Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 1/2019

Open Access 01-07-2019 | Ticagrelor

De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Dominick J. Angiolillo, Giuseppe Patti, Kam Tim Chan, Yaling Han, Wei-Chun Huang, Alexey Yakovlev, Dara Paek, Michael del Aguila, Shalini Girotra, Dirk Sibbing

Published in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may occur for a variety of reasons, including side effects (bleeding and non-bleeding) and costs. This study sought to assess the prevalence of de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel and the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes following de-escalation. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials and real-world studies in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor. Real-world data on the prevalence of de-escalation during hospitalization or at discharge, after hospital discharge, and during the whole study period were included for meta-analysis. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding events occurring after de-escalation were also assessed. A total of 12 studies were eligible for meta-analysis of the prevalence of de-escalation. De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel therapy occurred with a mean prevalence of 19.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.2–28.4%]. De-escalation occurred more frequently in-hospital or at discharge than after hospital discharge (23.7% vs. 15.8%). For assessment of clinical outcomes, a total of six studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Mean rate of MACE for patients with de-escalation was 2.1% (95% CI 1.1–4.1%) and the rate of major bleeding events was 1.3% (95% CI 0.4–4.5%). In conclusion, de-escalation commonly occurs in real-world practice. Although rates of major cardiovascular and bleeding events in this analysis were generally low, the profile of patients suitable for de-escalation, the impact of de-escalation on adverse clinical outcomes and how this is affected by the timing after index ACS warrants further large-scale investigation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA et al (2017) 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 39:213–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx638 CrossRef Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA et al (2017) 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 39:213–260. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​eurheartj/​ehx638 CrossRef
7.
10.
go back to reference Antman EM, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA et al (2008) Early and late benefits of prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (TRial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:2028–2033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.002 CrossRefPubMed Antman EM, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA et al (2008) Early and late benefits of prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (TRial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:2028–2033. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2008.​04.​002 CrossRefPubMed
14.
17.
go back to reference University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009) Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York, York University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009) Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York, York
18.
go back to reference Reboussin DM, Allen NB, Griswold ME et al (2018) Systematic review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 71:2176–2198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.004 CrossRefPubMed Reboussin DM, Allen NB, Griswold ME et al (2018) Systematic review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 71:2176–2198. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2017.​11.​004 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Raudenbush SW (2009) Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (eds) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2nd edn. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 295–315 Raudenbush SW (2009) Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (eds) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2nd edn. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 295–315
22.
go back to reference Jiang J (2007) Linear and generalized linear mixed models and their applications. Springer, New York Jiang J (2007) Linear and generalized linear mixed models and their applications. Springer, New York
23.
go back to reference Verbyla A (1993) Modelling variance heterogeneity: residual maximum likelihood and diagnostics. J Roy Stat Soc B 55:493–508 Verbyla A (1993) Modelling variance heterogeneity: residual maximum likelihood and diagnostics. J Roy Stat Soc B 55:493–508
29.
go back to reference Déry JP, Mehta SR, Fisher HN et al (2016) Baseline characteristics, adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor treatment patterns, and in-hospital outcomes of myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the prospective Canadian Observational AntiPlatelet sTudy (COAPT). Am Heart J 181:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2016.07.014 CrossRefPubMed Déry JP, Mehta SR, Fisher HN et al (2016) Baseline characteristics, adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor treatment patterns, and in-hospital outcomes of myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the prospective Canadian Observational AntiPlatelet sTudy (COAPT). Am Heart J 181:26–34. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ahj.​2016.​07.​014 CrossRefPubMed
33.
34.
36.
go back to reference Zettler ME, Peterson ED, McCoy LA et al (2017) Switching of adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor after hospital discharge among myocardial infarction patients: insights from the treatment with adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors: longitudinal assessment of treatment patterns and events after acute coronary syndrome (TRANSLATE-ACS) observational study. Am Heart J 183:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AHJ.2016.10.006 CrossRefPubMed Zettler ME, Peterson ED, McCoy LA et al (2017) Switching of adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor after hospital discharge among myocardial infarction patients: insights from the treatment with adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors: longitudinal assessment of treatment patterns and events after acute coronary syndrome (TRANSLATE-ACS) observational study. Am Heart J 183:62–68. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​J.​AHJ.​2016.​10.​006 CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Sibbing D, Aradi D, Alexopoulos D et al (2019) Updated expert consensus statement on platelet function and genetic testing for guiding P2Y12 receptor inhibitor treatment in percutaneous intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv (in press) Sibbing D, Aradi D, Alexopoulos D et al (2019) Updated expert consensus statement on platelet function and genetic testing for guiding P2Y12 receptor inhibitor treatment in percutaneous intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv (in press)
Metadata
Title
De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Dominick J. Angiolillo
Giuseppe Patti
Kam Tim Chan
Yaling Han
Wei-Chun Huang
Alexey Yakovlev
Dara Paek
Michael del Aguila
Shalini Girotra
Dirk Sibbing
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0929-5305
Electronic ISSN: 1573-742X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01860-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 1/2019 Go to the issue