Top

Published in:

01-03-2020 | Original Paper

Return-to-Player Percentage in Gaming Machines: Impact of Informative Materials on Player Understanding

Authors: Kate Beresford, Alexander Blaszczynski

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 1/2020

Abstract

The addictive potential of electronic gaming machines (EGMs) is currently explained within a cognitive-behavioural framework. This framework explains that various erroneous cognitions regarding players’ likelihood of winning contribute to persistent EGM gambling behaviour. Related to these cognitions is the pervasive misunderstanding among players regarding the operation of EGMs. However, little research has focussed specifically on player understanding of the theoretical proportion returned to players over the lifetime of a machine; return to player percentage. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which players understand the concept return to player percentage presented in different educative formats. A sample of 112 university students were randomly allocated to one of four conditions pertaining to a different mode of information delivery; infographic, vignette, brochure, or mandated legislation (control). Participants completed post-intervention measures to determine changes in knowledge. As predicted, participants exhibited a lack of understanding of the concept of return to player at baseline. However, contrary to predictions, exposure to any of the experimental conditions did not result in a greater understanding of return to player than controls. The study findings emphasise the difficulty individuals have in understanding complex concepts related to return to player percentages when presented in current formats and content. Treatment and responsible gambling policies need to adopt strategies to effectively improve knowledge of this aspect of the structural characteristics of gaming machines.

American Casino Guide. (2019). Slot machine payback statistics. Retrieved February 9, 2019 from https://www.americancasinoguide.com/slot-machine-payback-statistics.html.

Australian Hotels Association. (2014). Responsible gambling code of conduct: February 2012 (version 1). Retrieved July 24, 2017 from https://yarravilleclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Responsible-Gambling-code-of-conduct.pdf.

Blaszczynski, A., Collins, P., Fong, D., Ladouceur, R., Nower, L., Shaffer, H. J., et al. (2011). Responsible gambling: General principles and minimal requirements. Journal of Gambling Studies,27(4), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-010-9214-0.CrossRefPubMed

Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies,20(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040281.49444.e2.CrossRefPubMed

Brewer, N. T., Richman, A. R., DeFrank, J. T., Reyna, V. F., & Carey, L. A. (2012). Improving communication of breast cancer recurrence risk. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment,133(2), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1791-9.CrossRefPubMed

Brust-Renck, P. G., Royer, C. E., & Reyna, V. F. (2013). Communicating numerical risk: Human factors that aid understanding in health care. Review of Human Factors and Ergonomics,8(1), 235–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557234X13492980.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bunge, M., Mühlhauser, I., & Steckelberg, A. (2010). What constitutes evidence-based patient information? Overview of discussed criteria. Patient Education and Counseling,78(3), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.029.CrossRefPubMed

Chóliz, M. (2010). Experimental analysis of the game in pathological gamblers: Effect of the immediacy of the reward in slot machines. Journal of Gambling,26(2), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9156-6.CrossRef

Clifford, A., Ryan, J., Walsh, C., & McCurtin, A. (2017). What information is used in treatment decision aids? A systematic review of the types of evidence populating health decision aids. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0415-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Collins, D., Green, S., d’Ardenne, J., Wardle, H., & Williams, S. (2014). Understanding of return to player messages: Findings from user testing. Report prepared for the Responsible Gambling Trust. London: Responsible Gambling Trust.

Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist,18(2), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528309529266.CrossRef

Delfabbro, P. (2004). The stubborn logic of regular gamblers: Obstacles and dilemmas in cognitive gambling research. Journal of Gambling Studies,20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGS.0000016701.17146.d0.CrossRefPubMed

Delfabbro, P., Lahn, J., & Grabosky, P. (2006). It’s not what you know, but how you use it: Statistical knowledge and adolescent problem gambling. Journal of Gambling,22(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-006-9009-5.CrossRef

Dixon, M. J., Fugelsang, J. A., MacLaren, V. V., & Harrigan, K. A. (2013). Gamblers can discriminate “tight” from “loose” electronic gambling machines. International Gambling Studies,13(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2012.712151.CrossRef

Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction,100(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00962.x.CrossRefPubMed

Erickson, S. J., Gerstle, M., & Feldstein, S. W. (2005). Brief interventions and motivational interviewing with children, adolescents, and their parents in pediatric health care settings: A review. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine,159(12), 1173–1180. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.159.12.1173.CrossRefPubMed

Fisher, S., & Griffiths, M. (1995). Current trends in slot machine gambling: Research and policy issues. Journal of Gambling Studies,11(3), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02104791.CrossRefPubMed

Gambling Technologies Association. (2013). Responsible gaming machine play. Retrieved March 27, 2017 from http://gamingta.com/responsible-gaming/.

Gaming Technologies Association. (2017). Australian gaming machines: Player information booklet. Retrieved March 27, 2017 from http://www.gamingta.com/pdf/playerinfo.pdf.

Gambling Technologies Australia. (2018). Responsible gambling videos. Retrieved from http://gamingta.com/vid-test/.

Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2011). Effective communication of risks to young adults: Using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,17(3), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023677.CrossRefPubMed

Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2017). Designing visual aids that promote risk literacy: A systematic review of health research and evidence-based design heuristics. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,59(4), 582–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817690634.CrossRef

Gigerenzer, G. (1996). The psychology of good judgment: Frequency formats and simple algorithms. Medical Decision Making,16(3), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9601600312.CrossRefPubMed

Griffiths, M. (1999). Gambling technologies: Prospects for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies,15(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023053630588.CrossRefPubMed

Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. (2010). Government sanctioned “tight” and “loose” slot machines: How having multiple versions of the same slot machine game may impact problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies,26(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9154-8.CrossRefPubMed

Hoffrage, U., Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Communicating statistical information. Science (New York, N.Y.),290(5500), 2261–2262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5500.2261.CrossRef

Hogarth, R. M. (1975). Cognitive processes and the assessment of subjective probability distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association,70(350), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1975.10479858.CrossRef

Ilic, D., Jammal, W., Chiarelli, P., Gardiner, R. A., Hughes, S., Stefanovic, D., et al. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of decision aids for decision making in prostate cancer testing: A systematic review: Decision aids for prostate cancer testing. Psycho-Oncology,24(10), 1303–1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3815.CrossRefPubMed

Lambos, C., & Delfabbro, P. (2007). Numerical reasoning ability and irrational beliefs in problem gambling. International Gambling Studies,7(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459790701387428.CrossRef

Livingstone, C. (2017). How electronic gambling machines work. AGRC discussion paper 8. Melbourne: Australian Gambling Research Centre, Australian Institute of Family Studies.

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review,14(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013184611077.CrossRef

Michielutte, R., Bahnson, J., Dignan, M. B., & Schroeder, E. M. (1992). The use of illustrations and narrative text style to improve readability of a health education brochure. Journal of Cancer Education: The Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Education,7(3), 251.CrossRef

Monaghan, S., Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2009). Do warning signs on electronic gaming machines influence irrational cognitions? Psychological Reports,105(1), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.1.173-187.CrossRefPubMed

O’Connor, A. M., Fiset, V., DeGrasse, C., Graham, I. D., Evans, W., Stacey, D., et al. (1999). Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: Evidence of efficacy and policy implications. Journal of the National Cancer Institute: Monographs,1999(25), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024212.CrossRef

Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. (2006). The psychology of the fruit machine: The role of structural characteristics (revisited). International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction,4(2), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-006-9014-z.CrossRef

Parke, J., Parke, A., & Blaszczynski, A. (2016). Key issues in product-based harm minimisation: Examining theory, evidence and policy issues relevant in Great Britain. Responsible Gambling Trust. Retrieved July 26, 2017 from http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/26363/1/pbhm-final-report-december-2016.pdf.

Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling: Productivity commission inquiry report, no 50, 26, February 2010. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

Satterfield, T., Slovic, P., & Gregory, R. (2000). Narrative valuation in a policy judgment context. Ecological Economics,34(3), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00177-4.CrossRef

Smith, S. K., Trevena, L., Simpson, J. M., Barratt, A., Nutbeam, D., & McCaffery, K. J. (2010). A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: Randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5370.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Col, N. F., Bennett, C. L., Barry, M. J., Eden, K. B., et al. (2014). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.CrossRefPubMed

The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal. (2005). Gambling: Promoting a culture of responsibility—Consequential report on governance structures. Sydney, Australia.

Thomas, A. C., Sullivan, G. B., & Allen, F. C. L. (2009). A theoretical model of EGM problem gambling: More than a cognitive escape. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction,7(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-008-9152-6.CrossRef

Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation. (2017). Victorian appendix to the Australian/New Zealand gaming machine national standard: March 2017 (version 1.1). Retrieved March 6, 2017 from https://www.vcglr.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/Victorian_Appendix_to_the_Australian_New_Zealand_Gaming_Machine_National%20_Standard_2016.PDF.

Victorian Department of Justice. (2009). Inside the pokies—Player guide. Retrieved from http://www.psych.usyd.edu.au/gambling_treatment_clinic/resources/Inside_the_Pokies.pdf.

Victorian Government Chief Parliamentary Council. (2015). Gambling Regulation Act 2003 No. 114 of 2003 authorised version incorporating amendments as at 19 November 2015 (version 065). Retrieved March 6, 2017 from http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/domino/Web_Notes/LDMS/LTObject_Store/ltobjst9.nsf/DDE300B846EED9C7CA257616000A3571/6ECB524096999A87CA257F01001C0841/$FILE/03-114aa065%20authorised.pdf.

Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation. (2014). Pokies, lotteries, keno: What is return to player? Retrieved March 27, 2017 from https://www.responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/11912/Fact-Sheet-What-is-return-to-player.pdf.

Walker, M. B., Schellinck, T., & Anjoul, F. (2008). Explaining why people gamble. In M. Zangeneh, A. Blaszczynski, & N. E. Turner (Eds.), In the pursuit of winning: Problem gambling theory, research and treatment (pp. 11–33). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef

Wohl, M. J. A., Christie, K.-L., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Animation-based education as a gambling prevention tool: Correcting erroneous cognitions and reducing the frequency of exceeding limits among slots players. Journal of Gambling Studies,26(3), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9155-7.CrossRefPubMed

Wohl, M. J. A., Gainsbury, S., Stewart, M. J., & Sztainert, T. (2013a). Facilitating responsible gambling: The relative effectiveness of education-based animation and monetary limit setting pop-up messages among electronic gaming machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies,29(4), 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9340-y.CrossRefPubMed

Wohl, M. J. A., Santesso, D. L., & Harrigan, K. (2013b). Reducing erroneous cognitions and the frequency of exceeding limits among slots players: A short (3-minute) educational animation facilitates responsible gambling. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction,11(4), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-012-9424-z.CrossRef

Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science,10(6), 224–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00154.CrossRef

Title: Return-to-Player Percentage in Gaming Machines: Impact of Informative Materials on Player Understanding
Authors: Kate Beresford
Alexander Blaszczynski
Publication date: 01-03-2020
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09854-z

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Return-to-Player Percentage in Gaming Machines: Impact of Informative Materials on Player Understanding

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Use of Consumer Protection Tools on Internet Gambling Sites: Customer Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers to Use

Predictors of Dropout in Disordered Gamblers in UK Residential Treatment

Correlates of At-Risk and Problem Gambling Among Veterans in Massachusetts

Prevalence and Characteristics of Sports Betting in a Population of Young Students in Madrid

Gamble with Your Head and Not Your Heart: A Conceptual Model for How Thinking-Style Promotes Irrational Gambling Beliefs

Betting Practices Among Players in Portuguese Championships: From Cultural to Illegal Behaviours