Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Nephrology - Original Paper

The carbon footprints of home and in-center peritoneal dialysis in China

Authors: Mindong Chen, Rong Zhou, Chongbo Du, Fulei Meng, Yanli Wang, Liping Wu, Fang Wang, Yahong Xu, Xiufen Yang

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The provision of healthcare itself is associated with abundant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study aims to determine the carbon footprints of peritoneal dialysis (PD) with the different modalities and treatment regimes.

Methods

A total of 68 subjects performed with PD treatment were enrolled in this study. Emissions factors were applied to data that were collected for energy consumption, travel, and procurement.

Results

The carbon footprints generated by the provision of PD treatment for the individual patient were calculated and normalized to a 2-l PD dialysate volume. The fixed emissions were higher in patients who received PD therapy in center than at home, mostly attributing to the consumption of electricity. Conversely, PD treatment performed in center yielded less variable emissions than that of at home, which resulted from reduced constituent percentage of waste disposal and transportation. Collectively, packaging consumption mostly contributed to the total carbon footprints of PD.

Conclusion

This study for the first time demonstrates the delivery of PD is associated with considerable GHG emissions, which is mainly attributed to packaging materials, transportation, electricity, and waste disposal. These results suggest that carbon reduction strategies focusing on packaging consumption in PD treatment are likely to yield the greatest benefits.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, Ball S, Bell S, Bellamy R et al (2009) Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Lancet 373(9676):1693–1733CrossRefPubMed Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, Ball S, Bell S, Bellamy R et al (2009) Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Lancet 373(9676):1693–1733CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Liu X, Zhang Y, Han W, Tang A, Shen J, Cui Z et al (2013) Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 494(7438):459–462CrossRefPubMed Liu X, Zhang Y, Han W, Tang A, Shen J, Cui Z et al (2013) Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 494(7438):459–462CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Markandya A, Armstrong BG, Hales S, Chiabai A, Criqui P, Mima S et al (2009) Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: low-carbon electricity generation. Lancet 374(9706):2006–2015CrossRefPubMed Markandya A, Armstrong BG, Hales S, Chiabai A, Criqui P, Mima S et al (2009) Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: low-carbon electricity generation. Lancet 374(9706):2006–2015CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Baillie J (2012) Surveys show support for green ‘activities’. Health Estate 66(3):17–20 Baillie J (2012) Surveys show support for green ‘activities’. Health Estate 66(3):17–20
5.
go back to reference McGain F (2010) Sustainable hospitals? An Australian perspective. Perspect Public Health 130(1):19–20CrossRefPubMed McGain F (2010) Sustainable hospitals? An Australian perspective. Perspect Public Health 130(1):19–20CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Connor A, Lillywhite R, Cooke MW (2011) The carbon footprints of home and in-center maintenance hemodialysis in the United Kingdom. Hemodial Int 15(1):39–51CrossRefPubMed Connor A, Lillywhite R, Cooke MW (2011) The carbon footprints of home and in-center maintenance hemodialysis in the United Kingdom. Hemodial Int 15(1):39–51CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Agar JW (2012) Personal viewpoint: hemodialysis–water, power, and waste disposal: rethinking our environmental responsibilities. Hemodial Int 16(1):6–10PubMed Agar JW (2012) Personal viewpoint: hemodialysis–water, power, and waste disposal: rethinking our environmental responsibilities. Hemodial Int 16(1):6–10PubMed
10.
go back to reference Sinnakirouchenan R, Holley JL (2011) Peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis: risks, benefits, and access issues. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 18(6):428–432CrossRefPubMed Sinnakirouchenan R, Holley JL (2011) Peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis: risks, benefits, and access issues. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 18(6):428–432CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Li PK, Chow KM (2013) Peritoneal dialysis-first policy made successful: perspectives and actions. Am J Kidney Dis 62(5):993–1005CrossRefPubMed Li PK, Chow KM (2013) Peritoneal dialysis-first policy made successful: perspectives and actions. Am J Kidney Dis 62(5):993–1005CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Berger A, Edelsberg J, Inglese GW, Bhattacharyya SK, Oster G (2009) Cost comparison of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease. Am J Manag Care 15(8):509–518PubMed Berger A, Edelsberg J, Inglese GW, Bhattacharyya SK, Oster G (2009) Cost comparison of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease. Am J Manag Care 15(8):509–518PubMed
13.
go back to reference Baboolal K, McEwan P, Sondhi S, Spiewanowski P, Wechowski J, Wilson K (2008) The cost of renal dialysis in a UK setting—a multicentre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23(6):1982–1989CrossRefPubMed Baboolal K, McEwan P, Sondhi S, Spiewanowski P, Wechowski J, Wilson K (2008) The cost of renal dialysis in a UK setting—a multicentre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23(6):1982–1989CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lee H, Manns B, Taub K, Ghali WA, Dean S, Johnson D et al (2002) Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. Am J Kidney Dis 40(3):611–622CrossRefPubMed Lee H, Manns B, Taub K, Ghali WA, Dean S, Johnson D et al (2002) Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. Am J Kidney Dis 40(3):611–622CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Yanming J (2011) The provincial power industry carbon emissions situation and trend analysis in China. Electr Power Technol Econ 10(23):56–60 Yanming J (2011) The provincial power industry carbon emissions situation and trend analysis in China. Electr Power Technol Econ 10(23):56–60
20.
go back to reference Morris DS, Wright T, Somner JE, Connor A (2013) The carbon footprint of cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 27(4):495–501CrossRef Morris DS, Wright T, Somner JE, Connor A (2013) The carbon footprint of cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 27(4):495–501CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Venkatesh R, van Landingham SW, Khodifad AM, Haripriya A, Thiel CL, Ramulu P et al (2016) Carbon footprint and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 27(1):82–88CrossRefPubMed Venkatesh R, van Landingham SW, Khodifad AM, Haripriya A, Thiel CL, Ramulu P et al (2016) Carbon footprint and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 27(1):82–88CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Pollard AS, Taylor TJ, Fleming LE, Stahl-Timmins W, Depledge MH, Osborne NJ (2013) Mainstreaming carbon management in healthcare systems: a bottom-up modeling approach. Environ Sci Technol 47(2):678–686CrossRefPubMed Pollard AS, Taylor TJ, Fleming LE, Stahl-Timmins W, Depledge MH, Osborne NJ (2013) Mainstreaming carbon management in healthcare systems: a bottom-up modeling approach. Environ Sci Technol 47(2):678–686CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Connor A, Lillywhite R, Cooke MW (2010) The carbon footprint of a renal service in the United Kingdom. QJM 103(12):965–975CrossRefPubMed Connor A, Lillywhite R, Cooke MW (2010) The carbon footprint of a renal service in the United Kingdom. QJM 103(12):965–975CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference DiConsiglio J (2008) Reprocessing SUDs reduces waste, costs. Mater Manag Health Care 17(9):40–42PubMed DiConsiglio J (2008) Reprocessing SUDs reduces waste, costs. Mater Manag Health Care 17(9):40–42PubMed
26.
go back to reference Hawkes N (2012) Cutting emissions by drug industry is crucial to reducing NHS’s carbon footprint. BMJ 345:e8243CrossRefPubMed Hawkes N (2012) Cutting emissions by drug industry is crucial to reducing NHS’s carbon footprint. BMJ 345:e8243CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Woods DL, McAndrew T, Nevadunsky N, Hou JY, Goldberg G, Yi-Shin Kuo D et al (2015) Carbon footprint of robotically-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy: a comparison. Int J Med Robot 11(4):406–412CrossRefPubMed Woods DL, McAndrew T, Nevadunsky N, Hou JY, Goldberg G, Yi-Shin Kuo D et al (2015) Carbon footprint of robotically-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy: a comparison. Int J Med Robot 11(4):406–412CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Lee BK, Ellenbecker MJ, Moure-Eraso R (2002) Analyses of the recycling potential of medical plastic wastes. Waste Manag 22(5):461–470CrossRefPubMed Lee BK, Ellenbecker MJ, Moure-Eraso R (2002) Analyses of the recycling potential of medical plastic wastes. Waste Manag 22(5):461–470CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lenzen M (2008) Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: a review. Energy Convers Manag 49(8):2178–2199CrossRef Lenzen M (2008) Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: a review. Energy Convers Manag 49(8):2178–2199CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The carbon footprints of home and in-center peritoneal dialysis in China
Authors
Mindong Chen
Rong Zhou
Chongbo Du
Fulei Meng
Yanli Wang
Liping Wu
Fang Wang
Yahong Xu
Xiufen Yang
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1418-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

International Urology and Nephrology 2/2017 Go to the issue