Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Original Article

Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility in a rural Familial Cancer Program

Authors: David J. Hermel, Wendy C. McKinnon, Marie E. Wood, Marc S. Greenblatt

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

This study explores our Familial Cancer Program’s experience implementing multi-gene panel testing in a largely rural patient population. We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing panel testing between May 2011 and August 2015. Our goal was to evaluate factors that might be predictors of identifying variants (pathogenic or uncertain significance) and to assess clinical management changes due to testing. We utilized a structured family history tool to determine the significance of patient’s family histories with respect to identification of genetic variants. A total of 227 patients underwent panel testing at our center and 67 patients (29.5 %) had variants identified, with 8 (3.5 %) having multiple variants. Overall, 44 patients (19.4 %) had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) and 28 patients (12.3 %) had a pathogenic variant detected, with 10 (4.4 %) having pathogenic variants in highly penetrant genes. We found no statistical difference in patient familial and personal cancer history, age, rural status, Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, insurance coverage and prior single-gene testing among those with pathogenic, VUS and negative panel testing results. There were no predictors of pathogenic variants on regression analysis. Panel testing changed cancer screening and management guidelines from that expected based on family history alone in 13.2 % of patients. Ultimately, cancer panel testing does yield critical information not identified by traditional single gene testing but maximal utility through a broad range of personal and family histories requires improved interpretation of variants.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blazer KR, Nehoray B, Solomon I et al (2015) Next-generation testing for cancer risk: perceptions, experiences, and needs among early adopters in community healthcare settings. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 19:657–665CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blazer KR, Nehoray B, Solomon I et al (2015) Next-generation testing for cancer risk: perceptions, experiences, and needs among early adopters in community healthcare settings. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 19:657–665CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Hiraki S, Rinella ES, Schnabel F, Oratz R, Ostrer H (2014) Cancer risk assessment using genetic panel testing: considerations for clinical application. J Genet Couns 23:604–617CrossRefPubMed Hiraki S, Rinella ES, Schnabel F, Oratz R, Ostrer H (2014) Cancer risk assessment using genetic panel testing: considerations for clinical application. J Genet Couns 23:604–617CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Susswein LR, Marshall ML, Nusbaum R et al (2015) Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variant prevalence among the first 10,000 patients referred for next-generation cancer panel testing. Genet Med. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.166 Susswein LR, Marshall ML, Nusbaum R et al (2015) Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variant prevalence among the first 10,000 patients referred for next-generation cancer panel testing. Genet Med. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2015.​166
4.
go back to reference Desmond A, Kurian AW, Gabree M et al (2015) Clinical actionability of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment. JAMA Oncol 1:943–951CrossRefPubMed Desmond A, Kurian AW, Gabree M et al (2015) Clinical actionability of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment. JAMA Oncol 1:943–951CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference LaDuca H, Stuenkel AJ, Dolinsky JS et al (2014) Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients. Genet Med 16:830–837CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral LaDuca H, Stuenkel AJ, Dolinsky JS et al (2014) Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients. Genet Med 16:830–837CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Selkirk CG, Vogel KJ, Newlin AC et al (2014) Cancer genetic testing panels for inherited cancer susceptibility: the clinical experience of a large adult genetics practice. Fam Cancer 13:527–536CrossRefPubMed Selkirk CG, Vogel KJ, Newlin AC et al (2014) Cancer genetic testing panels for inherited cancer susceptibility: the clinical experience of a large adult genetics practice. Fam Cancer 13:527–536CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Vallée MP, Francy TC, Judkins MK, Babikyan D, Lesueur F, Gammon A, Goldgar DE, Couch FJ, Tavtigian SV (2012) Classification of missense substitutions in the BRCA genes: a database dedicated to Ex UVs. Hum Mutat 33:22–28. doi:10.1002/humu.21629 CrossRefPubMed Vallée MP, Francy TC, Judkins MK, Babikyan D, Lesueur F, Gammon A, Goldgar DE, Couch FJ, Tavtigian SV (2012) Classification of missense substitutions in the BRCA genes: a database dedicated to Ex UVs. Hum Mutat 33:22–28. doi:10.​1002/​humu.​21629 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference McClain MR et al (2005) An evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations penetrance estimates for breast cancer among Ashkenazi Jewish women. Genet Med 7(1):34–39CrossRefPubMed McClain MR et al (2005) An evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations penetrance estimates for breast cancer among Ashkenazi Jewish women. Genet Med 7(1):34–39CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Frey MK, Kim SH, Bassett RY et al (2015) Rescreening for genetic mutations using multi-gene panel testing in patients who previously underwent non-informative genetic screening. Gynecol Oncol 139:211–215CrossRefPubMed Frey MK, Kim SH, Bassett RY et al (2015) Rescreening for genetic mutations using multi-gene panel testing in patients who previously underwent non-informative genetic screening. Gynecol Oncol 139:211–215CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kurian AW, Hare EE, Mills MA et al (2014) Clinical evaluation of a multiple-gene sequencing panel for hereditary cancer risk assessment. J Clin Oncol 32:2001–2009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kurian AW, Hare EE, Mills MA et al (2014) Clinical evaluation of a multiple-gene sequencing panel for hereditary cancer risk assessment. J Clin Oncol 32:2001–2009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Yorczyk A, Robinson LS, Ross TS (2015) Use of panel tests in place of single gene tests in the cancer genetics clinic. Clin Genet 88:278–282CrossRefPubMed Yorczyk A, Robinson LS, Ross TS (2015) Use of panel tests in place of single gene tests in the cancer genetics clinic. Clin Genet 88:278–282CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Robson M (2014) Multigene panel testing: planning the next generation of research studies in clinical cancer genetics. J Clin Oncol 32:1987–1989CrossRefPubMed Robson M (2014) Multigene panel testing: planning the next generation of research studies in clinical cancer genetics. J Clin Oncol 32:1987–1989CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cragun D, Radford C, Dolinsky JS, Caldwell M, Chao E, Pal T (2014) Panel-based testing for inherited colorectal cancer: a descriptive study of clinical testing performed by a US laboratory. Clin Genet 86:510–520CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cragun D, Radford C, Dolinsky JS, Caldwell M, Chao E, Pal T (2014) Panel-based testing for inherited colorectal cancer: a descriptive study of clinical testing performed by a US laboratory. Clin Genet 86:510–520CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Pilgrim SM, Pain SJ, Tischkowitz MD (2014) Opportunities and challenges of next-generation DNA sequencing for breast units. Br J Surg 101:889–898CrossRefPubMed Pilgrim SM, Pain SJ, Tischkowitz MD (2014) Opportunities and challenges of next-generation DNA sequencing for breast units. Br J Surg 101:889–898CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility in a rural Familial Cancer Program
Authors
David J. Hermel
Wendy C. McKinnon
Marie E. Wood
Marc S. Greenblatt
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-016-9913-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Familial Cancer 1/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine