Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 3/2010

01-09-2010 | Nephrology – Original Paper

Dialysis modality choices among chronic kidney disease patients: identifying the gaps to support patients on home-based therapies

Authors: Ai-Hua Zhang, Joanne M. Bargman, Charmaine E. Lok, Eveline Porter, Maria Mendez, Dimitrios G. Oreopoulos, Christopher T. Chan

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Home dialysis is a cost-effective renal replacement strategy, which provides improved quality of life compared to conventional in-center hemodialysis (CHD). To date, most studies support the use of multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinics to facilitate timely initiation of dialysis. This is an observational cohort study examining 486 patients with CKD over the period of 2001–2007 to ascertain potential demographic differences among patients transitioned to in-center versus home dialysis.

Subjects and methods

From January 2001 to December 2007, 486 patients with CKD attended the multidisciplinary renal management clinic at the University Health Network in Toronto.

Results

One hundred and fifty-three of the 486 patients were initiated on renal replacement therapy [59 to center hemodialysis (CHD), 15 to home hemodialysis (HHD) and 79 to home peritoneal dialysis (PD)]. HHD patients were younger (48 ± 15 years) than those who selected CHD (62 ± 16 years) or PD (64 ± 16 years). Although the gender distribution was similar overall, the percentage of single males was higher in CHD versus home dialysis patients (29 vs. 15%, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other demographic, clinical and biochemical parameters at the time of dialysis initiation. Disinterest in home dialysis by patients and their families (25.4%) and lack of social support (12.1%) constituted the main barriers to home dialysis. Medical contraindications for home dialysis were present among 11% of the patients. Other less frequent barriers were inadequate space, communication barrier and inability to perform their own dialysis.

Conclusions

Sixty-one percent of patients requiring dialysis chose a home dialysis modality. Patients’ and their families’ disinterest in home dialysis and lack of support (either perceived or actual) represented the major overall barriers to adoption of home dialysis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rubin HR, Fink NE, Plantinga LC et al (2004) Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis. JAMA 291:697–703CrossRefPubMed Rubin HR, Fink NE, Plantinga LC et al (2004) Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis. JAMA 291:697–703CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Foley RN, Collins AJ (2007) End-stage renal disease in the United States: an update from the United States Renal Data System. J Am Soc Nephrol 18:2644–2648CrossRefPubMed Foley RN, Collins AJ (2007) End-stage renal disease in the United States: an update from the United States Renal Data System. J Am Soc Nephrol 18:2644–2648CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Li PK, Lui SL, Leung CB et al (2007) Increased utilization of peritoneal dialysis to cope with mounting demand for renal replacement therapy—perspectives from Asian countries. Perit Dial Int 27(Suppl 2):S59–S61PubMed Li PK, Lui SL, Leung CB et al (2007) Increased utilization of peritoneal dialysis to cope with mounting demand for renal replacement therapy—perspectives from Asian countries. Perit Dial Int 27(Suppl 2):S59–S61PubMed
4.
go back to reference Mcgregor MS, Agar JW, Blagg CR (2006) Home hemodialysis international trends and variation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:1934–1945CrossRef Mcgregor MS, Agar JW, Blagg CR (2006) Home hemodialysis international trends and variation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:1934–1945CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mendelssohn DC, Mujais SK, Soroka SD et al (2009) A prospective evaluation of renal replacement therapy modality eligibility. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24(2):555–561CrossRefPubMed Mendelssohn DC, Mujais SK, Soroka SD et al (2009) A prospective evaluation of renal replacement therapy modality eligibility. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24(2):555–561CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mendelssohn DC, Pierratos A (2002) Reformulating the integrated care concept for the new millennium. Perit Dial Int 22:5–8PubMed Mendelssohn DC, Pierratos A (2002) Reformulating the integrated care concept for the new millennium. Perit Dial Int 22:5–8PubMed
7.
go back to reference Bernardini J, Price V, Figueiredo A et al (2006) International survey of peritoneal dialysis training programs. Perit Dial Int 26:658–663PubMed Bernardini J, Price V, Figueiredo A et al (2006) International survey of peritoneal dialysis training programs. Perit Dial Int 26:658–663PubMed
8.
go back to reference Levin A, Lewis M, Mortiboy P et al (1997) Multidisciplinary predialysis programs: quantification and limitations of their impact on patient outcomes in two Canadian settings. Am J Kidney Dis 29:533–540CrossRefPubMed Levin A, Lewis M, Mortiboy P et al (1997) Multidisciplinary predialysis programs: quantification and limitations of their impact on patient outcomes in two Canadian settings. Am J Kidney Dis 29:533–540CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Curtis BM, Barret BJ, Jindal K et al (2002) Canadian survey of clinical status at dialysis initiation 1998–1999: a multicenter prospective survey. Clin Nephrol 58:282–288PubMed Curtis BM, Barret BJ, Jindal K et al (2002) Canadian survey of clinical status at dialysis initiation 1998–1999: a multicenter prospective survey. Clin Nephrol 58:282–288PubMed
10.
go back to reference Van Manen JG, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW et al (2003) NECOSAD-study group. Adjustment for comorbidity in studies on health status in ESRD patients: which comorbidity index to use? J Am Soc Nephrol 14:478–485CrossRefPubMed Van Manen JG, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW et al (2003) NECOSAD-study group. Adjustment for comorbidity in studies on health status in ESRD patients: which comorbidity index to use? J Am Soc Nephrol 14:478–485CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Oreopoulos DG, Thodis E, Passadakis P et al (2003) Home dialysis as a first option: a new paradigm. Int Urol Nephrol 41(3):595–605 [Epub 2009 May 9 Review] Oreopoulos DG, Thodis E, Passadakis P et al (2003) Home dialysis as a first option: a new paradigm. Int Urol Nephrol 41(3):595–605 [Epub 2009 May 9 Review]
12.
go back to reference Liakopoulos V, Stefanidis I, Dombros NV (2010) Peritoneal dialysis glossary 2009. Int Urol Nephrol 42(2):417–423CrossRefPubMed Liakopoulos V, Stefanidis I, Dombros NV (2010) Peritoneal dialysis glossary 2009. Int Urol Nephrol 42(2):417–423CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mendelssohn DC, Mullaney SR, Jung B et al (2001) What do American nephologists think about dialysis modality selection? Am J Kidney Dis 37:22–29PubMed Mendelssohn DC, Mullaney SR, Jung B et al (2001) What do American nephologists think about dialysis modality selection? Am J Kidney Dis 37:22–29PubMed
14.
go back to reference Jung B, Blake PG, Mehta RL et al (1999) Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists toward dialysis modality selection. Perit Dial Int 19:263–268PubMed Jung B, Blake PG, Mehta RL et al (1999) Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists toward dialysis modality selection. Perit Dial Int 19:263–268PubMed
15.
go back to reference Miskulin DC, Meyer KB, Athienites NV et al (2002) Comorbidity and other factors associated with modality selection in incident dialysis patients: the CHOICE Study. Choices for healthy outcomes in caring for end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 39:324–336CrossRefPubMed Miskulin DC, Meyer KB, Athienites NV et al (2002) Comorbidity and other factors associated with modality selection in incident dialysis patients: the CHOICE Study. Choices for healthy outcomes in caring for end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 39:324–336CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Stack AG (2002) Determinants of modality selection among incident US dialysis patients: results from a national study. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:1279–1287PubMed Stack AG (2002) Determinants of modality selection among incident US dialysis patients: results from a national study. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:1279–1287PubMed
17.
go back to reference Jager KJ, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW et al (2004) Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD) Study Group: the effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands. Am J Kidney Dis 43:891–899CrossRefPubMed Jager KJ, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW et al (2004) Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD) Study Group: the effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands. Am J Kidney Dis 43:891–899CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Winkelmayer WC, Glynn RJ, Levin R et al (2001) Late referral and modality choice in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 60:1547–1554CrossRefPubMed Winkelmayer WC, Glynn RJ, Levin R et al (2001) Late referral and modality choice in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 60:1547–1554CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Fong E, Bargman JM, Chan CT (2007) Cross-sectional comparison of quality of life and illness intrusiveness in patients who are treated with nocturnal home hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2:1195–1200CrossRefPubMed Fong E, Bargman JM, Chan CT (2007) Cross-sectional comparison of quality of life and illness intrusiveness in patients who are treated with nocturnal home hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2:1195–1200CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Oliver MJ, Quinn RR, Richardson EP et al (2007) Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 71:673–678CrossRefPubMed Oliver MJ, Quinn RR, Richardson EP et al (2007) Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 71:673–678CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Agraharkar M, Barclay C, Agraharkar A (2002) Staff-assisted home hemodialysis in debilitated or terminally ill patients. Int Urol Nephrol 33:139–144CrossRefPubMed Agraharkar M, Barclay C, Agraharkar A (2002) Staff-assisted home hemodialysis in debilitated or terminally ill patients. Int Urol Nephrol 33:139–144CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Just PM, de Charro FT, Tschosik EA et al (2008) Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:2365–2373CrossRefPubMed Just PM, de Charro FT, Tschosik EA et al (2008) Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:2365–2373CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Dialysis modality choices among chronic kidney disease patients: identifying the gaps to support patients on home-based therapies
Authors
Ai-Hua Zhang
Joanne M. Bargman
Charmaine E. Lok
Eveline Porter
Maria Mendez
Dimitrios G. Oreopoulos
Christopher T. Chan
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-010-9793-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

International Urology and Nephrology 3/2010 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.