Published in:
Open Access
01-01-2017 | COMMENTARY
Significance testing: Why does it prevail?
Author:
Anders Ahlbom
Published in:
European Journal of Epidemiology
|
Issue 1/2017
Login to get access
Excerpt
A report by Seliger et al. on statin use and risk of glioma prompted Greenland to write a letter-to-the-editor in which he again explains why lack of statistical significance must not be interpreted as lack of association [
1,
2]. Greenland and colleagues have also stressed recently that a statistically significant association very well may be due to chance [
3]. These two statements hold just the same regardless of whether the statistical significance judgment is based on if the
P value is smaller than 5% or if the confidence interval excludes the no-effect value. …