Top

Published in:

01-12-2007 | Original Research

Living with Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer; Experiences from and Impact of Genetic Testing

Authors: C. Carlsson, M. Nilbert

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 6/2007

Abstract

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is one of our most common cancer syndromes and an increasing number of individuals live in families with verified hereditary cancer. We conducted an interview study to explore experiences from and perceived impact on life after genetic testing for HNPCC. Three major themes emerged: reactions and emotions, family relations and implications for life. Among the reactions described were suspecting heredity, feelings of guilt, the importance of experiential knowledge, and coping strategies. The impact on family relations was related to perceived responsibility for conveying information, encountering different reactions among family members, and difficulties in communication and relations. The implications described included uncertainty, adaptation, new choices and changes in life, family planning issues, and experiences of surveillance programs. We suggest that the themes and sub-themes identified should be taken into account during genetic counselling in order to facilitate the spread of information and to prepare family members for the impact on life that knowledge about hereditary cancer may have.

Aarnio, M., Sankila, R., Pukkala, E., Salovaara, R., Aaltonen, L. A., de la Chapelle, A., et al. (1999). Cancer risk in mutation carriers of DNA-mismatch-repair genes. International Journal of Cancer, 81(2), 214–218.CrossRef

Broadstock, M., Michie, S., & Marteau, T. (2000). Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: A systematic review. European Journal of Human Genetics, 8(10), 731–738.PubMedCrossRef

Claes, E., Denayer, L., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Boogaerts, A., & Legius, E. (2004). Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: Motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact. Patient Education and Counseling, 55(2), 265–274.PubMedCrossRef

Codori, A. M., Petersen, G. M., Miglioretti, D. L., Larkin, E. K., Bushey, M. T., Young, C., et al. (2004). Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: Factors predicting test uptake. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention, 8(4 Pt 2), 345–351.

d’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2005). The effect of experiential knowledge on construction of risk perception in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(1), 55–69.PubMedCrossRef

Esplen, M. J., Madlensky, L., Butler, K., McKinnon, W., Bapat, B., Wong, J., et al. (2001). Motivations and psychosocial impact of genetic testing for HNPCC. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 103(1), 9–15.PubMedCrossRef

Esplen, M. J., Urquhart, C., Butler, K., Gallinger, S., Aronson, M., & Wong, J. (2003). The experience of loss and anticipation of distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic testing. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55(5), 427–435.PubMedCrossRef

Forrest, K., Simpson, S. A., Wilson, B. J., van Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., et al. (2003). To tell or not to tell: Barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clinical Genetics, 64(4), 317–326.PubMedCrossRef

Gaff, C. L., Collins, V., Symes, T., & Halliday, J. (2005). Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: Probands’ perceptions. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(2), 133–140.PubMedCrossRef

Hopwood, P., Shenton, A., Lalloo, F., Evans, D. G., & Howell, A. (2001). Risk perception and cancer worry: An exploratory study of the impact of genetic risk counselling in women with a family history of breast cancer. Journal of Medical Genetics, 38(2), 139.PubMedCrossRef

Koehly, L. M., Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Kempf, K. K., Vernon, S. W., & Gritz, E. R. (2003). A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention, 12(4), 304–313.

Lim, J., Macluran, M., Price, M., Bennett, B., & Butow, P. (2004). Short- and long-term impact of receiving genetic mutation results in women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(2), 115–133.PubMedCrossRef

Lindor, N. M., Petersen, G. M., Hadley, D. W., Kinney, A. Y., Miesfeldt, S., Lu, K. H., et al. (2006). Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: A systematic review. JAMA, 296(12), 1507–1517.PubMedCrossRef

Loader, S., Shields, C., Levenkron, J. C., Fishel, R., & Rowley, P. T. (2002). Patient vs. physician as the target of educational outreach about screening for an inherited susceptibility to colorectal cancer. Genetic Testing, 6(4), 281–290.PubMedCrossRef

