Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 1/2016

01-02-2016 | Original Research

Parents’ Perspectives on Variants of Uncertain Significance from Chromosome Microarray Analysis

Authors: Lesli A. Kiedrowski, Kailey M. Owens, Beverly M. Yashar, Jane L. Schuette

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for unexplained anomalies and developmental delay has improved diagnosis rates, but results classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) may challenge both clinicians and families. We explored the impact of such results on families, including parental knowledge, understanding and interpretation. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with parents (N = 14) who received genetic counseling for a VUS in their child. Transcripts were analyzed through an iterative coding process. Participants demonstrated a range of recall and personal interpretation regarding whether test results provided a causal explanation for their children’s health issues. Participants maintained contradictory interpretations, describing results as answers while maintaining that little clarification of their child’s condition had been provided. Reported benefits included obtaining medical services and personal validation. Parents described adaptation/coping processes similar to those occurring after positive test results. Recall of terminology, including “VUS” and precise CMA abnormalities, was poor. However, most demonstrated conceptual understanding of scientific uncertainty. All participants expressed intentions to return for recommended genetics follow-up but had misconceptions about how this would occur. These results provide insight into the patient-and-family experience when receiving uncertain genomic findings, emphasize the importance of exploring uncertainty during the communication process, and highlight areas for potential attention or improvement in the clinical encounter.
Literature
go back to reference Ashtiani, S., Makela, N., Carrion, P., & Austin, J. (2014). Parents’ experiences of receiving their child’s genetic diagnosis: A qualitative study to inform clinical genetics practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 164(6), 1496–1502. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.36525.PubMedCentralCrossRef Ashtiani, S., Makela, N., Carrion, P., & Austin, J. (2014). Parents’ experiences of receiving their child’s genetic diagnosis: A qualitative study to inform clinical genetics practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 164(6), 1496–1502. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​a.​36525.PubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Biesecker, B. B., Klein, W., Lewis, K. L., Fisher, T. C., Wright, M. F., Biesecker, L. G., & Han, P. K. (2014). How do research participants perceive “uncertainty” in genome sequencing? Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 16(12), 977–980. doi:10.1038/gim.2014.57.CrossRef Biesecker, B. B., Klein, W., Lewis, K. L., Fisher, T. C., Wright, M. F., Biesecker, L. G., & Han, P. K. (2014). How do research participants perceive “uncertainty” in genome sequencing? Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 16(12), 977–980. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2014.​57.CrossRef
go back to reference Coughlin, C. R., Scharer, G. H., & Shaikh, T. H. (2012). Clinical impact of copy number variation analysis using high-resolution microarray technologies: advantages, limitations and concerns. Genome Medicine, 4(10), 80. doi:10.1186/gm381.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Coughlin, C. R., Scharer, G. H., & Shaikh, T. H. (2012). Clinical impact of copy number variation analysis using high-resolution microarray technologies: advantages, limitations and concerns. Genome Medicine, 4(10), 80. doi:10.​1186/​gm381.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCulloch, A. W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: an example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136–155. doi:10.1177/1525822X10388468.CrossRef DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCulloch, A. W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: an example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136–155. doi:10.​1177/​1525822X10388468​.CrossRef
go back to reference Fanos, J. H. (2012). New “first families”: the psychosocial impact of new genetic technologies. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 14(2), 189–190. doi:10.1038/gim.2011.17.CrossRef Fanos, J. H. (2012). New “first families”: the psychosocial impact of new genetic technologies. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 14(2), 189–190. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2011.​17.CrossRef
go back to reference Graungaard, A. H., & Skov, L. (2007). Why do we need a diagnosis? A qualitative study of parents’ experiences, coping and needs, when the newborn child is severely disabled. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(3), 296–307. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00666.x. Graungaard, A. H., & Skov, L. (2007). Why do we need a diagnosis? A qualitative study of parents’ experiences, coping and needs, when the newborn child is severely disabled. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(3), 296–307. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-2214.​2006.​00666.​x.
go back to reference Lee, C., Iafrate, A. J., & Brothman, A. R. (2007). Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders. Nature Genetics, 39(7 Suppl), S48–54. doi:10.1038/ng2092.CrossRefPubMed Lee, C., Iafrate, A. J., & Brothman, A. R. (2007). Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders. Nature Genetics, 39(7 Suppl), S48–54. doi:10.​1038/​ng2092.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lipinski, S. E., Lipinski, M. J., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2006). Uncertainty and perceived personal control among parents of children with rare chromosome conditions: The role of genetic counseling. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C(4), 232–240. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30107.CrossRefPubMed Lipinski, S. E., Lipinski, M. J., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2006). Uncertainty and perceived personal control among parents of children with rare chromosome conditions: The role of genetic counseling. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C(4), 232–240. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​c.​30107.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lopez-Rangel, E., Mickelson, E. C. R., & Lewis, M. E. S. (2008). The value of a genetic diagnosis for individuals with intellectual disabilities: optimising healthcare and function across the lifespan. The British Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 54(Part 2), 69–82.CrossRef Lopez-Rangel, E., Mickelson, E. C. R., & Lewis, M. E. S. (2008). The value of a genetic diagnosis for individuals with intellectual disabilities: optimising healthcare and function across the lifespan. The British Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 54(Part 2), 69–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Manning, M., Hudgins, L., Practice, P., & Committee, G. (2010). Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 12(11), 742–745. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f8baad.CrossRef Manning, M., Hudgins, L., Practice, P., & Committee, G. (2010). Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 12(11), 742–745. doi:10.​1097/​GIM.​0b013e3181f8baad​.CrossRef
go back to reference Michie, S., Marteau, T. M., & Bobrow, M. (1997). Genetic counselling: the psychological impact of meeting patients’ expectations. Journal of Medical Genetics, 34(3), 237–241.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Michie, S., Marteau, T. M., & Bobrow, M. (1997). Genetic counselling: the psychological impact of meeting patients’ expectations. Journal of Medical Genetics, 34(3), 237–241.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller, D. T., Adam, M. P., Aradhya, S., Biesecker, L. G., Brothman, A. R., Carter, N. P., & Ledbetter, D. H. (2010a). Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 86(5), 749–764. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Miller, D. T., Adam, M. P., Aradhya, S., Biesecker, L. G., Brothman, A. R., Carter, N. P., & Ledbetter, D. H. (2010a). Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 86(5), 749–764. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajhg.​2010.​04.​006.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Palmer, E., Speirs, H., Taylor, P. J., Mullan, G., Turner, G., Einfeld, S., & Mowat, D. (2014). Changing interpretation of chromosomal microarray over time in a community cohort with intellectual disability. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 164A(2), 377–385. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.36279.CrossRefPubMed Palmer, E., Speirs, H., Taylor, P. J., Mullan, G., Turner, G., Einfeld, S., & Mowat, D. (2014). Changing interpretation of chromosomal microarray over time in a community cohort with intellectual disability. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 164A(2), 377–385. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​a.​36279.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Reiff, M., Bernhardt, B. A., Mulchandani, S., Soucier, D., Cornell, D., Pyeritz, R. E., & Spinner, N. B. (2012). “What does it mean?”: uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 14(2), 250–258. doi:10.1038/gim.2011.52.CrossRef Reiff, M., Bernhardt, B. A., Mulchandani, S., Soucier, D., Cornell, D., Pyeritz, R. E., & Spinner, N. B. (2012). “What does it mean?”: uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 14(2), 250–258. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2011.​52.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosenthal, E. T., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2001). Parental attitudes toward a diagnosis in children with unidentified multiple congenital anomaly syndromes. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 103(2), 106–114.CrossRefPubMed Rosenthal, E. T., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2001). Parental attitudes toward a diagnosis in children with unidentified multiple congenital anomaly syndromes. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 103(2), 106–114.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shaffer, L. G., Coppinger, J., Alliman, S., Torchia, B. A., Theisen, A., Ballif, B. C., & Bejjani, B. A. (2008). Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens. Prenatal Diagnosis, 28(9), 789–795. doi:10.1002/pd.2053.CrossRefPubMed Shaffer, L. G., Coppinger, J., Alliman, S., Torchia, B. A., Theisen, A., Ballif, B. C., & Bejjani, B. A. (2008). Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens. Prenatal Diagnosis, 28(9), 789–795. doi:10.​1002/​pd.​2053.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Turbitt, E., Halliday, J. L., Amor, D. J., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2014). Preferences for results from genomic microarrays: comparing parents and health care providers. Clinical Genetics. doi:10.1111/cge.12398.PubMed Turbitt, E., Halliday, J. L., Amor, D. J., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2014). Preferences for results from genomic microarrays: comparing parents and health care providers. Clinical Genetics. doi:10.​1111/​cge.​12398.PubMed
go back to reference Vos, J., Otten, W., van Asperen, C., Jansen, A., Menko, F., & Tibben, A. (2008). The counsellees’ view of an unclassified variant in BRCA1/2: Recall, interpretation, and impact on life. Psycho-Oncology, 17(8), 822–830. doi:10.1002/pon.1311.CrossRefPubMed Vos, J., Otten, W., van Asperen, C., Jansen, A., Menko, F., & Tibben, A. (2008). The counsellees’ view of an unclassified variant in BRCA1/2: Recall, interpretation, and impact on life. Psycho-Oncology, 17(8), 822–830. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​1311.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Parents’ Perspectives on Variants of Uncertain Significance from Chromosome Microarray Analysis
Authors
Lesli A. Kiedrowski
Kailey M. Owens
Beverly M. Yashar
Jane L. Schuette
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9847-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Genetic Counseling 1/2016 Go to the issue