Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Molecular Imaging and Biology 4/2020

01-08-2020 | Computed Tomography | Research Article

Next-Generation Radiogenomics Sequencing for Prediction of EGFR and KRAS Mutation Status in NSCLC Patients Using Multimodal Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms

Authors: Isaac Shiri, Hasan Maleki, Ghasem Hajianfar, Hamid Abdollahi, Saeed Ashrafinia, Mathieu Hatt, Habib Zaidi, Mehrdad Oveisi, Arman Rahmim

Published in: Molecular Imaging and Biology | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Considerable progress has been made in the assessment and management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients based on mutation status in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS). At the same time, NSCLC management through KRAS and EGFR mutation profiling faces challenges. In the present work, we aimed to evaluate a comprehensive radiomics framework that enabled prediction of EGFR and KRAS mutation status in NSCLC patients based on radiomic features from low-dose computed tomography (CT), contrast-enhanced diagnostic quality CT (CTD), and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging modalities and use of machine learning algorithms.

Methods

Our study involved NSCLC patients including 150 PET, low-dose CT, and CTD images. Radiomic features from original and preprocessed (including 64 bin discretizing, Laplacian-of-Gaussian (LOG), and Wavelet) images were extracted. Conventional clinically used standard uptake value (SUV) parameters and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were also obtained from PET images. Highly correlated features were pre-eliminated, and false discovery rate (FDR) correction was performed with the resulting q-values reported for univariate analysis. Six feature selection methods and 12 classifiers were then used for multivariate prediction of gene mutation status (provided by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) in patients. We performed 10-fold cross-validation for model tuning to improve robustness, and our developed models were assessed on an independent validation set with 68 patients (common in all three imaging modalities). The average area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was utilized for performance evaluation.

Results

The best predictive power for conventional PET parameters was achieved by SUVpeak (AUC 0.69, p value = 0.0002) and MTV (AUC 0.55, p value = 0.0011) for EGFR and KRAS, respectively. Univariate analysis of extracted radiomics features improved AUC performance to 0.75 (q-value 0.003, Short-Run Emphasis feature of GLRLM from LOG preprocessed image of PET with sigma value 1.5) and 0.71 (q-value 0.00005, Large Dependence Low Gray-Level Emphasis feature of GLDM in LOG preprocessed image of CTD with sigma value 5) for EGFR and KRAS, respectively. Furthermore, multivariate machine learning-based AUC performances were significantly improved to 0.82 for EGFR (LOG preprocessed image of PET with sigma 3 with variance threshold (VT) feature selector and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) classifier (q-value = 4.86E-05) and 0.83 for KRAS (LOG preprocessed image of CT with sigma 3.5 with select model (SM) feature selector and SGD classifier (q-value = 2.81E−09).

Conclusion

Our work demonstrated that non-invasive and reliable radiomics analysis can be successfully used to predict EGFR and KRAS mutation status in NSCLC patients. We demonstrated that radiomic features extracted from different image-feature sets could be used for EGFR and KRAS mutation status prediction in NSCLC patients and showed improved predictive power relative to conventional image-derived metrics.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Roberts PJ, Stinchcombe TE, Der CJ, Socinski MA (2010) Personalized medicine in non–small-cell lung cancer: is KRAS a useful marker in selecting patients for epidermal growth factor receptor–targeted therapy? J Clin Oncol 28:4769–4777PubMed Roberts PJ, Stinchcombe TE, Der CJ, Socinski MA (2010) Personalized medicine in non–small-cell lung cancer: is KRAS a useful marker in selecting patients for epidermal growth factor receptor–targeted therapy? J Clin Oncol 28:4769–4777PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ludovini V, Bianconi F, Pistola L, Chiari R, Minotti V, Colella R, Giuffrida D, Tofanetti FR, Siggillino A, Flacco A, Baldelli E, Iacono D, Mameli MG, Cavaliere A, Crinò L (2011) Phosphoinositide-3-kinase catalytic alpha and KRAS mutations are important predictors of resistance to therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 6:707–715PubMed Ludovini V, Bianconi F, Pistola L, Chiari R, Minotti V, Colella R, Giuffrida D, Tofanetti FR, Siggillino A, Flacco A, Baldelli E, Iacono D, Mameli MG, Cavaliere A, Crinò L (2011) Phosphoinositide-3-kinase catalytic alpha and KRAS mutations are important predictors of resistance to therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 6:707–715PubMed
3.
go back to reference Linardou H, Dahabreh IJ, Kanaloupiti D, Siannis F, Bafaloukos D, Kosmidis P, Papadimitriou CA, Murray S (2008) Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet Oncol 9:962–972PubMed Linardou H, Dahabreh IJ, Kanaloupiti D, Siannis F, Bafaloukos D, Kosmidis P, Papadimitriou CA, Murray S (2008) Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet Oncol 9:962–972PubMed
4.
go back to reference Eberhard DA, Johnson BE, Amler LC, Goddard AD, Heldens SL, Herbst RS, Ince WL, Jänne PA, Januario T, Johnson DH, Klein P, Miller VA, Ostland MA, Ramies DA, Sebisanovic D, Stinson JA, Zhang YR, Seshagiri S, Hillan KJ (2005) Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol 23:5900–5909PubMed Eberhard DA, Johnson BE, Amler LC, Goddard AD, Heldens SL, Herbst RS, Ince WL, Jänne PA, Januario T, Johnson DH, Klein P, Miller VA, Ostland MA, Ramies DA, Sebisanovic D, Stinson JA, Zhang YR, Seshagiri S, Hillan KJ (2005) Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol 23:5900–5909PubMed
5.
go back to reference Riely GJ, Marks J, Pao W (2009) KRAS mutations in non–small cell lung cancer. Ann Am Thorac Soc 6:201–205 Riely GJ, Marks J, Pao W (2009) KRAS mutations in non–small cell lung cancer. Ann Am Thorac Soc 6:201–205
6.
go back to reference Mak R, Hermann G, Aerts H et al (2016) Outcomes by EGFR, KRAS and ALK genotype after combined modality therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96:S156 Mak R, Hermann G, Aerts H et al (2016) Outcomes by EGFR, KRAS and ALK genotype after combined modality therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96:S156
7.
go back to reference Sun X, Xiao Z, Chen G et al (2018) A PET imaging approach for determining EGFR mutation status for improved lung cancer patient management. Sci Transl Med 10:eaan8840PubMed Sun X, Xiao Z, Chen G et al (2018) A PET imaging approach for determining EGFR mutation status for improved lung cancer patient management. Sci Transl Med 10:eaan8840PubMed
8.
go back to reference Thawani R, McLane M, Beig N et al (2017) Radiomics and radiogenomics in lung cancer: a review for the clinician. Lung Cancer 115:34–41PubMed Thawani R, McLane M, Beig N et al (2017) Radiomics and radiogenomics in lung cancer: a review for the clinician. Lung Cancer 115:34–41PubMed
9.
go back to reference Incoronato M, Aiello M, Infante T et al (2017) Radiogenomic analysis of oncological data: a technical survey. Int J Mol Sci 18:805PubMedCentral Incoronato M, Aiello M, Infante T et al (2017) Radiogenomic analysis of oncological data: a technical survey. Int J Mol Sci 18:805PubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout R, Granton P, Zegers CM, Gillies R, Boellard R, Dekker A, Aerts HJ (2012) Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer 48:441–446PubMedPubMedCentral Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout R, Granton P, Zegers CM, Gillies R, Boellard R, Dekker A, Aerts HJ (2012) Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer 48:441–446PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2015) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577PubMed Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2015) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577PubMed
12.
go back to reference Hatt M, Tixier F, Pierce L, Kinahan PE, Le Rest CC, Visvikis D (2017) Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present … any future? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44:151–165PubMed Hatt M, Tixier F, Pierce L, Kinahan PE, Le Rest CC, Visvikis D (2017) Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present … any future? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44:151–165PubMed
13.
