Top

Published in:

01-12-2016 | Original Research

Family Communication in Inherited Cardiovascular Conditions in Ireland

Authors: Sinead Whyte, Andrew Green, Marion McAllister, Hannah Shipman

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 6/2016

Abstract

Over 100,000 individuals living in Ireland carry a mutated gene for an inherited cardiac condition (ICC), most of which demonstrate an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. First-degree relatives of individuals with these mutations are at a 50 % risk of being a carrier: disclosing genetic information to family members can be complex. This study explored how families living in Ireland communicate genetic information about ICCs and looked at the challenges of communicating information, factors that may affect communication and what influence this had on family relationships. Face to face interviews were conducted with nine participants using an approved topic guide and results analysed using thematic analysis. The participants disclosed that responsibility to future generations, gender, proximity and lack of contact all played a role in family communication. The media was cited as a source of information about genetic information and knowledge of genetic information tended to have a positive effect on families. Results from this study indicate that individuals are willing to inform family members, particularly when there are children and grandchildren at risk, and different strategies are utilised. Furthermore, understanding of genetics is partially regulated not only by their families, but by the way society handles information. Therefore, genetic health professionals should take into account the familial influence on individuals and their decision to attend genetic services, and also that of the media.

Aatre, R. D., & Day, S. M. (2011). Psychological issues in genetic testing for inherited cardiovascular diseases. Circulation. Cardiovascular Genetics, 4, 81–90.CrossRefPubMed

Ashida, S., Koehly, L., Roberts, J. S., Chen, C. A., Hiraki, S., & Green, R. C. (2009). Disclosing the disclosure: factors associated with communicating the results of genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Health Communication, 14(8), 768–784.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRef

Chivers-Seymour, K., Addington-Hall, J., Lucassen, A. M., & Foster, C. L. (2010). What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risks? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 330–342.CrossRefPubMed

Claes, E., Evers-Kisbooms, G., Boogaerts, A., Decruyenaere, M., Denayer, L., & Legius, E. (2003). Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 116A, 11–19.CrossRef

D’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2001). Experiences of genetic risk: disclosure and the gendering of responsibility. Bioethics, 15, 231–247.CrossRefPubMed

Dugan, R. B., Wiesner, G. L., Juengst, E. T., O’Riordan, M., Matthews, A. L., & Robin, N. H. (2003). Duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease: genetic counselors’ clinical experience. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 119C(1), 27–34.CrossRef

Farnsworth, M. M., Fosyth, D., Haglund, C., & Ackerman, M. J. (2006). When I go in to wake them… I wonder: parental perceptions about congenital long QT syndrome. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 18(6), 284–290.CrossRefPubMed

Finkler, K., Skrzynia, C., & Evans, J. P. (2003). The new genetics and its consequences for family, kinship, medicine and medical genetics. Social Science & Medicine, 57(3), 403–412.CrossRef

Foster, C., Evans, D. G. R., Eeles, R., Eccles, D., Ashley, S., Brooks, L., Cole, T., Cook, J., Davidson, R., Gregory, H. & Mackay, J. (2004). Non-uptake of predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2 among relatives of known carriers: attributes, cancer worry, and barriers to testing in a multicenter clinical cohort. Genetic testing, 8(1), 23–29.

Forrest Keenan, K., Simpson, S. A., Wilson, B. J., Van Teijlingen, E. R., Mckee, L., Haites, N., et al. (2005). ‘It’s their blood not mine’: who’s responsible for (not) telling relatives about genetic risk? Health, Risk & Society, 7, 290–226.

Forrest, K., Simpson, S. A., Wilson, B. J., Van Teijlingen, E. R., Mckee, L., Haites, N., et al. (2003). To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clinical Genetics, 64, 317–326.CrossRefPubMed

Gaff, C. L., & Bylund, C. L. (2010). Family communication about genetics; Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

Gaff, C. L., Collins, V., Symes, T., & Halliday, J. (2005). Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands’ perceptions. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 133–140.CrossRefPubMed

Gaff, C. L., Clarke, A. J., Atkinson, P., Sivell, S., Elwyn, G., Iredale, R., et al. (2007). Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review. European Journal of Human Genetics, 15, 999–1011.CrossRefPubMed

Galvin, K. M., & Young, M. (2010). Family systems theory. In C. L. Gaff & C. L. Bylund (Eds.), Family communication about genetics: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery ofgrounded theory. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

Green, J., Richards, M., Murton, F., Statham, H., & Hallowell, N. (1997). Family communication and genetic counselling: the case of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counselling, 6, 45–60.CrossRef

Greene, M., O’Brien, D., Ward, D., Quigley, D., Kelly, F., Carter, G., Durkan, A. & Farrell, E. (2010) CRY-Cardiac Risk in the Young. [Online] Available: http://www.cry.ie/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1&Itemid=8 [Accessed 8th of April 2012].

Kenen, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2004). We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC). Psycho-Oncology, 13, 335–345.CrossRefPubMed

Koehly, L. M., Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Kempf, K. K. G., Vernon, S. W., & Gritz, E. R. (2003). A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 12, 304–313.

Koerner, A. F. & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2006). Family communication patterns theory: a social cognitive approach. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 50–65). Sage Publications. doi:10.4135/9781452204420.n4.

