Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 7/2016

Open Access 01-07-2016 | Urology - Original Paper

MR-targeted TRUS prostate biopsy using local reference augmentation: initial experience

Authors: Wendy J. M. van de Ven, Wulphert Venderink, J. P. Michiel Sedelaar, Jeroen Veltman, Jelle O. Barentsz, Jurgen J. Fütterer, Erik B. Cornel, Henkjan J. Huisman

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate MR-targeted TRUS prostate biopsy using a novel local reference augmentation method.

Patients and methods

Tracker-based MR–TRUS fusion was applied using local reference augmentation. In contrast to conventional whole gland fusion, local reference augmentation focuses the highest registration accuracy to the region surrounding the lesion to be biopsied. Pre-acquired multi-parametric MR images (mpMRI) were evaluated using PIRADS classification. T2-weighted MR images were imported on an ultrasound machine to allow for MR–TRUS fusion. Biopsies were targeted to the most suspicious lesion area identified on mpMRI. Each target was biopsied 1–5 times. For each biopsied lesion the diameter, PIRADS and Gleason scores, visibility during fusion, and representativeness were recorded.

Results

Included were 23 consecutive patients with 25 MR suspicious lesions, of which 11 patients had a previous negative TRUS-guided biopsy and 12 were biopsy naïve. The cancer detection rate was 64 % (Gleason score ≥6). Biopsy was negative (i.e., no Gleason score) in seven patients confirmed by follow-up in all of them (up to 18 months). After MR–TRUS fusion, 88 % of the lesions could be visualized on TRUS. The cancer detection rate increases with increasing lesion size, being 73 % for lesions larger than 10 mm.

Conclusion

Tracker-based MR–TRUS fusion biopsy with local reference augmentation is feasible, especially for lesions with an MR maximum diameter of at least 10 mm or PIRADS 5 lesions. If this is not the case, we recommend in-bore MR-guided biopsy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ukimura O, Coleman JA, de la Taille A, Emberton M, Epstein JI, Freedland SJ, Giannarini G, Kibel AS, Montironi R, Ploussard G, Roobol MJ, Scattoni V, Jones JS (2013) Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care. Eur Urol 63:214–230CrossRefPubMed Ukimura O, Coleman JA, de la Taille A, Emberton M, Epstein JI, Freedland SJ, Giannarini G, Kibel AS, Montironi R, Ploussard G, Roobol MJ, Scattoni V, Jones JS (2013) Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care. Eur Urol 63:214–230CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparén P, Norlén BJ, Busch C (1997) The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 50:562–566CrossRefPubMed Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparén P, Norlén BJ, Busch C (1997) The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 50:562–566CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Roehl KA, Antenor JAV, Catalona WJ (2002) Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study. J Urol 167:2435–2439CrossRefPubMed Roehl KA, Antenor JAV, Catalona WJ (2002) Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study. J Urol 167:2435–2439CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Terris MK (1999) Sensitivity and specificity of sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: preliminary report. Urology 54:486–489CrossRefPubMed Terris MK (1999) Sensitivity and specificity of sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: preliminary report. Urology 54:486–489CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hambrock T, Hoeks C, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Scheenen T, Fütterer J, Bouwense S, van Oort I, Schröder F, Huisman H, Barentsz J (2012) Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort. Eur Urol 61:177–184CrossRefPubMed Hambrock T, Hoeks C, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Scheenen T, Fütterer J, Bouwense S, van Oort I, Schröder F, Huisman H, Barentsz J (2012) Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort. Eur Urol 61:177–184CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kvåle R, Møller B, Wahlqvist R, Fossa SD, Berner A, Busch C, Kyrdalen AE, Svindland A, Viset T, Halvorsen OJ (2009) Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study. Br J Urol Int 103:1647–1654CrossRef Kvåle R, Møller B, Wahlqvist R, Fossa SD, Berner A, Busch C, Kyrdalen AE, Svindland A, Viset T, Halvorsen OJ (2009) Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study. Br J Urol Int 103:1647–1654CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rajinikanth A, Manoharan M, Soloway CT, Civantos FJ, Soloway MS (2008) Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years. Urology 72:177–182CrossRefPubMed Rajinikanth A, Manoharan M, Soloway CT, Civantos FJ, Soloway MS (2008) Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years. Urology 72:177–182CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ehdaie B, Vertosick E, Spaliviero M, Giallo-Uvino A, Taur Y, O’Sullivan M, Livingston J, Eastham J, Scardino P, Touijer K (2014) The impact of repeat biopsies on infectious complications in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. J Urol 191:660–664CrossRefPubMed Ehdaie B, Vertosick E, Spaliviero M, Giallo-Uvino A, Taur Y, O’Sullivan M, Livingston J, Eastham J, Scardino P, Touijer K (2014) The impact of repeat biopsies on infectious complications in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. J Urol 191:660–664CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kitajima K, Kaji Y, Fukabori Y, Yoshida K, Suganuma N, Sugimura K (2010) Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:625–631CrossRefPubMed Kitajima K, Kaji Y, Fukabori Y, Yoshida K, Suganuma N, Sugimura K (2010) Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:625–631CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tanimoto A, Nakashima J, Kohno H, Shinmoto H, Kuribayashi S (2007) Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:146–152CrossRefPubMed Tanimoto A, Nakashima J, Kohno H, Shinmoto H, Kuribayashi S (2007) Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:146–152CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pokorny MR, de Rooij M, Duncan E, Schröder FH, Parkinson R, Barentsz JO, Thompson LC (2014) Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 66:22–29CrossRefPubMed Pokorny MR, de Rooij M, Duncan E, Schröder FH, Parkinson R, Barentsz JO, Thompson LC (2014) Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 66:22–29CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hu Y, Ahmed HU, Taylor Z, Allen C, Emberton M, Hawkes D, Barratt D (2012) MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions. Med Image Anal 16:687–703CrossRefPubMed Hu Y, Ahmed HU, Taylor Z, Allen C, Emberton M, Hawkes D, Barratt D (2012) MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions. Med Image Anal 16:687–703CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kaplan I, Oldenburg NE, Meskell P, Blake M, Church P, Holupka EJ (2002) Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. Magn Reson Imaging 20:295–299CrossRefPubMed Kaplan I, Oldenburg NE, Meskell P, Blake M, Church P, Holupka EJ (2002) Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. Magn Reson Imaging 20:295–299CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ukimura O, Hirahara N, Fujihara A, Yamada T, Iwata T, Kamoi K, Okihara K, Ito H, Nishimura T, Miki T (2010) Technique for a hybrid system of real-time transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy. Int J Urol 17:890–893CrossRefPubMed Ukimura O, Hirahara N, Fujihara A, Yamada T, Iwata T, Kamoi K, Okihara K, Ito H, Nishimura T, Miki T (2010) Technique for a hybrid system of real-time transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy. Int J Urol 17:890–893CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference van de Ven WJM, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Hambrock T, Barentsz JO, Huisman HJ (2013) Simulated required accuracy of image registration tools for targeting high-grade cancer components with prostate biopsies. Eur Radiol 23:1401–1407CrossRefPubMed van de Ven WJM, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Hambrock T, Barentsz JO, Huisman HJ (2013) Simulated required accuracy of image registration tools for targeting high-grade cancer components with prostate biopsies. Eur Radiol 23:1401–1407CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Singh AK, Kruecker J, Xu S, Glossop N, Guion P, Ullman K, Choyke PL, Wood BJ (2008) Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy. Br J Urol Int 101:841–845CrossRef Singh AK, Kruecker J, Xu S, Glossop N, Guion P, Ullman K, Choyke PL, Wood BJ (2008) Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy. Br J Urol Int 101:841–845CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Martin PR, Cool DW, Romagnoli C, Fenster A, Ward AD (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis. Med Phys 41:073504CrossRefPubMed Martin PR, Cool DW, Romagnoli C, Fenster A, Ward AD (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis. Med Phys 41:073504CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Delongchamps NB, Peyromaure M, Schull A, Beuvon F, Bouazza N, Flam T, Zerbib M, Muradyan N, Legman P, Cornud F (2013) Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies. J Urol 189:493–499CrossRefPubMed Delongchamps NB, Peyromaure M, Schull A, Beuvon F, Bouazza N, Flam T, Zerbib M, Muradyan N, Legman P, Cornud F (2013) Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies. J Urol 189:493–499CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Puech P, Rouvière O, Renard-Penna R, Villers A, Devos P, Colombel M, Bitker M-O, Leroy X, Mège-Lechevallier F, Comperat E, Ouzzane A, Lemaitre L (2013) Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US–MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy—prospective multicenter study. Radiology 268:461–469CrossRefPubMed Puech P, Rouvière O, Renard-Penna R, Villers A, Devos P, Colombel M, Bitker M-O, Leroy X, Mège-Lechevallier F, Comperat E, Ouzzane A, Lemaitre L (2013) Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US–MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy—prospective multicenter study. Radiology 268:461–469CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference van de Ven WJM, Rinsma S, Karssemeijer N, Barentsz JO, Huisman HJ (2014) Electro-magnetic tracker-based fusion for image-guided TRUS prostate biopsy. In: European congress of radiology van de Ven WJM, Rinsma S, Karssemeijer N, Barentsz JO, Huisman HJ (2014) Electro-magnetic tracker-based fusion for image-guided TRUS prostate biopsy. In: European congress of radiology
21.
go back to reference van de Ven WJM, Sedelaar JPM, Fütterer JJ, Huisman HJ (2014) Focally targeted magnetic resonance imaging guided transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate with an ultrasound machine that has electromagnetic tracking fusion. In: Annual meeting of the radiological society of North America van de Ven WJM, Sedelaar JPM, Fütterer JJ, Huisman HJ (2014) Focally targeted magnetic resonance imaging guided transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate with an ultrasound machine that has electromagnetic tracking fusion. In: Annual meeting of the radiological society of North America
22.
go back to reference Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouvière O, Logager V, Fütterer JJ, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:746–757CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouvière O, Logager V, Fütterer JJ, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:746–757CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Huisman H, Vos P (2010) MRCAD for daily clinical analysis of prostate MR. Kitware Source 13:14–15 Huisman H, Vos P (2010) MRCAD for daily clinical analysis of prostate MR. Kitware Source 13:14–15
24.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Amin MB, Egevad LL, Grading ISUP, ISUP Grading Committee (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Amin MB, Egevad LL, Grading ISUP, ISUP Grading Committee (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Truong H, Stamatakis L, Vourganti S, Nix J, Hoang AN, Walton-Diaz A, Shuch B, Weintraub M, Kruecker J, Amalou H, Turkbey B, Merino MJ, Choyke PL, Wood BJ, Pinto PA (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. Eur Urol 64:713–719CrossRefPubMed Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Truong H, Stamatakis L, Vourganti S, Nix J, Hoang AN, Walton-Diaz A, Shuch B, Weintraub M, Kruecker J, Amalou H, Turkbey B, Merino MJ, Choyke PL, Wood BJ, Pinto PA (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. Eur Urol 64:713–719CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ, Macairan M, Lieu P, Huang J, Dorey FJ, Reiter RE, Marks LS (2013) Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol 65:809–815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ, Macairan M, Lieu P, Huang J, Dorey FJ, Reiter RE, Marks LS (2013) Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol 65:809–815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Ukimura O, Marien A, Palmer S, Villers A, Aron M, de Castro Abreu AL, Leslie S, Shoji S, Matsugasumi T, Gross M, Dasgupta P, Gill IS (2015) Trans-rectal ultrasound visibility of prostate lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging increases accuracy of image-fusion targeted biopsies. World J Urol 33(11):1669–1676CrossRefPubMed Ukimura O, Marien A, Palmer S, Villers A, Aron M, de Castro Abreu AL, Leslie S, Shoji S, Matsugasumi T, Gross M, Dasgupta P, Gill IS (2015) Trans-rectal ultrasound visibility of prostate lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging increases accuracy of image-fusion targeted biopsies. World J Urol 33(11):1669–1676CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
MR-targeted TRUS prostate biopsy using local reference augmentation: initial experience
Authors
Wendy J. M. van de Ven
Wulphert Venderink
J. P. Michiel Sedelaar
Jeroen Veltman
Jelle O. Barentsz
Jurgen J. Fütterer
Erik B. Cornel
Henkjan J. Huisman
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1283-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

International Urology and Nephrology 7/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.