Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 8/2019

01-08-2019 | Prostatectomy | Urology - Original Paper

Index tumor volume on MRI as a predictor of clinical and pathologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy

Authors: Dordaneh Sugano, Abhinav Sidana, Amit L. Jain, Brian Calio, Sonia Gaur, Mahir Maruf, Maria Merino, Peter Choyke, Baris Turkbey, Bradford J. Wood, Peter A. Pinto

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Index tumor volume (ITV) measured on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens has been shown to be associated with adverse pathologic and oncologic outcomes. We evaluate the value of ITV calculated from prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in predicting adverse clinical and pathologic outcomes.

Materials and methods

Data from a prospectively maintained, single-institution database were analyzed for patients who underwent mpMRI prior to RP (2007–2016). Index tumor was defined as a T2-visible lesion with the longest diameter. Adverse pathologic outcomes were extraprostatic extension (EPE), lymph node invasion (LNI), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and positive margins (PM). Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to assess associations with adverse pathology and biochemical recurrence (BCR), respectively.

Results

Of the 455 patients included, EPE, LNI, SVI and PM were present in 23.5%, 6.2%, 5.5% and 15.7% patients, respectively. Patients with adverse pathologic outcomes had larger median ITV. ITV was found to be an independent predictor of EPE (OR 1.22, p = 0.010), LNI (OR 1.39, p = 0.001), and SVI (OR 1.28, p = 0.009), but not PM (OR 1.03, p = 0.522). Combination of ITV and PSA was found to have predictive ability comparable to that of modified Partin tables (EPE:ITV + PSAAUC = 0.71 vs. PartinAUC = 0.71; LNI:ITV + PSAAUC = 0.92 vs. PartinAUC = 0.90, SVI:ITV + PSAAUC = 0.78 vs. PartinAUC = 0.82). 5 year BCR-free survival (median follow-up 24.9 months) was higher for patients with ITV < 2 cc (84.1% vs. 58.5%, p = 0.001). However, ITV was not found to be an independent predictor of BCR (HR 1.69, p = 0.130).

Conclusions

We demonstrate that ITV measured on mpMRI is a predictor of adverse pathologic and clinical outcomes and can aid in preoperative risk assessment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Knoedler JJ, Karnes RJ, Thompson RH et al (2014) The association of tumor volume with mortality following radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 17:144–148CrossRefPubMed Knoedler JJ, Karnes RJ, Thompson RH et al (2014) The association of tumor volume with mortality following radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 17:144–148CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wysock JS, Mendhiratta N, Zattoni F et al (2016) Predictive value of negative 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on 12-core biopsy results. BJU Int 118:515–520CrossRefPubMed Wysock JS, Mendhiratta N, Zattoni F et al (2016) Predictive value of negative 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on 12-core biopsy results. BJU Int 118:515–520CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Villers A, Puech P, Mouton D et al (2006) Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. J Urol 176:2432–2437CrossRefPubMed Villers A, Puech P, Mouton D et al (2006) Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. J Urol 176:2432–2437CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Turkbey B, Pinto PA, Mani H et al (2010) Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection–histopathologic correlation. Radiology 255:89–99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Turkbey B, Pinto PA, Mani H et al (2010) Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection–histopathologic correlation. Radiology 255:89–99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL et al (2007) Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol 177:540–545CrossRefPubMed Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL et al (2007) Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol 177:540–545CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Meyer CP, Hansen J, Boehm K et al (2016) Tumor volume improves the long-term prediction of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer with positive surgical margins. World J Urol 35(2):199–206CrossRefPubMed Meyer CP, Hansen J, Boehm K et al (2016) Tumor volume improves the long-term prediction of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer with positive surgical margins. World J Urol 35(2):199–206CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Merrill MM, Lane BR, Reuther AM et al (2007) Tumor volume does not predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with surgical Gleason score 6 or less prostate cancer. Urology 70:294–298CrossRefPubMed Merrill MM, Lane BR, Reuther AM et al (2007) Tumor volume does not predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with surgical Gleason score 6 or less prostate cancer. Urology 70:294–298CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jung JW, Lee JK, Hong SK et al (2015) Stratification of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int 115:907–912CrossRefPubMed Jung JW, Lee JK, Hong SK et al (2015) Stratification of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int 115:907–912CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Beauval JB, Ploussard G, Cabarrou B et al (2016) Improved decision making in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a multicenter study on pathologic and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 35(8):1191–1197CrossRefPubMed Beauval JB, Ploussard G, Cabarrou B et al (2016) Improved decision making in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a multicenter study on pathologic and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 35(8):1191–1197CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Somford DM, Hamoen EH, Futterer JJ et al (2013) The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. J Urol 190:1728–1734CrossRefPubMed Somford DM, Hamoen EH, Futterer JJ et al (2013) The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. J Urol 190:1728–1734CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pelzer AE, Colleselli D, Bektic J et al (2008) Pathological features of Gleason score 6 prostate cancers in the low and intermediate range of prostate-specific antigen level: is there a difference? BJU Int 101:822–825CrossRefPubMed Pelzer AE, Colleselli D, Bektic J et al (2008) Pathological features of Gleason score 6 prostate cancers in the low and intermediate range of prostate-specific antigen level: is there a difference? BJU Int 101:822–825CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nakanishi H, Troncoso P, Babaian RJ (2008) Prediction of extraprostatic extension in men with biopsy Gleason score of 8 or greater. J Urol 180:2441–2445 (discussion 2445-6) CrossRefPubMed Nakanishi H, Troncoso P, Babaian RJ (2008) Prediction of extraprostatic extension in men with biopsy Gleason score of 8 or greater. J Urol 180:2441–2445 (discussion 2445-6) CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chun FK, Briganti A, Jeldres C et al (2007) Tumour volume and high grade tumour volume are the best predictors of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Cancer 43:536–543CrossRefPubMed Chun FK, Briganti A, Jeldres C et al (2007) Tumour volume and high grade tumour volume are the best predictors of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Cancer 43:536–543CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kongnyuy M, Sidana A, George AK et al (2017) Tumor contact with prostate capsule on magnetic resonance imaging: a potential biomarker for staging and prognosis. Urol Oncol 35:30.e1–30.e8CrossRef Kongnyuy M, Sidana A, George AK et al (2017) Tumor contact with prostate capsule on magnetic resonance imaging: a potential biomarker for staging and prognosis. Urol Oncol 35:30.e1–30.e8CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Abdollah F, Abdo A, Sun M et al (2013) Pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: adherence and accuracy of the recent guidelines. Int J Urol 20:405–410CrossRefPubMed Abdollah F, Abdo A, Sun M et al (2013) Pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: adherence and accuracy of the recent guidelines. Int J Urol 20:405–410CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Briganti A, Gallina A, Nazareno S et al (2013) 374 External validation of the eau guidelines for pelvic lymph node dissection among patients treated with robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol 189:e151–e152 Briganti A, Gallina A, Nazareno S et al (2013) 374 External validation of the eau guidelines for pelvic lymph node dissection among patients treated with robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol 189:e151–e152
19.
go back to reference Yossepowitch O, Briganti A, Eastham JA et al (2014) Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update. Eur Urol 65:303–313CrossRefPubMed Yossepowitch O, Briganti A, Eastham JA et al (2014) Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update. Eur Urol 65:303–313CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Crispen PL et al (2010) The impact of positive surgical margins on mortality following radical prostatectomy during the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 183:1003–1009CrossRefPubMed Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Crispen PL et al (2010) The impact of positive surgical margins on mortality following radical prostatectomy during the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 183:1003–1009CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Chalfin HJ, Dinizo M, Trock BJ et al (2012) Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality. BJU Int 110:1684–1689CrossRefPubMed Chalfin HJ, Dinizo M, Trock BJ et al (2012) Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality. BJU Int 110:1684–1689CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Preston MA, Blute ML (2014) Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: does it matter? Eur Urol 65:314–315CrossRefPubMed Preston MA, Blute ML (2014) Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: does it matter? Eur Urol 65:314–315CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:382–404CrossRefPubMed Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:382–404CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ho R, Siddiqui MM, George AK et al (2016) Preoperative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy. PLoS One 11:e0157313CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ho R, Siddiqui MM, George AK et al (2016) Preoperative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy. PLoS One 11:e0157313CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Meng Y, Li H, Xu P et al (2015) Do tumor volume, percent tumor volume predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy? A meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:22319–22327PubMedPubMedCentral Meng Y, Li H, Xu P et al (2015) Do tumor volume, percent tumor volume predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy? A meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:22319–22327PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Bhindi B, Mamdani M, Kulkarni GS et al (2015) Impact of the U.S. preventive services task force recommendations against prostate specific antigen screening on prostate biopsy and cancer detection rates. J Urol 193:1519–1524CrossRefPubMed Bhindi B, Mamdani M, Kulkarni GS et al (2015) Impact of the U.S. preventive services task force recommendations against prostate specific antigen screening on prostate biopsy and cancer detection rates. J Urol 193:1519–1524CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Banerji JS, Wolff EM, Massman JD et al (2016) Prostate needle biopsy outcomes in the Era of the U.S. preventive services task force recommendation against prostate specific antigen based screening. J Urol 195:66–73CrossRefPubMed Banerji JS, Wolff EM, Massman JD et al (2016) Prostate needle biopsy outcomes in the Era of the U.S. preventive services task force recommendation against prostate specific antigen based screening. J Urol 195:66–73CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Klotz L, Vesprini D, Sethukavalan P et al (2015) Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 33:272–277CrossRefPubMed Klotz L, Vesprini D, Sethukavalan P et al (2015) Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 33:272–277CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Index tumor volume on MRI as a predictor of clinical and pathologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy
Authors
Dordaneh Sugano
Abhinav Sidana
Amit L. Jain
Brian Calio
Sonia Gaur
Mahir Maruf
Maria Merino
Peter Choyke
Baris Turkbey
Bradford J. Wood
Peter A. Pinto
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02168-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

International Urology and Nephrology 8/2019 Go to the issue