Top

Oral Radiology

Published in:

01-10-2021 | Computed Tomography | Review Article

Nature and clinical significance of incidental findings in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review

Authors: Hanadi M. Khalifa, Osama M. Felemban

Published in: Oral Radiology | Issue 4/2021

Abstract

Objective

This systematic review was conducted to assess the types, potential clinical significance, and treatment implications of incidental findings (IFs) in CBCT diagnostic imaging of the maxillofacial region.

Material and methods

The authors searched several electronic databases and grey literature without time restriction for studies on the IFs in maxillofacial CBCT. Studies that classified the IFs based on their potential clinical significance were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by the STROBE criteria.

Results

The online searches of the electronic databases yielded 1323 records. Five articles were included in the final qualitative analysis. The methodological quality ranged from low to moderate risk of bias. Percentages of IFs with high (requiring intervention/referral), moderate (requiring monitoring), and low clinical significance ranged from 0.3 to 31.4%, 15.6 to 28.9%, and 43.46 to 71.1%, respectively. There was an inconsistency between the studies in the clinical significance of 58.8% of the IFs identified.

Conclusion

Most IFs in maxillofacial CBCT are either normal variants or findings that do not require referral or treatment. There was no clear consensus on the recommended management of most common IFs. The lack of consensus on clinical significance emphasizes the importance of collaboration between medical and dental specialties to establish professional guidelines for the management of commonly encountered IFs in CBCT.

Yang J, Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C. Incidental findings on CBCT. In: maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: principles, techniques and clinical applications. Springer International Publishing; 2018:553–589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62061-9_16

Lumbreras B, Donat L, Hernández-Aguado I. Incidental findings in imaging diagnostic tests: a systematic review. Br J Radiol. 2010;83(988):276–89. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/98067945.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Scarfe WC. Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomographic images: a Pandora’s box? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;117(5):537–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.01.002.CrossRefPubMed

O’Sullivan JW, Muntinga T, Grigg S, Ioannidis JPA. Prevalence and outcomes of incidental imaging findings: umbrella review. BMJ. 2018;361:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2387.CrossRef

Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52(4):707–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005.CrossRefPubMed

Miles DA, Danforth RA. Reporting findings in the cone beam computed tomography volume. Dent Clin North Am. 2014;58(3):687–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2014.04.006.CrossRefPubMed

Husain MA, Tetradis S, Mallya SM. Intraosseous pneumatocysts of the cervical spine: A report of four cases and review of literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;119(1):e49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.09.019.CrossRefPubMed

Edwards R, Alsufyani N, Heo G, Flores-Mir C. The frequency and nature of incidental findings in large-field cone beam computed tomography scans of an orthodontic sample. Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0037-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Alsufyani NA. Cone beam computed tomography incidental findings of the cervical spine and clivus: retrospective analysis and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123(6):e197–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.02.011.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Jadhav AB, Tadinada A, Rengasamy K, Fellows D, Lurie AG. Clival lesion incidentally discovered on cone-beam computed tomography: a case report and review of the literature. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44(2):165–9. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.2.165.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: an advisory statement from the American dental association council on scientific affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143(8):899–902. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0295.CrossRef

12.

Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, et al. American academy of oral and maxillofacial radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2008;106(4):561–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.007.CrossRef

13.

Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European academy of dental and maxillofacial radiology. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2009;38(4):187–95. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/74941012.CrossRef

14.

Allareddy V, Vincent SD, Hellstein JW, Qian F, Smoker WRKK, Ruprecht A. Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography images. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/871532.CrossRef

15.

Zain-Alabdeen EH, El Khateeb SM. Incidental cone beam computed tomographic findings among Taibah University patients, KSA: a retrospective study. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2017;12(2):131–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.10.014.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Pliska B, DeRocher M, Larson BE. Incidence of significant findings on CBCT scans of an orthodontic patient population. Northwest Dent. 2011;90(2):12–6.PubMed

17.

Cha JY, Mah J, Sinclair P. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial area with 3-dimensional cone-beam imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.041.CrossRef

18.

Caglayan F, Tozoglu U. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial region detected by cone beam CT. Diagnostic Interventional Radiol. 2012;18(2):159–63. https://doi.org/10.4261/1305-3825.Dir.4341-11.2.CrossRef

19.

Warhekar S, Nagarajappa S, Dasar PL, Warhekar AM, Parihar A, Phulambrikar T, Airen B, Jain D (2015) Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography and reasons for referral by dental practitioners in indore city (m.p). J Clin Diagn Res 9(2):Zc21–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2015/11705.5555

20.

Oliveira RD, Perettog JT, Panzarella FK, Raitz R (2019) Evaluation of incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography. Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clinica Integrada. 19(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.4034/pboci.2019.191.81

21.

Santos G, Ickow I, Job J, Brooker JE, Dvoracek LA, Rigby E, Shah N, Chen W, Branstetter B, Schuster LA. Cone-beam computed tomography incidental findings in individuals with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(4):404–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665619897469.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kocsis, C., Sohns, J. M. S., Graf, I., Dreiseidler, T., Kreppel, M., Rothamel, D., ZInser, M., Sohns, H. C. S., Derlin, T., Braumann, B., Zoller, J. E., Ritter, L. Incidental findings on craniomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in orthodontic patients. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(2):149-162

23.

Pette GA, Norkin FJ, Ganeles J, Hardigan P, Lask E, Zfaz S, Parker W. Incidental findings from a retrospective study of 318 cone beam computed tomography consultation reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(3):595–603.PubMed

24.

Oser DG, Henson BR, Shiang EY, Finkelman MD, Amato RB. Incidental findings in small field of view cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod. 2017;43(6):901–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.033.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Togan B, Gander T, Lanzer M, Martin R, Lubbers HT. Incidence and frequency of nondental incidental findings on cone-beam computed tomography. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2019;44(9):1373–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.06.026.CrossRef

26.

Dief S, Veitz-Keenan A, Amintavakoli N, McGowan R (2019) A systematic review on incidental findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBOT) scans. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 48(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180396

27.

Edwards R, Altalibi M, Flores-Mir C. The frequency and nature of incidental findings in cone-beam computed tomographic scans of the head and neck region: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144(2):161–70. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0095.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Rogers AJ, Maher CO, Schunk JE, et al. Incidental findings in children with blunt head trauma evaluated with cranial CT scans. Pediatrics. 2013;132(2):e356–63. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0299.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Friedland B, Miles DA. Liabilities and risks of using cone beam computed tomography. Dent Clin North Am. 2014;58(3):671–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2014.04.005.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Noffke CE, Farman AG, Van der Linde A, Nel S. Responsible use of cone beam computed tomography: minimising medico-legal risks. SADJ. 2013;68(6):256–9.PubMed

31.

Monsarrat P, Galibourg A, Nasr K, Telmon N, Maret D. Incidental findings in dental radiology are concerning for family doctors. Open Med. 2019;14(1):467–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0050.CrossRef

32.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535, doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

33.

Drage N, Rogers S, Greenall C, Playle R. Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography in orthodontic patients. J Orthod. 2013;40(1):29–37. https://doi.org/10.1179/1465313312y.0000000027.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Nguyen PN, Kruger E, Huang T, Koong B. Incidental findings detected on cone beam computed tomography in an older population for pre-implant assessment. Aust Dent J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12777.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Jadu FM. Number and nature of incidental findings in cone-beam computed tomography made for oral surgery purposes. World J Dent. 2019;10(5):390–2. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1659.CrossRef

36.

Price JB, Thaw KL, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Padilla RJ. Incidental findings from cone beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region: a descriptive retrospective study. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2011;23(11):1261–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02299.x.CrossRef

37.

Doğramaci EJ, Rossi-Fedele G, McDonald F. Clinical importance of incidental findings reported on small-volume dental cone beam computed tomography scans focused on impacted maxillary canine teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;118(6):e205–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.09.006.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Barghan S, Tahmasbi Arashlow M, Nair MK. Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography studies outside of the maxillofacial skeleton. Int J Dent. 2016;2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9196503

39.

Lopes IA, Tucunduva RM, Handem RH, Capelozza AL. Study of the frequency and location of incidental findings of the maxillofacial region in different fields of view in CBCT scans. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2017;46(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160215.CrossRef

40.

Mutalik S, Rengasamy K, Tadinada A. Incidental findings based on anatomical location and clinical significance in CBCT scans of dental implant patients. Quintessence Int. 2018;49(5):419–26. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a40112.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Edwards R, Alsufyani N, Heo G, Flores-Mir C. Agreement among orthodontists experienced with cone-beam computed tomography on the need for follow-up and the clinical impact of craniofacial findings from multiplanar and 3-dimensional reconstructed views. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148(2):264–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.024.CrossRef

42.

Johnson PT, Horton KM, Megibow AJ, Jeffrey RB, Fishman EK. Common incidental findings on MDCT: survey of radiologist recommendations for patient management. J Am College Radiol. 2011;8(11):762–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2011.05.012.CrossRef

43.

Gaalaas SA. Survey of recommended referral patterns for incidental maxillary sinus and airway findings on CBCT analysis in an orthodontic population [M.S.]. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy; 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/190601.

44.

Nair PNR, Sjögren U, Figdor D, Sundqvist G. Persistent periapical radiolucencies of root-filled human teeth, failed endodontic treatments, and periapical scars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87(5):617–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70145-9.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Shahidi S, Salehi P, Abedi P, Dehbozorgi M, Hamedani S, Berahman N. Comparison of the bony changes of TMJ in patients with and without TMD complaints using CBCT. J Dent. 2018;19(2):142.

46.

Kiroǧlu Y, Çalli C, Karabulut N, Óncel Ç. Intracranial calcifications on CT. Diagnostic Interv Radiol. 2010;16(4):263–9. https://doi.org/10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.2626-09.1.CrossRef

47.

Tan DX, Xu B, Zhou X, Reiter RJ. Pineal calcification, melatonin production, aging, associated health consequences and rejuvenation of the pineal gland. Molecules. 2018;23(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020301

48.

Mahlberg R, Walther S, Kalus P, et al. Pineal calcification in Alzheimer’s disease: an in vivo study using computed tomography. Neurobiol Aging. 2008;29(2):203–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.10.003.CrossRefPubMed

49.

MacDonald D, Chan A, Harris A, Vertinsky T, Farman AG, Scarfe WC. Diagnosis and management of calcified carotid artery atheroma: dental perspectives. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114(4):533–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.06.020.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Friedlander AH, Liebeskind DS, Tran HQ, Mallya SM. What are the potential implications of identifying intracranial internal carotid artery atherosclerotic lesions on cone-beam computed tomography? A systematic review and illustrative case studies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(11):2167–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.06.437.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Schulze R, Friedlander AH. Cone beam CT incidental findings: intracranial carotid artery calcification–a cause for concern. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(10):20130347. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20130347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Powell DK (2014) Patient explanation guidelines for incidentalomas: Helping patients not to fear the delayed surveillance. Am J Roentgenol. 202(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.12337

53.

Ahmed F, Brooks SL, Kapila SD. Efficacy of identifying maxillofacial lesions in cone-beam computed tomographs by orthodontists and orthodontic residents with third-party software. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2012;141(4):451–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.10.025.CrossRef

54.

Cha J, Mah J, Sinclair P, Cha J-Y, Mah J, Sinclair P. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial area with 3-dimensional cone-beam imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.041.CrossRef

Title: Nature and clinical significance of incidental findings in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review
Authors: Hanadi M. Khalifa
Osama M. Felemban
Publication date: 01-10-2021
Publisher: Springer Singapore
Keywords: Computed Tomography
Computed Tomography
Published in: Oral Radiology / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0911-6028
Electronic ISSN: 1613-9674
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00499-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Nature and clinical significance of incidental findings in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review

Abstract

Objective

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objective

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Correction to: Superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy using altered blood flow compared to conventional systemic chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study

Superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy using altered blood flow compared to conventional systemic chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study

Magnetic resonance image biomarkers improve differentiation of benign and malignant parotid tumors through diagnostic model analysis

The relationship between COVID-19 and the dental damage stage determined by radiological examination

LRVRG: a local region-based variational region growing algorithm for fast mandible segmentation from CBCT images

Correction to: The relationship between COVID-19 and the dental damage stage determined by radiological examination