Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Infertility | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

A novel mathematical model of true ovarian reserve assessment based on predicted probability of poor ovarian response: a retrospective cohort study

Authors: Huiyu Xu, Guoshuang Feng, Haiyan Wang, Yong Han, Rui Yang, Ying Song, Lixue Chen, Li Shi, Meng Qian Zhang, Rong Li, Jie Qiao

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To establish a mathematical model for assessing the true ovarian reserve based on the predicted probability of poor ovarian response (POR).

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 1523 GnRH-antagonist cycles in 2017 were firstly analyzed. The ovarian responses were calculated based on the number of retrieved oocytes. The continuous variables were converted into categorical variables according to cutoff values generated by the decision tree method. The optimal model was identified using forward stepwise multiple logistic regression with 5-fold cross-validation and further verified its performances using outer validation data.

Results

The predictors in our model were anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle counts (AFC), basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and age, in order of their significance, named AAFA model. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of AAFA model in inner validation and outer validation data were 0.861 and 0.850, 0.603 and 0.519, 0.917 and 0.930, 0.655 and 0.570, and 0.899 and 0.915. Ovarian reserve of 16 subgroups was further ranked according to the predicted probability of POR and further divided into 4 groups of A–D using clustering analysis. The incidence of POR in the four groups was 0.038 (0.030–0.046), 0.139 (0.101–0.177), 0.362 (0.308–0.415), and 0.571 (0.525–0.616), respectively. The order of ovarian reserve from adequate to poor followed the order of A to D.

