Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2010

01-08-2010 | Original Research

What Facilitates or Impedes Family Communication Following Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk? A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Primary Qualitative Research

Authors: Kim Chivers Seymour, Julia Addington-Hall, Anneke M. Lucassen, Claire L. Foster

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

To systematically review and meta-synthesise primary qualitative research findings regarding family communication following genetic testing of cancer risk, in order to inform development of effective interventions. Systematic searches of CINAHL, Embase, Medline, British Nursing Index and PsycINFO databases were undertaken and relevant studies identified using strict criteria. The selected primary qualitative studies were appraised for quality and relevance by three independent researchers and then synthesized using a “Framework” approach. Fourteen (4.3%) studies met the inclusion criteria. The following factors influenced family communication following genetic testing for late-onset hereditary cancer: the informant’s feelings about informing relatives about genetic testing; the perceived relevance of the information to other family members and their anticipated reactions; the “closeness” of relationships within the family; family rules and patterns (e.g., who is best placed to share information with whom); finding the right time and level of disclosure; and the supportive role of heath care professionals. The themes identified in this review could provide practitioners with a useful framework for discussing family communication with those undergoing genetic testing. This framework focuses on helping health care professionals to facilitate family communication. The next step will be the development of an intervention to directly support people in talking to their relatives.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Bonadona, V., Saltel, P., Desseigne, F., Mignotte, H., Saurin, J. C., Wang, Q., et al. (2002). Cancer patients who experienced diagnostic genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: reactions and behaviour after the disclosure of a positive test result. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers Prevention, 11(1), 97–104. Bonadona, V., Saltel, P., Desseigne, F., Mignotte, H., Saurin, J. C., Wang, Q., et al. (2002). Cancer patients who experienced diagnostic genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: reactions and behaviour after the disclosure of a positive test result. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers Prevention, 11(1), 97–104.
go back to reference Bradbury, A. R., Dignam, J. J., Ibe, C. N., Auh, S. L., Hlubocky, F. J., Cummings, S. A., et al. (2007). How often do BRCA mutation carriers tell their young children of the family’s risk for cancer? A study of parental disclosure of BRCA mutations to minors and young adults. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(24), 3705–3711.CrossRefPubMed Bradbury, A. R., Dignam, J. J., Ibe, C. N., Auh, S. L., Hlubocky, F. J., Cummings, S. A., et al. (2007). How often do BRCA mutation carriers tell their young children of the family’s risk for cancer? A study of parental disclosure of BRCA mutations to minors and young adults. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(24), 3705–3711.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Buckman, R. (1992). How to break bad news: A guide for health care professionals. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. Buckman, R. (1992). How to break bad news: A guide for health care professionals. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
go back to reference Burke, W., Petersen, G., Lynch, P., Botkin, J., Daly, M., Garber, J., et al. (1997). Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer: Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. JAMA, 277, 915–919.CrossRefPubMed Burke, W., Petersen, G., Lynch, P., Botkin, J., Daly, M., Garber, J., et al. (1997). Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer: Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. JAMA, 277, 915–919.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Claes, E., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Boogaerts, A., Decruyenaere, M., Denayer, L., & Legius, E. (2003). Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics A, 116(1), 11–19. Claes, E., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Boogaerts, A., Decruyenaere, M., Denayer, L., & Legius, E. (2003). Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics A, 116(1), 11–19.
go back to reference Carlsson, C., & Nilbert, M. (2007). Living with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; experiences from and impact of genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 811–820.CrossRefPubMed Carlsson, C., & Nilbert, M. (2007). Living with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; experiences from and impact of genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 811–820.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Claus, E. B., Schildkraut, J. M., Thompson, W. D., & Risch, N. J. (1996). The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer, 77(11), 2318–2324.CrossRefPubMed Claus, E. B., Schildkraut, J. M., Thompson, W. D., & Risch, N. J. (1996). The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer, 77(11), 2318–2324.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference D’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2001). Experiences of genetic risk: disclosure and the gendering of responsibility. Bioethics, 15(3), 231–247.CrossRefPubMed D’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2001). Experiences of genetic risk: disclosure and the gendering of responsibility. Bioethics, 15(3), 231–247.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Daly, M. B., Barsevick, A. M., Miller, S. M., Buckman, R., Costalas, J. W., Montgomery, S. V., et al. (2001). Communicating genetic test results to the fmaily: a six-step, skills-building strategy. Family and Community Health, 24(3), 13–26.PubMed Daly, M. B., Barsevick, A. M., Miller, S. M., Buckman, R., Costalas, J. W., Montgomery, S. V., et al. (2001). Communicating genetic test results to the fmaily: a six-step, skills-building strategy. Family and Community Health, 24(3), 13–26.PubMed