go back to reference Zinn PO, Majadan B, Sathyan P et al (2011) Radiogenomic mapping of edema/cellular invasion MRI-phenotypes in glioblastoma multiforme. PLoS One 6:e25451PubMedPubMedCentral Zinn PO, Majadan B, Sathyan P et al (2011) Radiogenomic mapping of edema/cellular invasion MRI-phenotypes in glioblastoma multiforme. PLoS One 6:e25451PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Kang J, Rancati T, Lee S et al (2018) Machine learning and radiogenomics: lessons learned and future directions. Front Oncol 8:228PubMedPubMedCentral Kang J, Rancati T, Lee S et al (2018) Machine learning and radiogenomics: lessons learned and future directions. Front Oncol 8:228PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Liu Y, Kim J, Balagurunathan Y et al (2016) Radiomic features are associated with EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinomas. Clin Lung Cancer 17:441–448.e446PubMedPubMedCentral Liu Y, Kim J, Balagurunathan Y et al (2016) Radiomic features are associated with EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinomas. Clin Lung Cancer 17:441–448.e446PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Lin YC, Lin G, Hong JH, Lin YP, Chen FH, Ng SH, Wang CC (2017) Diffusion radiomics analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity in a murine prostate cancer model following radiotherapy: Pixelwise correlation with histology. J Magn Reson Imaging 46:483–489PubMed Lin YC, Lin G, Hong JH, Lin YP, Chen FH, Ng SH, Wang CC (2017) Diffusion radiomics analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity in a murine prostate cancer model following radiotherapy: Pixelwise correlation with histology. J Magn Reson Imaging 46:483–489PubMed
17.
go back to reference Velazquez ER, Parmar C, Liu Y et al (2017) Somatic mutations drive distinct imaging phenotypes in lung cancer. Cancer Res 77:3922–3930PubMedCentral Velazquez ER, Parmar C, Liu Y et al (2017) Somatic mutations drive distinct imaging phenotypes in lung cancer. Cancer Res 77:3922–3930PubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Zhang L, Chen B, Liu X et al (2018) Quantitative biomarkers for prediction of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Oncol 11:94–101PubMed Zhang L, Chen B, Liu X et al (2018) Quantitative biomarkers for prediction of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Oncol 11:94–101PubMed
19.
go back to reference Wang S, Shi J, Ye Z et al (2019) Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma on computed tomography image using deep learning. Eur Respir J 53:1800986PubMedPubMedCentral Wang S, Shi J, Ye Z et al (2019) Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma on computed tomography image using deep learning. Eur Respir J 53:1800986PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Zhao W, Yang J, Ni B et al (2019) Toward automatic prediction of EGFR mutation status in pulmonary adenocarcinoma with 3D deep learning. In: Cancer medicine Zhao W, Yang J, Ni B et al (2019) Toward automatic prediction of EGFR mutation status in pulmonary adenocarcinoma with 3D deep learning. In: Cancer medicine
21.
go back to reference Li X, Yin G, Zhang Y, et al. (2019) Predictive power of a radiomic signature based on 18F-FDG PET/CT images for EGFR mutational status in NSCLC. Frontiers in Oncology 9 Li X, Yin G, Zhang Y, et al. (2019) Predictive power of a radiomic signature based on 18F-FDG PET/CT images for EGFR mutational status in NSCLC. Frontiers in Oncology 9
22.
go back to reference Pinheiro G, Pereira T, Dias C, et al. (2019) Identifying relationships between imaging phenotypes and lung cancer-related mutation status: EGFR and KRAS. bioRxiv:794123 Pinheiro G, Pereira T, Dias C, et al. (2019) Identifying relationships between imaging phenotypes and lung cancer-related mutation status: EGFR and KRAS. bioRxiv:794123
23.
go back to reference Lambin P, Leijenaar RT, Deist TM, Peerlings J, de Jong EEC, van Timmeren J, Sanduleanu S, Larue RTHM, Even AJG, Jochems A, van Wijk Y, Woodruff H, van Soest J, Lustberg T, Roelofs E, van Elmpt W, Dekker A, Mottaghy FM, Wildberger JE, Walsh S (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:749–762PubMed Lambin P, Leijenaar RT, Deist TM, Peerlings J, de Jong EEC, van Timmeren J, Sanduleanu S, Larue RTHM, Even AJG, Jochems A, van Wijk Y, Woodruff H, van Soest J, Lustberg T, Roelofs E, van Elmpt W, Dekker A, Mottaghy FM, Wildberger JE, Walsh S (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:749–762PubMed
24.
go back to reference Parmar C, Grossmann P, Bussink J, Lambin P, Aerts HJ (2015) Machine learning methods for quantitative radiomic biomarkers. Sci Rep 5:13087PubMedPubMedCentral Parmar C, Grossmann P, Bussink J, Lambin P, Aerts HJ (2015) Machine learning methods for quantitative radiomic biomarkers. Sci Rep 5:13087PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Parmar C, Grossmann P, Rietveld D, Rietbergen MM, Lambin P, Aerts HJ (2015) Radiomic machine-learning classifiers for prognostic biomarkers of head and neck cancer. Front Oncol 5:272PubMedPubMedCentral Parmar C, Grossmann P, Rietveld D, Rietbergen MM, Lambin P, Aerts HJ (2015) Radiomic machine-learning classifiers for prognostic biomarkers of head and neck cancer. Front Oncol 5:272PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Leger S, Zwanenburg A, Pilz K et al (2017) A comparative study of machine learning methods for time-to-event survival data for radiomics risk modelling. Sci Rep 7:13206PubMedPubMedCentral Leger S, Zwanenburg A, Pilz K et al (2017) A comparative study of machine learning methods for time-to-event survival data for radiomics risk modelling. Sci Rep 7:13206PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Deist TM, Dankers FJ, Valdes G et al (2018) Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo) radiotherapy: an empirical comparison of classifiers. Med Phys Deist TM, Dankers FJ, Valdes G et al (2018) Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo) radiotherapy: an empirical comparison of classifiers. Med Phys
28.
go back to reference Hajianfar G, Shiri I, Maleki H, Oveisi N, Haghparast A, Abdollahi H, Oveisi M (2019) Noninvasive O6 methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status prediction in glioblastoma multiforme cancer using magnetic resonance imaging radiomics features: univariate and multivariate radiogenomics analysis. World Neurosurg 132:e140–e161PubMed Hajianfar G, Shiri I, Maleki H, Oveisi N, Haghparast A, Abdollahi H, Oveisi M (2019) Noninvasive O6 methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status prediction in glioblastoma multiforme cancer using magnetic resonance imaging radiomics features: univariate and multivariate radiogenomics analysis. World Neurosurg 132:e140–e161PubMed
29.
go back to reference Prior FW, Clark K, Commean P, et al. (2013) TCIA: an information resource to enable open science [abstract]. 1282-1285P Prior FW, Clark K, Commean P, et al. (2013) TCIA: an information resource to enable open science [abstract]. 1282-1285P
30.
go back to reference Gevaert O, Xu J, Hoang CD et al (2012) Non–small cell lung cancer: identifying prognostic imaging biomarkers by leveraging public gene expression microarray data—methods and preliminary results. Radiology 264:387–396PubMedPubMedCentral Gevaert O, Xu J, Hoang CD et al (2012) Non–small cell lung cancer: identifying prognostic imaging biomarkers by leveraging public gene expression microarray data—methods and preliminary results. Radiology 264:387–396PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K et al (2013) The cancer imaging archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging 26:1045–1057PubMedPubMedCentral Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K et al (2013) The cancer imaging archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging 26:1045–1057PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
33.
go back to reference Asano H, Toyooka S, Tokumo M, Ichimura K, Aoe K, Ito S, Tsukuda K, Ouchida M, Aoe M, Katayama H, Hiraki A, Sugi K, Kiura K, Date H, Shimizu N (2006) Detection of EGFR gene mutation in lung cancer by mutant-enriched polymerase chain reaction assay. Clin Cancer Res 12:43–48PubMed Asano H, Toyooka S, Tokumo M, Ichimura K, Aoe K, Ito S, Tsukuda K, Ouchida M, Aoe M, Katayama H, Hiraki A, Sugi K, Kiura K, Date H, Shimizu N (2006) Detection of EGFR gene mutation in lung cancer by mutant-enriched polymerase chain reaction assay. Clin Cancer Res 12:43–48PubMed
34.
