Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 2/2016

Open Access 01-04-2016 | Original Research

Counselees’ Expressed Level of Understanding of the Risk Estimate and Surveillance Recommendation are Not Associated with Breast Cancer Surveillance Adherence

Authors: Akke Albada, Sandra van Dulmen, Henrietta Dijkstra, Ivette Wieffer, Arjen Witkamp, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

We studied counselees’ expressed understanding of the risk estimate and surveillance recommendation in the final consultation for breast cancer genetic counseling in relation with their risk perception, worry and cancer surveillance adherence 1 year post-counseling. Consecutive counselees were included from 2008 to 2010. Counselees with an indication for diagnostic DNA-testing for themselves or a breast cancer affected relative were requested to complete online questionnaires before and after counseling and one year after counseling (N = 152–124). Self-reported surveillance was compared to surveillance recommendations. Consultations were videotaped. Counselees’ reactions to the risks and recommendations were coded. Statements about the risk perception and surveillance intentions of breast cancer unaffected counselees were transcribed. Associations with outcomes were explored. Almost all breast cancer unaffected counselees (>90 %) reacted to their risk estimate with an utterance indicating understanding and this reaction was not significantly associated with their post-visit risk perception alignment. Over one-third (38.6 %) overestimated their risk post-counseling. Few counselees (5.8 %) expressed surveillance intentions. One year after counseling, about three-quarters (74.0 %) of the breast cancer unaffected counselees had adhered to the surveillance recommendation. Almost one-quarter (23.3 %) had performed more mammograms/MRI scans than recommended, which was associated with prior mammography uptake (n = 47; X2 = 5.2; p = .02). Counselees’ post-counseling overestimation of their risk, high levels of worry and high surveillance uptake were not reflected in their reactions to the counselor’s information during the final visit.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Albada, A., Ausems, M. G. E. M., Van Dulmen, S. (2014). Counselee participation in final breast cancer genetic counselling visits and associations with achievement of the preferred role, cognitive outcomes, risk perception alignment and perceived personal control. Social Science and Medecine, Epub.CrossRef Albada, A., Ausems, M. G. E. M., Van Dulmen, S. (2014). Counselee participation in final breast cancer genetic counselling visits and associations with achievement of the preferred role, cognitive outcomes, risk perception alignment and perceived personal control. Social Science and Medecine, Epub.CrossRef
go back to reference Albada, A., Van Dulmen, S., Ausems, M. G. E. M., & Bensing, J. M. (2012). A pre-visit website with question prompt sheet for counselees facilitates communication in the first consultation for breast cancer genetic counselling: findings from an RCT. Genetics in Medecine, 14(5), 535–542.CrossRef Albada, A., Van Dulmen, S., Ausems, M. G. E. M., & Bensing, J. M. (2012). A pre-visit website with question prompt sheet for counselees facilitates communication in the first consultation for breast cancer genetic counselling: findings from an RCT. Genetics in Medecine, 14(5), 535–542.CrossRef
go back to reference Botkin, J. R., Smith, K. R., Croyle, R. T., Baty, B. J., Wylie, J. E., Dutson, D., et al. (2003). Genetic testing for a BRCA1 mutation: prophylactic surgery and screening behavior in women 2 years post testing. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 118A, 201–209.CrossRef Botkin, J. R., Smith, K. R., Croyle, R. T., Baty, B. J., Wylie, J. E., Dutson, D., et al. (2003). Genetic testing for a BRCA1 mutation: prophylactic surgery and screening behavior in women 2 years post testing. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 118A, 201–209.CrossRef
go back to reference Burke, W., Culver, J., Pinsky, L., Hall, S., Reynolds, S. E., Yasui, Y., et al. (2009). Genetic assessment of breast cancer risk in primary care practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 149A, 349–56.CrossRef Burke, W., Culver, J., Pinsky, L., Hall, S., Reynolds, S. E., Yasui, Y., et al. (2009). Genetic assessment of breast cancer risk in primary care practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 149A, 349–56.CrossRef
go back to reference Butow, P. N., Lobb, E. A., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., & Tucker, K. M. (2003). Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review. Medical Journal of Australia, 178, 77–81.CrossRef Butow, P. N., Lobb, E. A., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., & Tucker, K. M. (2003). Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review. Medical Journal of Australia, 178, 77–81.CrossRef
go back to reference De Bock, G. H., Van Asperen, C. J., De Vries, J. M., Hageman, G. C., Springer, M. P., & Kievit, J. (2001). How women with a family history of breast cancer and their general practitioners act on genetic advice in general practice: prospective longitudinal study. BMJ, 322, 26–7.CrossRef De Bock, G. H., Van Asperen, C. J., De Vries, J. M., Hageman, G. C., Springer, M. P., & Kievit, J. (2001). How women with a family history of breast cancer and their general practitioners act on genetic advice in general practice: prospective longitudinal study. BMJ, 322, 26–7.CrossRef
go back to reference Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a metaanalysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a metaanalysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.
go back to reference Heyes, G. J., Mill, A. J., & Charles, M. W. (2009). Mammography-oncogenecity at low doses. Journal of Radiological Protection, 29, A123–32.CrossRef Heyes, G. J., Mill, A. J., & Charles, M. W. (2009). Mammography-oncogenecity at low doses. Journal of Radiological Protection, 29, A123–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Lechner, L., De Vries, H., & Offermans, N. (1997). Participation in a breast cancer screening program: influence of past behavior and determinants on future screening participation. Preventive Medicine, 26, 473–482.CrossRef Lechner, L., De Vries, H., & Offermans, N. (1997). Participation in a breast cancer screening program: influence of past behavior and determinants on future screening participation. Preventive Medicine, 26, 473–482.CrossRef
go back to reference Lerman, C., Hughes, C., Croyle, R. T., Main, D., Durham, C., Snyder, C., et al. (2000). Prophylactic surgery decisions and surveillance practices one year following BRCA1/2 testing. Preventive Medicine, 31, 75–80.CrossRef Lerman, C., Hughes, C., Croyle, R. T., Main, D., Durham, C., Snyder, C., et al. (2000). Prophylactic surgery decisions and surveillance practices one year following BRCA1/2 testing. Preventive Medicine, 31, 75–80.CrossRef
go back to reference Meiser, B., & Halliday, J. L. (2002). What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 1463–1470.CrossRef Meiser, B., & Halliday, J. L. (2002). What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 1463–1470.CrossRef
go back to reference Meiser, B., Butow, P. N., Barratt, A. L., Schnieden, V., Gattas, M., Kirk, J., et al. (2001). Long-term outcomes of genetic counseling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 44, 215–225.CrossRef Meiser, B., Butow, P. N., Barratt, A. L., Schnieden, V., Gattas, M., Kirk, J., et al. (2001). Long-term outcomes of genetic counseling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 44, 215–225.CrossRef
go back to reference Michie, S., Weinman, J., Miller, J., Collins, V., Halliday, J., & Marteau, T. M. (2002). Predictive genetic testing: high risk expectations in the face of low risk information. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 33–50.CrossRef Michie, S., Weinman, J., Miller, J., Collins, V., Halliday, J., & Marteau, T. M. (2002). Predictive genetic testing: high risk expectations in the face of low risk information. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 33–50.CrossRef
go back to reference Michie, S., Smith, J. A., Senior, V., & Marteau, T. M. (2003). Understanding why negative genetic test results sometimes fail to reassure. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 119A, 340–347.CrossRef Michie, S., Smith, J. A., Senior, V., & Marteau, T. M. (2003). Understanding why negative genetic test results sometimes fail to reassure. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 119A, 340–347.CrossRef
go back to reference Michie, S., Lester, K., Pinto, J., & Marteau, T. M. (2005). Communicating risk information in genetic counselling: an observational study. Health Education and Behavior, 32, 589–598.CrossRef Michie, S., Lester, K., Pinto, J., & Marteau, T. M. (2005). Communicating risk information in genetic counselling: an observational study. Health Education and Behavior, 32, 589–598.CrossRef
go back to reference Pieterse, A. H., Van Dulmen, S., Van Dijk, S., Bensing, J. M., & Ausems, M. G. E. M. (2006). Risk communication in completed series of breast cancer genetic counseling visits. Genetics in Medicine, 8, 688–696.CrossRef Pieterse, A. H., Van Dulmen, S., Van Dijk, S., Bensing, J. M., & Ausems, M. G. E. M. (2006). Risk communication in completed series of breast cancer genetic counseling visits. Genetics in Medicine, 8, 688–696.CrossRef
go back to reference Pieterse, A., Ausems, M., Spreeuwenberg, P., & Van Dulmen, S. (2011). Longer-term influence of breast cancer genetic counseling on cognitions and distress: Smaller benefits for affected versus unaffected women. Patient Education and Counseling, 85, 425–431.CrossRef Pieterse, A., Ausems, M., Spreeuwenberg, P., & Van Dulmen, S. (2011). Longer-term influence of breast cancer genetic counseling on cognitions and distress: Smaller benefits for affected versus unaffected women. Patient Education and Counseling, 85, 425–431.CrossRef
go back to reference Resta, R., Bowles Biesecker, B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Estabrooks, Hahn, S., et al. (2008). A new definition of genetic counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83.CrossRef Resta, R., Bowles Biesecker, B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Estabrooks, Hahn, S., et al. (2008). A new definition of genetic counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83.CrossRef
go back to reference Ricketts, M. L., Baerlocher, M. O., Asch, M. R., & Myers, A. (2013). Perception of radiation exposure and risk among patients, medical students, and referring physicians at a tertiary care community hospital. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 64, 208–12.CrossRef Ricketts, M. L., Baerlocher, M. O., Asch, M. R., & Myers, A. (2013). Perception of radiation exposure and risk among patients, medical students, and referring physicians at a tertiary care community hospital. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 64, 208–12.CrossRef
go back to reference Rollnick, S., Butler, C. C., Kinnersley, P., Gregory, J., & Mash, B. (2010). Motivational interviewing. BMJ, 340, c1900.CrossRef Rollnick, S., Butler, C. C., Kinnersley, P., Gregory, J., & Mash, B. (2010). Motivational interviewing. BMJ, 340, c1900.CrossRef
go back to reference Roter, D. (2006). The Roter method of interaction process analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Roter, D. (2006). The Roter method of interaction process analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.
go back to reference Smerecnik, C. M. R., Mesters, I., Verweij, E., De Vries, N. K., & de Vries, H. A. (2009). Systematic review of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18, 217–228.CrossRef Smerecnik, C. M. R., Mesters, I., Verweij, E., De Vries, N. K., & de Vries, H. A. (2009). Systematic review of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18, 217–228.CrossRef
go back to reference Sollie, A., Helsper, C. W., Ader, R. J. M., Ausems, M. G. E. M., Numans, M. E. (2015). Primary care management of women with breast cancer related concerns—a cross sectional study in the Julius General Practitioners’ Network Database. Submitted. Sollie, A., Helsper, C. W., Ader, R. J. M., Ausems, M. G. E. M., Numans, M. E. (2015). Primary care management of women with breast cancer related concerns—a cross sectional study in the Julius General Practitioners’ Network Database. Submitted.