Conclusion

We have established an easy applicable AAFA model for assessing true ovarian reserve and may have important implications in both infertile women and general reproductive women in Chinese or Asian population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Qiao J, Wang ZB, Feng HL, Miao YL, Wang Q, Yu Y, et al. The root of reduced fertility in aged women and possible therapentic options: current status and future perspects. Mol Asp Med. 2014;38:54–85.CrossRef Qiao J, Wang ZB, Feng HL, Miao YL, Wang Q, Yu Y, et al. The root of reduced fertility in aged women and possible therapentic options: current status and future perspects. Mol Asp Med. 2014;38:54–85.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lass A. Assessment of ovarian reserve: is there still a role for ovarian biopsy in the light of new data? Hum Reprod. 2004;19:467–9.CrossRef Lass A. Assessment of ovarian reserve: is there still a role for ovarian biopsy in the light of new data? Hum Reprod. 2004;19:467–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:685–718.CrossRef Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:685–718.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wallace WH, Kelsey TW. Human ovarian reserve from conception to the menopause. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8772.CrossRef Wallace WH, Kelsey TW. Human ovarian reserve from conception to the menopause. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8772.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Roudebush WE, Kivens WJ, Mattke JM. Biomarkers of ovarian reserve. Biomark Insights. 2008;3:259–68.CrossRef Roudebush WE, Kivens WJ, Mattke JM. Biomarkers of ovarian reserve. Biomark Insights. 2008;3:259–68.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gynecologists TACoOa. Committee opinion no. 618: ovarian reserve testing. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:268–73.CrossRef Gynecologists TACoOa. Committee opinion no. 618: ovarian reserve testing. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:268–73.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Medicine PCotASfR. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:e9–e17. Medicine PCotASfR. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:e9–e17.
8.
go back to reference de Carvalho BR, Rosa e Silva AC, Rosa e Silva JC, dos Reis RM, Ferriani RA, Silva de Sa MF. Ovarian reserve evaluation: state of the art. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25:311–22.CrossRef de Carvalho BR, Rosa e Silva AC, Rosa e Silva JC, dos Reis RM, Ferriani RA, Silva de Sa MF. Ovarian reserve evaluation: state of the art. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25:311–22.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Broer SL, van Disseldorp J, Broeze KA, Dolleman M, Opmeer BC, Bossuyt P, et al. Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:26–36.CrossRef Broer SL, van Disseldorp J, Broeze KA, Dolleman M, Opmeer BC, Bossuyt P, et al. Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:26–36.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Durlinger AL, Gruijters MJ, Kramer P, Karels B, Ingraham HA, Nachtigal MW, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone inhibits initiation of primordial follicle growth in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology. 2002;143:1076–84.CrossRef Durlinger AL, Gruijters MJ, Kramer P, Karels B, Ingraham HA, Nachtigal MW, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone inhibits initiation of primordial follicle growth in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology. 2002;143:1076–84.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Eldar-Geva T, Ben-Chetrit A, Spitz IM, Rabinowitz R, Markowitz E, Mimoni T, et al. Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3178–83.CrossRef Eldar-Geva T, Ben-Chetrit A, Spitz IM, Rabinowitz R, Markowitz E, Mimoni T, et al. Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3178–83.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference van Rooij IA, Broekmans FJ, Scheffer GJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD, de Jong FH, et al. Serum antimullerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: a longitudinal study. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:979–87.CrossRef van Rooij IA, Broekmans FJ, Scheffer GJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD, de Jong FH, et al. Serum antimullerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: a longitudinal study. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:979–87.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yding Andersen C. Inhibin-B secretion and FSH isoform distribution may play an integral part of follicular selection in the natural menstrual cycle. Mol Hum Reprod. 2017;23:16–24.CrossRef Yding Andersen C. Inhibin-B secretion and FSH isoform distribution may play an integral part of follicular selection in the natural menstrual cycle. Mol Hum Reprod. 2017;23:16–24.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Santoro N. The menopausal transition. Am J Med. 2005;118(Suppl 12B):8–13.CrossRef Santoro N. The menopausal transition. Am J Med. 2005;118(Suppl 12B):8–13.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1616–24.CrossRef Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1616–24.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, et al. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1452–3.CrossRef Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, et al. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1452–3.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Johnson MKK. Applied predictive modeling, measuring performance in regresssion model. Berlin: Springer; 2013. Johnson MKK. Applied predictive modeling, measuring performance in regresssion model. Berlin: Springer; 2013.
18.
go back to reference Xu H, Zeng L, Yang R, Feng Y, Li R, Qiao J. Retrospective cohort study: AMH is the best ovarian reserve markers in predicting ovarian response but has unfavorable value in predicting clinical pregnancy in GnRH antagonist protocol. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:763–70.CrossRef Xu H, Zeng L, Yang R, Feng Y, Li R, Qiao J. Retrospective cohort study: AMH is the best ovarian reserve markers in predicting ovarian response but has unfavorable value in predicting clinical pregnancy in GnRH antagonist protocol. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:763–70.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Qiao J, Wang ZB, Feng HL, Miao YL, Wang Q, Yu Y, et al. The root of reduced fertility in aged women and possible therapentic options: current status and future perspects. Mol Asp Med. 2013;38:54–85.CrossRef Qiao J, Wang ZB, Feng HL, Miao YL, Wang Q, Yu Y, et al. The root of reduced fertility in aged women and possible therapentic options: current status and future perspects. Mol Asp Med. 2013;38:54–85.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Heidar Z, Bakhtiyari M, Mirzamoradi M, Zadehmodarres S, Sarfjoo FS, Mansournia MA. Prediction of different ovarian responses using anti-Mullerian hormone following a long agonist treatment protocol for IVF. J Endocrinol Investig. 2015;38:1007–15.CrossRef Heidar Z, Bakhtiyari M, Mirzamoradi M, Zadehmodarres S, Sarfjoo FS, Mansournia MA. Prediction of different ovarian responses using anti-Mullerian hormone following a long agonist treatment protocol for IVF. J Endocrinol Investig. 2015;38:1007–15.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference La Marca A, Sunkara SK. Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:124–40.CrossRef La Marca A, Sunkara SK. Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:124–40.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N. A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Mullerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:855–64.CrossRef Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N. A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Mullerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:855–64.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Muttukrishna S, Suharjono H, McGarrigle H, Sathanandan M. Inhibin B and anti-Mullerian hormone: markers of ovarian response in IVF/ICSI patients? Bjog-an Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol. 2004;111:1248–53.CrossRef Muttukrishna S, Suharjono H, McGarrigle H, Sathanandan M. Inhibin B and anti-Mullerian hormone: markers of ovarian response in IVF/ICSI patients? Bjog-an Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol. 2004;111:1248–53.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kotanidis L, Nikolettos K, Petousis S, Asimakopoulos B, Chatzimitrou E, Kolios G, et al. The use of serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle count (AFC) to predict the number of oocytes collected and availability of embryos for cryopreservation in IVF. J Endocrinol Investig. 2016;39:1459–64.CrossRef Kotanidis L, Nikolettos K, Petousis S, Asimakopoulos B, Chatzimitrou E, Kolios G, et al. The use of serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle count (AFC) to predict the number of oocytes collected and availability of embryos for cryopreservation in IVF. J Endocrinol Investig. 2016;39:1459–64.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference La Marca A, Argento C, Sighinolfi G, Grisendi V, Carbone M, D'Ippolito G, et al. Possibilities and limits of ovarian reserve testing in ART. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:398–408.CrossRef La Marca A, Argento C, Sighinolfi G, Grisendi V, Carbone M, D'Ippolito G, et al. Possibilities and limits of ovarian reserve testing in ART. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:398–408.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Medicine TPCotASfR. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1407–15.CrossRef Medicine TPCotASfR. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1407–15.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Riggs R, Kimble T, Oehninger S, Bocca S, Zhao Y, Leader B, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone serum levels predict response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation but not embryo quality or pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:410–2.CrossRef Riggs R, Kimble T, Oehninger S, Bocca S, Zhao Y, Leader B, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone serum levels predict response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation but not embryo quality or pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:410–2.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nardo LG, Gelbaya TA, Wilkinson H, Roberts SA, Yates A, Pemberton P, et al. Circulating basal anti-Mullerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1586–93.CrossRef Nardo LG, Gelbaya TA, Wilkinson H, Roberts SA, Yates A, Pemberton P, et al. Circulating basal anti-Mullerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1586–93.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A novel mathematical model of true ovarian reserve assessment based on predicted probability of poor ovarian response: a retrospective cohort study
Authors
Huiyu Xu
Guoshuang Feng
Haiyan Wang
Yong Han
Rui Yang
Ying Song
Lixue Chen
Li Shi
Meng Qian Zhang
Rong Li
Jie Qiao
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01700-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2020 Go to the issue