go back to reference Ganeshan B, Panayiotou E, Burnand K, Dizdarevic S, Miles K (2012) Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival. Eur Radiol 22:796–802PubMed Ganeshan B, Panayiotou E, Burnand K, Dizdarevic S, Miles K (2012) Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival. Eur Radiol 22:796–802PubMed
35.
go back to reference Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O (2004) OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 17:205–216PubMedPubMedCentral Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O (2004) OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 17:205–216PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Pieper S, Halle M, Kikinis R (2004) 3D slicer [abstract]. 632-635P Pieper S, Halle M, Kikinis R (2004) 3D slicer [abstract]. 632-635P
37.
go back to reference Van Griethuysen JJ, Fedorov A, Parmar C et al (2017) Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res 77:e104–e107PubMedPubMedCentral Van Griethuysen JJ, Fedorov A, Parmar C et al (2017) Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res 77:e104–e107PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Vallières M, Löck S (2016) Image biomarker standardisation initiative. arXiv preprint arXiv:161207003 Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Vallières M, Löck S (2016) Image biomarker standardisation initiative. arXiv preprint arXiv:161207003
39.
go back to reference Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830 Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830
40.
go back to reference Simon R, Roychowdhury S (2013) Implementing personalized cancer genomics in clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12:358PubMed Simon R, Roychowdhury S (2013) Implementing personalized cancer genomics in clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12:358PubMed
41.
42.
go back to reference Shiri I, Maleki H, Hajianfar G, et al. (2018) PET/CT Radiomic sequencer for prediction of EGFR and KRAS mutation status in NSCLC patients [abstract]. 1-4P Shiri I, Maleki H, Hajianfar G, et al. (2018) PET/CT Radiomic sequencer for prediction of EGFR and KRAS mutation status in NSCLC patients [abstract]. 1-4P
43.
go back to reference Zhang B, He X, Ouyang F et al (2017) Radiomic machine-learning classifiers for prognostic biomarkers of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Lett 403:21–27PubMed Zhang B, He X, Ouyang F et al (2017) Radiomic machine-learning classifiers for prognostic biomarkers of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Lett 403:21–27PubMed
44.
go back to reference Abdollahi H, Mofid B, Shiri I et al (2019) Machine learning-based radiomic models to predict intensity-modulated radiation therapy response, Gleason score and stage in prostate cancer. La radiologia medica 124:555–567PubMed Abdollahi H, Mofid B, Shiri I et al (2019) Machine learning-based radiomic models to predict intensity-modulated radiation therapy response, Gleason score and stage in prostate cancer. La radiologia medica 124:555–567PubMed
45.
go back to reference Du D, Feng H, Lv W et al (2019) Machine learning methods for optimal radiomics-based differentiation between recurrence and inflammation: application to nasopharyngeal carcinoma post-therapy PET/CT images. Molecular imaging and biology:1–9 Du D, Feng H, Lv W et al (2019) Machine learning methods for optimal radiomics-based differentiation between recurrence and inflammation: application to nasopharyngeal carcinoma post-therapy PET/CT images. Molecular imaging and biology:1–9
46.
go back to reference Tu W, Sun G, Fan L, Wang Y, Xia Y, Guan Y, Li Q, Zhang D, Liu S, Li Z (2019) Radiomics signature: a potential and incremental predictor for EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients, comparison with CT morphology. Lung Cancer 132:28–35PubMed Tu W, Sun G, Fan L, Wang Y, Xia Y, Guan Y, Li Q, Zhang D, Liu S, Li Z (2019) Radiomics signature: a potential and incremental predictor for EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients, comparison with CT morphology. Lung Cancer 132:28–35PubMed
47.
go back to reference Rizzo S, Raimondi S, de Jong EE, van Elmpt W, de Piano F, Petrella F, Bagnardi V, Jochems A, Bellomi M, Dingemans AM, Lambin P (2019) Genomics of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): association between CT-based imaging features and EGFR and K-RAS mutations in 122 patients—an external validation. Eur J Radiol 110:148–155PubMed Rizzo S, Raimondi S, de Jong EE, van Elmpt W, de Piano F, Petrella F, Bagnardi V, Jochems A, Bellomi M, Dingemans AM, Lambin P (2019) Genomics of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): association between CT-based imaging features and EGFR and K-RAS mutations in 122 patients—an external validation. Eur J Radiol 110:148–155PubMed
48.
go back to reference Reuzé S, Schernberg A, Orlhac F et al (2018) Radiomics in nuclear medicine applied to radiation therapy: methods, pitfalls and challenges. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Reuzé S, Schernberg A, Orlhac F et al (2018) Radiomics in nuclear medicine applied to radiation therapy: methods, pitfalls and challenges. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
49.
go back to reference Aerts HJ (2016) The potential of radiomic-based phenotyping in precision medicine: a review. JAMA Oncol 2:1636–1642PubMed Aerts HJ (2016) The potential of radiomic-based phenotyping in precision medicine: a review. JAMA Oncol 2:1636–1642PubMed
50.
go back to reference Pinker K, Shitano F, Sala E, Do RK, Young RJ, Wibmer AG, Hricak H, Sutton EJ, Morris EA (2018) Background, current role, and potential applications of radiogenomics. J Magn Reson Imaging 47:604–620PubMed Pinker K, Shitano F, Sala E, Do RK, Young RJ, Wibmer AG, Hricak H, Sutton EJ, Morris EA (2018) Background, current role, and potential applications of radiogenomics. J Magn Reson Imaging 47:604–620PubMed
51.
go back to reference Leijenaar RT, Carvalho S, Velazquez ER, van Elmpt W, Parmar C, Hoekstra OS, Hoekstra CJ, Boellaard R, Dekker AL, Gillies RJ, Aerts HJ, Lambin P (2013) Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: an integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability. Acta Oncol 52:1391–1397PubMed Leijenaar RT, Carvalho S, Velazquez ER, van Elmpt W, Parmar C, Hoekstra OS, Hoekstra CJ, Boellaard R, Dekker AL, Gillies RJ, Aerts HJ, Lambin P (2013) Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: an integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability. Acta Oncol 52:1391–1397PubMed
52.
go back to reference Abdollahi H, Shiri I, Heydari M (2019) Medical imaging technologists in radiomics era: an Alice in wonderland problem. Iran J Public Health 48:184PubMedPubMedCentral Abdollahi H, Shiri I, Heydari M (2019) Medical imaging technologists in radiomics era: an Alice in wonderland problem. Iran J Public Health 48:184PubMedPubMedCentral
53.
go back to reference Shiri I, Rahmim A, Ghaffarian P, Geramifar P, Abdollahi H, Bitarafan-Rajabi A (2017) The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies. Eur Radiol 27:4498–4509PubMed Shiri I, Rahmim A, Ghaffarian P, Geramifar P, Abdollahi H, Bitarafan-Rajabi A (2017) The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies. Eur Radiol 27:4498–4509PubMed
54.
go back to reference Lu L, Lv W, Jiang J, Ma J, Feng Q, Rahmim A, Chen W (2016) Robustness of radiomic features in [11 C] choline and [18 F] FDG PET/CT imaging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: impact of segmentation and discretization. Mol Imaging Biol 18:935–945PubMed Lu L, Lv W, Jiang J, Ma J, Feng Q, Rahmim A, Chen W (2016) Robustness of radiomic features in [11 C] choline and [18 F] FDG PET/CT imaging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: impact of segmentation and discretization. Mol Imaging Biol 18:935–945PubMed
Metadata
Title
Next-Generation Radiogenomics Sequencing for Prediction of EGFR and KRAS Mutation Status in NSCLC Patients Using Multimodal Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
Authors
Isaac Shiri
Hasan Maleki
Ghasem Hajianfar
Hamid Abdollahi
Saeed Ashrafinia
Mathieu Hatt
Habib Zaidi
Mehrdad Oveisi
Arman Rahmim
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Molecular Imaging and Biology / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1536-1632
Electronic ISSN: 1860-2002
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-020-01487-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Molecular Imaging and Biology 4/2020 Go to the issue