Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 3/2017

01-07-2017 | Original Article

Detection of false positive mutations in BRCA gene by next generation sequencing

Authors: Moushumi Suryavanshi, Dushyant Kumar, Manoj Kumar Panigrahi, Meenakshi Chowdhary, Anurag Mehta

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are implicated in 20–25% of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. New age sequencing platforms have revolutionized massively parallel sequencing in clinical practice by providing cost effective, rapid, and sensitive sequencing. This study critically evaluates the false positives in multiplex panels and suggests the need for careful analysis. We employed multiplex PCR based BRCA1 and BRCA2 community Panel with ion torrent PGM machine for evaluation of these mutations. Out of all 41samples analyzed for BRCA1 and BRCA2 five were found with 950_951 insA(Asn319fs) at Chr13:32906565 position and one sample with 1032_1033 insA(Asn346fs) at Chr13:32906647, both being frame-shift mutations in BRCA2 gene. 950_951 insA(Asn319fs) mutation is reported as pathogenic allele in NCBI dbSNP. On examination of IGV for all these samples, it was seen that both mutations had ‘A’ nucleotide insertion at 950, and 1032 position in exon 10 of BRCA2 gene. Sanger Sequencing did not confirm these insertions. Next-generation sequencing shows great promise by allowing rapid mutational analysis of multiple genes in human cancer but our results indicate the need for careful sequence analysis to avoid false positive results.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Campeau PM, Foulkes WD, Tischkowitz MD et al (2008) Hereditary breast cancer: new genetic developments, new therapeutic avenues. Hum Genet 124:31–42CrossRefPubMed Campeau PM, Foulkes WD, Tischkowitz MD et al (2008) Hereditary breast cancer: new genetic developments, new therapeutic avenues. Hum Genet 124:31–42CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pal T, Permuth-Wey J, Betts JA et al (2005) BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for a large proportion of ovarian carcinoma cases. Cancer 04:2807–2816CrossRef Pal T, Permuth-Wey J, Betts JA et al (2005) BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for a large proportion of ovarian carcinoma cases. Cancer 04:2807–2816CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Petrucelli N, Daly M, Feldman G et al (2016) BRCA1 and BRCA2 hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Gene Reviews University of Washington, Seattle 1993–2016 Petrucelli N, Daly M, Feldman G et al (2016) BRCA1 and BRCA2 hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Gene Reviews University of Washington, Seattle 1993–2016
5.
go back to reference Zhang J, Fackenthal JD, Huo D et al (2010) Searching for large genomic rearrangements of the BRCA1 gene in a Nigerian population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124:573–577CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Fackenthal JD, Huo D et al (2010) Searching for large genomic rearrangements of the BRCA1 gene in a Nigerian population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124:573–577CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mafficini A, Simbolo M, Parisi A et al (2016) BRCA somatic and germline mutation detection in paraffin embedded ovarian cancers by next-generation sequencing. Oncotarget 7:1076–1083PubMedPubMedCentral Mafficini A, Simbolo M, Parisi A et al (2016) BRCA somatic and germline mutation detection in paraffin embedded ovarian cancers by next-generation sequencing. Oncotarget 7:1076–1083PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Pisano M, Mezzollo V, Galante MM et al (2011) A new mutation of BRCA2 gene in an Italian healthy woman with familial breast cancer history. Fam Cancer 10:65–71CrossRefPubMed Pisano M, Mezzollo V, Galante MM et al (2011) A new mutation of BRCA2 gene in an Italian healthy woman with familial breast cancer history. Fam Cancer 10:65–71CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rothberg JM, Hinz W, Rearick TM et al (2011) An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing. Nature 475:348–352CrossRefPubMed Rothberg JM, Hinz W, Rearick TM et al (2011) An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing. Nature 475:348–352CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Voelkerding KV, Dames SA, Durtschi JD et al (2009) Next-generation sequencing: from basic research to diagnostics. Clin Chem 55:641–658CrossRefPubMed Voelkerding KV, Dames SA, Durtschi JD et al (2009) Next-generation sequencing: from basic research to diagnostics. Clin Chem 55:641–658CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bragg LM, Stone G, Butler KM et al (2013) Shining a light on dark sequencing: characterising errors in Ion Torrent PGM data. PLoS Comput Biol 9:e1003031CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bragg LM, Stone G, Butler KM et al (2013) Shining a light on dark sequencing: characterising errors in Ion Torrent PGM data. PLoS Comput Biol 9:e1003031CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Stuewing JP, Abeliovich D, Petertz T et al (1995) The carrier frequency of the BRCA1 mutation 185delAG mutation is approximately 1 percent in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals. Nat Genet 11:198–200CrossRef Stuewing JP, Abeliovich D, Petertz T et al (1995) The carrier frequency of the BRCA1 mutation 185delAG mutation is approximately 1 percent in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals. Nat Genet 11:198–200CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Johannsson O, Ostemeyer EA, Hakansson S et al (1996) Founding BRCA1 mutations in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in southern Sweden. Am J Hum Genet 58:441–450PubMedPubMedCentral Johannsson O, Ostemeyer EA, Hakansson S et al (1996) Founding BRCA1 mutations in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in southern Sweden. Am J Hum Genet 58:441–450PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Fitzgerald MG, MacDonald DJ, Krainer M et al (1996) Germline BRCA1 mutations in Jewish and non-Jewish women with early onset breast cancer. N Engl J Med 334:143–149CrossRefPubMed Fitzgerald MG, MacDonald DJ, Krainer M et al (1996) Germline BRCA1 mutations in Jewish and non-Jewish women with early onset breast cancer. N Engl J Med 334:143–149CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Haliassos A, Chomel JC, Tesson L et al (1989) Modification of enzymatically amplified DNA for the detection of pointmutations. Nucleic Acids Res 17:3606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Haliassos A, Chomel JC, Tesson L et al (1989) Modification of enzymatically amplified DNA for the detection of pointmutations. Nucleic Acids Res 17:3606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Rohlfs EM, Learning WG, Friedman KJ et al (1997) Direst detection of mutations in the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 by PCR-mediated site-directed mutagenesis. Clin Chem 43:24–29PubMed Rohlfs EM, Learning WG, Friedman KJ et al (1997) Direst detection of mutations in the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 by PCR-mediated site-directed mutagenesis. Clin Chem 43:24–29PubMed
16.
go back to reference Gayther SA, Harrington P, Russell P et al (1996) The UKCCCR Familial Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Rapid detection of regionally clustered germline BRCA1 mutations by multiplex heteroduplexanalysis. Am J Hum Genet 58:451–456PubMedPubMedCentral Gayther SA, Harrington P, Russell P et al (1996) The UKCCCR Familial Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Rapid detection of regionally clustered germline BRCA1 mutations by multiplex heteroduplexanalysis. Am J Hum Genet 58:451–456PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Friedman LS, Gayther SA, Kurosaki T et al (1997) Mutation analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a male breast cancer population. Am J Hum Genet 60:313–319PubMedPubMedCentral Friedman LS, Gayther SA, Kurosaki T et al (1997) Mutation analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a male breast cancer population. Am J Hum Genet 60:313–319PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Ozcelik H, Antebi Y, Andrulis IL et al (1996) Heteroduplex and protein truncation analysis of the BRCA1 185delAG mutation. Hum Genet 98:310–312CrossRefPubMed Ozcelik H, Antebi Y, Andrulis IL et al (1996) Heteroduplex and protein truncation analysis of the BRCA1 185delAG mutation. Hum Genet 98:310–312CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wagle N, Berger MF, Davis MJ et al (2012) High-throughput detection of actionable genomic alterations in clinical tumor samples by targeted, massively parallel sequencing. Cancer Discov 2:82–93CrossRefPubMed Wagle N, Berger MF, Davis MJ et al (2012) High-throughput detection of actionable genomic alterations in clinical tumor samples by targeted, massively parallel sequencing. Cancer Discov 2:82–93CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Harismendy O, Schwab RB, Bao L et al (2011) Detection of low prevalence somatic mutations in solid tumors with ultra-deep targeted sequencing. Genome Biol 12:R124CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harismendy O, Schwab RB, Bao L et al (2011) Detection of low prevalence somatic mutations in solid tumors with ultra-deep targeted sequencing. Genome Biol 12:R124CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Hadd AG, Houghton J, Choudhary A et al (2013) Targeted, high-depth, next-generation sequencing of cancer genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and fine-needle aspiration tumor specimens. J Mol Diagn 15:234–247CrossRefPubMed Hadd AG, Houghton J, Choudhary A et al (2013) Targeted, high-depth, next-generation sequencing of cancer genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and fine-needle aspiration tumor specimens. J Mol Diagn 15:234–247CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Singh RR, Patel KP, Routbort MJ et al (2013) Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing screen for mutational hotspots in 46 cancer-related genes. J Mol Diagn 15:607–622CrossRefPubMed Singh RR, Patel KP, Routbort MJ et al (2013) Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing screen for mutational hotspots in 46 cancer-related genes. J Mol Diagn 15:607–622CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Loman NJ, Misra RV, Dallman TJ et al (2012) Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms.Nat. Biotech 30:434–439 Loman NJ, Misra RV, Dallman TJ et al (2012) Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms.Nat. Biotech 30:434–439
24.
go back to reference Quail M, Smith M, Coupland P et al (2012) A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion torrent, pacific biosciences and illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genom 13:341CrossRef Quail M, Smith M, Coupland P et al (2012) A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion torrent, pacific biosciences and illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genom 13:341CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pellegrini L, Yu DS, Lo T et al (2002) Insights into DNA recombination from the structure of a RAD51-BRCA2 complex. Nature 420:287–293CrossRefPubMed Pellegrini L, Yu DS, Lo T et al (2002) Insights into DNA recombination from the structure of a RAD51-BRCA2 complex. Nature 420:287–293CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Xia B, Sheng Q, Nakanishi K et al (2006) Control of BRCA2 cellular and clinical functions by a nuclear partner, PALB2. Mol Cell 22:719–729CrossRefPubMed Xia B, Sheng Q, Nakanishi K et al (2006) Control of BRCA2 cellular and clinical functions by a nuclear partner, PALB2. Mol Cell 22:719–729CrossRefPubMed
27.
Metadata
Title
Detection of false positive mutations in BRCA gene by next generation sequencing
Authors
Moushumi Suryavanshi
Dushyant Kumar
Manoj Kumar Panigrahi
Meenakshi Chowdhary
Anurag Mehta
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-016-9955-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Familial Cancer 3/2017 Go to the issue

Original Article

Gastric tumours in FAP

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine