Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 3/2020

01-04-2020 | Atrial Fibrillation

The impact of steerable sheaths on unblinded contact force during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Authors: Marc W. Deyell, Glen Wen, Zachary Laksman, Matthew T. Bennett, Santabhanu Chakrabarti, John A. Yeung-Lai-Wah, Andrew D. Krahn, Jason G. Andrade

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of steerable sheaths on multiple contact force parameters during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Steerable sheaths are commonly used during AF ablation, at an additional cost to standard fixed-curve sheaths. However, there is little data on their incremental value in the era of contact force-guided radiofrequency ablation.

Methods

This multi-center cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing index pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with a force-sensing catheter. Operators employed either only steerable or only fixed-curve sheaths. Operators targeted a force of 10–40 g for each ablation lesion. Automated ablation lesion assessment software with standardized settings was employed.

Results

Of 85 subjects, 52 and 33 underwent ablation with steerable and fixed-curve sheaths, respectively. The steerable sheath group showed significantly higher average and maximum forces, but predominantly for the right PVs. The proportion of lesions with ≥ 10% of time with less than 10 g of force was lower in the steerable sheath group (adjusted odds ratio 0.56, steerable vs. fixed; 95% confidence interval 0.35, 0.89, p = 0.01). Improved stability was seen in the posterior aspect of both PV pairs. The proportion of RF time-in-target (the proportion of RF time meeting lesion criteria) was not different between the two groups (p = 0.176).

Conclusions

Even with contemporary contact force targets, steerable sheath use in AF ablation is associated with better average and maximum contact force and increased stability in comparison to fixed-curve sheaths.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Oral H, Knight BP, Tada H, Ozaydin M, Chugh A, Hassan S, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2002;105(9):1077–81.CrossRef Oral H, Knight BP, Tada H, Ozaydin M, Chugh A, Hassan S, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2002;105(9):1077–81.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen S-A, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Heart Rhythm. 2012. 2012;9(4):632–96.e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.016.CrossRefPubMed Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen S-A, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Heart Rhythm. 2012. 2012;9(4):632–96.e21. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​hrthm.​2011.​12.​016.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Camm AJ, Lip GYH, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH, et al. 2012 Focused update of the ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. An update of the 2010 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(21):2719–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs253.CrossRefPubMed Camm AJ, Lip GYH, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH, et al. 2012 Focused update of the ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. An update of the 2010 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(21):2719–47. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​eurheartj/​ehs253.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Natale A, Albenque JP, Kautzner J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of the safety and effectiveness of a contact force-sensing irrigated catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the TactiCath contact force ablation catheter study for atrial fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) study. Circulation. 2015;132(10):907–15. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014092.CrossRefPubMed Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Natale A, Albenque JP, Kautzner J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of the safety and effectiveness of a contact force-sensing irrigated catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the TactiCath contact force ablation catheter study for atrial fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) study. Circulation. 2015;132(10):907–15. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1161/​CIRCULATIONAHA.​114.​014092.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The impact of steerable sheaths on unblinded contact force during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation
Authors
Marc W. Deyell
Glen Wen
Zachary Laksman
Matthew T. Bennett
Santabhanu Chakrabarti
John A. Yeung-Lai-Wah
Andrew D. Krahn
Jason G. Andrade
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00514-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 3/2020 Go to the issue