Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies 1/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Paper

Losing More by Losing It: Poker Experience, Sensitivity to Losses and Tilting Severity

Authors: Jussi Palomäki, Michael Laakasuo, Mikko Salmela

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

In poker, detrimental decision-making as a result of losing control due to negative emotions is known as tilting. Previous evidence suggests that poker experience is related to better emotion regulation in dealing with poker losses, and possibly to reduced severity of tilting in the game. A correlational on-line study (N = 417) was conducted to operationalize the tilting phenomenon by defining certain experiential characteristics that conceivably protect players from tilting or predispose them to it. These characteristics, as well as a measurement of poker experience, were then used in predicting the severity of tilting. It was hypothesized that (1) players with more poker experience are more likely to perceive having tilted less severely, as a result of accumulating poker experience; (2) players with more poker experience have lower severity of tilting; (3) players with more poker experience report lower emotional sensitivity to losses; and (4) players with a higher emotional sensitivity to losses have higher severity of tilting. Hypotheses 1 and 4 were supported, hypothesis 3 was weakly supported, but contrary to hypothesis 2, poker experience was associated with higher tilting severity. It is argued that these results are sensible if experienced players are less likely to tilt in relative terms, per single hand, but more likely to tilt in the long run.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
For information concerning the rules of poker, including an overlook at the general mechanisms of winning and losing in poker, see, e.g., Sklansky and Miller 2006.
 
2
A bad beat refers to losing in a situation where losing is perceived to be highly unlikely.
 
3
Alternatively, it is possible that the less frequently negative emotions are experienced, the more likely players are to continue playing.
 
4
Here, a poker hand refers to a single round of game play; the period begins when cards are dealt and ends with the showdown (revealing of players' cards and deciding the winner of said hand).
 
5
For instance, an item in the South Oaks Gambling Screen aimed at assessing chasing behavior “When you gamble, how often do you go back another day to win back money you have lost?” is not valid in assessing, for example, the assumed chasing behavior of a professional poker player: it is a poker professional's job to return to play the next day.
 
6
Based on the underlying theory, emotional sensitivity to losses (as measured by SL) was presumed to be the most consequential measured characteristic in predicting the severity of tilting (as measured by ST), and it was further assumed that effects of both poker experience (as measured by PES) and perceived effects of experience on tilting (as measured by PEET) would be mediated by SL. The prerequisites of diagnosing mediation were met by including SL as a mediator into the model.
 
7
This might relate to (1) higher overall amount of hands played, (2) higher average stakes played, resulting in, on average, higher occasional monetary losses (despite the fact experienced players win, in the long run, more money than inexperienced players), and (3) higher overall amount of times betting with statistically strong hands—experienced players bet more frequently than inexperienced players with strong hands and therefore encounter potential bad beats more often than the latter.
 
8
For instance, it might be conceivable that during playing the Iowa Gambling Task (Bechara et al. 1994), which is a widely recognized decision-making task involving constant risk-taking, players' scores on the Sensitivity to Losses-scale would be positively associated with risk-seeking behavior.
 
Literature
go back to reference Aiken, L., & West, G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage. Aiken, L., & West, G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
go back to reference Angelo, T. (2007). Elements of poker. Self-published. Angelo, T. (2007). Elements of poker. Self-published.
go back to reference Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1–3), 7–15.PubMedCrossRef Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1–3), 7–15.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bjerg, O. (2010). Problem gambling in poker: Money, rationality and control in a skill-based social game. International Gambling Studies, 10(3), 239–254.CrossRef Bjerg, O. (2010). Problem gambling in poker: Money, rationality and control in a skill-based social game. International Gambling Studies, 10(3), 239–254.CrossRef
go back to reference Bjerg, O. (2011). Poker. The parody of capitalism. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Bjerg, O. (2011). Poker. The parody of capitalism. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
go back to reference Brown, S. C., & Mitchell, L. A. (2010). An observational investigation of poker style and of five-factor personality model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(2), 229–234.PubMedCrossRef Brown, S. C., & Mitchell, L. A. (2010). An observational investigation of poker style and of five-factor personality model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(2), 229–234.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Brown, S. L., Rodda, S., & Phillips, J. G. (2004). Differences between problem and nonproblem gamblers in subjective arousal and affective valence amongst electronic gaming machine players. Addictive Behaviors, 29(9), 1863–1867.PubMedCrossRef Brown, S. L., Rodda, S., & Phillips, J. G. (2004). Differences between problem and nonproblem gamblers in subjective arousal and affective valence amongst electronic gaming machine players. Addictive Behaviors, 29(9), 1863–1867.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Browne, B. R. (1989). Going on tilt: Frequent poker players and control. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 5(1), 3–21.CrossRef Browne, B. R. (1989). Going on tilt: Frequent poker players and control. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 5(1), 3–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Dedonno, M. A., & Detterman, D. K. (2008). Poker is a skill. Gaming Law Review, 12(1), 31–36.CrossRef Dedonno, M. A., & Detterman, D. K. (2008). Poker is a skill. Gaming Law Review, 12(1), 31–36.CrossRef
go back to reference Dickerson, M., & O’Connor, J. (2006). Gambling as an addictive behavior. Impaired control, harm minimisation, treatment and prevention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Dickerson, M., & O’Connor, J. (2006). Gambling as an addictive behavior. Impaired control, harm minimisation, treatment and prevention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Griffiths, M., Parke, J., Wood, R., & Rigbye, J. (2010). Online poker gambling in university students: Further findings from an online survey. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8(1), 82–89.CrossRef Griffiths, M., Parke, J., Wood, R., & Rigbye, J. (2010). Online poker gambling in university students: Further findings from an online survey. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8(1), 82–89.CrossRef
go back to reference Hayano, D. M. (1982). Poker faces: The life and work of professional card players. Berkeley: University of California Press. Hayano, D. M. (1982). Poker faces: The life and work of professional card players. Berkeley: University of California Press.
go back to reference Hopley, A. A. B., Dempsey, K., & Nicki, R. (2011). Texas Hold’em online poker: A further examination. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. doi:10.1007/s11469-011-9353-2. Hopley, A. A. B., Dempsey, K., & Nicki, R. (2011). Texas Hold’em online poker: A further examination. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. doi:10.​1007/​s11469-011-9353-2.
go back to reference Hopley, A. A. B., & Nicki, R. M. (2010). Predictive factors of excessive online poker playing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(4), 379–385.CrossRef Hopley, A. A. B., & Nicki, R. M. (2010). Predictive factors of excessive online poker playing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(4), 379–385.CrossRef
go back to reference Lesieur, H. (1984). The chase: Career of the compulsive gambler. Massachusetts: Schenkman. Lesieur, H. (1984). The chase: Career of the compulsive gambler. Massachusetts: Schenkman.
go back to reference Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.PubMed Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.PubMed
go back to reference Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Feldman Barrett, L. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of emotions (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Feldman Barrett, L. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of emotions (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Linnet, J., Frøslev, M., Ramsgaard, S., Gebauer, L., Mouridsen, K., & Wohlert, V. (2011). Impaired probability estimation and decision-making in pathological gambling poker players. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-011-9244-2. Linnet, J., Frøslev, M., Ramsgaard, S., Gebauer, L., Mouridsen, K., & Wohlert, V. (2011). Impaired probability estimation and decision-making in pathological gambling poker players. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.​1007/​s10899-011-9244-2.
go back to reference Linnet, J., Gebauer, L., Shaffer, H., Mouridsen, K., & Møller, A. (2010). Experienced poker players differ from inexperienced poker players in estimation bias and decision bias. Journal of Gambling Issues, 24, 86–100.CrossRef Linnet, J., Gebauer, L., Shaffer, H., Mouridsen, K., & Møller, A. (2010). Experienced poker players differ from inexperienced poker players in estimation bias and decision bias. Journal of Gambling Issues, 24, 86–100.CrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, G., von Meduna, M., Brosowski, T., & Hayer, T. (2012). Is poker a game of skill or chance? A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-012-9327-8. Meyer, G., von Meduna, M., Brosowski, T., & Hayer, T. (2012). Is poker a game of skill or chance? A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.​1007/​s10899-012-9327-8.
go back to reference Mitrovic, D. V., & Brown, J. (2009). Poker mania and problem gambling: A study of distorted cognitions, motivations and alexithymia. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(4), 489–502.PubMedCrossRef Mitrovic, D. V., & Brown, J. (2009). Poker mania and problem gambling: A study of distorted cognitions, motivations and alexithymia. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(4), 489–502.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moodie, C., & Finnigan, F. (2005). A comparison of the autonomic arousal of frequent, infrequent and non-gamblers while playing fruit machines. Addiction, 100(1), 51–59.PubMedCrossRef Moodie, C., & Finnigan, F. (2005). A comparison of the autonomic arousal of frequent, infrequent and non-gamblers while playing fruit machines. Addiction, 100(1), 51–59.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Palomäki, J., & Laakasuo, M. Qualitative assessment of feelings associated with significant losses in poker. Unpublished manuscript. Palomäki, J., & Laakasuo, M. Qualitative assessment of feelings associated with significant losses in poker. Unpublished manuscript.
go back to reference Palomäki, J., Laakasuo, M., & Salmela, M. (2012). “Don’t worry, it’s just poker!”-Experience, self-rumination and self-reflection as determinants of decision-making in on-line poker. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-012-9311-3.PubMed Palomäki, J., Laakasuo, M., & Salmela, M. (2012). “Don’t worry, it’s just poker!”-Experience, self-rumination and self-reflection as determinants of decision-making in on-line poker. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.​1007/​s10899-012-9311-3.PubMed
go back to reference Radburn, B., & Horsley, R. (2011). Gamblers, grinders, and mavericks: The use of membership categorisation to manage identity by professional poker players. Journal of Gambling Issues. doi:10.4309/jgi.2011.26.4. Radburn, B., & Horsley, R. (2011). Gamblers, grinders, and mavericks: The use of membership categorisation to manage identity by professional poker players. Journal of Gambling Issues. doi:10.​4309/​jgi.​2011.​26.​4.
go back to reference Rosenthal, R. J. (1995). The phenomenology of “Bad Beats”: Some clinical observations. Journal of Gambling Studies, 11(4), 367–372.PubMedCrossRef Rosenthal, R. J. (1995). The phenomenology of “Bad Beats”: Some clinical observations. Journal of Gambling Studies, 11(4), 367–372.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Siler, K. (2010). Social and psychological challenges of poker. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(3), 401–420.PubMedCrossRef Siler, K. (2010). Social and psychological challenges of poker. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(3), 401–420.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sklansky, D., & Miller, E. (2006). No-limit Hold’em: Theory and practice. Henderson, NV: Two Plus Two Publishing. Sklansky, D., & Miller, E. (2006). No-limit Hold’em: Theory and practice. Henderson, NV: Two Plus Two Publishing.
go back to reference Teed, M., Finlay, K. A., Marmurek, H. H. C., Colwell, S. R., & Newby-Clark, I. R. (2011). Sympathetic magic and gambling: Adherence to the law of contagions varies with gambling severity. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-011-9280-y. Teed, M., Finlay, K. A., Marmurek, H. H. C., Colwell, S. R., & Newby-Clark, I. R. (2011). Sympathetic magic and gambling: Adherence to the law of contagions varies with gambling severity. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.​1007/​s10899-011-9280-y.
go back to reference Toneatto, T. (1999). Cognitive psychopathology of problem gambling. Substance Use and Misuse, 34(11), 1593–1604.PubMedCrossRef Toneatto, T. (1999). Cognitive psychopathology of problem gambling. Substance Use and Misuse, 34(11), 1593–1604.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Loewenstein, G. (Eds.). (2007). Do emotions hurt or help decision-making? A hedgefoxian perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Loewenstein, G. (Eds.). (2007). Do emotions hurt or help decision-making? A hedgefoxian perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
go back to reference Zhou, K., Tang, H., Sun, Y., Huang, G., Rao, L., Liang, Z., et al. (2011). Belief in luck or in skill: Which locks people into gambling? Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-011-9263-z. Zhou, K., Tang, H., Sun, Y., Huang, G., Rao, L., Liang, Z., et al. (2011). Belief in luck or in skill: Which locks people into gambling? Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.​1007/​s10899-011-9263-z.
Metadata
Title
Losing More by Losing It: Poker Experience, Sensitivity to Losses and Tilting Severity
Authors
Jussi Palomäki
Michael Laakasuo
Mikko Salmela
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9339-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Journal of Gambling Studies 1/2014 Go to the issue