Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Genetics

Simple FISH-based evaluation of spermatic nuclear architecture shows an abnormal chromosomal organization in balanced chromosomal rearrangement carriers

Authors: Majda Lyna Mebrek, Sylvain Clède, Aliénor de Chalus, Solveig Heide, Léa Ruoso, Eli Rogers, Nathalie Lédée, Laura Prat-Ellenberg, Nino Guy Cassuto, Jean-Pierre Siffroi, Alexandre Rouen

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Interphasic DNA has a constant three-dimensional conformation, which is particularly striking for spermatic DNA, with distinct chromosomal territories and a constant chromosomal conformation. We hypothesized that this organization is fragile, and that an excess or a lack of chromosomal segments could hinder the genomic structure as a whole.

Methods

Five human male chromosomal translocation carriers and five controls were included. Spermatic DNA spatial organization was studied, in both balanced and unbalanced spermatozoa, with two-dimensional fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) via analysis of chromosomes not implicated in the cases’ translocations, compared to that of normal controls. Two parameters were studied: the distance between the two telomeric ends of chromosome 1, and the area of the chromosomal territories of chromosomes 1 and 17.

Results

Sperm FISH analysis of rearrangement carriers revealed changes in the nuclear architecture compared to that of controls. Inter-telomeric distance and chromosomal territories areas were both significantly increased.

Discussion

We show that an excess or lack of chromosomal segments can hinder the normal spatial nuclear architecture in sperm. These results show that nuclear architecture is a fragile assembly, and that local chromosomal abnormalities may impact the nucleus as a whole. This suggests a potential avenue for selection of spermatozoa prior to in vitro fertilization, not only in rearrangement carriers but also in the infertile population at large. Furthermore, we suggest that 2D-FISH could possibly be a useful tool in assessing spermatic nuclear organization in a way to evaluate male fertility.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sehgal N, Fritz AJ, Vecerova J, Ding H, Chen Z, Stojkovic B, et al. Large-scale probabilistic 3D organization of human chromosome territories. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:419–36.CrossRef Sehgal N, Fritz AJ, Vecerova J, Ding H, Chen Z, Stojkovic B, et al. Large-scale probabilistic 3D organization of human chromosome territories. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:419–36.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bickmore WA, Chubb JR. Dispatch. Chromosome position: now, where was I? Curr Biol. 2003;13:R357–9.CrossRef Bickmore WA, Chubb JR. Dispatch. Chromosome position: now, where was I? Curr Biol. 2003;13:R357–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cremer T, Küpper K, Dietzel S, Fakan S. Higher order chromatin architecture in the cell nucleus: on the way from structure to function. Biol Cell. 2004;96:555–67.CrossRef Cremer T, Küpper K, Dietzel S, Fakan S. Higher order chromatin architecture in the cell nucleus: on the way from structure to function. Biol Cell. 2004;96:555–67.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jost D, Carrivain P, Cavalli G, Vaillant C. Modeling epigenome folding: formation and dynamics of topologically associated chromatin domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:9553–61.CrossRef Jost D, Carrivain P, Cavalli G, Vaillant C. Modeling epigenome folding: formation and dynamics of topologically associated chromatin domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:9553–61.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zalensky A, Zalenskaya I. Organization of chromosomes in spermatozoa: an additional layer of epigenetic information? Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35:609–11.CrossRef Zalensky A, Zalenskaya I. Organization of chromosomes in spermatozoa: an additional layer of epigenetic information? Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35:609–11.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zalenskaya IA, Zalensky AO. Non-random positioning of chromosomes in human sperm nuclei. Chromosom Res. 2004;12:163–73.CrossRef Zalenskaya IA, Zalensky AO. Non-random positioning of chromosomes in human sperm nuclei. Chromosom Res. 2004;12:163–73.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zalensky AO, Allen MJ, Kobayashi A, Zalenskaya IA, Balhórn R, Bradbury EM. Well-defined genome architecture in the human sperm nucleus. Chromosoma. 1995;103:577–90.CrossRef Zalensky AO, Allen MJ, Kobayashi A, Zalenskaya IA, Balhórn R, Bradbury EM. Well-defined genome architecture in the human sperm nucleus. Chromosoma. 1995;103:577–90.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Meyer-Ficca M, Müller-Navia J, Scherthan H. Clustering of pericentromeres initiates in step 9 of spermiogenesis of the rat (Rattus norvegicus) and contributes to a well defined genome architecture in the sperm nucleus. J Cell Sci. 1998;111(Pt 10):1363–70.PubMed Meyer-Ficca M, Müller-Navia J, Scherthan H. Clustering of pericentromeres initiates in step 9 of spermiogenesis of the rat (Rattus norvegicus) and contributes to a well defined genome architecture in the sperm nucleus. J Cell Sci. 1998;111(Pt 10):1363–70.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Schmid M, Krone W. The relationship of a specific chromosomal region to the development of the acrosome. Chromosoma. 1976;56:327–47.CrossRef Schmid M, Krone W. The relationship of a specific chromosomal region to the development of the acrosome. Chromosoma. 1976;56:327–47.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McKinlay S. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. 4th ed. USA, chapters 4 & 6: Oxford University Press; 2011. McKinlay S. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. 4th ed. USA, chapters 4 & 6: Oxford University Press; 2011.
11.
go back to reference Rouen A, Lavillaureix A, Hyon C, Heide S, Clède S, Balet R, et al. Nuclear volume differences between balanced and unbalanced spermatozoa in chromosomal translocation carriers. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;30:290–5.CrossRef Rouen A, Lavillaureix A, Hyon C, Heide S, Clède S, Balet R, et al. Nuclear volume differences between balanced and unbalanced spermatozoa in chromosomal translocation carriers. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;30:290–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rouen A, Balet R, Dorna M, Hyon C, Pollet-Villard X, Chantot-Bastaraud S, et al. Discontinuous gradient centrifugation (DGC) decreases the proportion of chromosomally unbalanced spermatozoa in chromosomal rearrangement carriers. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2003–9.CrossRef Rouen A, Balet R, Dorna M, Hyon C, Pollet-Villard X, Chantot-Bastaraud S, et al. Discontinuous gradient centrifugation (DGC) decreases the proportion of chromosomally unbalanced spermatozoa in chromosomal rearrangement carriers. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2003–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HWG, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:231–45.CrossRef Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HWG, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:231–45.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82.CrossRef Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Simple FISH-based evaluation of spermatic nuclear architecture shows an abnormal chromosomal organization in balanced chromosomal rearrangement carriers
Authors
Majda Lyna Mebrek
Sylvain Clède
Aliénor de Chalus
Solveig Heide
Léa Ruoso
Eli Rogers
Nathalie Lédée
Laura Prat-Ellenberg
Nino Guy Cassuto
Jean-Pierre Siffroi
Alexandre Rouen
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01736-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2020 Go to the issue