Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2/2021

Open Access 01-03-2021 | Antiarrhythmic Drugs

Reducing radiation exposure in second-generation cryoballoon ablation without compromising clinical outcome

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon (CB) ablation is associated with an increased radiation exposure compared with radiofrequency ablation. Previous studies showed that radiation exposure in CB PVI can be reduced by optimizing the fluoroscopy protocol without comprising acute efficacy and safety. We evaluated the mid-term outcome of a modified fluoroscopy protocol in patients undergoing CB PVI.

Methods

The study population comprised 90 consecutive patients who underwent second-generation CB-based PVI. The first 46 patients underwent CB PVI with conventional fluoroscopy settings (group A, historic control group). In the following 44 patients (group B), a modified fluoroscopy protocol was applied consisting of (1) visualization of degree of PV occlusion only by fluoroscopy (no cine runs); (2) increased radiation awareness. Primary endpoints were the total dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and freedom from documented recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after a single procedure.

Results

Group B had a lower median DAP (1393 cGycm2 vs. 3232 cGycm2, P < 0.001) and median fluoroscopy time (20 min vs. 24 min, P < 0.001) as compared with group A. The 1-year freedom from documented recurrence of AF after a single procedure was similar among groups (74% in group A vs. 77% in group B, P = 0.71). There were no significant differences between both groups for the secondary endpoints, including procedure duration, proportion of patients with complete electrical isolation, and complications.

