Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 4/2009

Open Access 01-03-2009 | Original Article

Complementary value of functional capacity evaluation for physicians in assessing the physical work ability of workers with musculoskeletal disorders

Authors: Haije Wind, Vincent Gouttebarge, P. Paul F. M. Kuijer, Judith K. Sluiter, Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To study the complementary value of information from functional capacity evaluation (FCE) for insurance physicians (IPs) who assess the physical work ability of claimants with long-term musculoskeletal disorders (MSD).

Method

A post-test only design was used in the context of disability claims. Twenty-eight IPs participated in the study. Claimants with MSD formed the patient population. For each IP, the first claimant who agreed to participate was included in the study, and underwent FCE in addition to the regular disability claim assessment. Firstly, the IP performed the statutory disability claim assessment. Secondly, the FCE assessment took place. Finally, a self-formulated questionnaire was presented to the IPs after they viewed the FCE report. IPs were asked whether they perceived FCE information to be of complementary value to their judgment of the claimant’s physical work ability investigated. We considered FCE information to be of complementary value if more than 66% of the IPs indicated as such. IPs were also asked whether FCE information led them to change their initial judgment about the claimant’s physical work ability, and whether they felt this information made them more confident about their ultimate judgement. Finally, they were asked whether they planned to include FCE information in future disability claims and for what type of claimants. Differences between IPs who did or did not experience complementary value were explored.

Results

Of the 28, 19 (nearly 68%) IPs considered FCE information to be of complementary value for their assessment of claimants with MSD. Half of the IPs stated that FCE information reinforced their judgment. All but four IPs changed their assessment after reading the FCE report. Sixteen IPs intended to involve FCE information in future disability claim assessments. There were no observed differences between the IPs who did or did not consider the FCE information to be of complementary value.

Conclusion

FCE information was found to have complementary value at present and in the future according to most IPs in the assessment of the physical work ability of claimants with MSD. Half of the IPs felt that this information reinforces their judgment in this context.
Literature
go back to reference de Bont A, van den Brink JC, Berendsen L, Boonk M (2002) Limited control of information for work disability evaluation [De beperkte controle van de informatie voor de arbeidsongeschiktheidsbeoordeling: in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 146:27–30PubMed de Bont A, van den Brink JC, Berendsen L, Boonk M (2002) Limited control of information for work disability evaluation [De beperkte controle van de informatie voor de arbeidsongeschiktheidsbeoordeling: in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 146:27–30PubMed
go back to reference Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, Goeken LN, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH (2005) Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil 27:999–1005PubMedCrossRef Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, Goeken LN, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH (2005) Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil 27:999–1005PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed
go back to reference Frings-Dresen MHW, Sluiter JK (2003) Development of a Job-specific FCE protocol: the work demands of hospital nurses as an example. J Occup Rehabil 13:233–248PubMedCrossRef Frings-Dresen MHW, Sluiter JK (2003) Development of a Job-specific FCE protocol: the work demands of hospital nurses as an example. J Occup Rehabil 13:233–248PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PPFM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2005) Intra- and interrater reliability of the Ergo-Kit Functional Capacity Evaluation method in adults without musculoskeletal complaints. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:2354–2360PubMedCrossRef Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PPFM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2005) Intra- and interrater reliability of the Ergo-Kit Functional Capacity Evaluation method in adults without musculoskeletal complaints. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:2354–2360PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PPFM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2006) Reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit Functional Capacity Evaluation in lifting tests in subjects with low back pain. Arch Phys Med 87:1365–1370PubMedCrossRef Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PPFM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2006) Reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit Functional Capacity Evaluation in lifting tests in subjects with low back pain. Arch Phys Med 87:1365–1370PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gross DP, Battié MC (2004) The prognostic value of Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 2; sustained recovery. Spine 29:920–924PubMedCrossRef Gross DP, Battié MC (2004) The prognostic value of Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 2; sustained recovery. Spine 29:920–924PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gross DP, Battié MC (2005) Functional Capacity Evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain. J Occup Rehab 15:285–294CrossRef Gross DP, Battié MC (2005) Functional Capacity Evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain. J Occup Rehab 15:285–294CrossRef
go back to reference Gross DP, Battié MC (2006) Does Functional Capacity Evaluation predict recovery in workers’ compensation claimants with upper extremity disorders? Occup Environ Med 3:404–410CrossRef Gross DP, Battié MC (2006) Does Functional Capacity Evaluation predict recovery in workers’ compensation claimants with upper extremity disorders? Occup Environ Med 3:404–410CrossRef
go back to reference Gross DP, Battié MC, Cassidy JD (2004) The prognostic value of Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1; timely return to work. Spine 29:914–919PubMedCrossRef Gross DP, Battié MC, Cassidy JD (2004) The prognostic value of Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1; timely return to work. Spine 29:914–919PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gross DP, Battié MC, Asante A (2006) Development and validation of a short-form Functional Capacity Evaluation for use in claimants with low back disorders. J Occup Rehab 16:53–62CrossRef Gross DP, Battié MC, Asante A (2006) Development and validation of a short-form Functional Capacity Evaluation for use in claimants with low back disorders. J Occup Rehab 16:53–62CrossRef
go back to reference Harten JA (1998) Functional capacity evaluation. Occup Med 13:209–212PubMed Harten JA (1998) Functional capacity evaluation. Occup Med 13:209–212PubMed
go back to reference Hudson-Cook N, Tomes-Nicholson K, Breen A (1989) A revised Oswestry disability questionnaire. In: Roland M, Jenner JR (eds) Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 187–204 Hudson-Cook N, Tomes-Nicholson K, Breen A (1989) A revised Oswestry disability questionnaire. In: Roland M, Jenner JR (eds) Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 187–204
go back to reference Innes E (2006) Reliability and validity of functional capacity evaluations: an update. Int J Disab Manag Res 1:135–148CrossRef Innes E (2006) Reliability and validity of functional capacity evaluations: an update. Int J Disab Manag Res 1:135–148CrossRef
go back to reference Innes E, Straker L (1999a) Reliability of work-related assessments. Work 13:107–124PubMed Innes E, Straker L (1999a) Reliability of work-related assessments. Work 13:107–124PubMed
go back to reference Innes E, Straker L (1999b) Validity of work-related assessments. Work 13:125–152PubMed Innes E, Straker L (1999b) Validity of work-related assessments. Work 13:125–152PubMed
go back to reference Kerstholt JH, de Boer WEL, Jansen EJM, Bollen D, Rasker PC, Cremer R (2002) Psychological aspects of disability claim assessment (Psychologische aspecten van de claimbeoordeling: in Dutch). TNO report, TM-02-C051, Hoofddorp, p 33 Kerstholt JH, de Boer WEL, Jansen EJM, Bollen D, Rasker PC, Cremer R (2002) Psychological aspects of disability claim assessment (Psychologische aspecten van de claimbeoordeling: in Dutch). TNO report, TM-02-C051, Hoofddorp, p 33
go back to reference King PM, Tuckwell N, Barrett TE (1998) A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther 78(8):852–866PubMed King PM, Tuckwell N, Barrett TE (1998) A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther 78(8):852–866PubMed
go back to reference Le Pen C, Reygrobellet C, Gérentes I (2005) Financial cost of osteoarthritis in France. The COART France study. Joint Bone Spine 72:567–570PubMedCrossRef Le Pen C, Reygrobellet C, Gérentes I (2005) Financial cost of osteoarthritis in France. The COART France study. Joint Bone Spine 72:567–570PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lubeck DP (2003) The costs of musculoskeletal disease: health needs assessment and health economics. Best Pract Res Clin Rheum 17:529–539CrossRef Lubeck DP (2003) The costs of musculoskeletal disease: health needs assessment and health economics. Best Pract Res Clin Rheum 17:529–539CrossRef
go back to reference Lyth JR (2001) Disability management and functional capacity evaluation: a dynamic resource. Work 16:13–22PubMed Lyth JR (2001) Disability management and functional capacity evaluation: a dynamic resource. Work 16:13–22PubMed
go back to reference Picavet S, Schouten JSAG (2003) Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC3-study. Pain 102:167–178PubMedCrossRef Picavet S, Schouten JSAG (2003) Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC3-study. Pain 102:167–178PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rainville J, Pransky G, Indahl A, Mayer EK (2005) The physician as disability advisor for patients with musculoskeletal complaints. Spine 30:2579–2584PubMedCrossRef Rainville J, Pransky G, Indahl A, Mayer EK (2005) The physician as disability advisor for patients with musculoskeletal complaints. Spine 30:2579–2584PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Razenberg PPA (1992) Formation of judgment: scientific framework (Verzekeringsgeneeskundige oordeelsvorming: inzicht in de praktijk: in Dutch). PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Razenberg PPA (1992) Formation of judgment: scientific framework (Verzekeringsgeneeskundige oordeelsvorming: inzicht in de praktijk: in Dutch). PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
go back to reference Soer R, Gerrits EHJ, Reneman MF (2006) Test-retest reliability of a WRULD functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. Work 26:273–280PubMed Soer R, Gerrits EHJ, Reneman MF (2006) Test-retest reliability of a WRULD functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. Work 26:273–280PubMed
go back to reference Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Andresen EM, Hadler NM (2006) Disability determination: validity with occupational low back pain. J Pain 7(12):951–957PubMedCrossRef Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Andresen EM, Hadler NM (2006) Disability determination: validity with occupational low back pain. J Pain 7(12):951–957PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van de Mheen H, Stronks K, Schrijvers CTM, Mackenbach JP (1999) The influence of adult ill health on occupational class mobility and mobility out of and into employment in The Netherlands. Soc Sci Med 49:509–518PubMedCrossRef Van de Mheen H, Stronks K, Schrijvers CTM, Mackenbach JP (1999) The influence of adult ill health on occupational class mobility and mobility out of and into employment in The Netherlands. Soc Sci Med 49:509–518PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vasudevan SV (1996) Role of functional capacity assessment in disability evaluation. J Back Musculoskel Rehab 6:237–248CrossRef Vasudevan SV (1996) Role of functional capacity assessment in disability evaluation. J Back Musculoskel Rehab 6:237–248CrossRef
go back to reference Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PPFM, Frings-Dresen MHW (2005) Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: a systematic review. J Occup Rehab 15:253–272CrossRef Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PPFM, Frings-Dresen MHW (2005) Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: a systematic review. J Occup Rehab 15:253–272CrossRef
go back to reference Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PPFM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2006) The utility of functional capacity evaluation: the opinion of physicians and other experts in the field of return to work and disability claims. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79:528–534PubMedCrossRef Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PPFM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2006) The utility of functional capacity evaluation: the opinion of physicians and other experts in the field of return to work and disability claims. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79:528–534PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Complementary value of functional capacity evaluation for physicians in assessing the physical work ability of workers with musculoskeletal disorders
Authors
Haije Wind
Vincent Gouttebarge
P. Paul F. M. Kuijer
Judith K. Sluiter
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen
Publication date
01-03-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0361-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 4/2009 Go to the issue