Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Research Article

Variability of the multifocal electroretinogram based on the type and position of the electrode

Authors: Ángel García-García, Francisco José Muñoz-Negrete, Gema Rebolleda

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate and compare the wave amplitude of multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) measurements and discomfort from Dawson–Trick–Litzkow (DTL) electrode located on the cornea (cDTL) and on the conjunctival fornix (fDTL) and ERG-jet contact lens electrode (CL).

Methods

Thirty-six patients and 18 healthy volunteers were evaluated with three different methods (cDTL, fDTL and CL). Wave amplitude, number of artifacts, number of electrode dislocations and level of discomfort obtained with each electrode were compared. These variables were also compared between patients and healthy volunteers (control group). Comparisons between wave amplitudes were made using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

Responses by the three tested electrode were better correlated (ICC) in patient (0.616–0.756) than in control groups (0.342–0.679). CL provided the highest wave amplitude in both groups (p < 0.005), but it was associated with higher discomfort (p < 0.001) and the highest rate of dislocations (72 and 100 % in control and patients, respectively). Looking at the differences obtained by each electrode between both groups, CL seems to be able to differentiate patient from control in the ring 1 of the mfERG. By contrast, fDTL gave the lowest wave amplitude in both groups, but it had the advantage to, apparently, discriminate between patients and control group in rings 1 and 2. cDTL produced more artifacts than the other electrodes in both groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Although wave amplitude measurements with different electrodes were correlated, they cannot be directly compared, so it is mandatory to create an appropriate normative database with each electrode. Despite providing the lowest amplitudes, fDTL seems to offer the best features to perform mfERG regarding discomfort, number of artifacts and diagnostic capability.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Heckenlively JR, Arden GB, Nusinowitz S, Holder GE, Bach M (2006) Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision, 2nd edn. MIT Press, London Heckenlively JR, Arden GB, Nusinowitz S, Holder GE, Bach M (2006) Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision, 2nd edn. MIT Press, London
3.
go back to reference Hood DC (2000) Assesing retinal function with the multifocal technique. Prog Ret Eye Res 19:207–246CrossRef Hood DC (2000) Assesing retinal function with the multifocal technique. Prog Ret Eye Res 19:207–246CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Beeler P, Barthelmes D, Sutter FK, Helbig H, Fleischhauer JC (2007) Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes. Klin Mobl Augenheilkd 224(4):265–268CrossRef Beeler P, Barthelmes D, Sutter FK, Helbig H, Fleischhauer JC (2007) Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes. Klin Mobl Augenheilkd 224(4):265–268CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kuze M, Uji Y (2000) Comparison between Dawtson, Trick, and Litzkow electrode and contact lens electrodes used in clinical electroretinography. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44(4):374–380CrossRefPubMed Kuze M, Uji Y (2000) Comparison between Dawtson, Trick, and Litzkow electrode and contact lens electrodes used in clinical electroretinography. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44(4):374–380CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yin H, Pardue MT (2004) Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the Jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing. Doc Ophthalmol 108:77–86CrossRefPubMed Yin H, Pardue MT (2004) Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the Jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing. Doc Ophthalmol 108:77–86CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mohidin N, Yap MK, Jacobs RJ (1997) The repeatability and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrode types. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 17(6):530–535CrossRefPubMed Mohidin N, Yap MK, Jacobs RJ (1997) The repeatability and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrode types. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 17(6):530–535CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Thimonier C, Daubas P, Bourdon L, Deral-Stephant V, Menu JP, Vignal R, Roux C (2008) ERG multifocal avec électrodes ERG-jet et Gold Foil chez le sujet normal: comparaison et reproducibilité. J Fr Ophthalmol 31(6):585–590CrossRef Thimonier C, Daubas P, Bourdon L, Deral-Stephant V, Menu JP, Vignal R, Roux C (2008) ERG multifocal avec électrodes ERG-jet et Gold Foil chez le sujet normal: comparaison et reproducibilité. J Fr Ophthalmol 31(6):585–590CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hood DC, Bach M, Brigell MG, Keating D, Kondo M, Lyons J, Marmor M, McCulloch DL, Palmowski-Wolfe A (2012) ISCEV Standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2011 edition). Doc Ophthalmol 124(1):1–13CrossRefPubMed Hood DC, Bach M, Brigell MG, Keating D, Kondo M, Lyons J, Marmor M, McCulloch DL, Palmowski-Wolfe A (2012) ISCEV Standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2011 edition). Doc Ophthalmol 124(1):1–13CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fleiss JL (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley Classics Library, New York Fleiss JL (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley Classics Library, New York
11.
go back to reference Otto T, Bach M (1997) Reproducibility of the pattern electroretinogram. Ophthalmologe 94(3):217–221CrossRefPubMed Otto T, Bach M (1997) Reproducibility of the pattern electroretinogram. Ophthalmologe 94(3):217–221CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Honda Y (1977) Some characteristics of the c-wave of ERGs recorded by a pair of electrodes on the cornea and sclera. Albrecht v Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophth 202:19–26CrossRef Honda Y (1977) Some characteristics of the c-wave of ERGs recorded by a pair of electrodes on the cornea and sclera. Albrecht v Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophth 202:19–26CrossRef
13.
go back to reference McAllan A, Sinn J, Aylward GW (1989) The effect of gold foil electrode position on the electroretinogram in human subjects. Vis Res 29(9):1085–1087CrossRefPubMed McAllan A, Sinn J, Aylward GW (1989) The effect of gold foil electrode position on the electroretinogram in human subjects. Vis Res 29(9):1085–1087CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Feng Y, Simpson TL (2003) Nociceptive sensation and sensitivity evoked from human cornea and conjunctiva stimulated by CO2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(2):529–532CrossRefPubMed Feng Y, Simpson TL (2003) Nociceptive sensation and sensitivity evoked from human cornea and conjunctiva stimulated by CO2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(2):529–532CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Yoshii M, Yanashima K, Suzuki S, Okisaka S (2000) Artifact removal procedure distorts multifocal electroretinogram. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44(4):419–423CrossRefPubMed Yoshii M, Yanashima K, Suzuki S, Okisaka S (2000) Artifact removal procedure distorts multifocal electroretinogram. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44(4):419–423CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zaragoza P (2011) Aplicaciones clínicas de la electrofisiología ocular. Sociedad Española de Oftalmología, Madrid Zaragoza P (2011) Aplicaciones clínicas de la electrofisiología ocular. Sociedad Española de Oftalmología, Madrid
17.
go back to reference Chan HH, Ng YF, Chu PH (2011) Applications of the multifocal electroretinogram in the detection of glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom 94(3):247–258CrossRefPubMed Chan HH, Ng YF, Chu PH (2011) Applications of the multifocal electroretinogram in the detection of glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom 94(3):247–258CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE (1990) Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol 300(1):5–25CrossRefPubMed Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE (1990) Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol 300(1):5–25CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Keating D, Parks S, Evans A (2000) Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording. Doc Ophthalmol 100:77–98CrossRefPubMed Keating D, Parks S, Evans A (2000) Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording. Doc Ophthalmol 100:77–98CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Variability of the multifocal electroretinogram based on the type and position of the electrode
Authors
Ángel García-García
Francisco José Muñoz-Negrete
Gema Rebolleda
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-016-9560-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2016 Go to the issue