Koerner, A. F., Leroy, B., & Veach, P. M. (2010). Family communication patterns. In C. L. Gaff & C. L. Bylund (Eds.), Family communication about genetics: Theory and practice (pp. 184–198). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Liede, A., Metcalfe, K., Hanna, D., Hoodfar, E., Snyder, C., Durham, C., et al. (2000). Evaluation of the needs of male carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who have undergone genetic counselling. American Journal of Human Genetics, 67(6), 1494–1504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mcallister, M., Evans, D. G. R., Ormiston, W., & Daly, P. (1998). Men in breast cancer families: a preliminary qualitative study of awareness and experience. Journal of Medical Genetics, 35, 739–744.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mccann, S., Maculey, D., Barnett, Y., Bunting, B., Bradley, A., Jeffers, L., et al. (2009). Family communication, genetic testing and colonoscopy screening in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer: a qualitative study. Psycho-Oncology, 18(11), 1208–1215.CrossRefPubMed

Metcalfe, A., Coad, J., Plumridge, G. M., Gill, P., & Farndon, P. (2008). Family communication between children and their parents about inherited genetic conditions: a meta-synthesis of the research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 16, 1193–1200.CrossRefPubMed

Ormondroyd, E., Oates, S., Parker, M., Blair, E., & Watkins, H. (2014). Pre-symptomatic genetic testing for inherited cardiac conditions: a qualitative exploration of psychosocial andethical implications. European Journal of Human Genetics, 22(1), 88–93.CrossRefPubMed

Parrott, R., Miller-Day, M., Peters, K., & Dillard, J. (2010). Societal, expert, and lay influences. In C. L. Gaff & C. L. Bylund (Eds.), Family communication about genetics: Theory and practice (pp. 34–67). New York: Oxford University Press.

Patenaude, A. F., Dorval, M., Digianni, L. S., Schneider, K. A., Chittenden, A., & Garber, J. E. (2006). Sharing BRCA ½ test results with first-degree relatives: factors predicting who women tell. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24, 700–706.CrossRefPubMed

Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Koehly, L. M., Vernon, S. W., Baile, W. F., Kohlmann, W. K., et al. (2003). How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 119C, 78–86.CrossRef

Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995). Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach - an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health-services research. British Medical Journal, 311, 42–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., and Elam, G. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.

Rolland, J. S. (2006). Genetics, family systems, and multicultural influences. Families, Systems & Health, 24, 425–441.CrossRef

Schaffer, R., Kuczynski, K., & Skinner, D. (2008). Producing genetic knowledge and citizenship through the internet: mothers, pediatric genetics, and cybermedicine. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(1), 145–159.CrossRef

Shaw, C., Abrams, K., & Marteau, T. M. (1999). Psychological impact of predicting individuals’ risks of illness: a systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 49(12), 1571–1598.CrossRef

Smart, A. (2010). Impediments to DNA testing and Cascade screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and long QT syndrome: a qualitative study of patient experiences. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 630–639.CrossRefPubMed

Smets, E. M. A., Stam, M. M. H., Meulenkamp, T. M., Van Langen, I. M., Wilde, A. A. M., Wiegman, A., et al. (2008). Health-dated quality of life of children with a positive carrier status for inherited cardiovascular diseases. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 146A, 700–707.CrossRef

Sobel, S. K., & Cowan, D. B. (2000). Impact of genetic testing for Huntington disease on the family system. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 90, 49–59.CrossRefPubMed

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. London: Sage.

Ulph, F., Leong, J., Glazebrook, C., & Townsend, E. (2010). A qualitative study exploring genetic counsellors’ experiences of counselling children. European Journal of Human Genetics, 18, 1090–1094.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Van Den Nieuwenhoff, H. W., Gielen, C., & De Vries, N. K. (2007). Family communication regarding inherited high cholesterol: why and how do patients disclose genetic risk? Social Science & Medicine, 65(5), 1025–1037.CrossRef

Weiner, J. L., Silk, K. J., & Parrott, R. L. (2005). Family communication about genetic health: a research note. The Journal of Family Communication, 5, 313–324.CrossRef

White, L., & Riedmann, A. (1992). Ties among adult siblings. Social Forces, 71(1), 85–102.CrossRef

Wilson, B. J., Forrest, K., Van Teijlingen, E. R., Mckee, L., Haites, N., Matthews, E., et al. (2004). Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known. Community Genetics, 7, 15–24.PubMed

Title: Family Communication in Inherited Cardiovascular Conditions in Ireland
Authors: Sinead Whyte
Andrew Green
Marion McAllister
Hannah Shipman
Publication date: 01-12-2016
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9974-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Family Communication in Inherited Cardiovascular Conditions in Ireland

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Family Studies for Classification of Variants of Uncertain Classification: Current Laboratory Clinical Practice and a New Web-Based Educational Tool

Predispositions to Lymphoma: A Practical Review for Genetic Counselors

Presented Abstracts from the Thirty Fifth Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (Seattle, WA, September 2016)

Understanding the Psychosocial Effects of WES Test Results on Parents of Children with Rare Diseases

Attitudes Toward Autism Spectrum Disorders Among Students of Allied Health Professions

Impact of Huntington Disease Gene-Positive Status on Pre-Symptomatic Young Adults and Recommendations for Genetic Counselors