Top

Published in:

01-12-2019 | Intense Pulsed Light | Review

To Watch is to Work: a Review of NeuroImaging Data on Tool Use Observation Network

Authors: Emanuelle Reynaud, Jordan Navarro, Mathieu Lesourd, François Osiurak

Published in: Neuropsychology Review | Issue 4/2019

Abstract

Since the discovery of mirror neurons in the 1990s, many neuroimaging studies have tackled the issue of action observation with the aim of unravelling a putative homolog human system. However, these studies do not distinguish between non-tool-use versus tool-use actions, implying that a common brain network is systematically involved in the observation of any action. Here we provide evidence for a brain network dedicated to tool-use action observation, called the tool-use observation network, mostly situated in the left hemisphere, and distinct from the non-tool-use action observation network. Areas specific for tool-use action observation are the left cytoarchitectonic area PF within the left inferior parietal lobe and the left inferior frontal gyrus. The neural correlates associated with the observation of tool-use reported here offer new insights into the neurocognitive bases of action observation and tool use, as well as addressing more fundamental issues on the origins of specifically human phenomena such as cumulative technological evolution.

Available only for authorised users

The term network used here must be understood as a collection of brain areas, with no assessment of the structural or functional connectivity that could exist between these areas.

Abdollahi, R. O., Kolster, H., Glasser, M. F., Robinson, E. C., Coalson, T. S., Dierker, D., … Orban, G. A. (2014). Correspondences between retinotopic areas and myelin maps in human visual cortex. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.042 PubMedCrossRef

Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., Zilles, K., & Fink, G. (2004). Supramodal representation of objects and actions in the human inferior temporal and ventral premotor cortex. Cortex, 40(1), 159–161.PubMedCrossRef

Boronat, C. B., Buxbaum, L. J., Coslett, H. B., Tang, K., Saffran, E. M., Kimberg, D. Y., & Detre, J. A. (2005). Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.11.001 PubMedCrossRef

Bortoletto, M., & Cunnington, R. (2010). Motor timing and motor sequencing contribute differently to the preparation for voluntary movement. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.048 PubMedCrossRef

Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1996). Why culture is common, but cultural evolution is rare. In W. G. Runciman, J. M. Smith, & R. I. M. Dunbar (Eds.), Proceedings of The British Academy, Vol. 88. Evolution of social behaviour patterns in primates and man (pp. 77-93). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.

Brass, M., & Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.007 PubMedCrossRef

Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., … Freund, H. J. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13(2), 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2001.01385.x CrossRefPubMed

Buxbaum, L. J. (2001). Ideomotor apraxia: A call to action. Neurocase, 7(6), 445–458.PubMedCrossRef

Buxbaum, L. J. (2017). Learning, remembering, and predicting how to use tools: Distributed neurocognitive mechanisms: Comment on osiurak and badets (2016). Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000051 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Buxbaum, L. J., Giovannetti, T., & Libon, D. (2000). The role of the dynamic body schema in praxis: Evidence from primary progressive apraxia. Brain and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1227 PubMedCrossRef

Buxbaum, L. J., & Saffran, E. M. (2002). Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00014-7 PubMedCrossRef

Caspers, S., Geyer, S., Schleicher, A., Mohlberg, H., Amunts, K., & Zilles, K. (2006). The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.054 PubMedCrossRef

Caspers, S., Zilles, K., Laird, A. R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2010). ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. NeuroImage, 50(3), 1148–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112 CrossRefPubMed

Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0635 PubMedCrossRef

Chen, Q., Garcea, F. E., Jacobs, R. A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2018). Abstract representations of object-directed action in the left inferior parietal lobule. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx120 CrossRefPubMedCentral

Chong, T. T.-J., Williams, M. A., Cunnington, R., & Mattingley, J. B. (2008). Selective attention modulates inferior frontal gyrus activity during action observation. NeuroImage, 40(1), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.030 CrossRefPubMed

Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Neural representations of graspable objects: Are tools special? Cognitive Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.10.006 PubMedCrossRef

Cross, E. S., Kraemer, D. J. M., Hamilton, A. F. D. C., Kelley, W. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2009). Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cerebral Cortex, 19(2), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn083 CrossRefPubMed

