Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 6/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Research

An Exploration of Genetic Counselors’ Needs and Experiences with Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing

Authors: Barbara A. Bernhardt, Katherine Kellom, Alexandra Barbarese, W. Andrew Faucett, Ronald J. Wapner

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Because of the higher yield over traditional chromosomal analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is being used increasingly in prenatal diagnosis. Unfortunately, the clinical implication of many copy number variants found on prenatal CMA is uncertain, complicating genetic counseling. Recognizing that uncertain results will be encountered frequently as more of the genome is assayed prenatally, we set out to understand the experiences and needs of genetic counselors when counseling patients about uncertain prenatal microarray results, their comfort with various aspects of prenatal genetic counseling, and their interest in additional education and training about prenatal microarray testing. We first interviewed 10 genetic counselors about their experiences of providing pre- and post-test genetic counseling about prenatal CMA. Based on the findings from the counselor interviews, we developed items for a survey to assess the prevalence of genetic counselors’ attitudes towards, experience and comfort with, and educational needs regarding prenatal CMA. Based on surveys completed by 193 prenatal genetic counselors, we found that when there is an uncertain CMA result, only 59 % would be comfortable providing genetic counseling and only 43 % would be comfortable helping a patient make a decision about pregnancy termination. Being less comfortable was associated with seeing fewer patients having prenatal CMA testing. Respondents expressed a high degree of interest in additional education about prenatal CMA and counseling about uncertain results. Further genetic counselor education and training aimed at improving counselors’ personal comfort with uncertain results and communicating about them with patients is needed.
Literature
go back to reference Benn, P. A. (2013). Prenatal counseling and the detection of copy-number variants. Genetics in Medicine, 15, 316–317.PubMedCrossRef Benn, P. A. (2013). Prenatal counseling and the detection of copy-number variants. Genetics in Medicine, 15, 316–317.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bernhardt, B. A., Silver, R., Rushton, C. H., Micco, E., & Geller, G. (2010). What keeps you up at night? Genetics professionals’ distressing experiences in patient care. Genetics in Medicine, 12(5), 289–297.PubMedCrossRef Bernhardt, B. A., Silver, R., Rushton, C. H., Micco, E., & Geller, G. (2010). What keeps you up at night? Genetics professionals’ distressing experiences in patient care. Genetics in Medicine, 12(5), 289–297.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bernhardt, B. A., Soucier, D., Hanson, K., Savage, M. S., Jackson, L., & Wapner, R. J. (2012). Women’s experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results. Genetics in Medicine, 15(2), 139–145.PubMedCrossRef Bernhardt, B. A., Soucier, D., Hanson, K., Savage, M. S., Jackson, L., & Wapner, R. J. (2012). Women’s experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results. Genetics in Medicine, 15(2), 139–145.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Borders, L. D., Eubanks, S., & Callanan, N. (2006). Supervision of psychosocial skills in genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(4), 211–223.PubMedCrossRef Borders, L. D., Eubanks, S., & Callanan, N. (2006). Supervision of psychosocial skills in genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(4), 211–223.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Braddock, C. H. (2013). Supporting shared decision making when clinical evidence is low. Medical Care Research and Review, 70(1 suppl), 129S–140S.PubMedCrossRef Braddock, C. H. (2013). Supporting shared decision making when clinical evidence is low. Medical Care Research and Review, 70(1 suppl), 129S–140S.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Brady, P. D., Delle Chiaie, B., Christenhusz, G., Dierickx, K., Van Den Bogaert, K., Menten, B. et al. (2014). A prospective study of the clinical utility of prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities and an exploration of a framework for reporting unclassified variants and risk factors. Genetics in Medicine, in press. Brady, P. D., Delle Chiaie, B., Christenhusz, G., Dierickx, K., Van Den Bogaert, K., Menten, B. et al. (2014). A prospective study of the clinical utility of prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities and an exploration of a framework for reporting unclassified variants and risk factors. Genetics in Medicine, in press.
