Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2015

01-06-2015

Functional Capacity Evaluation: Performance of Patients with Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain Without Waddell Signs

Authors: Peter Oesch, Kathrin Meyer, Beatrice Jansen, Jan Kool

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of Waddell signs (WS) on Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) undergoing fitness for work evaluation. If an effect is observed, the secondary objective is to report performance of patients without WS in a standardized 1 day FCE protocol. Methods Survey of patients with CNSLBP as their primary complaint, referred for fitness for work evaluation, age between 20 and 60 years. Main outcome measures were WS and performance during manual handling assessed with lifting from floor to waist, waist to crown, horizontal and one handed carry; grip strength with Jamar hand held Dynamometer; ambulation with stair climbing and six minute walking test; work postures with elevated work, forward bend standing, kneeling, and sitting. Results 145 male with a mean age of 44.5 years (±10.1), and 53 females with a mean age of 43.6 years (±11.0) were included. Mean days off work were in male 658 (±1,056) and in female 642 (±886). 33 % of all patients presented positive WS. FCE performance in male and female patients with positive and negative WS differed significantly in all comparisons except grip strength of the dominant hand and sitting in female. Performance of patients with negative WS indicated a mean physical capacity corresponding to lightmedium work in females and medium work in males for both age groups. Conclusions WS should be assessed for interpretation of FCE results. Despite long work absence, patients with CNSLBP with negative WS demonstrated a physical capacity corresponding to substantial physical work demands.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Wieser S, Horisberger B, Schmidhauser S, Eisenring C, Brugger U, Ruckstuhl A, et al. Cost of low back pain in Switzerland in 2005. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(5):455–67.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Wieser S, Horisberger B, Schmidhauser S, Eisenring C, Brugger U, Ruckstuhl A, et al. Cost of low back pain in Switzerland in 2005. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(5):455–67.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. France: OECD Publishing; 2010. OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. France: OECD Publishing; 2010.
4.
go back to reference Fordyce W. Back pain in the workplace: management of disability in nonspecific conditions a report of the task force on pain in the workplace of the international association for the study of pain. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 1995. Fordyce W. Back pain in the workplace: management of disability in nonspecific conditions a report of the task force on pain in the workplace of the international association for the study of pain. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 1995.
5.
go back to reference Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15 Suppl 2:S192–300. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15 Suppl 2:S192–300.
6.
go back to reference Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):482–91. Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):482–91.
7.
go back to reference Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Valat JP, Nordin M, Avouac B, Blotman F, et al. The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain. Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain. Spine. 2000;25(4 Suppl):1S–33S.CrossRefPubMed Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Valat JP, Nordin M, Avouac B, Blotman F, et al. The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain. Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain. Spine. 2000;25(4 Suppl):1S–33S.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, Macedo LG, McAuley J, Maher C. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(12):2075–94.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, Macedo LG, McAuley J, Maher C. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(12):2075–94.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Milhous RL, Haugh LD, Frymoyer JW, Ruess JM, Gallagher RM, Wilder DG, et al. Determinants of vocational disability in patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70(8):589–93.PubMed Milhous RL, Haugh LD, Frymoyer JW, Ruess JM, Gallagher RM, Wilder DG, et al. Determinants of vocational disability in patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70(8):589–93.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Cocchiarella L, Turk MA, Andersson G. Improving the evaluation of permanent impairment. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283(4):532–3.CrossRef Cocchiarella L, Turk MA, Andersson G. Improving the evaluation of permanent impairment. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283(4):532–3.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hunt DG, Zuberbier OA, Kozlowski AJ, Berkowitz J, Schultz IZ, Milner RA, et al. Are components of a comprehensive medical assessment predictive of work disability after an episode of occupational low back trouble? Spine. 2002;27(23):2715–9.CrossRefPubMed Hunt DG, Zuberbier OA, Kozlowski AJ, Berkowitz J, Schultz IZ, Milner RA, et al. Are components of a comprehensive medical assessment predictive of work disability after an episode of occupational low back trouble? Spine. 2002;27(23):2715–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bolderson H, Mabbett D, Hvinden B. Definitions of disability in Europe: a comparative analysis. Brussels: European Commission Directorate General for Employment and Social Affairs; 2002. Bolderson H, Mabbett D, Hvinden B. Definitions of disability in Europe: a comparative analysis. Brussels: European Commission Directorate General for Employment and Social Affairs; 2002.
