Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 5/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Research

“Something Extra on Chromosome 5”: Parents’ Understanding of Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) Results

Authors: Sarah A. Walser, Allison Werner-Lin, Amita Russell, Ronald J. Wapner, Barbara A. Bernhardt

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aims to explore how couples’ understanding of the nature and consequences of positive prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) results impacts decision-making and concern about pregnancy. We interviewed 28 women and 12 male partners after receiving positive results and analyzed the transcripts to assess their understanding and level of concern about the expected clinical implications of results. Participant descriptions were compared to the original laboratory interpretation. When diagnosed prenatally, couples’ understanding of the nature and consequences of copy number variants (CNVs) impacts decision-making and concern. Findings suggest women, but less so partners, generally understand the nature and clinical implications of prenatal CMA results. Couples feel reassured, perhaps sometimes falsely so, when a CNV is inherited from a “normal” parent and experience considerable uncertainty when a CNV is de novo, frequently precipitating a search for additional information and guidance. Five factors influenced participants’ concern including: the pattern of inheritance, type of possible phenotypic involvement, perceived manageability of outcomes, availability and strength of evidence about outcomes associated with the CNV, and provider messages about continuing the pregnancy. A good understanding of results is vital as couples decide whether or not to continue with their pregnancy and seek additional information to assist in pregnancy decision-making.
Literature
go back to reference Alsulaiman, A., Hewison, J., Abu-Amero, K. K., Ahmed, S., Green, J. M., & Hirst, J. (2012). Attitudes to prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for 30 conditions among women in Saudi Arabia and the UK. Prenatal Diagnosis, 32, 1109–1113. doi:10.1002/pd.3967.CrossRefPubMed Alsulaiman, A., Hewison, J., Abu-Amero, K. K., Ahmed, S., Green, J. M., & Hirst, J. (2012). Attitudes to prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for 30 conditions among women in Saudi Arabia and the UK. Prenatal Diagnosis, 32, 1109–1113. doi:10.​1002/​pd.​3967.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bernhardt, B. A., Soucier, D., Hanson, K., Savage, M. S., Jackson, L., & Wapner, R. J. (2013). Women’s experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results. Genetics in Medicine, 15, 139–45. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.113.CrossRefPubMed Bernhardt, B. A., Soucier, D., Hanson, K., Savage, M. S., Jackson, L., & Wapner, R. J. (2013). Women’s experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results. Genetics in Medicine, 15, 139–45. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2012.​113.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Crolla, J. A., Wapner, R., & Van Lith, J. M. M. (2014). Controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: should everyone undergoing invasive testing have a microarray? Prenatal Diagnosis, 34, 18–22. doi:10.1002/pd.4287.CrossRefPubMed Crolla, J. A., Wapner, R., & Van Lith, J. M. M. (2014). Controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: should everyone undergoing invasive testing have a microarray? Prenatal Diagnosis, 34, 18–22. doi:10.​1002/​pd.​4287.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cypowyj, C., Eisinger, F., Huiart, L., Sobol, H., Morin, M., & Julian-Reynier, C. (2009). Subjective interpretation of inconclusive BRCA1/2 cancer genetic test results and transmission of information to the relatives. Psycho-Oncology, 18, 209–15. doi:10.1002/pon.1407.CrossRefPubMed Cypowyj, C., Eisinger, F., Huiart, L., Sobol, H., Morin, M., & Julian-Reynier, C. (2009). Subjective interpretation of inconclusive BRCA1/2 cancer genetic test results and transmission of information to the relatives. Psycho-Oncology, 18, 209–15. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​1407.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hanoch, Y., Miron-Shatz, T., Rolison, J. J., & Ozanne, E. (2014). Understanding of BRCA1/2 genetic tests results: the importance of objective and subjective numeracy. Psycho-Oncology, 23, 1142–1148. doi:10.1002/pon.3537.CrossRefPubMed Hanoch, Y., Miron-Shatz, T., Rolison, J. J., & Ozanne, E. (2014). Understanding of BRCA1/2 genetic tests results: the importance of objective and subjective numeracy. Psycho-Oncology, 23, 1142–1148. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​3537.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hillman, S. C., Willams, D., Carss, K. J., McMullan, D. J., Hurles, M. E., & Kilby, M. D. (2015). Prenatal exome sequencing for fetuses with structural abnormalities: the next step. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 45, 4–9. doi:10.1002/uog.14653.CrossRef Hillman, S. C., Willams, D., Carss, K. J., McMullan, D. J., Hurles, M. E., & Kilby, M. D. (2015). Prenatal exome sequencing for fetuses with structural abnormalities: the next step. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 45, 4–9. doi:10.​1002/​uog.​14653.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaphingst, K. A., Lachance, C. R., Gepp, A., Hoyt D’Anna, L., & Rios-Ellis, B. (2009). Educating underserved Latino communities about family health history using lay health advisors. Public Health Genomics, 14(4–5), 211–221. doi:10.1159%2F000272456.PubMedPubMedCentral Kaphingst, K. A., Lachance, C. R., Gepp, A., Hoyt D’Anna, L., & Rios-Ellis, B. (2009). Educating underserved Latino communities about family health history using lay health advisors. Public Health Genomics, 14(4–5), 211–221. doi:10.​1159%2F000272456.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Kearney, H. M., Thorland, E. C., Brown, K. K., Quintero-Rivera, F., & South, S. T. (2011). American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genetics in Medicine, 13, 680–685. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182217a3a.CrossRefPubMed Kearney, H. M., Thorland, E. C., Brown, K. K., Quintero-Rivera, F., & South, S. T. (2011). American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genetics in Medicine, 13, 680–685. doi:10.​1097/​GIM.​0b013e3182217a3a​.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kiedrowski, L. A., Owens, K. M., Yashar, B. M., & Schuette, J. L. (2015). Parents’ perspectives on variants of uncertain significance from chromosome microarray analysis. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.1007/s10897-015-9847-3.PubMed Kiedrowski, L. A., Owens, K. M., Yashar, B. M., & Schuette, J. L. (2015). Parents’ perspectives on variants of uncertain significance from chromosome microarray analysis. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-015-9847-3.PubMed
go back to reference Kripalani, S., Bengtzen, R., Henderson, L. E., & Jacobson, T. A. (2008). Clinical research in low-literacy populations: using teach-back to assess comprehension of informed consent and privacy information. IRB, 30, 13–19. doi:10.1007/s10865-015-9642-5.PubMed Kripalani, S., Bengtzen, R., Henderson, L. E., & Jacobson, T. A. (2008). Clinical research in low-literacy populations: using teach-back to assess comprehension of informed consent and privacy information. IRB, 30, 13–19. doi:10.​1007/​s10865-015-9642-5.PubMed
go back to reference Mikhaelian, M., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I., LeRoy, B. S., & Bower, M. (2013). Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis: a survey of prenatal genetic counselors’ experiences and attitudes. Prenatal Diagnosis, 33, 371–377. doi:10.1002/pd.4071.PubMed Mikhaelian, M., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I., LeRoy, B. S., & Bower, M. (2013). Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis: a survey of prenatal genetic counselors’ experiences and attitudes. Prenatal Diagnosis, 33, 371–377. doi:10.​1002/​pd.​4071.PubMed
go back to reference Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed., pp. 55–103). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed., pp. 55–103). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Muller, C., & Cameron, L. D. (2015). It’s complicated: factors predicting decisional conflict in prenatal diagnostic testing. Health Expectations. doi:10.1111/hex.12363.PubMed Muller, C., & Cameron, L. D. (2015). It’s complicated: factors predicting decisional conflict in prenatal diagnostic testing. Health Expectations. doi:10.​1111/​hex.​12363.PubMed
go back to reference Nahar, R., Puri, R. D., Saxena, R., & Verma, I. C. (2013). Do parental perceptions and motivations towards genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis for deafness vary in different cultures? American Journal of Medical Genetics, 161A, 76–81. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.35692.CrossRefPubMed Nahar, R., Puri, R. D., Saxena, R., & Verma, I. C. (2013). Do parental perceptions and motivations towards genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis for deafness vary in different cultures? American Journal of Medical Genetics, 161A, 76–81. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​a.​35692.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nielson-Bohlman, L., Panzer, A., & Kindig, D. (2004). Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion. Washington: National Academic Press. Nielson-Bohlman, L., Panzer, A., & Kindig, D. (2004). Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion. Washington: National Academic Press.
go back to reference Pieters, J. J., Kooper, A. J., Eggink, A. J., Verhaak, C. M., Otten, B. J., Braat, D. D., & van Leeuwen, E. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on the unforeseen finding of a fetal sex chromosomal aneuploidy. Prenatal Diagnosis, 31, 286–292. doi:10.1002/pd.2707.CrossRefPubMed Pieters, J. J., Kooper, A. J., Eggink, A. J., Verhaak, C. M., Otten, B. J., Braat, D. D., & van Leeuwen, E. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on the unforeseen finding of a fetal sex chromosomal aneuploidy. Prenatal Diagnosis, 31, 286–292. doi:10.​1002/​pd.​2707.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pilnick, A., & Zayts, O. (2014). “It’s just a likelihood”: uncertainty as topic and resource in conveying “positive” results in an antenatal screening clinic. Symbolic Interaction, 37, 187–208. doi:10.1002/symb.99.CrossRef Pilnick, A., & Zayts, O. (2014). “It’s just a likelihood”: uncertainty as topic and resource in conveying “positive” results in an antenatal screening clinic. Symbolic Interaction, 37, 187–208. doi:10.​1002/​symb.​99.CrossRef
go back to reference Reiff, M., Bernhardt, B. A., Mulchandani, S., Soucier, D., Cornell, D., Pyeritz, R. E., & Spinner, N. B. (2012). “What does it mean?”: uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing. Genetics in Medicine, 14, 250–258. doi:10.1038/gim.2011.52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reiff, M., Bernhardt, B. A., Mulchandani, S., Soucier, D., Cornell, D., Pyeritz, R. E., & Spinner, N. B. (2012). “What does it mean?”: uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing. Genetics in Medicine, 14, 250–258. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2011.​52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Reiff, M., Giarelli, E., Bernhardt, B. A., Easley, E., Spinner, N. B., Sankar, P. L., & Mulchandani, S. (2015). Parents’ perceptions of the usefulness of chromosomal microarray analysis for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 3262–3275. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2489-3.CrossRefPubMed Reiff, M., Giarelli, E., Bernhardt, B. A., Easley, E., Spinner, N. B., Sankar, P. L., & Mulchandani, S. (2015). Parents’ perceptions of the usefulness of chromosomal microarray analysis for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 3262–3275. doi:10.​1007/​s10803-015-2489-3.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Richards, E. G., Sangi-Haghpeykar, H., McGuire, A. L., Van den Veyver, I. B., & Fruhman, G. (2015). Pregnant patients’ risk perception of prenatal test results with uncertain fetal clinical significance: ultrasound versus advanced genetic testing. Prenatal Diagnosis. doi:10.1002/pd.4680.PubMed Richards, E. G., Sangi-Haghpeykar, H., McGuire, A. L., Van den Veyver, I. B., & Fruhman, G. (2015). Pregnant patients’ risk perception of prenatal test results with uncertain fetal clinical significance: ultrasound versus advanced genetic testing. Prenatal Diagnosis. doi:10.​1002/​pd.​4680.PubMed
go back to reference Semaka, A., Balneaves, L. G., & Hayden, M. R. (2013). “Grasping the grey”: patient understanding and interpretation of an intermediate allele predictive test result for Huntington disease. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22, 200–217. doi:10.1007/s10897-012-9533-7.CrossRefPubMed Semaka, A., Balneaves, L. G., & Hayden, M. R. (2013). “Grasping the grey”: patient understanding and interpretation of an intermediate allele predictive test result for Huntington disease. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22, 200–217. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-012-9533-7.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Turbitt, E., Halliday, J. L., Amor, D. J., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2015). Preferences for results from genomic microarrays: comparing parents and health care providers. Clinical Genetics, 87, 21–29. doi:10.1111/cge.12398.CrossRefPubMed Turbitt, E., Halliday, J. L., Amor, D. J., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2015). Preferences for results from genomic microarrays: comparing parents and health care providers. Clinical Genetics, 87, 21–29. doi:10.​1111/​cge.​12398.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Van der Steen, S. L., Diderich, K. E., Riedijk, S. R., Verhagen-Visser, J., Govaerts, L. C., Joosten, M., & Galjaard, R. J. (2015). Pregnant couples at increased risk for common aneuploidies choose maximal information from invasive genetic testing. Clinical Genetics, 88, 25–31. doi:10.1111/cge.12479.CrossRefPubMed Van der Steen, S. L., Diderich, K. E., Riedijk, S. R., Verhagen-Visser, J., Govaerts, L. C., Joosten, M., & Galjaard, R. J. (2015). Pregnant couples at increased risk for common aneuploidies choose maximal information from invasive genetic testing. Clinical Genetics, 88, 25–31. doi:10.​1111/​cge.​12479.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Werner-Lin, A., Barg, F. K., Kellom, K. S., Stumm, K. J., Pilchman, L., Tomlinson, A. N., & Bernhardt, B. A. (2015). Couple’s narratives of communion and isolation following abnormal prenatal microarray testing results. Qualitative Health Research. doi:10.1177/1049732315603367.PubMed Werner-Lin, A., Barg, F. K., Kellom, K. S., Stumm, K. J., Pilchman, L., Tomlinson, A. N., & Bernhardt, B. A. (2015). Couple’s narratives of communion and isolation following abnormal prenatal microarray testing results. Qualitative Health Research. doi:10.​1177/​1049732315603367​.PubMed
go back to reference Werner-Lin, A. McCoyd, J., & Bernhardt, B. A. Recommendations for psychosocial genetic counseling during prenatal cytogenetic microarray analysis: Addressing uncertainty with more than just information. (under review) . Werner-Lin, A. McCoyd, J., & Bernhardt, B. A. Recommendations for psychosocial genetic counseling during prenatal cytogenetic microarray analysis: Addressing uncertainty with more than just information. (under review) .
go back to reference White, M., Garbez, R., Carroll, M., Brinker, E., & Howie-Esquivel, J. (2013). Is “teach-back” associated with knowledge retention and hospital readmission in hospitalized heart failure patients? The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 28, 137–146. doi:10.1097/JCN.0b013e31824987bd.CrossRefPubMed White, M., Garbez, R., Carroll, M., Brinker, E., & Howie-Esquivel, J. (2013). Is “teach-back” associated with knowledge retention and hospital readmission in hospitalized heart failure patients? The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 28, 137–146. doi:10.​1097/​JCN.​0b013e31824987bd​.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Willis, A. M., Smith, S. K., Meiser, B., Muller, C., Lewis, S., & Halliday, J. (2015). How do prospective parents prefer to receive information about prenatal screening and diagnostic testing? Prenatal Diagnosis, 35, 100–102. doi:10.1002/pd.4493.CrossRefPubMed Willis, A. M., Smith, S. K., Meiser, B., Muller, C., Lewis, S., & Halliday, J. (2015). How do prospective parents prefer to receive information about prenatal screening and diagnostic testing? Prenatal Diagnosis, 35, 100–102. doi:10.​1002/​pd.​4493.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
“Something Extra on Chromosome 5”: Parents’ Understanding of Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) Results
Authors
Sarah A. Walser
Allison Werner-Lin
Amita Russell
Ronald J. Wapner
Barbara A. Bernhardt
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9943-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Journal of Genetic Counseling 5/2016 Go to the issue