go back to reference Daly, P. A., Nolan, C., Green, A., Ormiston, W., Cody, N., McDevitt, T., et al. (2003). Predictive testing for BRCA1 and 2 mutations: a male contribution. Annals of Oncology, 14(4), 549–553.CrossRefPubMed Daly, P. A., Nolan, C., Green, A., Ormiston, W., Cody, N., McDevitt, T., et al. (2003). Predictive testing for BRCA1 and 2 mutations: a male contribution. Annals of Oncology, 14(4), 549–553.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dixon-Wood, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., et al. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical prespective. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 27–44.CrossRef Dixon-Wood, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., et al. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical prespective. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 27–44.CrossRef
go back to reference Dixon-Wood, M., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2001). Qualitative research in systemativ reviews. Has it estamblished a place for itself. British Medical Journal, 323, 765–766.CrossRef Dixon-Wood, M., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2001). Qualitative research in systemativ reviews. Has it estamblished a place for itself. British Medical Journal, 323, 765–766.CrossRef
go back to reference Dixon-Wood, M., Fitzpatrick, R., & Roberts, K. (2001). Incluing qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(2), 125–133.CrossRef Dixon-Wood, M., Fitzpatrick, R., & Roberts, K. (2001). Incluing qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(2), 125–133.CrossRef
go back to reference Easton, D. F., Narod, S. A., Ford, D., & Steel, M. (1994). The genetic epidemiology of BRCA1. Breast cancer linkage consortium. Lancet, 344(8924), 761.CrossRefPubMed Easton, D. F., Narod, S. A., Ford, D., & Steel, M. (1994). The genetic epidemiology of BRCA1. Breast cancer linkage consortium. Lancet, 344(8924), 761.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Esplen, M. J., Madlensky, L., Butler, K., McKinnon, W., Bapat, B., Wong, J., et al. (2001). Motivations and psychosocial impact of genetic testing for HNPCC. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 103(1), 9–15.CrossRefPubMed Esplen, M. J., Madlensky, L., Butler, K., McKinnon, W., Bapat, B., Wong, J., et al. (2001). Motivations and psychosocial impact of genetic testing for HNPCC. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 103(1), 9–15.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Evans, D., & Pearson, A. (2001). Systematic reviews of qualitative research. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing, 5, 111–119.CrossRef Evans, D., & Pearson, A. (2001). Systematic reviews of qualitative research. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing, 5, 111–119.CrossRef
go back to reference Ford, D., Easton, D. F., Bishop, D. T., Narod, S. A., & Goldgar, D. E. (1994). Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast cancer linkage consortium. Lancet, 343(8899), 692–695.CrossRefPubMed Ford, D., Easton, D. F., Bishop, D. T., Narod, S. A., & Goldgar, D. E. (1994). Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast cancer linkage consortium. Lancet, 343(8899), 692–695.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Forrest, K., Simpson, S. A., Wilson, B. J., van Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., et al. (2003). To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clinical Genetics, 64(4), 317–326.CrossRefPubMed Forrest, K., Simpson, S. A., Wilson, B. J., van Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., et al. (2003). To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clinical Genetics, 64(4), 317–326.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Foster, C., Eeles, R., Arden-Jones, A., Moynihan, C., & Watson, M. (2004). Juggling roles and expectations: dilemmas faced by women talking to relatives about cancer and genetic testing. Psychology and Health, 19(4), 439–455.CrossRef Foster, C., Eeles, R., Arden-Jones, A., Moynihan, C., & Watson, M. (2004). Juggling roles and expectations: dilemmas faced by women talking to relatives about cancer and genetic testing. Psychology and Health, 19(4), 439–455.CrossRef
go back to reference Gaff, C. L., Collins, V., Symes, T., & Halliday, J. (2005). Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands’ perceptions. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(2), 133–140.CrossRefPubMed Gaff, C. L., Collins, V., Symes, T., & Halliday, J. (2005). Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands’ perceptions. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(2), 133–140.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Green, R. M., & Thomas, A. M. (1997). Whose gene is it? A case discussion about familial conflict over genetic testing for breast cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6(2), 245–254.CrossRefPubMed Green, R. M., & Thomas, A. M. (1997). Whose gene is it? A case discussion about familial conflict over genetic testing for breast cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6(2), 245–254.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gysels, M., & Higginson, I. J. (2007). Systematic Reviews. In J. Addington-Hall, E. Bruera, I. J. Higginson, & S. Payne (Eds.), Research methods in pallative care (pp. 115–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gysels, M., & Higginson, I. J. (2007). Systematic Reviews. In J. Addington-Hall, E. Bruera, I. J. Higginson, & S. Payne (Eds.), Research methods in pallative care (pp. 115–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Hallowell, N., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., et al. (2005). Communication about genetic testing in families of male BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers: patterns, priorities and problems. Clinical Genetics, 67(6), 492–502.CrossRefPubMed Hallowell, N., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., et al. (2005). Communication about genetic testing in families of male BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers: patterns, priorities and problems. Clinical Genetics, 67(6), 492–502.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hallowell, N., Foster, C., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Murday, V., & Watson, M. (2002). Genetic testing for women previously diagnosed with breast/ovarian cancer: examining the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation searching. Genetic Test, 6(2), 79–87.CrossRef Hallowell, N., Foster, C., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Murday, V., & Watson, M. (2002). Genetic testing for women previously diagnosed with breast/ovarian cancer: examining the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation searching. Genetic Test, 6(2), 79–87.CrossRef
go back to reference Hallowell, N., Foster, C., Eeles, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Watson, M. (2004). Accommodating risk: responses to BRCA1/2 genetic testing of women who have had cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 59(3), 553–565.CrossRef Hallowell, N., Foster, C., Eeles, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Watson, M. (2004). Accommodating risk: responses to BRCA1/2 genetic testing of women who have had cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 59(3), 553–565.CrossRef
go back to reference Hallowell, N., Foster, C., Eeles, R., Ardern-Jones, A., Murday, V., & Watson, M. (2003). Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(2), 74–79.CrossRefPubMed Hallowell, N., Foster, C., Eeles, R., Ardern-Jones, A., Murday, V., & Watson, M. (2003). Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(2), 74–79.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hamilton, R. J., Bowers, B. J., & Williams, J. K. (2005). Disclosing genetic test results to family members. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(1), 18–24.CrossRefPubMed Hamilton, R. J., Bowers, B. J., & Williams, J. K. (2005). Disclosing genetic test results to family members. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(1), 18–24.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hartley, R. J. (1990). Online Searching: Principles and practice. London: BowkerSaur. Hartley, R. J. (1990). Online Searching: Principles and practice. London: BowkerSaur.
go back to reference Hawker, S., Payne, S., Kerr, C., Hardey, M., & Powell, J. (2002). Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 1284–1299.CrossRefPubMed Hawker, S., Payne, S., Kerr, C., Hardey, M., & Powell, J. (2002). Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 1284–1299.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Holt, K. (2006). What do we tell the children? Contrasting the disclosure choices of two HD families regarding risk status and predictive genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(4), 253–265.CrossRefPubMed Holt, K. (2006). What do we tell the children? Contrasting the disclosure choices of two HD families regarding risk status and predictive genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(4), 253–265.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hughes, C., Lerman, C., Schwartz, M., Peshkin, B. N., Wenzel, L., Narod, S., et al. (2002). All in the family: evaluation of the process and content of sisters’ communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 107(2), 143–150.CrossRefPubMed Hughes, C., Lerman, C., Schwartz, M., Peshkin, B. N., Wenzel, L., Narod, S., et al. (2002). All in the family: evaluation of the process and content of sisters’ communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 107(2), 143–150.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Joint Committee on Medical Genetics. (2006). Consent and confidentiality in genetic practice. Guidance of gentic testing and sharing genetic information. 1–40. Ref Type: Report. Joint Committee on Medical Genetics. (2006). Consent and confidentiality in genetic practice. Guidance of gentic testing and sharing genetic information. 1–40. Ref Type: Report.
go back to reference Jones, M. L. (2004). Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(3), 271–278.CrossRefPubMed Jones, M. L. (2004). Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(3), 271–278.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Julian-Reynier, C., Sobol, H., Sevilla, C., Nogues, C., & Bourret, P. (2000). Uptake of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genetic testing in a French national sample of BRCA1 families. The French cancer genetic network. Psychooncology, 9(6), 504–510.CrossRefPubMed Julian-Reynier, C., Sobol, H., Sevilla, C., Nogues, C., & Bourret, P. (2000). Uptake of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genetic testing in a French national sample of BRCA1 families. The French cancer genetic network. Psychooncology, 9(6), 504–510.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kenen, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2006). “Social separation” among women under 40 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer and carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(3), 149–162.CrossRefPubMed Kenen, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2006). “Social separation” among women under 40 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer and carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(3), 149–162.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Koehly, L. M., Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Kempf, K. K., Vernon, S. W., & Gritz, E. R. (2003). A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention, 12(4), 304–313. Koehly, L. M., Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Kempf, K. K., Vernon, S. W., & Gritz, E. R. (2003). A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention, 12(4), 304–313.
go back to reference McInerney-Leo, A., Bowels Biesecker, B., Hadley, D. W., Kase, R. G., Giambarresi, T. R., Johnson, E., et al. (2005). BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families II: Impact on relationships. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 113A(2), 165–169.CrossRef McInerney-Leo, A., Bowels Biesecker, B., Hadley, D. W., Kase, R. G., Giambarresi, T. R., Johnson, E., et al. (2005). BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families II: Impact on relationships. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 113A(2), 165–169.CrossRef
go back to reference Mesters, I., Ausems, M., Eichhorn, S., & Vasen, H. (2005). Informing one’s family about genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a retrospective exploratory study. Family Cancer, 4(2), 163–167.CrossRef Mesters, I., Ausems, M., Eichhorn, S., & Vasen, H. (2005). Informing one’s family about genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a retrospective exploratory study. Family Cancer, 4(2), 163–167.CrossRef
go back to reference Metcalfe, K. A., Liede, A., Hoodfar, E., Scott, A., Foulkes, W. D., & Narod, S. A. (2000). An evaluation of needs of female BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers undergoing genetic counselling. Journal of Medical Genetics, 37(11), 866–874.CrossRefPubMed Metcalfe, K. A., Liede, A., Hoodfar, E., Scott, A., Foulkes, W. D., & Narod, S. A. (2000). An evaluation of needs of female BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers undergoing genetic counselling. Journal of Medical Genetics, 37(11), 866–874.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Koehly, L. M., Vernon, S. W., Baile, W. F., Kohlmann, W. K., et al. (2003). How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study. American Journal of Medical Genetics C, Seminar Medical Genetics, 119(1), 78–86.CrossRef Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Koehly, L. M., Vernon, S. W., Baile, W. F., Kohlmann, W. K., et al. (2003). How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study. American Journal of Medical Genetics C, Seminar Medical Genetics, 119(1), 78–86.CrossRef
go back to reference Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). Routlege: London.CrossRef Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). Routlege: London.CrossRef
go back to reference Ropka, M. E., Wenzel, J., Phillips, E. K., Siadaty, M., & Philbrick, J. T. (2006). Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 15(5), 840–855.CrossRefPubMed Ropka, M. E., Wenzel, J., Phillips, E. K., Siadaty, M., & Philbrick, J. T. (2006). Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 15(5), 840–855.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sermijn, E., Goelen, G., Teugels, E., Kaufman, L., Bonduelle, M., Neyns, B., et al. (2004). The impact of proband mediated information dissemination in families with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation. Journal of Medical Genetics, 41(3), e23.CrossRefPubMed Sermijn, E., Goelen, G., Teugels, E., Kaufman, L., Bonduelle, M., Neyns, B., et al. (2004). The impact of proband mediated information dissemination in families with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation. Journal of Medical Genetics, 41(3), e23.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tercyak, K. P., Hughes, C., Main, D., Snyder, C., Lynch, J. F., Lynch, H. T., et al. (2001a). Parental communication of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to children. Patient Education and Counseling, 42(3), 213–224.CrossRef Tercyak, K. P., Hughes, C., Main, D., Snyder, C., Lynch, J. F., Lynch, H. T., et al. (2001a). Parental communication of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to children. Patient Education and Counseling, 42(3), 213–224.CrossRef
go back to reference Tercyak, K. P., Peshkin, B. N., Streisand, R., & Lerman, C. (2001b). Psychological issues among children of hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1/2) testing participants. Psychooncology, 10(4), 336–346.CrossRef Tercyak, K. P., Peshkin, B. N., Streisand, R., & Lerman, C. (2001b). Psychological issues among children of hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1/2) testing participants. Psychooncology, 10(4), 336–346.CrossRef
go back to reference Tercyak, K. P., Peshkin, B. N., DeMarco, T. A., Brogan, B. M., & Lerman, C. (2002). Parent-child factors and their effect on communicating BRCA1/2 test results to children. Patient Education and Counseling, 47(2), 145–153.CrossRefPubMed Tercyak, K. P., Peshkin, B. N., DeMarco, T. A., Brogan, B. M., & Lerman, C. (2002). Parent-child factors and their effect on communicating BRCA1/2 test results to children. Patient Education and Counseling, 47(2), 145–153.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden HJ, Brocker-Vriends AH, van Asperen CJ, Sijmons RH, et al. (2006) A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships. Psychooncology. Van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden HJ, Brocker-Vriends AH, van Asperen CJ, Sijmons RH, et al. (2006) A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships. Psychooncology.
go back to reference Wagner, C. J., Itzen, M., Malick, J., Babb, J. S., Bove, B., Godwin, A. K., et al. (2003). Communication of BRCA1 and BRCA2 results to at-risk relatives: a cancer risk assessment program’s experience. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 119(1), 11–18. Wagner, C. J., Itzen, M., Malick, J., Babb, J. S., Bove, B., Godwin, A. K., et al. (2003). Communication of BRCA1 and BRCA2 results to at-risk relatives: a cancer risk assessment program’s experience. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 119(1), 11–18.
Metadata
Title
What Facilitates or Impedes Family Communication Following Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk? A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Primary Qualitative Research
Authors
Kim Chivers Seymour
Julia Addington-Hall
Anneke M. Lucassen
Claire L. Foster
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-010-9296-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2010 Go to the issue