Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1/2017

Open Access 01-03-2017 | Clinical Study

Development of a questionnaire measuring instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in patients with brain tumors: a pilot study

Authors: Q. Oort, L. Dirven, W. Meijer, S. A. M. Sikkes, B. M. J. Uitdehaag, J. C. Reijneveld, M. J. B. Taphoorn

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Both dementia and brain tumor patients exhibit cognitive decline during the course of their disease. They might therefore experience similar problems with cognitively complex daily activities (i.e., instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)). The study's objective is to evaluate if the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire© (A-IADL-Q), a 70-item IADL questionnaire developed for and validated in early dementia patients, is also applicable to glioma patients. The evaluation consisted of three steps. Predetermined decision rules defined which activities were retained, altered, added or excluded. In the first step, 6 neuro-oncology health care professionals (HCP) and 10 glioma patient-proxy dyads were asked to evaluate the 70 A-IADL-Q activities. In the second step, in-depth interviews were conducted with 6 HCPs and 6 other patient-proxy dyads to generate relevant activities specific to glioma patients not covered by the A-IADL-Q. In the third step, 6 new patient-proxy dyads were cognitively debriefed with the list of activities constructed in the previous steps. Results indicated that in step 1, after alterations and exclusions, 28/70 activities could be retained. Nine newly generated activities were subsequently added in step 2. In step 3, the 37 activities were presented to the patient-proxy dyads. Based on their input, several additional alterations and exclusions were made resulting in a list of 32 activities. In conclusion, this evaluation of the A-IADL-Q showed that dementia-specific IADL activities are only partly applicable to glioma patients, and that the addition of glioma specific IADL activities is necessary to capture the IADL construct. This underlines the need for a disease-specific IADL questionnaire for brain tumor patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Efficace F, Taphoorn M (2012) Methodological issues in designing and reporting health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials: the challenge of brain cancer studies. J Neurooncol 108(2):221–226CrossRefPubMed Efficace F, Taphoorn M (2012) Methodological issues in designing and reporting health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials: the challenge of brain cancer studies. J Neurooncol 108(2):221–226CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9(3):179–186CrossRefPubMed Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9(3):179–186CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Overdorp EJ et al (2016) The combined effect of neuropsychological and neuropathological deficits on instrumental activities of daily living in older adults: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rev 26(1):92–106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Overdorp EJ et al (2016) The combined effect of neuropsychological and neuropathological deficits on instrumental activities of daily living in older adults: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rev 26(1):92–106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Sikkes SA et al (2012) A new informant-based questionnaire for instrumental activities of daily living in dementia. Alzheimers Dement 8(6):536–543CrossRefPubMed Sikkes SA et al (2012) A new informant-based questionnaire for instrumental activities of daily living in dementia. Alzheimers Dement 8(6):536–543CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mahoney FI, Barthel DW (1965) Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 14:61–65PubMed Mahoney FI, Barthel DW (1965) Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 14:61–65PubMed
6.
go back to reference Mackworth N, Fobair P, Prados MD (1992) Quality of life self-reports from 200 brain tumor patients: comparisons with Karnofsky performance scores. J Neurooncol 14(3):243–253CrossRefPubMed Mackworth N, Fobair P, Prados MD (1992) Quality of life self-reports from 200 brain tumor patients: comparisons with Karnofsky performance scores. J Neurooncol 14(3):243–253CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference O’Dell MW et al (1998) Functional outcome of inpatient rehabilitation in persons with brain tumors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79(12):1530–1534CrossRefPubMed O’Dell MW et al (1998) Functional outcome of inpatient rehabilitation in persons with brain tumors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79(12):1530–1534CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hall KM et al (1993) Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: disability rating scale, functional independence measure, and functional assessment measure. J Head Trauma Rehabil 8(2):60–74CrossRef Hall KM et al (1993) Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: disability rating scale, functional independence measure, and functional assessment measure. J Head Trauma Rehabil 8(2):60–74CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rosenberg L et al (2009) Perceived difficulty in everyday technology use among older adults with or without cognitive deficits. Scand J Occup Ther 16(4):216–226CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg L et al (2009) Perceived difficulty in everyday technology use among older adults with or without cognitive deficits. Scand J Occup Ther 16(4):216–226CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hobart JC et al (2001) Evidence-based measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology 57(4):639–644CrossRefPubMed Hobart JC et al (2001) Evidence-based measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology 57(4):639–644CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA (1984) Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2(3):187–193CrossRefPubMed Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA (1984) Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2(3):187–193CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sikkes SA et al (2013) Validation of the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire(c), a new tool to measure instrumental activities of daily living in dementia. Neuroepidemiology 41(1):35–41CrossRefPubMed Sikkes SA et al (2013) Validation of the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire(c), a new tool to measure instrumental activities of daily living in dementia. Neuroepidemiology 41(1):35–41CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Johnson C et al., EORTC Quality of life group (2011) Guidlines for Developing Questionnaire Modules Johnson C et al., EORTC Quality of life group (2011) Guidlines for Developing Questionnaire Modules
14.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR (2008) Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2008 Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–452. Streiner DL, Norman GR (2008) Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2008 Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–452.
15.
go back to reference Schneider SL (2011) The International Standard Classification of Education 2011, in Class and Stratification Analysis. pp 365–379 Schneider SL (2011) The International Standard Classification of Education 2011, in Class and Stratification Analysis. pp 365–379
16.
17.
go back to reference Gehrke AK et al (2013) Neurocognitive deficits following primary brain tumor treatment: systematic review of a decade of comparative studies. J Neurooncol 115(2):135–142CrossRefPubMed Gehrke AK et al (2013) Neurocognitive deficits following primary brain tumor treatment: systematic review of a decade of comparative studies. J Neurooncol 115(2):135–142CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tucha O et al (2000) Cognitive deficits before treatment among patients with brain tumors. Neurosurgery 47(2):324–333 (discussion 333–334) CrossRefPubMed Tucha O et al (2000) Cognitive deficits before treatment among patients with brain tumors. Neurosurgery 47(2):324–333 (discussion 333–334) CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Taphoorn MJ, Klein M (2004) Cognitive deficits in adult patients with brain tumours. Lancet Neurol 3(3):159–168CrossRefPubMed Taphoorn MJ, Klein M (2004) Cognitive deficits in adult patients with brain tumours. Lancet Neurol 3(3):159–168CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sterckx W et al (2013) The impact of a high-grade glioma on everyday life: a systematic review from the patient’s and caregiver’s perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs 17(1):107–117CrossRefPubMed Sterckx W et al (2013) The impact of a high-grade glioma on everyday life: a systematic review from the patient’s and caregiver’s perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs 17(1):107–117CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Chandana SR et al (2008) Primary brain tumors in adults. Am Fam Physician 77(10):1423–1430 Chandana SR et al (2008) Primary brain tumors in adults. Am Fam Physician 77(10):1423–1430
22.
go back to reference Dirven L et al (2013) Health-related quality of life in patients with brain tumors: limitations and additional outcome measures. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 13(7):359CrossRefPubMed Dirven L et al (2013) Health-related quality of life in patients with brain tumors: limitations and additional outcome measures. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 13(7):359CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development of a questionnaire measuring instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in patients with brain tumors: a pilot study
Authors
Q. Oort
L. Dirven
W. Meijer
S. A. M. Sikkes
B. M. J. Uitdehaag
J. C. Reijneveld
M. J. B. Taphoorn
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2352-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1/2017 Go to the issue