go back to reference Brashers, D. E., & Hogan, T. P. (2013). The appraisal and management of uncertainty: implications for information-retrieval systems. Information Processing & Management, 49(6), 1241–1249.CrossRef Brashers, D. E., & Hogan, T. P. (2013). The appraisal and management of uncertainty: implications for information-retrieval systems. Information Processing & Management, 49(6), 1241–1249.CrossRef
go back to reference Callaway, J. L., Shaffer, L. G., Chitty, L. S., Rosenfeld, J. A., & Crolla, J. A. (2013). The clinical utility of microarray technologies applied to prenatal cytogenetics in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype: a review of the literature. Prenatal Diagnosis, 33(12), 1119–1123.PubMedCrossRef Callaway, J. L., Shaffer, L. G., Chitty, L. S., Rosenfeld, J. A., & Crolla, J. A. (2013). The clinical utility of microarray technologies applied to prenatal cytogenetics in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype: a review of the literature. Prenatal Diagnosis, 33(12), 1119–1123.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Crolla, J. A., Wapner, R., & Van Lith, J. M. (2014). Controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: should everyone undergoing invasive testing have a microarray. Prenatal Diagnosis, 34(1), 18–22.PubMedCrossRef Crolla, J. A., Wapner, R., & Van Lith, J. M. (2014). Controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: should everyone undergoing invasive testing have a microarray. Prenatal Diagnosis, 34(1), 18–22.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference de Jong, A., Dondorp, W. J., Macville, M. V., de Die-Smulders, C. E., van Lith, J. M., de Wert, G. M. (2013). Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection. Human Genetics, 1–10. de Jong, A., Dondorp, W. J., Macville, M. V., de Die-Smulders, C. E., van Lith, J. M., de Wert, G. M. (2013). Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection. Human Genetics, 1–10.
go back to reference Donnelly, J. C., Wapner, R. J., & Simpson, J. L. (2013). Can microarray analysis reveal additional abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis? Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 8(3), 193–195.CrossRef Donnelly, J. C., Wapner, R. J., & Simpson, J. L. (2013). Can microarray analysis reveal additional abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis? Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 8(3), 193–195.CrossRef
go back to reference Dunlop, K. L., Barlow-Stewart, K., Butow, P., & Heinrich, P. (2011). A model of professional development for practicing genetic counselors: adaptation of communication skills training in oncology. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20(3), 217–230.PubMedCrossRef Dunlop, K. L., Barlow-Stewart, K., Butow, P., & Heinrich, P. (2011). A model of professional development for practicing genetic counselors: adaptation of communication skills training in oncology. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20(3), 217–230.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ellington, L., Kelly, K. M., Reblin, M., Latimer, S., & Roter, D. (2011). Communication in genetic counseling: cognitive and emotional processing. Health Communication, 26(7), 667–675.PubMedCrossRef Ellington, L., Kelly, K. M., Reblin, M., Latimer, S., & Roter, D. (2011). Communication in genetic counseling: cognitive and emotional processing. Health Communication, 26(7), 667–675.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Epstein, R. M., & Gramling, R. E. (2013). What is shared in shared decision making? Complex decisions when the evidence is unclear. Medical Care Research and Review, 70(1 suppl), 94S–112S.PubMedCrossRef Epstein, R. M., & Gramling, R. E. (2013). What is shared in shared decision making? Complex decisions when the evidence is unclear. Medical Care Research and Review, 70(1 suppl), 94S–112S.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fox, R. C. (1980). The evolution of medical uncertainty. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 58(1), 1–49.PubMedCrossRef Fox, R. C. (1980). The evolution of medical uncertainty. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 58(1), 1–49.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Han, P. K. (2013). Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems in communicating uncertainty in clinical evidence. Medical Care Research and Review, 70(1 suppl), 14S–36S.PubMedCrossRef Han, P. K. (2013). Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems in communicating uncertainty in clinical evidence. Medical Care Research and Review, 70(1 suppl), 14S–36S.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hartmann, J. E., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2013). Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: a validation study of the reciprocal-engagement model. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1–13. Hartmann, J. E., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2013). Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: a validation study of the reciprocal-engagement model. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1–13.
go back to reference Hehir–Kwa, J. Y., Pfundt, R., Veltman, J. A., & de Leeuw, N. (2013). Pathogenic or not? Assessing the clinical relevance of copy number variants. Clinical Genetics, 84(5), 415–421.PubMedCrossRef Hehir–Kwa, J. Y., Pfundt, R., Veltman, J. A., & de Leeuw, N. (2013). Pathogenic or not? Assessing the clinical relevance of copy number variants. Clinical Genetics, 84(5), 415–421.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hillman, S., McMullan, D. J., Maher, E. R., & Kilby, M. D. (2013a). The use of chromosomal microarray in prenatal diagnosis. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 15(2), 80–84.CrossRef Hillman, S., McMullan, D. J., Maher, E. R., & Kilby, M. D. (2013a). The use of chromosomal microarray in prenatal diagnosis. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 15(2), 80–84.CrossRef
go back to reference Hillman, S. C., Skelton, J., Quinlan–Jones, E., Wilson, A., & Kilby, M. D. (2013b). If it helps… the use of microarray technology in prenatal testing: patient and partners reflections. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 161A, 1619–1627.PubMedCrossRef Hillman, S. C., Skelton, J., Quinlan–Jones, E., Wilson, A., & Kilby, M. D. (2013b). If it helps… the use of microarray technology in prenatal testing: patient and partners reflections. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 161A, 1619–1627.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hunt, L. M., de Voogd, K. B., & Castañeda, H. (2005). The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: does clinical information inform patient decision-making? Patient Education and Counseling, 56(3), 302–312.PubMedCrossRef Hunt, L. M., de Voogd, K. B., & Castañeda, H. (2005). The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: does clinical information inform patient decision-making? Patient Education and Counseling, 56(3), 302–312.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jacob, H. J. (2013). Next-generation sequencing for clinical diagnostics. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(16), 1557–1558. Jacob, H. J. (2013). Next-generation sequencing for clinical diagnostics. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(16), 1557–1558.
go back to reference Kenen, R., Ardern-Jones, A., Lynch, E., & Eeles, R. (2011). Ownership of uncertainty: healthcare professionals counseling and treating women from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families who receive an inconclusive BRCA1/2 genetic test result. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 15(4), 243–250.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kenen, R., Ardern-Jones, A., Lynch, E., & Eeles, R. (2011). Ownership of uncertainty: healthcare professionals counseling and treating women from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families who receive an inconclusive BRCA1/2 genetic test result. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 15(4), 243–250.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kessler, S. (1997). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. XI. Nondirectiveness revisited. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 72(2), 164–171.PubMedCrossRef Kessler, S. (1997). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. XI. Nondirectiveness revisited. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 72(2), 164–171.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Klugman, S., Suskin, B., Spencer, B. L., Dar, P. E., Bajaj, K., Powers, J., Merkatz, I. R. (2013). Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis: report of first 6 months in clinical practice*. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.858243. Klugman, S., Suskin, B., Spencer, B. L., Dar, P. E., Bajaj, K., Powers, J., Merkatz, I. R. (2013). Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis: report of first 6 months in clinical practice*. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. doi:10.​3109/​14767058.​2013.​858243.
go back to reference Menezes, M. A., Hodgson, J. M., Sahhar, M., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2013). Taking Its toll: the challenges of working in fetal medicine. Birth, 40(1), 52–60.PubMedCrossRef Menezes, M. A., Hodgson, J. M., Sahhar, M., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2013). Taking Its toll: the challenges of working in fetal medicine. Birth, 40(1), 52–60.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mikhaelian, M., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I., LeRoy, B. S., & Bower, M. (2013). Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis: a survey of prenatal genetic counselors’ experiences and attitudes. Prenatal Diagnosis, 33, 371–377.PubMed Mikhaelian, M., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I., LeRoy, B. S., & Bower, M. (2013). Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis: a survey of prenatal genetic counselors’ experiences and attitudes. Prenatal Diagnosis, 33, 371–377.PubMed
go back to reference Miller, D. T., Adam, M. P., Aradhya, S., Biesecker, L. G., Brothman, A. R., Carter, N. P., et al. (2010). Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 86(5), 749–764.CrossRef Miller, D. T., Adam, M. P., Aradhya, S., Biesecker, L. G., Brothman, A. R., Carter, N. P., et al. (2010). Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 86(5), 749–764.CrossRef
go back to reference Nevalainen, M. K., Mantyranta, T., & Pitkala, K. H. (2010). Facing uncertainty as a medical student—a qualitative study of their reflective learning diaries and writings on specific themes during the first clinical year. Patient Education and Counseling, 78(2), 218–223.PubMedCrossRef Nevalainen, M. K., Mantyranta, T., & Pitkala, K. H. (2010). Facing uncertainty as a medical student—a qualitative study of their reflective learning diaries and writings on specific themes during the first clinical year. Patient Education and Counseling, 78(2), 218–223.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Peters, J. A. (2010). Genetic counselors: Caring mindfully for ourselves. In: genetic counseling practice: advanced concepts and skills. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. Peters, J. A. (2010). Genetic counselors: Caring mindfully for ourselves. In: genetic counseling practice: advanced concepts and skills. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
go back to reference Politi, M. C., & Légaré, F. (2010). Physicians’ reactions to uncertainty in the context of shared decision making. Patient Education and Counseling, 80(2), 155–157.PubMedCrossRef Politi, M. C., & Légaré, F. (2010). Physicians’ reactions to uncertainty in the context of shared decision making. Patient Education and Counseling, 80(2), 155–157.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Politi, M. C., Han, P. K., & Col, N. F. (2007). Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions. Medical Decision Making, 27(5), 681–695.PubMedCrossRef Politi, M. C., Han, P. K., & Col, N. F. (2007). Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions. Medical Decision Making, 27(5), 681–695.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Roter, D., Ellington, L., Erby, L. H., Larson, S., & Dudley, W. (2006). The genetic counseling video project (GCVP): models of practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142(4), 209–220.CrossRef Roter, D., Ellington, L., Erby, L. H., Larson, S., & Dudley, W. (2006). The genetic counseling video project (GCVP): models of practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142(4), 209–220.CrossRef
go back to reference Runyon, M., Zahm, K. W., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I.M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2010). What do genetic counselors learn on the job? A qualitative assessment of professional development outcomes. Journal of genetic counseling, 19(4), 371–386. Runyon, M., Zahm, K. W., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I.M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2010). What do genetic counselors learn on the job? A qualitative assessment of professional development outcomes. Journal of genetic counseling, 19(4), 371–386.
go back to reference Sarangi, S., & Clarke, A. (2002). Zones of expertise and the management of uncertainty in genetics risk communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(2), 139–171.CrossRef Sarangi, S., & Clarke, A. (2002). Zones of expertise and the management of uncertainty in genetics risk communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(2), 139–171.CrossRef
go back to reference Shaffer, L. G., Bejjani, B. A., Torchia, B., Kirkpatrick, S., Coppinger, J., & Ballif, B. C. (2007). The identification of microdeletion syndromes and other chromosome abnormalities: cytogenetic methods of the past, new technologies for the future. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 145(4), 335–345.CrossRef Shaffer, L. G., Bejjani, B. A., Torchia, B., Kirkpatrick, S., Coppinger, J., & Ballif, B. C. (2007). The identification of microdeletion syndromes and other chromosome abnormalities: cytogenetic methods of the past, new technologies for the future. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 145(4), 335–345.CrossRef
go back to reference Shaw, J., Brown, R., Heinrich, P., & Dunn, S. (2013). Doctors’ experience of stress during simulated bad news consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(2), 203–208.PubMedCrossRef Shaw, J., Brown, R., Heinrich, P., & Dunn, S. (2013). Doctors’ experience of stress during simulated bad news consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(2), 203–208.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Srinivasan, A., Bianchi, D. W., Huang, H., Sehnert, A. J., & Rava, R. P. (2013). Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 92(2), 167–176.CrossRef Srinivasan, A., Bianchi, D. W., Huang, H., Sehnert, A. J., & Rava, R. P. (2013). Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 92(2), 167–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Stark, Z., Gillam, L., Walker, S. P., & McGillivray, G. (2013). Ethical controversies in prenatal microarray. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 25(2), 133–137.PubMedCrossRef Stark, Z., Gillam, L., Walker, S. P., & McGillivray, G. (2013). Ethical controversies in prenatal microarray. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 25(2), 133–137.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Veach, P. M., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 713–728.PubMedCrossRef Veach, P. M., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 713–728.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wapner, R. J., Martin, C. L., Levy, B., Ballif, B. C., Eng, C. M., Zachary, J. M., et al. (2012). Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 367(23), 2175–2184.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wapner, R. J., Martin, C. L., Levy, B., Ballif, B. C., Eng, C. M., Zachary, J. M., et al. (2012). Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 367(23), 2175–2184.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Weil, J., Ormond, K., Peters, J., Peters, K., Biesecker, B. B., & LeRoy, B. (2006). The relationship of nondirectiveness to genetic counseling: report of a workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual education conference. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 85–93.PubMedCrossRef Weil, J., Ormond, K., Peters, J., Peters, K., Biesecker, B. B., & LeRoy, B. (2006). The relationship of nondirectiveness to genetic counseling: report of a workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual education conference. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 85–93.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference White, M. T. (1997). Respect for autonomy in genetic counseling: an analysis and a proposal. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6(3), 297–313.PubMedCrossRef White, M. T. (1997). Respect for autonomy in genetic counseling: an analysis and a proposal. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6(3), 297–313.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
An Exploration of Genetic Counselors’ Needs and Experiences with Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing
Authors
Barbara A. Bernhardt
Katherine Kellom
Alexandra Barbarese
W. Andrew Faucett
Ronald J. Wapner
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9702-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Journal of Genetic Counseling 6/2014 Go to the issue