McAllister, M. (2003). Personal theories of inheritance, coping strategies, risk perception and engagement in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer families offered genetic testing. Clinical Genetics, 64(3), 179–189.PubMedCrossRef

Meiser, B. (2005). Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: An update of the literature. Psychooncology, 14(12), 1060–1074.PubMedCrossRef

Meiser, B., Collins, V., Warren, R., Gaff, C., St John, D. J., Young, M. A., et al. (2004). Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Clinical Genetics, 66(6), 502–511.PubMedCrossRef

Meiser, B., & Halliday, J. L. (2002). What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review. Social Science & Medicine, 54(10), 1463–1470.CrossRef

Mesters, I., Ausems, M., Eichhorn, S., & Vasen, H. (2005). Informing one’s family about genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): A retrospective exploratory study. Familial Cancer, 4(2), 163–167.PubMedCrossRef

Mitchell, R. J., Farrington, S. M., Dunlop, M. G., & Campbell, H. (2002). Mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 and colorectal cancer: A HuGE review. American Journal of Epidemiology, 156(10), 885–902.PubMedCrossRef

Pentz, R. D., Peterson, S. K., Watts, B., Vernon, S. W., Lynch, P. M., Koehly, L. M., et al. (2005). Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer family members’ perceptions about the duty to inform and health professionals’ role in disseminating genetic information. Genetic Testing, 9(3), 261–268.PubMedCrossRef

Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Koehly, L. M., Vernon, S. W., Baile, W. F., Kohlmann, W. K., et al. (2003). How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: Findings from a qualitative study. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 119(1), 78–86.PubMedCrossRef

Schneider, K. (2002). Counseling about cancer. Strategies for genetic counseling. New York: Wiley-Liss.

Shiloh, S. (2006). Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: A theoretical review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(5), 325–337.PubMedCrossRef

Shiloh, S., Gerad, L., & Goldman, B. (2006). Patients’ information needs and decision-making processes: What can be learned from genetic counselees? Health Psychology, 25(2), 211–219.PubMedCrossRef

Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analysing talks, text and interaction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Sommerville, A., & English, V. (1999). Genetic privacy: Orthodoxy or oxymoron? Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(2), 144–150.PubMedCrossRef

van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Brocker-Vriends, A. H., van Asperen, C. J., Sijmons, R. H., et al. (2006a). Experience of parental cancer in childhood is a risk factor for psychological distress during genetic cancer susceptibility testing. Annals of Oncology, 17(7), 1090–1095.PubMedCrossRef

van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Brocker-Vriends, A. H., van Asperen, C. J., Sijmons, R. H., et al. (2006b). Prognostic factors for hereditary cancer distress six months after BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing. European Journal of Cancer, 43(1), 71–77.PubMedCrossRef

Vernon, S. W. (1999). Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: A review. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 25, 101–119.PubMed

Wagner, A., van Kessel, I., Kriege, M. G., Tops, C. M., Wijnen, J. T., Vasen, H. F., et al. (2005). Long term follow-up of HNPCC gene mutation carriers: Compliance with screening and satisfaction with counseling and screening procedures. Familial Cancer, 4(4), 295–300.PubMedCrossRef

Wilson, B. J., Forrest, K., van Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., Matthews, E., et al. (2004). Family communication about genetic risk: The little that is known. Community Genetics, 7(1), 15–24.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Living with Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer; Experiences from and Impact of Genetic Testing
Authors: C. Carlsson
M. Nilbert
Publication date: 01-12-2007
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 6/2007
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-007-9117-0

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Living with Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer; Experiences from and Impact of Genetic Testing

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2007

Factors Influencing Perceptions of Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling among Women in an Urban Health Care System

Women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations Renegotiating a Post-Prophylactic Mastectomy Identity: Self-Image and Self-Disclosure.

What I Wish I Knew Then...Reflections from Personal Experiences in Counseling about Down Syndrome

A National Survey of Genetic Counselors’ Personal Values

Why We Do What We Do: Commentary on A Reciprocal-Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice

Coming Full Circle: A Reciprocal-Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice