Abstract
The problem of gambling addiction can be especially noteworthy among college and university students, many of whom have the resources, proximity, free time, and desire to become involved in the myriad options of gambling now available. Although limited attention has been paid specifically to college student gambling in the body of literature, there have been two published meta-analyses estimating the prevalence of probable pathological gambling among college students. This present study aims to be the third, presenting an up-to-date proportion of those students exhibiting gambling pathology, and is the first to include international studies from outside the United States and Canada. The purpose of this study was to use the most up-to-date meta-analytical procedures to synthesize the rates of probable pathological gambling for college and university students worldwide. A thorough literature review and coding procedure resulted in 19 independent data estimates retrieved from 18 studies conducted between 2005 and 2013. To synthesize the studies, a random effects model for meta-analysis was applied. The estimated proportion of probable pathological gamblers among the over 13,000 college students surveyed was computed at 10.23 %, considerably higher than either of the two previously published meta-analyses, and more than double the rate reported in the first meta-analysis of this type published in 1999. Implications and recommendations for future practice in dealing with college students and gambling addiction are outlined and described for both administrators and mental health professionals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Studies marked with an asterisk (*) were included in the meta-analysis.
Adams, G. R., Sullivan, A., Horton, K. D., Menna, R., & Guilmette, A. (2007). A study of differences in Canadian university students’ gambling and proximity to a casino. Journal of Gambling Issues, 19, 9–18. doi:10.4309/jgi.2007.19.1.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
*Arthur, D., Tong, W., Chen, C., Hing, A., Sagara-Rosemeyer, M., Kua, E., & Ignacio, J. (2008). The validity and reliability of four measures of gambling behaviour in a sample of Singapore university students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(4), 451–462. doi:10.1007/s10899-008-9103-y.
Bailey, E. A., Burroughs, S. W., Dabit, J. S., Hambrick, R. S., & Theriot, P. B. (1997). The lure of casino gambling and its potential impact on college students in Mississippi. College Student Affairs Journal, 17, 81–92.
Barnes, G. M., Welte, J. W., Hoffman, J. H., & Tidwell, M. C. (2010). Comparisons of gambling and alcohol use among college students and noncollege young people in the United States. Journal of American College Health, 58(5), 443–452.
Beaudoin, C. M., & Cox, B. J. (1999). Characteristics of problem gambling in a Canadian context: A preliminary study using a DSM-IV-based questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 483–487.
Becker, B. J. (2000). Multivariate meta-analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 499–525). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Benston, L. (2009, November 23). Illness theory gaining ground for gambling addiction. Las Vegas Sun. Retrieved from http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/nov/23/illness-theory-gaining-ground/.
Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97(5), 487–499. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x.
Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Moodie, C. (2008). The Sydney Laval universities gambling screen: Preliminary data. Addiction Research & Theory, 16(4), 401–411. doi:10.1080/16066350701699031.
Blinn-Pike, L., Lokken Worthy, S., & Jonkman, J. N. (2007). Disordered gambling among college students: A meta-analytic synthesis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(2), 175–183. doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9036-2.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
*Burger, T. D. (2007). College students and gambling: Gauging the effects of gender on impulse control, sensation seeking, and mental health as predictors of involvement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67.
Burger, T. D., Dahlgren, D., & MacDonald, C. D. (2006). College students and gambling: An examination of gender differences in motivation for participation. College Student Journal, 40, 704–714.
*Butler, L. (2011). Using the multiple choice procedure to measure college student gambling. Dissertation Abstracts International, 71.
Caswell, J. (2006). Listening to their stories: Students’ perspectives about campus gambling. In G. S. McClellan, T. W. Hardy, & J. Caswell (Eds.), Gambling on campus: New directions for student services (pp. 25–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Dickerson, M. (2003). The evolving contribution of gambling research to addiction theory. Addiction, 98(6), 709. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00415.x.
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463.
Ellenbogen, S., Jacobs, D., Derevensky, J., Gupta, R., & Paskus, T. (2008). Gambling behavior among college student-athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20(3), 349–362. doi:10.1080/10413200802056685.
Engwall, D., Hunter, R., & Steinberg, M. (2004). Gambling and other risk behaviors on university campuses. Journal of American College Health, 52(6), 245–255. doi:10.3200/JACH.52.6.245-256.
*Fortune, E. E., & Goodie, A. S. (2010). Comparing the utility of a modified Diagnostic Interview for Gambling Severity (DIGS) with the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) as a research screen in college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(4), 639–644. doi:10.1007/s10899-010-9189-x.
*Goodie, A. S. (2005). The role of perceived control and overconfidence in pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(4), 481–502. doi:10.1007/s10899-005-5559-1.
Grant, J., Kim, S., Hollander, E., & Potenza, M. (2008). Predicting response to opiate antagonists and placebo in the treatment of pathological gambling. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 200(4), 521–527. doi:10.1007/s00213-008-1235-3.
Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (1998). An empirical examination of Jacobs’ General Theory of Addictions: Do adolescent gamblers fit the theory? Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(1), 17–49. doi:10.1023/A:1023046509031.
Hardy, T. W. (2006). A minute to learn and a lifetime to master: Implication of the poker craze for college campuses. In G. S. McClellan, T. W. Hardy, & J. Caswell (Eds.), Gambling on campus: New directions for student services (pp. 33–41). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Hodgins, D., Stea, J., & Grant, J. (2011). Gambling disorders. Lancet, 378(9806), 1874–1884. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62185-X.
Jacobs, D. F. (1986). A general theory of addictions: A new theoretical model. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 15–31.
Jacobs, D. F. (1989). Illegal and undocumented: A review of teenage gambling and the plight of children of problem gamblers in America. In H. J. Shaffer, S. A. Stein, & B. Gambino (Eds.), Compulsive gambling: Theory, research, and practice. Toronto: Lexington Books.
Kessler, R., Hwang, I., LaBrie, R., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N., Winters, K., et al. (2008). DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychological Medicine, 38(9), 1351–1360. doi:10.1017/S0033291708002900.
*Kido, M., & Shimazaki, T. (2007). Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Japanese Journal of Psychology, 77(6), 547–552. doi:10.4992/jjpsy.77.547.
*Kuentzel, J. G., Henderson, M. J., & Melville, C. L. (2008). The impact of social desirability biases on self-report among college student and problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(3), 307–319. doi:10.1007/s10899-008-9094-8.
LaBrie, R. A., Shaffer, H. J., LaPlante, D. A., & Wechsler, H. (2003). Correlates of college student gambling in the United States. The Journal of American College Health, 52(22), 53–62.
Ladouceur, R. (2004). Gambling: The hidden addiction. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie, 49(8), 501–503.
Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.
Lesieur, H. R., Cross, J., Frank, M., Welch, M., White, C. M., et al. (1991). Gambling and pathological gambling among university students. Addictive Behaviors, 16(6), 517–527.
*Locke, G. W., Shilkret, R., Everett, J. E., & Petry, N. M. (2013). Interpersonal guilt in college student pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 39(1), 28–32.
McClellan, G. S., Caswell, J., Beck, B., Holladay, C. G., Mitchell, A. A., & O’Connor, K. W. (2002). Gambling, its effects and prevalence on college campuses: Implications for student affairs. NASPA Center for Research on Student Life and Demographics, Invited Paper.
*McClellan, G. S., & Winters, K. C. (2006). Gambling: An old school new wave challenge for higher education in the twenty-first century. In G. S. McClellan, T. W. Hardy, & J. Caswell (Eds.), Gambling on campus: New directions for student services (pp. 9–23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McComb, J. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2009). Problem gambling on college campuses. NASPA Journal, 46(1), 1–29.
*Moodie, C. (2008). Student gambling, erroneous cognitions, and awareness of treatment in Scotland. Journal of Gambling Issues, 21, 30–55. doi:10.4309/jgi.2008.21.5.
National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2003). NCAA national study on collegiate sports wagering and associated health-risk behaviors. Indianapolis, IN: The National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Whiteside, U., Fossos, N., Walker, D. D., & Larimer, M. E. (2007). Injunctive norms and problem gambling among college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(3), 259–273. doi:10.1007/s10899-007-9059-3.
Oster, S. L., & Knapp, T. J. (1998). Sports betting among college students: Who bets and how often? College Student Journal, 32, 289–292.
*Oyebisi, E. O., Alao, K. A., & Popoola, B. I. (2012). Gambling behaviour of university students in South-Western Nigeria. IFE Psychologia: An International Journal, 20(1), 250–260.
*Parker, J. A., Wood, L. M., Bond, B. J., & Shaughnessy, P. (2005). Alexithymia in young adulthood: A risk factor for pathological gambling. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 74(1), 51–55. doi:10.1159/000082027.
Petry, N. M. (2005). Pathological gambling: Etiology, cormorbidity, and treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Assocation.
Petry, N. M. (2010). Pathological gambling and the DSM-V. Journal of International Gambling Studies, 10, 113–115.
*Petry, N. M., & Weinstock, J. (2007). Internet gambling is common in college students and associated with poor mental health. The American Journal on Addictions, 16(5), 325–330. doi:10.1080/10550490701525673.
*Platz, L., Knapp, T. J., & Crossman, E. W. (2005). Gambling by underage college students: Preferences and pathology. College Student Journal, 39(1), 3–6.
R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
Rockey, D. L, Jr, Rockey, C. M., Beason, K. R., Gilbert, J. D., & Howington, E. B. (2005). Gambling by Greek-affiliated college students: An association between affiliation and gambling. Journal of College Student Development, 46(1), 75–87.
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (2001). Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling and behaviour in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92, 168–172.
Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1369–1376.
Stinchfield, R. (2002). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 1–19. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00158-1.
Stinchfield, R., Hanson, W. E., & Olson, D. H. (2006). Problem and pathological gambling among college students. In G. S. McClellan, T. W. Hardy, & J. Caswell (Eds.), Gambling on campus: New directions for student services (pp. 63–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stuart, E. (2011, August 9). Gambling on the rise: Is America becoming addicted? Deseret News. Retrieved from http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700169522/Gambling-on-the-rise-Is-America-becoming-addicted.html?pg=all.
Stuhldreher, W. L., Stuhldreher, T. J., & Forrest, K. Z. (2007). Gambling as an emerging health problem on campus. Journal of American College Health, 56(1), 75–83. doi:10.3200/JACH.56.1.75-88.
Sumitra, L. M., & Miller, S. C. (2005). Pathologic gambling disorder. Postgraduate Medicine, 118(1), 31–37.
Takushi, R. Y., Neighbors, C., Larimer, M. E., Lostutter, T. W., Cronce, J. M., & Marlatt, G. (2004). Indicated prevention of problem gambling among college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(1), 83–93. doi:10.1023/B:JOGS.0000016705.58903.8f.
*Tang, C., & Wu, A. S. (2009). Screening for college problem gambling in Chinese societies: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (C-SOGS). International Gambling Studies, 9(3), 263–274.
Toneatto, T. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Gamblers Anonymous Twenty Questions. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 30(1), 71–78. doi:10.1007/s10862-007-9070-0.
Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48.
Walker, M. B. (1989). Some problems with the concept of ‘gambling addiction’: Should theories of addiction be generalized to include excessive gambling? Journal of Gambling Behavior, 5(3), 179–200. doi:10.1007/BF01024386.
*Weinstock, J., & Petry, N. M. (2008). Pathological gambling college students’ perceived social support. Journal of College Student Development, 49(6), 625–632. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0047.
*Weinstock, J., Whelan, J. P., Meyers, A. W., & McCausland, C. (2007). The performance of two pathological gambling screens in college students. Assessment, 14(4), 399–407. doi:10.1177/1073191107305273.
Weiss, S. M., & Loubier, S. L. (2008). Gambling behaviors of former athletes: The delayed competitive effect. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 12(1–2), 53–60.
*Wickwire, E. R., Whelan, J. P., Meyers, A. W., McCausland, C., Luellen, J., & Studaway, A. (2008). Environmental correlates of gambling behavior among college students: A partial application of problem behavior theory to gambling. Journal of College Student Development, 49(5), 459–475. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0030.
*Wickwire, E. R., Whelan, J. P., West, R., Meyers, A., McCausland, C., & Leullen, J. (2007). Perceived availability, risks, and benefits of gambling among college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(4), 395–408. doi:10.1007/s10899-007-9057-5.
World Health Organization. (1992). International classification of diseases: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic Criteria for Pathological Gambling (312.31)
Diagnostic Criteria:
Persistent and recurrent maladaptive gambling behavior as indicated by at least five of the following:
-
1.
is preoccupied with gambling (e.g., preoccupied with reliving past gambling experiences, handicapping or planning the next venture, or thinking of ways to get money with which to gamble)
-
2.
needs to gamble with increasing amounts of money in order to achieve the desired excitement
-
3.
has repeated unsuccessful efforts to control, cut back, or stop gambling
-
4.
is restless or irritable when attempting to cut down or stop gambling
-
5.
gambles as a way of escaping from problems or of relieving a dysphoric mood (e.g., feelings of helplessness, guilt, anxiety, depression)
-
6.
after losing money gambling, often returns another day in order to get even (“chasing” one’s losses)
-
7.
lies to family members, therapist, or others to conceal the extent of involvement with gambling
-
8.
has committed illegal acts, such as forgery, fraud theft, or embezzlement, in order to finance gambling
-
9.
has jeopardized or lost a significant relationship, job, or educational career opportunity because of gambling
-
10.
relies on others to provide money to relieve a desperate financial situation caused by gambling
Differential diagnosis
Distinct from
-
Social and professional gambling
-
Gambling in the context of a manic episode
-
Problems with gambling in antisocial personality disorder
ICD-10 Diagnostic Criteria for Pathological Gambling (F63.0)
The disorder consists of frequent, repeated episodes of gambling that dominate the patient’s life to the detriment of social, occupational, material, and family values and commitments.
Diagnostic Criteria:
-
a.
Repeated (two or more) episodes of gambling over a period of at least 1 year.
-
b.
These episodes do not have a profitable outcome for the person, but are continued despite personal distress and interference with personal functioning in daily living.
-
c.
The person describes an intense urge to gamble which is difficult to control, and reports that he or she is unable to stop gambling by an effort of will.
-
d.
The person is preoccupied with thoughts or mental images of the act of gambling or the circumstances surrounding the act.
Exclusions:
-
Excessive gambling by manic patients (F30)
-
Gambling and betting not otherwise specified (Z72.6)
-
Gambling in dissocial personality disorder (F60.2)
Appendix 2
College Gambling Resources
-
1.
BetCheck: www.responsiblegambling.org/betcheck/
-
(a)
Online tool that allows gamblers to assess their risk by answering their questions
-
(a)
-
2.
Self Help Handbook for Problem Gambling: www.problemgamblingvictoria.ca/handbook/handbook_toc.shtm
-
(a)
This book is for adult gamblers who would like to address their problem gambling individually.
-
(a)
-
3.
Gambling Decisions: www.gamingresearch.blogspot.com/2006/12/gambling-decisionsprogram-news.html
-
(a)
Six-week program to help individuals abstain or control gambling
-
(a)
-
4.
YMCA Youth Gambling Project: www.peterboroughymca.org/programs/ygp.htm
-
(a)
Gambling program for youth 8–24
-
(a)
-
5.
Association of Problem Gambling Services Administrators: www.camh.net/egambling/pdf/jgi_15_christensen.pdf
-
(a)
A group that initiates collaboration among states for problem gambling services
-
(a)
-
6.
National Council on Problem Gambling: www.ncpgambling.org
-
(a)
National organization that provides information on problem and pathological gambling including clinician gambling certification
-
(a)
-
7.
Responsible Gaming Council: www.responsiblegambling.org/en/index.cfm
-
(a)
Website of a non-profit organization that address problem gambling preventions
-
(a)
-
8.
Gambler’s Anonymous: www.gamblersanonymous.org
-
(a)
Organizational website that provides lists of meetings and resources for those seeking assistance for pathological gambling.
-
(a)
-
9.
Don’t Bet on It: www.dontbetonit.org
-
(a)
Interactive resource for college athletes, developed by NCAA
-
(a)
-
10.
Campus Blues: www.campusblues.com/gambling.asp
-
(a)
This site provides information on gambling on American campuses
-
(a)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nowak, D.E., Aloe, A.M. The Prevalence of Pathological Gambling Among College Students: A Meta-analytic Synthesis, 2005–2013. J Gambl Stud 30, 819–843 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9399-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9399-0