Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes

Authors: Hongyi Yang, Qingling Yang, Shanjun Dai, Gang Li, Haixia Jin, Guidong Yao, Yingpu Sun

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Whether there are differences in the pregnancy outcomes of blastocysts cryopreserved during different developmental stages remains under debate because the results among studies are inconsistent. We analyzed blastocyst quality and pregnancy outcomes by considering blastocyst euploidy and investigated the differences in the development potential between blastocysts of different developmental stages (frozen-thawed day 5 [D5] and day 6 [D6] cycles) and their relationship with clinical pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

In total, 1374 D5 and 255 D6 frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles were retrospectively analyzed. Additionally, the chromosome euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates of 237 blastocysts from 50 pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGS) cycles were statistically analyzed. The corresponding euploidy rate and pregnancy outcomes of the D5 and D6 blastocyst transfers were also compared.

Results

The clinical pregnancy rate (47.2 vs 40.0 %; P = 0.04) and implantation rate (34.2 vs 28.8 %; P = 0.03) of the D5 blastocysts were higher than were those of the D6 blastocysts. However, the clinical pregnancy rate (52.4 vs 52.6 %; P = 0.97) and implantation rate (38.9 vs 35.6 %; P = 0.39) of the high-quality D5 blastocysts did not significantly differ from those of the high-quality D6 blastocysts. Analysis of blastocyst euploidy in 237 blastocysts examined in 50 PGS cycles showed that the euploidy rates of the D5 and D6 blastocysts were both 48.1 % (P = 0.99). The clinical pregnancy rate of the D5 blastocysts (48.5 vs 17.6 %; P = 0.03) was higher than that of the D6 blastocysts. The euploidy rates (55.2 vs 55.3 %; P = 0.99) and clinical pregnancy rates (60.0 vs 42.9 %; P = 0.77) of the high-quality D5 and D6 blastocysts did not differ. The euploidy rate (55.3 vs 41.5 %, P = 0.03) and clinical pregnancy rate (54.5 vs 25.0 %, P = 0.03) of the high-quality blastocysts were higher than were those of the poor-quality blastocysts.

Conclusions

The euploidy rates between the D5 and D6 blastocysts did not differ. High-quality D6 blastocysts in frozen-thawed cycles had similar developmental potential and pregnancy outcomes compared to those of high-quality D5 blastocysts. The quality of the blastocysts was an important factor that affected the pregnancy outcomes of the frozen-thawed cycles.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;7:CD002118.PubMed Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;7:CD002118.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Sullivan EA, Wang YA, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Illingworth P, McBain J, et al. Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3609–15.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan EA, Wang YA, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Illingworth P, McBain J, et al. Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3609–15.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(1):107–20.CrossRefPubMed Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(1):107–20.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Barrenetxea G, Lopez de Larruzea A, Ganzabal T, Jimenez R, Carbonero K, Mandiola M. Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:49–53.CrossRefPubMed Barrenetxea G, Lopez de Larruzea A, Ganzabal T, Jimenez R, Carbonero K, Mandiola M. Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:49–53.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Utsunomiya T, Ito H, Nagaki M, Sato J. A prospective, randomized study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1598–603.CrossRefPubMed Utsunomiya T, Ito H, Nagaki M, Sato J. A prospective, randomized study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1598–603.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shapiro B, Daneshmand S, Garner F, Aguirre M, Ross R. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:20–6.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro B, Daneshmand S, Garner F, Aguirre M, Ross R. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:20–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Van Voorhis BJ, Dokras A. Delayed blastocyst transfer: is the window shutting? Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):31–2.CrossRefPubMed Van Voorhis BJ, Dokras A. Delayed blastocyst transfer: is the window shutting? Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):31–2.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Marek DM, Langley MT, McKean C, et al. Frozen embryo transfer (FET) of day 5 blastocyst embryos compared to transfer of day 6 blastocyst embryos. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(1):S52–3.CrossRef Marek DM, Langley MT, McKean C, et al. Frozen embryo transfer (FET) of day 5 blastocyst embryos compared to transfer of day 6 blastocyst embryos. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(1):S52–3.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kovalevsky G, Carney SM, Morrison LS, et al. Should embryos developing to blastocysts on day 7 be cryopreserved and transferred: an analysis of pregnancy and implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1008–12.CrossRefPubMed Kovalevsky G, Carney SM, Morrison LS, et al. Should embryos developing to blastocysts on day 7 be cryopreserved and transferred: an analysis of pregnancy and implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1008–12.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Behr B, Gebhardt J, Lyon J, Milki A. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:697–9.CrossRefPubMed Behr B, Gebhardt J, Lyon J, Milki A. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:697–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hiraoka K, Hiraoka K, Miyazaki M, Fukunaga E, Horiuchi T. Perinatal outcomes following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified at day 5, 6 and 7. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2009;6:4.PubMedPubMedCentral Hiraoka K, Hiraoka K, Miyazaki M, Fukunaga E, Horiuchi T. Perinatal outcomes following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified at day 5, 6 and 7. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2009;6:4.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Levens E, Whitcomb B, Hennessy S, James A, Yauger B, Larsen F. Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2138–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Levens E, Whitcomb B, Hennessy S, James A, Yauger B, Larsen F. Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2138–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, et al. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155–8.CrossRefPubMed Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, et al. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mukaida T, Goto OC, et al. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoels using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Repord. 2006;21(12):3246–52.CrossRef Mukaida T, Goto OC, et al. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoels using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Repord. 2006;21(12):3246–52.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, et al. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(3):300–8.CrossRefPubMed Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, et al. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(3):300–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Li G, He N, Jin H, Liu Y, et al. The influence of single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based molecular karyotype on preimplantation embryonic development potential. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138234.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li G, He N, Jin H, Liu Y, et al. The influence of single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based molecular karyotype on preimplantation embryonic development potential. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138234.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Stanger J, Wong J, Conceicao J, Yovich J. Vitrification of human embryos previously cryostored by either slow freezing or vitrification results in high pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(3):314–20.CrossRefPubMed Stanger J, Wong J, Conceicao J, Yovich J. Vitrification of human embryos previously cryostored by either slow freezing or vitrification results in high pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(3):314–20.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Liebermann J. Vitrification of human blastocysts: an update. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 4:4328.PubMed Liebermann J. Vitrification of human blastocysts: an update. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 4:4328.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Liebermann J, Tucker M. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:20–6.CrossRefPubMed Liebermann J, Tucker M. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:20–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference El-Toukhy T, Wharf E, Walavalkar R, Singh A, Bolton V, Khalaf Y, et al. Delayed blastocyst development does not influence the outcome of frozen thawed transfer cycles. BJOG. 2011;118:1551–6.CrossRefPubMed El-Toukhy T, Wharf E, Walavalkar R, Singh A, Bolton V, Khalaf Y, et al. Delayed blastocyst development does not influence the outcome of frozen thawed transfer cycles. BJOG. 2011;118:1551–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sunkara S, Siozos A, Bolton V, Khalaf Y, Braude P, El-Toukhy T. The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(8):1906–15.CrossRefPubMed Sunkara S, Siozos A, Bolton V, Khalaf Y, Braude P, El-Toukhy T. The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(8):1906–15.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1173–81.CrossRefPubMed Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1173–81.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes
Authors
Hongyi Yang
Qingling Yang
Shanjun Dai
Gang Li
Haixia Jin
Guidong Yao
Yingpu Sun
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0712-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 7/2016 Go to the issue