Conclusion

Using a modified fluoroscopy protocol and increased radiation awareness, radiation exposure can be significantly reduced in CB PVI with a similar 1-year clinical outcome.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kuck KH, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235–45.CrossRef Kuck KH, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235–45.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Murray MI, Arnold A, Younis M, Varghese S, Zeiher AM. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107:658–69.CrossRef Murray MI, Arnold A, Younis M, Varghese S, Zeiher AM. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107:658–69.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Andrade JG, Champagne J, Dubuc M, Deyell MW, Verma A, Macle L, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation assessed by continuous monitoring: a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2019;140:1779–88.CrossRef Andrade JG, Champagne J, Dubuc M, Deyell MW, Verma A, Macle L, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation assessed by continuous monitoring: a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2019;140:1779–88.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Andrade JG, Khairy P, Guerra PG, Deyell MW, Rivard L, Macle L, et al. Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of published studies. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1444–51.CrossRef Andrade JG, Khairy P, Guerra PG, Deyell MW, Rivard L, Macle L, et al. Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of published studies. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1444–51.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Heidbuchel H, Wittkampf FH, Vano E, Ernst S, Schilling R, Picano E, et al. Practical ways to reduce radiation dose for patients and staff during device implantations and electrophysiological procedures. Europace. 2014;16:946–64.CrossRef Heidbuchel H, Wittkampf FH, Vano E, Ernst S, Schilling R, Picano E, et al. Practical ways to reduce radiation dose for patients and staff during device implantations and electrophysiological procedures. Europace. 2014;16:946–64.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Reissmann B, Maurer T, Wohlmuth P, Kruger M, Heeger C, Lemes C, et al. Significant reduction of radiation exposure in cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2018;20:608–13.CrossRef Reissmann B, Maurer T, Wohlmuth P, Kruger M, Heeger C, Lemes C, et al. Significant reduction of radiation exposure in cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2018;20:608–13.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rubesch-Kutemeyer V, Molatta S, Vogt J, Gutleben KJ, Horstkotte D, Nolker G. Reduction of radiation exposure in cryoballoon ablation procedures: a single-centre study applying intracardiac echocardiography and other radioprotective measures. Europace. 2017;19:947–53.PubMed Rubesch-Kutemeyer V, Molatta S, Vogt J, Gutleben KJ, Horstkotte D, Nolker G. Reduction of radiation exposure in cryoballoon ablation procedures: a single-centre study applying intracardiac echocardiography and other radioprotective measures. Europace. 2017;19:947–53.PubMed
8.
go back to reference De Heide J, Vroegh CJ, Bhagwandien RE, Wijchers SA, Szili-Torok T, Zijlstra F, et al. Minimally interrupted novel oral anticoagulant versus uninterrupted vitamin K antagonist during atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018;53:341–6.CrossRef De Heide J, Vroegh CJ, Bhagwandien RE, Wijchers SA, Szili-Torok T, Zijlstra F, et al. Minimally interrupted novel oral anticoagulant versus uninterrupted vitamin K antagonist during atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018;53:341–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Luik A, Radzewitz A, Kieser M, Walter M, Bramlage P, Hormann P, et al. Cryoballoon versus open irrigated radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the prospective, randomized, controlled, Noninferiority FreezeAF Study. Circulation. 2015;132:1311–9.CrossRef Luik A, Radzewitz A, Kieser M, Walter M, Bramlage P, Hormann P, et al. Cryoballoon versus open irrigated radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the prospective, randomized, controlled, Noninferiority FreezeAF Study. Circulation. 2015;132:1311–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ciconte G, Baltogiannis G, de Asmundis C, Sieira J, Conte G, Di Giovanni G, et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation as index procedure for persistent atrial fibrillation: a comparison between radiofrequency catheter ablation and second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Europace. 2015;17:559–65.CrossRef Ciconte G, Baltogiannis G, de Asmundis C, Sieira J, Conte G, Di Giovanni G, et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation as index procedure for persistent atrial fibrillation: a comparison between radiofrequency catheter ablation and second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Europace. 2015;17:559–65.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jourda F, Providencia R, Marijon E, Bouzeman A, Hireche H, Khoueiry Z, et al. Contact-force guided radiofrequency vs second-generation balloon cryotherapy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-a prospective evaluation. Europace. 2015;17:225–31.CrossRef Jourda F, Providencia R, Marijon E, Bouzeman A, Hireche H, Khoueiry Z, et al. Contact-force guided radiofrequency vs second-generation balloon cryotherapy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-a prospective evaluation. Europace. 2015;17:225–31.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Squara F, Zhao A, Marijon E, Latcu DG, Providencia R, Di Giovanni G, et al. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation. Europace. 2015;17:718–24.CrossRef Squara F, Zhao A, Marijon E, Latcu DG, Providencia R, Di Giovanni G, et al. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation. Europace. 2015;17:718–24.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Straube F, Dorwarth U, Ammar-Busch S, Peter T, Noelker G, Massa T, et al. First-line catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcome of radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2016;18:368–75.CrossRef Straube F, Dorwarth U, Ammar-Busch S, Peter T, Noelker G, Massa T, et al. First-line catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcome of radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2016;18:368–75.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Providencia R, Defaye P, Lambiase PD, Pavin D, Cebron JP, Halimi F, et al. Results from a multicentre comparison of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: is cryoablation more reproducible? Europace. 2017;19:48–57.CrossRef Providencia R, Defaye P, Lambiase PD, Pavin D, Cebron JP, Halimi F, et al. Results from a multicentre comparison of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: is cryoablation more reproducible? Europace. 2017;19:48–57.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Khoueiry Z, Providencia R, Combes S, Combes N, Pasquie JL, Albenque JP, et al. Cryoablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation displayed the same results as radiofrequency despite anatomical variants of pulmonary veins. Europace. 2017;19:1754–5.PubMed Khoueiry Z, Providencia R, Combes S, Combes N, Pasquie JL, Albenque JP, et al. Cryoablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation displayed the same results as radiofrequency despite anatomical variants of pulmonary veins. Europace. 2017;19:1754–5.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Oude Velthuis B, Molenaar M, Reinhart Dorman HG, Stevenhagen JY, Scholten MF, van der Palen J, et al. Use of three-dimensional computed tomography overlay for real-time cryoballoon ablation in atrial fibrillation reduces radiation dose and contrast dye. Neth Heart J. 2017;25:388–93.CrossRef Oude Velthuis B, Molenaar M, Reinhart Dorman HG, Stevenhagen JY, Scholten MF, van der Palen J, et al. Use of three-dimensional computed tomography overlay for real-time cryoballoon ablation in atrial fibrillation reduces radiation dose and contrast dye. Neth Heart J. 2017;25:388–93.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hasegawa K, Miyazaki S, Kaseno K, Hisazaki K, Amaya N, Miyahara K, Aiki T, et al. Pressure-guided second-generation cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation: prospective comparison of the procedural and clinical outcomes with the conventional strategy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:1841–7. Hasegawa K, Miyazaki S, Kaseno K, Hisazaki K, Amaya N, Miyahara K, Aiki T, et al. Pressure-guided second-generation cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation: prospective comparison of the procedural and clinical outcomes with the conventional strategy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:1841–7.
18.
go back to reference Sharma A, Dhoot J, Wang J, Jones P, Gupta S, Wimmer AP. Outcomes following cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation guided by pressure waveform monitoring without the routine use of pulmonary venography. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017;49:75–82.CrossRef Sharma A, Dhoot J, Wang J, Jones P, Gupta S, Wimmer AP. Outcomes following cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation guided by pressure waveform monitoring without the routine use of pulmonary venography. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017;49:75–82.CrossRef
19.
Metadata
Title
Reducing radiation exposure in second-generation cryoballoon ablation without compromising clinical outcome
Publication date
01-03-2021
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00737-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2/2021 Go to the issue