Cubelli, R., Marchetti, C., Boscolo, G., & Della Sala, S. (2000). Cognition in action: Testing a model of limb apraxia. Brain and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1226 PubMedCrossRef

Culham, J. C., Brandt, S. A., Cavanagh, P., Kanwisher, N. G., Dale, A. M., & Tootell, R. B. (1998). Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80(5), 2657–2670 9819271.PubMedCrossRef

Daprati, E., & Sirigu, A. (2006). How we interact with objects: Learning from brain lesions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.005 PubMedCrossRef

De Renzi, E. (1989). Apraxia. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (vol. 2, pp. 245–263). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Decety, J., & Grezes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(5), 172–178.PubMedCrossRef

Dinstein, I., Gardner, J. L., Jazayeri, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2008). Executed and observed movements have different distributed representations in human aIPS. Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3585-08.2008 PubMedCrossRef

Dinstein, I., Hasson, U., Rubin, N., & Heeger, D. J. (2007). Brain areas selective for both observed and executed movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(3), 1415–1427. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00238.2007 CrossRefPubMed

Eickhoff, S. B., Bzdok, D., Laird, A. R., Kurth, F., & Fox, P. T. (2012). Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. Neuroimage, 59(3), 2349–2361.PubMedCrossRef

Eickhoff, S. B., Laird, A. R., Fox, P. M., Lancaster, J. L., & Fox, P. T. (2017). Implementation errors in the GingerALE software: Description and recommendations. Human Brain Mapping, 38(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23342 CrossRefPubMed

Evans, C., Edwards, M. G., Taylor, L. J., & Ietswaart, M. (2016). Perceptual decisions regarding object manipulation are selectively impaired in apraxia or when tDCS is applied over the left IPL. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.020 PubMedCrossRef

Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., & Olivier, E. (2005). Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.013 PubMedCrossRef

Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73(6), 2608–2611 https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1995.73.6.2608 CrossRefPubMed

Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119(2), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.2.593 CrossRefPubMed

Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the mind-reading. Trens in Cognitive Sciences, 2(12), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01262-5 CrossRef

Garcea, F. E., Dombovy, M., & Mahon, B. Z. (2013). Preserved tool knowledge in the context of impaired action knowledge: Implications for models of semantic memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00120

Georgieva, S., Peeters, R., Kolster, H., Todd, J. T., & Orban, G. A. (2009). The processing of three-dimensional shape from disparity in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4753-08.2009 PubMedCrossRef

Goghari, V. M., & MacDonald, A. W. (2009). The neural basis of cognitive control: Response selection and inhibition. Brain and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.04.004 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Goldenberg, G., & Spatt, J. (2009). The neural basis of tool use. Brain, 132(Pt 6), 1645–1655. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp080 CrossRefPubMed

Goldenberg, G, & Hagmann, S. (1998). Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia. Neuropsychologia.

Goldenberg, G. (2013). Apraxia - the cognitive side of motor control. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.07.016 PubMedCrossRef

Gonzalez Rothi, L. J., Ochipa, C., & Heilman, K. M. (1991). A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8(6), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299108253382 CrossRef

Grafton, S., Arbib, M., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. Experimental Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227183

Greenfield, P. M. (1991). Language, tools and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00071235 CrossRef

Halsband, U., Schmitt, J., Weyers, M., Binkofski, F., Grützner, G., & Freund, H. J. (2001). Recognition and imitation of pantomimed motor acts after unilateral parietal and premotor lesions: A perspective on apraxia. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00088-9 PubMedCrossRef

Hamilton, A., & Grafton, S. T. (2006). Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4551-05.2006 PubMedCrossRef

Hartmann, K., Goldenberg, G., Daumüller, M., & Hermsdörfer, J. (2005). It takes the whole brain to make a cup of coffee: The neuropsychology of naturalistic actions involving technical devices. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.07.015 PubMedCrossRef

Heilman, K. M., Rothi, L. J., & Valenstein, E. (1982). Two forms of ideomotor apraxia. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.32.4.342 PubMedCrossRef

Hickok, G. (2009). Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21189 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Hickok, G. (2014). The myth of mirror neurons: The real neuroscience of communication and cognition. New-York: Norton.

Higuchi, S., Chaminade, T., Imamizu, H., & Kawato, M. (2009). Shared neural correlates for language and tool use in Broca’s area. NeuroReport. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283315570 PubMedCrossRef

Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604 CrossRefPubMed

Ishibashi, R., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Saito, S., & Pobric, G. (2011). Different roles of lateral anterior temporal lobe and inferior parietal lobule in coding function and manipulation tool knowledge: Evidence from an rTMS study. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.004 PubMedCrossRef

Ishibashi, R., Pobric, G., Saito, S., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2016). The neural network for tool-related cognition: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of 70 neuroimaging contrasts. Cognitive Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2016.1188798 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Jacob, P., & Jeannerod, M. (2005). The motor theory of social cognition: A critique. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.003 PubMedCrossRef

Jastorff, J., Begliomini, C., Fabbri-Destro, M., Rizzolatti, G., & Orban, G. A. (2010). Coding observed motor acts: Different organizational principles in the parietal and premotor cortex of humans. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00254.2010 PubMedCrossRef

Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17(02), 187. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00034026 CrossRef

Johnson-Frey, S. H., Maloof, F. R., Newman-Norlund, R., Farrer, C., Inati, S., & Grafton, S. T. (2003). Actions or hand-object interactions? Human inferior frontal cortex and action observation. Neuron, 39(6), 1053–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00524-5 CrossRefPubMed

Johnson-Frey, S. H., Newman-Norlund, R., & Grafton, S. T. (2005). A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cerebral Cortex, 15(6), 681–695.PubMedCrossRef

Kalénine, S., Shapiro, A. D., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2013). Dissociations of action means and outcome processing in left-hemisphere stroke. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.017 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Kalénine, S., Buxbaum, L. J., & Coslett, H. B. (2010). Critical brain regions for action recognition: Lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq210 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Kilner, J. M. (2009). Dissociable functional roles of the human action-observation network (commentary on E. S. Cross et al.). European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06958.x PubMedCrossRef

Lancaster, J. L., Tordesillas-Gutierrez, D., Martinez, M., Salinas, F., Evans, A., Zilles, K., … Fox, P. T. (2007). Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM-152 brain template. Human Brain Mapping, 28(11), 1194–1205.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Lesourd, M., Osiurak, F., Navarro, J., & Reynaud, E. (2017). Involvement of the left supramarginal gyrus in manipulation judgment tasks: Contributions to theories of tool use. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617717000455 PubMedCrossRef

Lingnau, A., Gesierich, B., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Asymmetric fMRI adaptation reveals no evidence for mirror neurons in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902262106 CrossRef

Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2005). The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: Clues from neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000446 PubMedCrossRef

Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology Paris. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004 CrossRefPubMed

Meltzoff, A., & Moore, M. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198(4312), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.897687 CrossRefPubMed

Negri, G. A. L., Rumiati, R., Zadini, A., Ukmar, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2007). What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701707412 PubMedCrossRef

Orban, G. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (2012). An area specifically devoted to tool use in human left inferior parietal lobule. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Orban, G. A., Claeys, K., Nelissen, K., Smans, R., Sunaert, S., Todd, J. T., … Vanduffel, W. (2006). Mapping the parietal cortex of human and non-human primates. Neuropsychologia, 44(13), 2647–2667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.001 CrossRefPubMed

Orban, G. A., Sunaert, S., Todd, J. T., Van Hecke, P., & Marchal, G. (1999). Human cortical regions involved in extracting depth from motion. Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81040-5 PubMedCrossRef

Orban, G. A., & Caruana, F. (2014). The neural basis of human tool use. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 310.PubMedPubMedCentral

Osiurak, F. (2014a). What neuropsychology tells us about human tool use? The four constraints theory (4CT): Mechanics, space, time, and effort. Neuropsychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-014-9260-y PubMedCrossRef

Osiurak, F., Jarry, C., Allain, P., Aubin, G., Etcharry-Bouyx, F., Richard, I., … Le Gall, D. (2009). Unusual use of objects after unilateral brain damage. The technical reasoning model. Cortex, 45(6), 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.013 CrossRefPubMed

