Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2013

01-10-2013 | Epidemiology

Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer subtypes: the hormone receptor/HER2-positive subtype is associated with the most favorable outcome

Authors: Dorien J. A. Lobbezoo, Roel J. W. van Kampen, Adri C. Voogd, M. Wouter Dercksen, Franchette van den Berkmortel, Tineke J. Smilde, Agnes J. van de Wouw, Frank P. J. Peters, Johanna M. G. H. van Riel, Natascha A. J. B. Peters, Maaike de Boer, George F. Borm, Vivianne C. G. Tjan-Heijnen

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Contrary to the situation in early breast cancer, little is known about the prognostic relevance of the hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in metastatic breast cancer. The objectives of this study were to present survival estimates and to determine the prognostic impact of breast cancer subtypes based on HR and HER2 status in a recent cohort of metastatic breast cancer patients, which is representative of current clinical practice. Patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer between 2007 and 2009 were included. Information regarding patient and tumor characteristics and treatment was collected. Patients were categorized in four subtypes based on the HR and HER2 status of the primary tumor: HR positive (+)/HER2 negative (−), HR+/HER2+, HR−/HER2+ and triple negative (TN). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the prognostic impact of breast cancer subtype, adjusted for possible confounders. Median follow-up was 21.8 months for the 815 metastatic breast cancer patients included; 66 % of patients had the HR+/HER2− subtype, 8 % the HR−/HER2+ subtype, 15 % the TN subtype and 11 % the HR+/HER2+ subtype. The longest survival was observed for the HR+/HER2+ subtype (median 34.4 months), compared to 24.8 months for the HR+/HER2− subtype, 19.8 months for the HR−/HER2+ subtype and 8.8 months for the TN subtype (P < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, subtype was an independent prognostic factor, as were initial site of metastases and metastatic-free interval. The HR+/HER2+ subtype was associated with the longest survival after diagnosis of distant metastases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Gelber RD et al (2007) Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007. Ann Oncol 18:1133–1144PubMedCrossRef Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Gelber RD et al (2007) Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007. Ann Oncol 18:1133–1144PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Coates AS, Colleoni M, Goldhirsch A (2012) Is adjuvant chemotherapy useful for women with luminal a breast cancer? J Clin Oncol 30:1260–1263PubMedCrossRef Coates AS, Colleoni M, Goldhirsch A (2012) Is adjuvant chemotherapy useful for women with luminal a breast cancer? J Clin Oncol 30:1260–1263PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS et al (2011) Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22:1736–1747PubMedCrossRef Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS et al (2011) Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22:1736–1747PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yamamoto N, Watanabe T, Katsumata N et al (1998) Construction and validation of a practical prognostic index for patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2401–2408PubMed Yamamoto N, Watanabe T, Katsumata N et al (1998) Construction and validation of a practical prognostic index for patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2401–2408PubMed
5.
go back to reference Insa A, Lluch A, Prosper F et al (1999) Prognostic factors predicting survival from first recurrence in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of 439 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 56:67–78PubMedCrossRef Insa A, Lluch A, Prosper F et al (1999) Prognostic factors predicting survival from first recurrence in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of 439 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 56:67–78PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chang J, Clark GM, Allred DC et al (2003) Survival of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma: importance of prognostic markers of the primary tumor. Cancer 97:545–553PubMedCrossRef Chang J, Clark GM, Allred DC et al (2003) Survival of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma: importance of prognostic markers of the primary tumor. Cancer 97:545–553PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jung SY, Rosenzweig M, Sereika SM et al (2012) Factors associated with mortality after breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Causes Control 23:103–112PubMedCrossRef Jung SY, Rosenzweig M, Sereika SM et al (2012) Factors associated with mortality after breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Causes Control 23:103–112PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Largillier R, Ferrero JM, Doyen J et al (2008) Prognostic factors in 1,038 women with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 19:2012–2019PubMedCrossRef Largillier R, Ferrero JM, Doyen J et al (2008) Prognostic factors in 1,038 women with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 19:2012–2019PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Beslija S, Bonneterre J, Burstein HJ et al (2009) Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 20:1771–1785PubMedCrossRef Beslija S, Bonneterre J, Burstein HJ et al (2009) Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 20:1771–1785PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R et al (2010) Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 28:3271–3277PubMedCrossRef Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R et al (2010) Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 28:3271–3277PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dawood S, Broglio K, Buzdar AU et al (2010) Prognosis of women with metastatic breast cancer by HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment: an institutional-based review. J Clin Oncol 28:92–98PubMedCrossRef Dawood S, Broglio K, Buzdar AU et al (2010) Prognosis of women with metastatic breast cancer by HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment: an institutional-based review. J Clin Oncol 28:92–98PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410PubMedCrossRef Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Planchat E, Durando X, Abrial C et al (2011) Prognostic value of initial tumor parameters after metastatic relapse. Cancer Invest 29:635–643PubMedCrossRef Planchat E, Durando X, Abrial C et al (2011) Prognostic value of initial tumor parameters after metastatic relapse. Cancer Invest 29:635–643PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Puente J, Lopez-Tarruella S, Ruiz A et al (2010) Practical prognostic index for patients with metastatic recurrent breast cancer: retrospective analysis of 2,322 patients from the GEICAM Spanish El Alamo register. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122:591–600PubMedCrossRef Puente J, Lopez-Tarruella S, Ruiz A et al (2010) Practical prognostic index for patients with metastatic recurrent breast cancer: retrospective analysis of 2,322 patients from the GEICAM Spanish El Alamo register. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122:591–600PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chia S (2012) Testing for discordance at metastatic relapse: does it matter? J Clin Oncol 30:575–576PubMedCrossRef Chia S (2012) Testing for discordance at metastatic relapse: does it matter? J Clin Oncol 30:575–576PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hoefnagel LD, van de Vijver MJ, van Slooten HJ et al (2010) Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases. Breast Cancer Res 12:R75PubMedCrossRef Hoefnagel LD, van de Vijver MJ, van Slooten HJ et al (2010) Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases. Breast Cancer Res 12:R75PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Duchnowska R, Dziadziuszko R, Trojanowski T et al (2012) Conversion of epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and hormone receptor expression in breast cancer metastases to the brain. Breast Cancer Res 14:R119PubMedCrossRef Duchnowska R, Dziadziuszko R, Trojanowski T et al (2012) Conversion of epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and hormone receptor expression in breast cancer metastases to the brain. Breast Cancer Res 14:R119PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Niikura N, Liu J, Hayashi N et al (2010) Loss of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in metastatic sites of HER2-overexpressing primary breast tumors. J Clin Oncol 30:593–599CrossRef Niikura N, Liu J, Hayashi N et al (2010) Loss of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in metastatic sites of HER2-overexpressing primary breast tumors. J Clin Oncol 30:593–599CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Amir E, Miller N, Geddie W et al (2012) Prospective study evaluating the impact of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:587–592PubMedCrossRef Amir E, Miller N, Geddie W et al (2012) Prospective study evaluating the impact of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:587–592PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Amir E, Clemons M, Purdie CA et al (2012) Tissue confirmation of disease recurrence in breast cancer patients: pooled analysis of multi-centre, multi-disciplinary prospective studies. Cancer Treat Rev 38:708–714PubMedCrossRef Amir E, Clemons M, Purdie CA et al (2012) Tissue confirmation of disease recurrence in breast cancer patients: pooled analysis of multi-centre, multi-disciplinary prospective studies. Cancer Treat Rev 38:708–714PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Liedtke C, Broglio K, Moulder S et al (2009) Prognostic impact of discordance between triple-receptor measurements in primary and recurrent breast cancer. Ann Oncol 20:1953–1958PubMedCrossRef Liedtke C, Broglio K, Moulder S et al (2009) Prognostic impact of discordance between triple-receptor measurements in primary and recurrent breast cancer. Ann Oncol 20:1953–1958PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hoefnagel LD, Moelans CB, Meijer SL et al (2012) Prognostic value of estrogen receptor alpha and progesterone receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases. Cancer 118:4929–4935PubMedCrossRef Hoefnagel LD, Moelans CB, Meijer SL et al (2012) Prognostic value of estrogen receptor alpha and progesterone receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases. Cancer 118:4929–4935PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cardoso F, Costa A, Norton L et al (2012) 1st International consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 1). Breast 21:242–252PubMedCrossRef Cardoso F, Costa A, Norton L et al (2012) 1st International consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 1). Breast 21:242–252PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M et al (2010) American society of clinical oncology/college Of American pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2784–2795PubMedCrossRef Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M et al (2010) American society of clinical oncology/college Of American pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2784–2795PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sanpaolo P, Barbieri V, Genovesi D (2011) Prognostic value of breast cancer subtypes on breast cancer specific survival, distant metastases and local relapse rates in conservatively managed early stage breast cancer: a retrospective clinical study. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:876–882PubMedCrossRef Sanpaolo P, Barbieri V, Genovesi D (2011) Prognostic value of breast cancer subtypes on breast cancer specific survival, distant metastases and local relapse rates in conservatively managed early stage breast cancer: a retrospective clinical study. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:876–882PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bauer K, Parise C, Caggiano V (2010) Use of ER/PR/HER2 subtypes in conjunction with the 2007 St Gallen consensus statement for early breast cancer. BMC Cancer 10:228–240PubMedCrossRef Bauer K, Parise C, Caggiano V (2010) Use of ER/PR/HER2 subtypes in conjunction with the 2007 St Gallen consensus statement for early breast cancer. BMC Cancer 10:228–240PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer subtypes: the hormone receptor/HER2-positive subtype is associated with the most favorable outcome
Authors
Dorien J. A. Lobbezoo
Roel J. W. van Kampen
Adri C. Voogd
M. Wouter Dercksen
Franchette van den Berkmortel
Tineke J. Smilde
Agnes J. van de Wouw
Frank P. J. Peters
Johanna M. G. H. van Riel
Natascha A. J. B. Peters
Maaike de Boer
George F. Borm
Vivianne C. G. Tjan-Heijnen
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2711-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine