Top

Published in:

01-06-2018 | Original Paper

Using the Multiple-Choice Procedure to Measure the Relative Reinforcing Efficacy of Gambling: Initial Validity Evidence Among College Students

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 2/2018

Abstract

The multiple choice procedure (MCP) is used to assess the relative reinforcing value of concurrently available stimuli. The MCP was originally developed to assess the reinforcing value of drugs; the current within-subjects study employed the MCP to assess the reinforcing value of gambling behavior. Participants (N = 323) completed six versions of the MCP that presented hypothetical choices between money to be used while gambling ($10 or $25) versus escalating amounts of guaranteed money available immediately or after delays of either 1 week or 1 month. Results suggest that choices on the MCP are correlated with other measures of gambling behavior, thus providing concurrent validity data for using the MCP to quantify the relative reinforcing value of gambling. The MCP for gambling also displayed sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude and delay effects, which provides evidence of criterion validity. The results are consistent with a behavioral economic model of addiction and suggest that the MCP could be a valid tool for future research on gambling behavior.

Beaudoin, C. M., & Cox, B. J. (1999). Characteristics of problem gambling in a Canadian context: A preliminary study using a DSM-IV-based questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 483–487.CrossRefPubMed

Benson, T. A., Little, C. S., Henslee, A. M., & Correia, C. J. (2009). Effects of reinforcer magnitude and alternative reinforcer delay on preference for alcohol during a multiple-choice procedure. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 100, 161–163.CrossRefPubMed

Betz, C., Mihalic, D., Pinto, M. E., & Raffa, R. B. (2000). Could a common biochemical mechanism underlie addictions? Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 25, 11–20.CrossRefPubMed

Bickel, W. K., Johnson, M. W., Koffarnus, M. N., MacKillop, J., & Murphy, J. G. (2014). The behavioral economics of substance use disorders: Reinforcement pathologies and their repair. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 641–677.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Black, W. B., & Moyer, T. (1998). Clinical features and psychiatric comorbidity of subjects with pathological gambling. Psychiatric Services, 49, 1434–1439.CrossRefPubMed

Breiter, H. C., Aharon, I., Kahneman, D., Dale, A., & Shizgal, P. (2001). Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron, 30, 619–639.CrossRefPubMed

Caetano, R., John, S., & Cunrandi, C. (2001). Alcohol-related intimate partner violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Alcohol Research & Health, 25, 58–65.

Chamberlain, L. (2004). Understanding and diagnosing compuslive gambling. In R. H. Coombs (Ed.), Handbook of addictive disorders: A practical guide to diagnosis and treatment (pp. 129–160). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Chutuape, M. A. D., Silverman, K., & Stitzer, M. L. (1998). Survey assessment of methadone treatment services as reinforcers. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 24, 1–16.CrossRefPubMed

Correia, C. J., Carey, K. B., & Borsari, B. (2002). Measuring substance-free and substance-related reinforcement in the natural environment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 28–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Michaud, V. (2004). Comparisons between the south oaks gambling screen and a DSM-IV-based interview in a community survey of problem gambling. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 258–264.CrossRefPubMed

Engwall, D., Hunter, R., & Steinberg, M. (2004). Gambling and other risk behaviors on university campuses. Journal of American College Health, 52, 245–255.CrossRefPubMed

Garrett, B. E., & Griffiths, R. R. (1998). Physical dependence increases the relative reinforcing effects of caffeine versus placebo. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 139, 195–202.CrossRef

Grant, J. E., & Potenza, N. M. (2005). Pathological gambling and other behavioral addictions. In R. J. Frances, S. I. Miller, & A. H. Mack (Eds.), Clinical textbook of addictive disorders (3rd ed., pp. 303–320). New York: Guilford Press.

Greenwald, M. K., & Hursh, S. R. (2006). Behavioral economic analysis of opioid consumption in heroin-dependent individuals: Effects of unit price and presession drug supply. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 85, 35–48.CrossRefPubMed

Griffiths, R. R., Rush, C. R., & Puhala, K. A. (1996). Validation of the multiple-choice procedure for investigating drug reinforcement in humans. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 4(1), 97–106.CrossRef

Griffiths, R. R., Troisi, J. R., Silverman, K., & Mumford, G. K. (1993). Multiple-choice procedure: An efficient approach for investigating drug reinforcement in humans. Behavioral Pharmacology, 4, 3–13.CrossRef

Gwaltney, C. J., Shields, A. L., & Shiffman, S. S. (2008). Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytical review. Value in Health, 11, 322–333.CrossRefPubMed

Higgins, S. T., & Silverman, K. (Eds.). (1999). Motivating behavior change among illicit abusers: Research on contingency management interventions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.

Jones, H. E., Garrett, B. E., & Griffiths, R. R. (1999). Subjective and physiological effects of intravenous nicotine and cocaine in cigarette smoking cocaine abusers. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 288, 188–197.PubMed

Ladouceur, R., Dube, D., & Bujold, A. (1994). Prevalence of pathological gambling and related problems among college students in the Quebec metropolitan area. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 289–293.CrossRefPubMed

Lee, H. P., Chae, P. K., Lee, H. S., & Kim, Y. K. (2007). The five-factor gambling motivation model. Psychiatry Research, 150, 21–32.CrossRefPubMed

Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.CrossRefPubMed

Lesieur, H. R., Cross, J., Frank, M., Welch, M., White, C. M., Rubenstein, G., et al. (1991). Gambling and pathological gambling among university students. Addictive Behaviors, 16, 517–527.CrossRefPubMed

Little, C., & Correia, C. J. (2006). Use of a multiple choice procedure with college student drinkers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 445–454.CrossRefPubMed

Meyer, G., Hauffa, B. P., Schedlowski, M., Pawluk, C., Stadler, M. A., & Exton, M. S. (2000). Casino gambling increases heart rate and salivary cortisol in regular gamblers. Biological Psychiatry, 48, 948–953.CrossRefPubMed

Meyer, G., Schwertfeger, J., Exton, M. S., Janssen, O. E., Knapp, W., Stadler, M. A. S., et al. (2004). Neuroendocrine response to casino gambling in problem gamblers. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 1272–1280.CrossRefPubMed

Murphy, J. G., Correia, C. J., & Barnett, N. P. (2007). Behavioral economic approaches to reducing college student drinking. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2573–2585.CrossRefPubMed

Murphy, J. G., Correia, C. J., Colby, S. M., & Vuchinich, R. E. (2005). Using behavioral theories of choice to predict drinking outcomes following a brief intervention. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 13, 93–101.CrossRefPubMed

Murphy, J. G., Dennhardt, A. A., Skidmore, J. R., Borsari, B., Barnett, N. P., Colby, S. M., et al. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80(5), 876–886.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Cronce, J. M., & Larimer, M. E. (2002a). Exploring college student gambling motivation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 361–370.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Larimer, M. E., & Takushi, R. Y. (2002b). Measuring gambling outcomes among college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 339–359.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nowak, D. E., & Aloe, A. M. (2014). The prevalence of pathological gambling among college students: A meta-analytic synthesis, 2005–2013. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30, 819–843.CrossRefPubMed

Potenza, M. N. (2006). Should addictive disorders include non-substance-related conditions? Addiction, 101, 142–151.CrossRefPubMed

Rousseau, G. S., Irons, J. G., & Correia, C. J. (2011). The reinforcing value of alcohol in a drinking to cope paradigm. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 118, 1–4.CrossRefPubMed

Stinchfield, T. (2003). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 180–182.CrossRefPubMed

Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Ladouceur, R., & Tremblay, R. (2001). Gambling, delinquency, and drug use during adolescence” Mutual influences and common risk factors. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 171–190.CrossRefPubMed

Vuchinich, R. E., & Tucker, J. A. (1988). Contributions from behavioral theories of choice to an analysis of alcohol abuse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(2), 181–195.CrossRefPubMed

Weinstock, J., Whelan, J. P., Meyers, A. W., & McCausland, C. (2007). The performance of two pathological gambling screens in college students. Assessment, 14, 399–407.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Using the Multiple-Choice Procedure to Measure the Relative Reinforcing Efficacy of Gambling: Initial Validity Evidence Among College Students
Publication date: 01-06-2018
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 2/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-017-9716-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Using the Multiple-Choice Procedure to Measure the Relative Reinforcing Efficacy of Gambling: Initial Validity Evidence Among College Students

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

The Impact of Speed of Play in Gambling on Psychological and Behavioural Factors: A Critical Review

The Brain’s Reward Response Occurs Even Without Actual Reward!

When Does Premature Treatment Termination Occur? Examining Session-by-Session Dropout Among Clients with Gambling Disorder

The Development of an Internet-Based Treatment for Problem Gamblers and Concerned Significant Others: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Electroencephalographic Evidence of Abnormal Anticipatory Uncertainty Processing in Gambling Disorder Patients

Validation of the Short Gambling Harm Screen (SGHS): A Tool for Assessment of Harms from Gambling