go back to reference Van Asperen, C. J., Jonker, M. A., Jacobi, C. E., Van Diemen-Homan, J. E., Bakker, E., Breuning, M. H., et al. (2004). Risk estimation for healthy women from breast cancer families: new insights and new strategies. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 13, 87–93.CrossRef Van Asperen, C. J., Jonker, M. A., Jacobi, C. E., Van Diemen-Homan, J. E., Bakker, E., Breuning, M. H., et al. (2004). Risk estimation for healthy women from breast cancer families: new insights and new strategies. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 13, 87–93.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Dijk, S., Timmermans, D. R., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Tibben, A., van Asperen, C. J., & Otten, W. (2006). Clinical characteristics affect the impact of an uninformative DNA test result: the course of worry and distress experienced by women who apply for genetic testing for breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1(24), 3672–7.CrossRef Van Dijk, S., Timmermans, D. R., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Tibben, A., van Asperen, C. J., & Otten, W. (2006). Clinical characteristics affect the impact of an uninformative DNA test result: the course of worry and distress experienced by women who apply for genetic testing for breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1(24), 3672–7.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Dijk, S., Otten, W., Timmermans, D. R., Van Asperen, C. J., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Tibben, A., et al. (2005). What’s the message? Interpretation of an uninformative BRCA1/2 test result for women at risk of familial breast cancer. Genetics in Medicine, 7, 239–245.CrossRef Van Dijk, S., Otten, W., Timmermans, D. R., Van Asperen, C. J., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Tibben, A., et al. (2005). What’s the message? Interpretation of an uninformative BRCA1/2 test result for women at risk of familial breast cancer. Genetics in Medicine, 7, 239–245.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Dijk, S., Otten, W., Van Asperen, C., Timmermans, D., Tibben, A., Zoeteweij, M. W., et al. (2004a). Feeling at risk; how women interpret their familial breast cancer risk. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 131A, 42–49.CrossRef Van Dijk, S., Otten, W., Van Asperen, C., Timmermans, D., Tibben, A., Zoeteweij, M. W., et al. (2004a). Feeling at risk; how women interpret their familial breast cancer risk. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 131A, 42–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Dijk, S., Otten, W., Tollenaar, R. A., van Asperen, C. J., & Tibben, A. (2008). Putting it all behind: long-term psychological impact of an inconclusive DNA test result for breast cancer. Genetics in Medicine, 10, 745–50.CrossRef Van Dijk, S., Otten, W., Tollenaar, R. A., van Asperen, C. J., & Tibben, A. (2008). Putting it all behind: long-term psychological impact of an inconclusive DNA test result for breast cancer. Genetics in Medicine, 10, 745–50.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Dijk, S., Van Asperen, C. J., Jacobi, C. E., Vink, G. R., Tibben, A., Breuning, M. H., et al. (2004b). Variants of uncertain clinical significance as a result of BRCA1/2 testing: impact of an ambiguous breast cancer risk message. Genetic Testing, 8, 235–239.CrossRef Van Dijk, S., Van Asperen, C. J., Jacobi, C. E., Vink, G. R., Tibben, A., Breuning, M. H., et al. (2004b). Variants of uncertain clinical significance as a result of BRCA1/2 testing: impact of an ambiguous breast cancer risk message. Genetic Testing, 8, 235–239.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Dooren, S., Rijnsburger, A. J., Seynaeve, C., Kriege, A., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Bartels, C. C., et al. (2003). Psychological distress and breast self-examination frequency in women at increased risk for hereditary or familial breast cancer. Community Genetics, 6, 235–41.PubMed Van Dooren, S., Rijnsburger, A. J., Seynaeve, C., Kriege, A., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Bartels, C. C., et al. (2003). Psychological distress and breast self-examination frequency in women at increased risk for hereditary or familial breast cancer. Community Genetics, 6, 235–41.PubMed
go back to reference Van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H. J., et al. (2007). Comparison of individuals opting for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing with regard to coping, illness perceptions, illness experiences, family system characteristics and hereditary cancer distress. Patient Education and Counseling, 65, 58–68.CrossRef Van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H. J., et al. (2007). Comparison of individuals opting for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing with regard to coping, illness perceptions, illness experiences, family system characteristics and hereditary cancer distress. Patient Education and Counseling, 65, 58–68.CrossRef
go back to reference Vos, J., Oosterwijk, J. C., Gomez-Garcia, E., Menko, F. H., Collee, M. J., van Asperen, C. J., et al. (2012). Exploring the short-term impact of DNA-testing in breast cancer patients: the counselees’ perception matters, but the actual BRCA1/2 result does not. Patient Education and Counseling, 86, 239–51.CrossRef Vos, J., Oosterwijk, J. C., Gomez-Garcia, E., Menko, F. H., Collee, M. J., van Asperen, C. J., et al. (2012). Exploring the short-term impact of DNA-testing in breast cancer patients: the counselees’ perception matters, but the actual BRCA1/2 result does not. Patient Education and Counseling, 86, 239–51.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Counselees’ Expressed Level of Understanding of the Risk Estimate and Surveillance Recommendation are Not Associated with Breast Cancer Surveillance Adherence
Authors
Akke Albada
Sandra van Dulmen
Henrietta Dijkstra
Ivette Wieffer
Arjen Witkamp
Margreet G. E. M. Ausems
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9869-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Journal of Genetic Counseling 2/2016 Go to the issue