13.
go back to reference Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation. Work injury: management and prevention. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers Inc; 1988. p. 139–91. Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation. Work injury: management and prevention. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers Inc; 1988. p. 139–91.
14.
go back to reference Isernhagen S. Contemporary issues in functional capacity evaluation. In: Isernhagen S, editor. The comprehensive guide to work injury management. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers; 1995. p. 410–29. Isernhagen S. Contemporary issues in functional capacity evaluation. In: Isernhagen S, editor. The comprehensive guide to work injury management. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers; 1995. p. 410–29.
15.
go back to reference SAR. Functional Capacity Evaluation—Course Manual. Bellikon, Switzerland: Verein IG Ergonomie SAR; 2007. SAR. Functional Capacity Evaluation—Course Manual. Bellikon, Switzerland: Verein IG Ergonomie SAR; 2007.
16.
go back to reference Oesch PR, Kool JP, Bachmann S, Devereux J. The influence of a functional capacity evaluation on fitness for work certificates in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. Work. 2006;26(3):259–71.PubMed Oesch PR, Kool JP, Bachmann S, Devereux J. The influence of a functional capacity evaluation on fitness for work certificates in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. Work. 2006;26(3):259–71.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Complementary value of functional capacity evaluation for physicians in assessing the physical work ability of workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(4):435–43.CrossRefPubMed Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Complementary value of functional capacity evaluation for physicians in assessing the physical work ability of workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(4):435–43.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference USDL. DOT—Dictionnairy of Occupational Titles. Washington: United States Department of Labor (USDoL) 1981. USDL. DOT—Dictionnairy of Occupational Titles. Washington: United States Department of Labor (USDoL) 1981.
19.
go back to reference Soer R, van der Schans CP, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, et al. Normative values for a functional capacity evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(10):1785–94.CrossRefPubMed Soer R, van der Schans CP, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, et al. Normative values for a functional capacity evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(10):1785–94.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Reneman MF, Kool J, Oesch P, Geertzen JH, Battie MC, Gross DP. Material handling performance of patients with chronic low back pain during functional capacity evaluation: a comparison between three countries. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(18):1143–9.CrossRefPubMed Reneman MF, Kool J, Oesch P, Geertzen JH, Battie MC, Gross DP. Material handling performance of patients with chronic low back pain during functional capacity evaluation: a comparison between three countries. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(18):1143–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lackner JM, Carosella AM. The relative influence of perceived pain control, anxiety, and functional self efficacy on spinal function among patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1999;24(21):2254–60 (discussion 60-1).CrossRefPubMed Lackner JM, Carosella AM. The relative influence of perceived pain control, anxiety, and functional self efficacy on spinal function among patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1999;24(21):2254–60 (discussion 60-1).CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance—based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(3):119–29.CrossRefPubMed Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance—based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(3):119–29.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gross DP, Battie MC. Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker’s compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):287–95.CrossRefPubMed Gross DP, Battie MC. Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker’s compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):287–95.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Oesch P, Meyer K, Jansen B, Mowinckel P, Bachmann S, Hagen KB. What is the role of “nonorganic somatic components” in functional capacity evaluations in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain undergoing fitness for work evaluation? Spine. 2012;37(4):E243–50.CrossRefPubMed Oesch P, Meyer K, Jansen B, Mowinckel P, Bachmann S, Hagen KB. What is the role of “nonorganic somatic components” in functional capacity evaluations in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain undergoing fitness for work evaluation? Spine. 2012;37(4):E243–50.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, Venner RM. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine. 1980;5(2):117–25.CrossRefPubMed Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, Venner RM. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine. 1980;5(2):117–25.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Main CJ, Waddell G. Behavioral responses to examination. A reappraisal of the interpretation of “nonorganic signs”. Spine. 1998;23(21):2367–71.CrossRefPubMed Main CJ, Waddell G. Behavioral responses to examination. A reappraisal of the interpretation of “nonorganic signs”. Spine. 1998;23(21):2367–71.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Apeldoorn AT, Bosselaar H, Blom-Luberti T, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ. The reliability of nonorganic sign-testing and the Waddell score in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2008;33(7):821–6.CrossRefPubMed Apeldoorn AT, Bosselaar H, Blom-Luberti T, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ. The reliability of nonorganic sign-testing and the Waddell score in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2008;33(7):821–6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the Kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehabil. 1992;2(3):157–68.CrossRefPubMed Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the Kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehabil. 1992;2(3):157–68.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL, Matheson LM. Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation. Work. 1999;12(2):145–50.PubMed Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL, Matheson LM. Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation. Work. 1999;12(2):145–50.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Reneman MF, Jaegers SM, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation. Work. 2002;18(1):23–7.PubMed Reneman MF, Jaegers SM, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation. Work. 2002;18(1):23–7.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. Test–retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):269–75.CrossRefPubMed Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. Test–retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):269–75.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Test–retest reliability of the Isernhagen work systems functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):207–18.CrossRefPubMed Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Test–retest reliability of the Isernhagen work systems functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):207–18.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Reneman MF, Brouwer S, Meinema A, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW. Test–retest reliability of the Isernhagen work systems functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14(4):295–305.CrossRefPubMed Reneman MF, Brouwer S, Meinema A, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW. Test–retest reliability of the Isernhagen work systems functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14(4):295–305.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Gross D, Battié M. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther. 2002;82(4):364–71.PubMed Gross D, Battié M. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther. 2002;82(4):364–71.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1984;9(2):222–6.CrossRef Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1984;9(2):222–6.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66(2):69–74.PubMed Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66(2):69–74.PubMed
37.
go back to reference ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111–7. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111–7.
38.
go back to reference King MB, Judge JO, Whipple R, Wolfson L. Reliability and responsiveness of two physical performance measures examined in the context of a functional training intervention. Phys Ther. 2000;80(1):8–16.PubMed King MB, Judge JO, Whipple R, Wolfson L. Reliability and responsiveness of two physical performance measures examined in the context of a functional training intervention. Phys Ther. 2000;80(1):8–16.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD, Penney D. Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6(1):3.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD, Penney D. Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6(1):3.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
40.
go back to reference Shephard R. Aging and exercise. In: Fahey T, editor. Encyclopedia of Sports Medicine and Science. Internet Society for Sport Science; 1998. Shephard R. Aging and exercise. In: Fahey T, editor. Encyclopedia of Sports Medicine and Science. Internet Society for Sport Science; 1998.
41.
go back to reference Jay MA, Lamb JM, Watson RL, Young IA, Fearon FJ, Alday JM, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the indicators of sincere effort of the EPIC lift capacity test on a previously injured population. Spine. 2000;25(11):1405–12.CrossRefPubMed Jay MA, Lamb JM, Watson RL, Young IA, Fearon FJ, Alday JM, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the indicators of sincere effort of the EPIC lift capacity test on a previously injured population. Spine. 2000;25(11):1405–12.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Robinson ME, Dannecker EA. Critical issues in the use of muscle testing for the determination of sincerity of effort. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(6):392–8.CrossRefPubMed Robinson ME, Dannecker EA. Critical issues in the use of muscle testing for the determination of sincerity of effort. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(6):392–8.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Oesch P, Meyer K, Bachmann S, Hagen KB, Vollestad NK. Comparison of two methods for interpreting lifting performance during functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther. 2012;92(9):1130–40.CrossRefPubMed Oesch P, Meyer K, Bachmann S, Hagen KB, Vollestad NK. Comparison of two methods for interpreting lifting performance during functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther. 2012;92(9):1130–40.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference De Beeck R, Hermans V, editors. Research on work-related low back disorders. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2000. De Beeck R, Hermans V, editors. Research on work-related low back disorders. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2000.
Metadata
Title
Functional Capacity Evaluation: Performance of Patients with Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain Without Waddell Signs
Authors
Peter Oesch
Kathrin Meyer
Beatrice Jansen
Jan Kool
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9533-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2015 Go to the issue