Top

Published in:

01-04-2016 | Original Research

Defining Our Clinical Practice: The Identification of Genetic Counseling Outcomes Utilizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model

Authors: Krista Redlinger-Grosse, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Stephanie Cohen, Bonnie S. LeRoy, Ian M. MacFarlane, Heather Zierhut

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 2/2016

Abstract

The need for evidence-based medicine, including comparative effectiveness studies and patient-centered outcomes research, has become a major healthcare focus. To date, a comprehensive list of genetic counseling outcomes, as espoused by genetic counselors, has not been established and thus, identification of outcomes unique to genetic counseling services has become a priority for the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC). The purpose of this study was to take a critical first step at identifying a more comprehensive list of genetic counseling outcomes. This paper describes the results of a focus group study using the Reciprocal-Engagement Model (REM) as a framework to characterize patient-centered outcomes of genetic counseling clinical practice. Five focus groups were conducted with 27 peer nominated participants who were clinical genetic counselors, genetic counseling program directors, and/or outcomes researchers in genetic counseling. Members of each focus group were asked to identify genetic counseling outcomes for four to five of the 17 goals of the REM. A theory-driven, thematic analysis of focus group data yielded 194 genetic counseling outcomes across the 17 goals. Participants noted some concerns about how genetic counseling outcomes will be measured and evaluated given varying stakeholders and the long-term nature of genetic concerns. The present results provide a list of outcomes for use in future genetic counseling outcomes research and for empirically-supported clinical interventions.

Throughout this paper, genetic counseling outcomes refer to outcomes espoused by genetic counselors providing genetic counseling, in other words, genetic counselor-defined outcomes.

Access and Service Delivery Committee (ASD) of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. (2014). GC outcome committee/task force meeting minutes 2014. Retrieved from National Society of Genetic Counselor website: https://doi.org/nsgc.org/p/co/ly/gid=14

Armeli, C., Robbins, S. J., & Eunpu, D. (2005). Comparing knowledge of β-Thalassemia in samples of Italians, Italian-Americans, and Non-Italian-Americans. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 365–376.CrossRef

Baldwin, E. E., Boudreault, P., Fox, M., Sinsheimer, J. S., & Palmer, C. G. S. (2011). Effect of pre-test genetic counseling for deaf adults on knowledge of genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21, 256–272.CrossRef

Berkenstadt, M., Shiloh, S., Barkai, G., Katznelson, M., & Goldman, B. (1999). Perceived personal control: a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 82, 53–59.CrossRef

Bernhardt, B. A., Biesecker, B. B., & Mastromarino, C. L. (2000). Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94, 189–197.CrossRef

Biesecker, B. B., & Peters, K. F. (2001). Process studies in genetic counseling: peering into the black box. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106, 191–198.CrossRef

Bjorvatn, C., Eide, G. E., Hanestad, B. R., Øyen, N., Havik, O. E., Carlsson, A., & Berglund, G. (2007). Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 211–222.CrossRef

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2013). Physician quality reporting system. Retrieved August 13, 2013, from https://doi.org/www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/PQRS/index.html?redirect=/PQRS/.

Clarke, A., Parsons, E., & Williams, A. (1996). Outcomes and process in genetic counselling. Clinical Genetics, 50, 462–469.CrossRef

Codori, A.-M., Waldeck, T., Petersen, G. M., Miglioretti, D., Trimbath, J. D., & Tillery, M. A. (2005). Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 119–132.CrossRef

Davey, A., Rostant, K., Harrop, K., Goldblatt, J., & O’Leary, P. (2005). Evaluating genetic counseling: client expectations, psychological adjustment and satisfaction with service. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 197–206.CrossRef

Fox, M., Weil, J., & Resta, R. (2007). Why we do what we do: commentary on a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 729–730.CrossRef

Gaff, C. L., Collins, V., Symes, T., & Halliday, J. (2005). Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands’ perceptions. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 133–140.CrossRef

Hallowell, N., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., & Watson, M. (2005). Communication about genetic testing in families of male BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers: patterns, priorities and problems: communication about BRCA1/2 testing. Clinical Genetics, 67, 492–502.CrossRef

Hamilton, R. J., Bowers, B. J., & Williams, J. K. (2005). Disclosing genetic test results to family members. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37, 18–24.CrossRef

Hartmann, J. E., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2015). Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: a validation study of the reciprocal-engagement model. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24, 225–237.CrossRef

Hippman, C., Lohn, Z., Ringrose, A., Inglis, A., Cheek, J., & Austin, J. C. (2013). Nothing is absolute in life: Understanding uncertainty in the context of psychiatric genetic counseling from the perspective of those with serious mental illness. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 94–2.

Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233.CrossRef

Hunter, A., Cappelli, M., Humphreys, L., Allanson, J., Chiu, T., Peeters, C., & Zimak, A. (2005). A randomized trial comparing alternative approaches to prenatal diagnosis counseling in advanced maternal age patients: comparison of PND counseling approaches. Clinical Genetics, 67, 303–313.CrossRef

Kasparian, N. A., Wakefield, C. E., & Meiser, B. (2007). Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 693–712.CrossRef

Krousel-Wood, M. A. (2000). Outcomes assessment and performance improvement: Measurements and methodologies that matter in mental healthcare. In Mental health care administration: A guide for practitioners (pp. 233–254). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2008). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publichation.

MacFarlane, A., & O’Reilly-de Brun, M. (2012). Using a theory-driven conceptual framework in qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 607–618.CrossRef

Matloff, E. T., Moyer, A., Shannon, K. M., Niendorf, K. B., & Col, N. F. (2006). Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making. Journal of Women’s Health, 15, 843–856.CrossRef

McAllister, M., Payne, K., MacLeod, R., Nicholls, S., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. (2008). Patient empowerment in clinical genetics services. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 895–905.CrossRef

McAllister, M., Dunn, G., & Todd, C. (2010). Empowerment: qualitative underpinning of a new clinical genetics-specific patient-reported outcome. European Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 125–130.CrossRef

McAllister, M., Wood, A., Dunn, G., Shiloh, S., & Todd, C. (2011). The genetic counseling outcome scale: a new patient-reported outcome measure for clinical genetics services. Clinical Genetics, 79, 413–424.CrossRef

McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 713–728.

McCarthy Veach, P., LeRoy, B., & Bartels, D. M. (2010). Genetic counseling practice: Advanced concepts and skills. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

Meiser, B., Dunn, S., Dixon, J., & Powell, L. W. (2005). Psychological adjustment and knowledge About hereditary hemochromatosis in a clinic-based sample: a prospective study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 453–463.CrossRef

Meiser, B., Irle, J., Lobb, E., & Barlow-Stewart, K. (2008). Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 434–451.CrossRef

Nagle, C., Lewis, S., Meiser, B., Metcalfe, S., Carlin, J. B., Bell, R., & Halliday, J. (2006). Evaluation of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities: a cluster randomised trial. BMC Public Health, 6, 96.CrossRef

Outcomes Research. (2000). [Text]. Retrieved March 17, 2014, from https://doi.org/www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/factsheets/outcomes/outfact/

Payne, K., Nicholls, S., McAllister, M., MacLeod, R., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. M. (2008). Outcome measurement in clinical genetics services: a systematic review of validated measures. Value in Health, 11, 497–508.CrossRef

Peterson, S. K., Pentz, R. D., Blanco, A. M., Ward, P. A., Watts, B. G., Marani, S. K., & Strong, L. C. (2006). Evaluation of a decision aid for families considering p53 genetic counseling and testing. Genetics in Medicine, 8, 226–233.CrossRef

Pieterse, A. H., van Dulmen, A. M., Beemer, F. A., Bensing, J. M., & Ausems, M. G. E. M. (2007). Cancer genetic counseling: communication and counselees’ post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety, and needs fulfillment. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 85–96.CrossRef

Pithara, C. (2014). Identifying outcomes of clinical genetic services: qualitative evidence and methodological considerations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 229–238.CrossRef

Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38, 65–76.CrossRef

Read, C. Y., Perry, D. J., & Duffy, M. E. (2005). Design and psychometric evaluation of the psychological adaptation to genetic information scale. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37, 203–208.CrossRef

Resta, R., Biesecker, B. B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M. N., & Williams, J. L. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: national society of genetic counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83.CrossRef

Rieh, J. P., & Ray, C. (1974). Conceptual models for nursing practice. New York: Appleton.

Rowe, H. J., Fisher, J. R. W., & Quinlivan, J. A. (2006). Are pregnant Australian women well informed about prenatal genetic screening? A systematic investigation using the multidimensional measure of informed choice. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 46, 433–439.CrossRef

Skirton, H., Parsons, E., & Ewings, P. (2005). Development of an audit tool for genetic services. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 136A, 122–127.CrossRef

Supreme Court of the United States. (2013). Supreme Court of the United States. Retrieved August 13, 2013, from https://doi.org/www.hhs.gov/healthcare/rights/law/index.html.

Van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H., Bröcker-Vriends, A., Van Asperen, C., Sijmons, R., & Tibben, A. (2006). Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study. Clinical Genetics, 71, 35–42.CrossRef

Wakefield, C. E., Meiser, B., Homewood, J., Peate, M., Taylor, A., Lobb, E., & the AGenDA Collaborative Group. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of a decision aid for women considering genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 107, 289–301.CrossRef

Zierhut, H., & Cohen, S. (2013). Identification of patient-centered outcome measures in genetic counseling (Audrey Heimler Special Projects Award Proposal) (pp. 1–6). National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Title: Defining Our Clinical Practice: The Identification of Genetic Counseling Outcomes Utilizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model
Authors: Krista Redlinger-Grosse
Patricia McCarthy Veach
Stephanie Cohen
Bonnie S. LeRoy
Ian M. MacFarlane
Heather Zierhut
Publication date: 01-04-2016
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9864-2

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Defining Our Clinical Practice: The Identification of Genetic Counseling Outcomes Utilizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Breast Cancer Risk Perceptions among Relatives of Women with Uninformative Negative BRCA1/2 Test Results: The Moderating Effect of the Amount of Shared Information

Genetic Counselors’ Experiences Regarding Communication of Reproductive Risks with Autosomal Recessive Conditions found on Cancer Panels

Counselees’ Expressed Level of Understanding of the Risk Estimate and Surveillance Recommendation are Not Associated with Breast Cancer Surveillance Adherence

Exploration of Male Attitudes on Partnerships and Sexuality with Female BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

Reproductive Health CHOICES for Young Adults with Sickle Cell Disease or Trait: Randomized Controlled Trial Outcomes over Two Years

Clinical and Counseling Experiences of Early Adopters of Whole Exome Sequencing