Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 4/2015

01-08-2015 | PHASE I STUDIES

A phase 1 study with dose expansion of the CDK inhibitor dinaciclib (SCH 727965) in combination with epirubicin in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer

Authors: Zahi Mitri, Cansu Karakas, Caimiao Wei, Brian Briones, Holly Simmons, Nuhad Ibrahim, Ricardo Alvarez, James L. Murray, Khandan Keyomarsi, Stacy Moulder

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Summary

Purpose, Low molecular weight cyclin E (LMW-E) isoforms, overexpressed in a majority (~70 %) of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC), were found in preclinical models to mediate tumorigenesis through binding and activation of CDK2. CDK1/CDK2 inhibitors, such as dinaciclib, combined with anthracyclines, were synergistic in decreasing viability of TNBC cell lines. Based on this data, a phase 1 study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose of dinaciclib in combination with epirubicin in patients with metastatic TNBC. Methods, Cohorts of at least 2 patients were treated with escalating doses of dinaciclib given on day 1 followed by standard dose of epirubicin given on day 2 of a 21 day cycle. No intra-patient dose escalation was allowed. An adaptive accrual design based upon toxicity during cycle 1 determined entry into therapy cohorts. The target acceptable dose limiting toxicity (DLT) to advance to the next treatment level was 30 %. Results, Between 9/18/2012 and 7/18/2013, 9 patients were enrolled and treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center. DLTs included febrile neutropenia (grade 3, n = 2), syncope (grade 3, n = 2) and vomiting (grade 3, n = 1). Dose escalation did not proceed past the second cohort due to toxicity. After further accrual, the first dose level was also found to be too toxic. No treatment responses were noted, median time to progression was 5.5 weeks (range 3–12 weeks). Thus, accrual was stopped rather than explore the −1 dose level. Conclusion, The combination of dinaciclib and epirubicin is associated with substantial toxicities and does not appear to be an effective treatment option for TNBC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lobbezoo DJ et al (2013) Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer subtypes: the hormone receptor/HER2-positive subtype is associated with the most favorable outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141(3):507–14PubMedCrossRef Lobbezoo DJ et al (2013) Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer subtypes: the hormone receptor/HER2-positive subtype is associated with the most favorable outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141(3):507–14PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Weide R et al (2014) Metastatic breast cancer: prolongation of survival in routine care is restricted to hormone-receptor- and Her2-positive tumors. Springerplus 3:535PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Weide R et al (2014) Metastatic breast cancer: prolongation of survival in routine care is restricted to hormone-receptor- and Her2-positive tumors. Springerplus 3:535PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Keyomarsi K et al (2002) Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(20):1566–75PubMedCrossRef Keyomarsi K et al (2002) Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(20):1566–75PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wingate H et al (2005) The tumor-specific hyperactive forms of cyclin E are resistant to inhibition by p21 and p27. J Biol Chem 280(15):15148–57PubMedCrossRef Wingate H et al (2005) The tumor-specific hyperactive forms of cyclin E are resistant to inhibition by p21 and p27. J Biol Chem 280(15):15148–57PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Porter DC et al (2001) Tumor-specific proteolytic processing of cyclin E generates hyperactive lower-molecular-weight forms. Mol Cell Biol 21(18):6254–69PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Porter DC et al (2001) Tumor-specific proteolytic processing of cyclin E generates hyperactive lower-molecular-weight forms. Mol Cell Biol 21(18):6254–69PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Corin I et al (2006) Tumor-specific hyperactive low-molecular-weight cyclin E isoforms detection and characterization in non-metastatic colorectal tumors. Cancer Biol Ther 5(2):198–203PubMedCrossRef Corin I et al (2006) Tumor-specific hyperactive low-molecular-weight cyclin E isoforms detection and characterization in non-metastatic colorectal tumors. Cancer Biol Ther 5(2):198–203PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bedrosian I et al (2004) Cyclin E deregulation alters the biologic properties of ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene 23(15):2648–57PubMedCrossRef Bedrosian I et al (2004) Cyclin E deregulation alters the biologic properties of ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene 23(15):2648–57PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Akli S et al (2004) Tumor-specific low molecular weight forms of cyclin E induce genomic instability and resistance to p21, p27, and antiestrogens in breast cancer. Cancer Res 64(9):3198–208PubMedCrossRef Akli S et al (2004) Tumor-specific low molecular weight forms of cyclin E induce genomic instability and resistance to p21, p27, and antiestrogens in breast cancer. Cancer Res 64(9):3198–208PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Akli S et al (2007) Overexpression of the low molecular weight cyclin E in transgenic mice induces metastatic mammary carcinomas through the disruption of the ARF-p53 pathway. Cancer Res 67(15):7212–22PubMedCrossRef Akli S et al (2007) Overexpression of the low molecular weight cyclin E in transgenic mice induces metastatic mammary carcinomas through the disruption of the ARF-p53 pathway. Cancer Res 67(15):7212–22PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nanos-Webb A et al (2012) Targeting low molecular weight cyclin E (LMW-E) in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132(2):575–88PubMedCrossRef Nanos-Webb A et al (2012) Targeting low molecular weight cyclin E (LMW-E) in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132(2):575–88PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nemunaitis JJ et al (2013) A first-in-human, phase 1, dose-escalation study of dinaciclib, a novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, administered weekly in subjects with advanced malignancies. J Transl Med 11:259PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nemunaitis JJ et al (2013) A first-in-human, phase 1, dose-escalation study of dinaciclib, a novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, administered weekly in subjects with advanced malignancies. J Transl Med 11:259PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ortiz-Ferron G et al (2008) Roscovitine sensitizes breast cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis through a pleiotropic mechanism. Cell Res 18(6):664–76PubMedCrossRef Ortiz-Ferron G et al (2008) Roscovitine sensitizes breast cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis through a pleiotropic mechanism. Cell Res 18(6):664–76PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Paruch K et al (2010) Discovery of dinaciclib (SCH 727965): a potent and selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases. ACS Med Chem Lett 1(5):204–8PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Paruch K et al (2010) Discovery of dinaciclib (SCH 727965): a potent and selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases. ACS Med Chem Lett 1(5):204–8PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Parry D et al (2010) Dinaciclib (SCH 727965), a novel and potent cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Mol Cancer Ther 9(8):2344–53PubMedCrossRef Parry D et al (2010) Dinaciclib (SCH 727965), a novel and potent cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Mol Cancer Ther 9(8):2344–53PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mita MM et al (2014) Randomized phase II trial of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib (MK-7965) versus capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 14(3):169–76PubMedCrossRef Mita MM et al (2014) Randomized phase II trial of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib (MK-7965) versus capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 14(3):169–76PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ji Y, Li Y, Nebiyou Bekele B (2007) Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals. Clin Trials 4(3):235–44PubMedCrossRef Ji Y, Li Y, Nebiyou Bekele B (2007) Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals. Clin Trials 4(3):235–44PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mita, M.M., et al. (2011) A phase I study of the CDK inhibitor dinaciclib (SCH 727965) administered every 3 weeks in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies: Final results. J Clin Oncol 29(15) Mita, M.M., et al. (2011) A phase I study of the CDK inhibitor dinaciclib (SCH 727965) administered every 3 weeks in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies: Final results. J Clin Oncol 29(15)
18.
go back to reference Fabre C et al (2014) Clinical study of the novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 74(5):1057–64PubMedCrossRef Fabre C et al (2014) Clinical study of the novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 74(5):1057–64PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A phase 1 study with dose expansion of the CDK inhibitor dinaciclib (SCH 727965) in combination with epirubicin in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer
Authors
Zahi Mitri
Cansu Karakas
Caimiao Wei
Brian Briones
Holly Simmons
Nuhad Ibrahim
Ricardo Alvarez
James L. Murray
Khandan Keyomarsi
Stacy Moulder
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-015-0244-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Investigational New Drugs 4/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine