Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2021

01-06-2021

Contact-force recovery predicts the absence of cardiac perforation during steam pops

Authors: Anand V. Ganapathy, Alireza Nazeri, John Ashton, Krithika S. Ganapathy, Payam Safavi-Naeini, Mohammed Saeed, Abdi Rasekh, Mehdi Razavi

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Cardiac perforation (CP) is an uncommon but clinically important complication of radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We previously showed that contact-force recovery after a steam pop predicts the absence of CP in an open-chest animal model after pericardial dissection. We attempted to determine whether this also applies when pericardium is present.

Methods

In 5 open-chest sheep, left atrial RFA was performed under direct observation with a 7.5F ThermoCool SmartTouch force-sensing catheter (Biosense Webster Inc., Irvine, CA, USA). The catheter’s contact force was measured every 50 ms during RFA. After each steam pop, the presence (+) or absence (−) of CP was noted, as well as whether pericardium was present over the ablation site. Contact-force signals were analyzed to detect contact-force recovery. Perforation rates were compared between sites with or without pericardium.

Results

Ninety-six steam pops occurred: 77 with pericardium and 19 without. For the pericardial steam pops, contact-force recovery occurred in 31/60 CP− events (52%) and 1/17 CP+ events (6%; P = 0.0006). For nonpericardial steam pops, contact-force recovery occurred in 4/9 CP− events (44%) and 1/10 CP+ events (P = 0.14). The rate of CP was 22% with pericardium and 52% without (P = 0.02). Pericardial tissue charred extensively during steam pop induction, even in the absence of CP.

Conclusions

Contact-force recovery predicts the absence of CP during RFA independently of whether the pericardium is present. The presence of the pericardium may decrease the likelihood of perforation, perhaps by acting as a thermal sink. Additional studies are needed to correlate these results with clinical experience.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chik WW, Kosobrodov R, Bhaskaran A, Barry MA, Nguyen DT, Pouliopoulos J, et al. Acoustic signal emission monitoring as a novel method to predict steam pops during radiofrequency ablation: preliminary observations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:440–7.CrossRef Chik WW, Kosobrodov R, Bhaskaran A, Barry MA, Nguyen DT, Pouliopoulos J, et al. Acoustic signal emission monitoring as a novel method to predict steam pops during radiofrequency ablation: preliminary observations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:440–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Eick OJ, Gerritse B, Schumacher B. Popping phenomena in temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation: when and why do they occur? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:253–8.CrossRef Eick OJ, Gerritse B, Schumacher B. Popping phenomena in temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation: when and why do they occur? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:253–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nazeri A, Ganapathy A, Massumi A, Massumi M, Constantine G, Raz S, et al. Contact-force recovery can predict cardiac perforation during radiofrequency ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37:1129–32.CrossRef Nazeri A, Ganapathy A, Massumi A, Massumi M, Constantine G, Raz S, et al. Contact-force recovery can predict cardiac perforation during radiofrequency ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37:1129–32.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285:2370–5.CrossRef Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285:2370–5.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Khairallah F, Ezzedine R, Ganz LI, London B, Saba S. Epidemiology and determinants of outcome of admissions for atrial fibrillation in the United States from 1996 to 2001. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:500–4.CrossRef Khairallah F, Ezzedine R, Ganz LI, London B, Saba S. Epidemiology and determinants of outcome of admissions for atrial fibrillation in the United States from 1996 to 2001. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:500–4.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tung R, Buch E, Shivkumar K. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2012;126:223–9.CrossRef Tung R, Buch E, Shivkumar K. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2012;126:223–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tokuda M, Kojodjojo P, Epstein LM, Koplan BA, Michaud GF, Tedrow UB, et al. Outcomes of cardiac perforation complicating catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:660–6.CrossRef Tokuda M, Kojodjojo P, Epstein LM, Koplan BA, Michaud GF, Tedrow UB, et al. Outcomes of cardiac perforation complicating catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:660–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Koruth JS, Dukkipati S, Gangireddy S, McCarthy J, Spencer D, Weinberg AD, et al. Occurrence of steam pops during irrigated RF ablation: novel insights from microwave radiometry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:1271–7.CrossRef Koruth JS, Dukkipati S, Gangireddy S, McCarthy J, Spencer D, Weinberg AD, et al. Occurrence of steam pops during irrigated RF ablation: novel insights from microwave radiometry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:1271–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC, Fonck E, Yulzari A, et al. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1174–80.CrossRef Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC, Fonck E, Yulzari A, et al. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1174–80.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Theis C, Rostock T, Mollnau H, Sonnenschein S, Himmrich E, Kampfner D, et al. The incidence of audible steam pops is increased and unpredictable with the ThermoCool(R) Surround Flow catheter during left atrial catheter ablation: a prospective observational study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:956–62.CrossRef Theis C, Rostock T, Mollnau H, Sonnenschein S, Himmrich E, Kampfner D, et al. The incidence of audible steam pops is increased and unpredictable with the ThermoCool(R) Surround Flow catheter during left atrial catheter ablation: a prospective observational study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:956–62.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Contact-force recovery predicts the absence of cardiac perforation during steam pops
Authors
Anand V. Ganapathy
Alireza Nazeri
John Ashton
Krithika S. Ganapathy
Payam Safavi-Naeini
Mohammed Saeed
Abdi Rasekh
Mehdi Razavi
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00794-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2021 Go to the issue