz JN. The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis. 2011;2011:591253–591258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mahomed N, Gandhi R, Daltroy L, Katz JN. The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis. 2011;2011:591253–591258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P. Patients’ expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2001;83-A(7):1005–1012.CrossRef Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P. Patients’ expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2001;83-A(7):1005–1012.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med . 2009;151:264–269, W64.CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med . 2009;151:264–269, W64.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nwachukwu BU, Bozic KJ, Schairer WW, Bernstein JL, Jevsevar DS, Marx RG, Padgett DE. Current status of cost utility analyses in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2015;473:1815–1827.CrossRefPubMed Nwachukwu BU, Bozic KJ, Schairer WW, Bernstein JL, Jevsevar DS, Marx RG, Padgett DE. Current status of cost utility analyses in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2015;473:1815–1827.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN. The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2012;470:3–19.CrossRefPubMed Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN. The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2012;470:3–19.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg . 2003;73:712–716.CrossRefPubMed Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg . 2003;73:712–716.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review
Authors
Cynthia A. Kahlenberg, MD
Benedict U. Nwachukwu, MD, MBA
Alexander S. McLawhorn, MD, MBA
Michael B. Cross, MD
Charles N. Cornell, MD
Douglas E. Padgett, MD
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
HSS Journal ® / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1556-3316
Electronic ISSN: 1556-3324
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

HSS Journal ® 2/2018 Go to the issue