Osiurak, F. (2014b). Mechanical knowledge, but not manipulation knowledge, might support action prediction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 737.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Osiurak, F., & Badets, A. (2016). Tool use and affordance: Manipulation-based versus reasoning-based approaches tool use and affordance: Manipulation-based versus reasoning-based approaches. Psychological Review, 123(5), 534–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000027 CrossRefPubMed

Osiurak, F., De Oliveira, E., Navarro, J., Lesourd, M., Claidière, N., & Reynaud, E. (2016). Physical intelligence does matter to cumulative technological culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 941–948. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000189 CrossRef

Osiurak, F., De Oliveira, E., Navarro, J., & Reynaud, E. (2019). The Castaway island: Distinct roles of theory of mind and technical reasoning in cumulative technological culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000614

Osiurak, F., & Heinke, D. (2018). Looking for intoolligence: A unified framework for the cognitive study of human tool use and technology. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000162 PubMedCrossRef

Osiurak, F., Jarry, C., & Le Gall, D. (2010). Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning: Toward a dialectical theory of human tool use. Psychological Review, 117(2), 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019004 CrossRefPubMed

Osiurak, F., & Rossetti, Y. (2017). Definition: Limb apraxia. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.03.010 PubMedCrossRef

Osiurak, F., Rossetti, Y., & Badets, A. (2017). What is an affordance? 40 years later. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 77, 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.014 CrossRef

Peelen, M. V., & Downing, P. E. (2005). Is the extrastriate body area involved in motor actions? Nature Neuroscience, 8(2), 125.PubMedCrossRef

Peeters, R. R., Rizzolatti, G., & Orban, G. A. (2013). Functional properties of the left parietal tool use region. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.023 PubMedCrossRef

Peeters, R., Simone, L., Nelissen, K., Fabbri-Destro, M., Vanduffel, W., Rizzolatti, G., & Orban, G. A. (2009). The representation of tool use in humans and Monkeys: Common and uniquely human features. Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2040-09.2009 PubMedCrossRef

Petrides, M. (2005). Lateral prefrontal cortex: Architectonic and functional organization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1631 CrossRef

Rajah, M. N., Ames, B., & D’Esposito, M. (2008). Prefrontal contributions to domain-general executive control processes during temporal context retrieval. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.023 PubMedCrossRef

Reynaud, E., Lesourd, M., Navarro, J., & Osiurak, F. (2016). On the neurocognitive origins of human tool use: A critical review of neuroimaging data. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 64, 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.009 CrossRef

Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Matelli, M., Bettinardi, V., Paulesu, E., Perani, D., & Fazio, F. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Experimental Brain Research, 111(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227301

Rumiati, R. I., Zanini, S., Vorano, L., & Shallice, T. (2001). A form of ideational apraxia as a selective deficit of contention scheduling. Cognitive Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290126375 PubMedCrossRef

Rumiati, R. I., Weiss, P. H., Shallice, T., Ottoboni, G., Noth, J., Zilles, K., & Fink, G. R. (2004). Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.017 PubMedCrossRef

Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Smith, S. M., Keltner, J. R., Wager, T. D., & Nichols, T. E. (2009). Meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: A comparison of image-based and coordinate-based pooling of studies. NeuroImage, 45(3), 810–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.039 CrossRefPubMed

Samartsidis, P., Montagna, S., Johnson, T. D., & Nichols, T. E. (2017). The coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data. Statistical Science, 32(4), 580–599. https://doi.org/10.1214/17-STS624 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shmuelof, L., & Zohary, E. (2006). A mirror representation of others’ actions in the human anterior parietal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 26(38), 9736–9742. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1836-06.2006 CrossRef

Stadler, W., Schubotz, R. I., von Cramon, D. Y., Springer, A., Graf, M., & Prinz, W. (2011). Predicting and memorizing observed action: Differential premotor cortex involvement. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20949 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral

Sunaert, S., Van Hecke, P., Marchal, G., & Orban, G. A. (1999). Motion-responsive regions of the human brain. Experimental Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050804 PubMedCrossRef

Taylor, J. C., Wiggett, A. J., & Downing, P. E. (2007). Functional MRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(3), 1626–1633. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00012.2007 CrossRefPubMed

Tench, C. R., Tanasescu, R., Constantinescu, C. S., Auer, D. P., & Cottam, W. J. (2017). Coordinate based random effect size meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. NeuroImage, 153, 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2017.04.002 CrossRefPubMed

Tessari, A., Canessa, N., Ukmar, M., & Rumiati, R. I. (2007). Neuropsychological evidence for a strategic control of multiple routes in imitation. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm003 CrossRef

Thompson-Schill, S. L., D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792 CrossRef

Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(05). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000129 PubMedCrossRef

Tomassini, V., Jbabdi, S., Klein, J. C., Behrens, T. E. J., Pozzilli, C., Matthews, P. M., … Johansen-Berg, H. (2007). Diffusion-weighted imaging tractography-based parcellation of the human lateral premotor cortex identifies dorsal and ventral subregions with anatomical and functional specializations. Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2144-07.2007 PubMedCrossRef

Tootell, R. B., Reppas, J. B., Kwong, K. K., Malach, R., Born, R. T., Brady, T. J., … Belliveau, J. W. (1995). Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 15(4), 3215–3230 fmri_Mary M-converted #34; used to be #2162 and #2324.CrossRef

Turkeltaub, P. E., Eden, G. F., Jones, K. M., & Zeffiro, T. A. (2002). Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: Method and validation. Neuroimage, 16(3 Pt 1), 765–780.PubMedCrossRef

Uithol, S., van Rooij, I., Bekkering, H., & Haselager, P. (2011). Understanding motor resonance. Social Neuroscience, 6(4), 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2011.559129 CrossRefPubMed

van Elk, M., van Schie, H., & Bekkering, H. (2014). Action semantics: A unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge. Physics of Life Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.005 PubMedCrossRef

Van Essen, D. C. (2005). A population-average, landmark- and surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex. NeuroImage, 28(3), 635–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058 CrossRefPubMed

Van Overwalle, F., & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009 PubMedCrossRef

Vanduffel, W., Zhu, Q., & Orban, G. A. (2014). Monkey cortex through fMRI glasses. Neuron, 83(3), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.015 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Vingerhoets, G. (2014). Contribution of the posterior parietal cortex in reaching, grasping, and using objects and tools. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 151.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Wager, T. D., Lindquist, M. A., Nichols, T. E., Kober, H., & Van Snellenberg, J. X. (2009). Evaluating the consistency and specificity of neuroimaging data using meta-analysis. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.061 PubMedCrossRef

Watson, J. D. G., Myers, R., Frackowiak, R. S. J., Hajnal, J. V., Woods, R. P., Mazziotta, J. C., … Zeki, S. (1993). Area V5 of the human brain: Evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 3(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/3.2.79 CrossRefPubMed

Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science-AAAS-weekly paper edition, 269(5232), 1880-1882. Science-AAAS-Weekly Paper Edition.

Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2010). Cognitive neuroscience 2.0: Building a cumulative science of human brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.004 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Zeki, S., Watson, J. D., Lueck, C. J., Friston, K. J., Kennard, C., & Frackowiak, R. S. (1991). A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 11(March), 641–649 https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-03-00641.1991 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zhang, Z., Sun, Y., Humphreys, G. W., & Song, Y. (2017). Different activity patterns for action and language within their shared neural areas: An fMRI study on action observation and language phonology. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.02.025 PubMedCrossRef

Title: To Watch is to Work: a Review of NeuroImaging Data on Tool Use Observation Network
Authors: Emanuelle Reynaud
Jordan Navarro
Mathieu Lesourd
François Osiurak
Publication date: 01-12-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Keyword: Intense Pulsed Light
Published in: Neuropsychology Review / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1040-7308
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6660
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-019-09418-3

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

To Watch is to Work: a Review of NeuroImaging Data on Tool Use Observation Network

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

A Systematic Review of Neurocognitive Functioning in Behçet’s Disease

Towards a Better Understanding of Cognitive Deficits in Absence Epilepsy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Cerebellum in Frontotemporal Dementia: a Meta-Analysis of Neuroimaging Studies

A Guide to Conducting a Meta-Analysis with Non-Independent Effect Sizes

Caregiver- and Clinician-Reported Adaptive Functioning in Rett Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Evaluation of Measurement Strategies

Visuospatial Neglect - a Theory-Informed Overview of Current and Emerging Strategies and a Systematic Review on the Therapeutic Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation