Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Original Article

Trans-rectal ultrasound visibility of prostate lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging increases accuracy of image-fusion targeted biopsies

Authors: Osamu Ukimura, Arnaud Marien, Suzanne Palmer, Arnauld Villers, Manju Aron, Andre Luis de Castro Abreu, Scott Leslie, Sunao Shoji, Toru Matsugasumi, Mitchell Gross, Prokar Dasgupta, Inderbir S. Gill

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic yield of targeted prostate biopsy using image-fusion of multi-parametric magnetic resonance (mp-MR) with real-time trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) for clinically significant lesions that are suspicious only on mp-MR versus lesions that are suspicious on both mp-MR and TRUS.

Methods

Pre-biopsy MRI and TRUS were each scaled on a 3-point score: highly suspicious, likely, and unlikely for clinically significant cancer (sPCa). Using an MR-TRUS elastic image-fusion system (Koelis), a 127 consecutive patients with a suspicious clinically significant index lesion on pre-biopsy mp-MR underwent systematic biopsies and MR/US-fusion targeted biopsies (01/2010–09/2013). Biopsy histological outcomes were retrospectively compared with MR suspicion level and TRUS-visibility of the MR-suspicious lesion. sPCa was defined as biopsy Gleason score ≥7 and/or maximum cancer core length ≥5 mm.

Results

Targeted biopsies outperformed systematic biopsies in overall cancer detection rate (61 vs. 41 %; p = 0.007), sPCa detection rate (43 vs. 23 %; p = 0.0013), cancer core length (7.5 vs. 3.9 mm; p = 0.0002), and cancer rate per core (56 vs. 12 %; p < 0.0001), respectively. Highly suspicious lesions on mp-MR correlated with higher positive biopsy rate (p < 0.0001), higher Gleason score (p = 0.018), and greater cancer core length (p < 0.0001). Highly suspicious lesions on TRUS in corresponding to MR-suspicious lesion had a higher biopsy yield (p < 0.0001) and higher sPCa detection rate (p < 0.0001). Since majority of MR-suspicious lesions were also suspicious on TRUS, TRUS-visibility allowed selection of the specific MR-visible lesion which should be targeted from among the multiple TRUS suspicious lesions in each prostate.

Conclusions

MR-TRUS fusion-image-guided biopsies outperformed systematic biopsies. TRUS-visibility of a MR-suspicious lesion facilitates image-guided biopsies, resulting in higher detection of significant cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ukimura O, Coleman JA, de la Taille A et al (2013) Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care. Eur Urol 63:214–230CrossRefPubMed Ukimura O, Coleman JA, de la Taille A et al (2013) Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care. Eur Urol 63:214–230CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jeong IG, Lim JH, Hwang SS et al (2013) Nomogram using transrectal ultrasound-derived information predicting the detection of high grade prostate cancer on initial biopsy. Prostate Int. 1:69–75PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jeong IG, Lim JH, Hwang SS et al (2013) Nomogram using transrectal ultrasound-derived information predicting the detection of high grade prostate cancer on initial biopsy. Prostate Int. 1:69–75PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ukimura O, Abreu AL, Gill IS, Shoji S, Hung AJ, Bahn D (2013) Image-visibility of cancer to enhance targeting precision and spatial mapping biopsy for focal therapy of prostate cancer. BJU Int 111:E354–E364CrossRefPubMed Ukimura O, Abreu AL, Gill IS, Shoji S, Hung AJ, Bahn D (2013) Image-visibility of cancer to enhance targeting precision and spatial mapping biopsy for focal therapy of prostate cancer. BJU Int 111:E354–E364CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Smeenge M, Barentsz J, Cosgrove D et al (2012) Role of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in focal therapy of prostate cancer: report from a Consensus Panel. BJU Int 110:942–948CrossRefPubMed Smeenge M, Barentsz J, Cosgrove D et al (2012) Role of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in focal therapy of prostate cancer: report from a Consensus Panel. BJU Int 110:942–948CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kasivisvanathan V, Dufour R, Moore CM et al (2013) Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. J Urol 189:860–866CrossRefPubMed Kasivisvanathan V, Dufour R, Moore CM et al (2013) Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. J Urol 189:860–866CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wysock JS, Rosenkrantz AB, Huang WC et al (2014) A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of mr-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial. Eur Urol 66:343–351CrossRefPubMed Wysock JS, Rosenkrantz AB, Huang WC et al (2014) A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of mr-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial. Eur Urol 66:343–351CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S et al (2014) Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol 65:809–815PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S et al (2014) Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol 65:809–815PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Truong H et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. Eur Urol 64:713–719CrossRefPubMed Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Truong H et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. Eur Urol 64:713–719CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kuru TH, Roethke MC, Seidenader J et al (2013) Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 190:1380–1386CrossRefPubMed Kuru TH, Roethke MC, Seidenader J et al (2013) Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 190:1380–1386CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pokorny MR, de Rooij M, Duncan E et al (2014) Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 66:22–29CrossRefPubMed Pokorny MR, de Rooij M, Duncan E et al (2014) Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 66:22–29CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ukimura O, Desai MM, Palmer S et al (2012) 3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion. J Urol 187:1080–1086CrossRefPubMed Ukimura O, Desai MM, Palmer S et al (2012) 3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion. J Urol 187:1080–1086CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Delongchamps NB, Peyromaure M, Schull A et al (2013) Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies. J Urol 189:493–499CrossRefPubMed Delongchamps NB, Peyromaure M, Schull A et al (2013) Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies. J Urol 189:493–499CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Baco E, Ukimura O, Rud E et al (2014) MRI-TRUS image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients. Eur Urol (in press) Baco E, Ukimura O, Rud E et al (2014) MRI-TRUS image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients. Eur Urol (in press)
14.
go back to reference Ukimura O, Gross ME, Abreu ALC et al (2015) A novel technique using three-dimensionally documented biopsy mapping allows precise re-visiting of prostate cancer foci with serial surveillance of cell cycle progression gene panel. Prostate (in press) Ukimura O, Gross ME, Abreu ALC et al (2015) A novel technique using three-dimensionally documented biopsy mapping allows precise re-visiting of prostate cancer foci with serial surveillance of cell cycle progression gene panel. Prostate (in press)
15.
go back to reference Ahmed HU, Hu Y, Carter T et al (2011) Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy. J Urol 186:458–464CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU, Hu Y, Carter T et al (2011) Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy. J Urol 186:458–464CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, Eggener S et al (2013) Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an international working group. Eur Urol 64:544–552CrossRefPubMed Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, Eggener S et al (2013) Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an international working group. Eur Urol 64:544–552CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Portalez D, Mozer P, Cornud F et al (2012) Validation of the european society of urogenital radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients. Eur Urol 62:986–996CrossRefPubMed Portalez D, Mozer P, Cornud F et al (2012) Validation of the european society of urogenital radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients. Eur Urol 62:986–996CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Trans-rectal ultrasound visibility of prostate lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging increases accuracy of image-fusion targeted biopsies
Authors
Osamu Ukimura
Arnaud Marien
Suzanne Palmer
Arnauld Villers
Manju Aron
Andre Luis de Castro Abreu
Scott Leslie
Sunao Shoji
Toru Matsugasumi
Mitchell Gross
Prokar Dasgupta
Inderbir S. Gill
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1501-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

World Journal of Urology 11/2015 Go to the issue