Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies 1/2020

01-03-2020 | Original Paper

Use of Consumer Protection Tools on Internet Gambling Sites: Customer Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers to Use

Authors: Sally M. Gainsbury, Douglas J. Angus, Lindsey Procter, Alex Blaszczynski

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Internet gambling has been widely legalised in recognition of its capacity to, and the importance of, providing consumer protection tools to prevent and minimise gambling-related harms. Most licensed Internet gambling sites are required to provide consumer protection tools, including activity statements, deposit limits, and time-outs (temporary self-exclusion). However, few Internet gambling customers engage with the tools. An online survey of 564 customers of Australian Internet gambling sites aimed to understand the extent to which consumer protection tools are used, characteristics of those using these tools, and the perceptions and attitudes towards tool use, including barriers to use. Most participants were aware of the tools and had accessed activity statements; few had used deposit limits (24.5%) or time-outs (8.1%) but use of these restrictive tools was higher among those at-risk of gambling problems. Satisfaction with tools was generally high among users and tools were mostly used as intended; however, only moderate changes in behaviour were reported. Participants predominately did not use the restrictive tools as they did not see these as relevant for them, and they were perceived to be intended for people with gambling problems. The findings are important to drive necessary improvements to consumer protection efforts including efforts to encourage perception that tools are relevant for all customers. Changes to current practice, including terminology and promotion of tools, are needed by Internet gambling operators and policy makers to improve the utilisation and effectiveness of consumer protection tools to enable sustainable gambling among the broader cohort of Internet gamblers.
Literature
go back to reference Auer, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2016). Personalized behavioral feedback for online gamblers: A real world empirical study. Frontiers in Psychology,7, 1875.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Auer, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2016). Personalized behavioral feedback for online gamblers: A real world empirical study. Frontiers in Psychology,7, 1875.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Wang, J., El-Guebaly, N., Wynne, H., & Chen, S. (2006). Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities. Addiction,101(4), 570–580.CrossRefPubMed Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Wang, J., El-Guebaly, N., Wynne, H., & Chen, S. (2006). Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities. Addiction,101(4), 570–580.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottowa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottowa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
go back to reference Gainsbury, S., Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., & Blaszczynski, A. (2013b). The impact of internet gambling on gambling problems: A comparison of moderate-risk and problem Internet and non-Internet gamblers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,27(4), 1092–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031475.CrossRefPubMed Gainsbury, S., Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., & Blaszczynski, A. (2013b). The impact of internet gambling on gambling problems: A comparison of moderate-risk and problem Internet and non-Internet gamblers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,27(4), 1092–1101. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0031475.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gainsbury, S., Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., Lubman, D. I., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). The prevalence and determinants of problem gambling in Australia: Assessing the impact of interactive gambling and new technologies. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,28(3), 769–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036207.CrossRefPubMed Gainsbury, S., Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., Lubman, D. I., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). The prevalence and determinants of problem gambling in Australia: Assessing the impact of interactive gambling and new technologies. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,28(3), 769–779. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0036207.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Reith, G. (2008). Reflections on responsibility. Journal of Gambling Issues,22, 149–155.CrossRef Reith, G. (2008). Reflections on responsibility. Journal of Gambling Issues,22, 149–155.CrossRef
go back to reference Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2008). Why Swedish people play online poker and factors that can increase or decrease trust in poker websites: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Gambling Issues,21, 80–97.CrossRef Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2008). Why Swedish people play online poker and factors that can increase or decrease trust in poker websites: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Gambling Issues,21, 80–97.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Use of Consumer Protection Tools on Internet Gambling Sites: Customer Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers to Use
Authors
Sally M. Gainsbury
Douglas J. Angus
Lindsey Procter
Alex Blaszczynski
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09859-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Gambling Studies 1/2020 Go to the issue