Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Documenta Ophthalmologica
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2016

Open Access 01-10-2016 | Original Research Article

Transfer characteristics of subretinal visual implants: corneally recorded implant responses

Authors: K. Stingl, K. U. Bartz-Schmidt, A. Braun, F. Gekeler, U. Greppmaier, A. Schatz, A. Stett, T. Strasser, V. Kitiratschky, E. Zrenner

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The subretinal Alpha IMS visual implant is a CE-approved medical device for restoration of visual functions in blind patients with end-stage outer retina degeneration. We present a method to test the function of the implant objectively in vivo using standard electroretinographic equipment and to assess the devices’ parameter range for an optimal perception.

Methods

Subretinal implant Alpha IMS (Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany) consists of 1500 photodiode-amplifier-electrode units and is implanted surgically into the subretinal space in blind retinitis pigmentosa patients. The voltages that regulate the amplifiers’ sensitivity (V gl) and gain (V bias), related to the perception of contrast and brightness, respectively, are adjusted manually on a handheld power supply device. Corneally recorded implant responses (CRIR) to full-field illumination with long duration flashes in various implant settings for brightness gain (V bias) and amplifiers’ sensitivity (V gl) are measured using electroretinographic setup with a Ganzfeld bowl in a protocol of increasing stimulus luminances up to 1000 cd/m2.

Results

CRIRs are a meaningful tool for assessing the transfer characteristic curves of the electronic implant in vivo monitoring the implants’ voltage output as a function of log luminance in a sigmoidal shape. Changing the amplifiers’ sensitivity (V gl) shifts the curve left or right along the log luminance axis. Adjustment of the gain (V bias) changes the maximal output. Contrast perception is only possible within the luminance range of the increasing slope of the function.

Conclusions

The technical function of subretinal visual implants can be measured objectively using a standard electroretinographic setup. CRIRs help the patient to optimise the perception by adjusting the gain and luminance range of the device and are a useful tool for clinicians to objectively assess the function of subretinal visual implants in vivo.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Maguire AM, High KA, Auricchio A, Wright JF, Pierce EA, Testa F et al (2009) Age-dependent effects of RPE65 gene therapy for Leber’s congenital amaurosis: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet 374(9701):1597–1605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Bainbridge JWB, Smith AJ, Barker SS, Robbie S, Henderson R, Balaggan K et al (2008) Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber’s congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med 358(21):2231–2239CrossRefPubMed
3.
Busskamp V, Picaud S, Sahel JA, Roska B (2012) Optogenetic therapy for retinitis pigmentosa. Gene Ther 19(2):169–175CrossRefPubMed
4.
Schatz A, Röck T, Naycheva L, Willmann G, Wilhelm B, Peters T et al (2011) Transcorneal electrical stimulation for patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a prospective, randomized, Sham-controlled exploratory study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(7):4485–4496CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zrenner E, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Benav H, Besch D, Bruckmann A, Gabel V-P et al (2011) Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words. Proc Biol Sci 278(1711):1489–1497CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Humayun MS, Dorn JD, da Cruz L, Dagnelie G, Sahel J-A, Stanga PE et al (2012) Interim results from the international trial of second sight’s visual prosthesis. Ophthalmology 119(4):779–788CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
9.
Santos A, Humayun MS, de Juan E, Greenburg RJ, Marsh MJ, Klock IB et al (1997) Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 115(4):511–515CrossRefPubMed
10.
Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Besch D, Chee CK, Cottriall CL, Gekeler F et al (2015) Subretinal visual implant alpha IMS—clinical trial interim report. Vision Res 111((Pt B)):149–160CrossRefPubMed
11.
Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt K-U, Gekeler F, Kusnyerik A, Sachs H, Zrenner E (2013) Functional outcome in subretinal electronic implants depends on foveal eccentricity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54(12):7658–7665CrossRefPubMed
12.
Eickenscheidt M, Jenkner M, Thewes R, Fromherz P, Zeck G (2012) Electrical stimulation of retinal neurons in epiretinal and subretinal configuration using a multicapacitor array. J Neurophysiol 107(10):2742–2755CrossRefPubMed
13.
Stett A, Barth W, Weiss S, Haemmerle H, Zrenner E (2000) Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina. Vision Res 40(13):1785–1795CrossRefPubMed
14.
Dawson WW, Trick GL, Litzkow CA (1979) Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18(9):988–991PubMed
15.
Gekeler F, Messias A, Ottinger M, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Zrenner E (2006) Phosphenes electrically evoked with DTL electrodes: a study in patients with retinitis pigmentosa, glaucoma, and homonymous visual field loss and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(11):4966–4974CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Transfer characteristics of subretinal visual implants: corneally recorded implant responses
Authors
K. Stingl
K. U. Bartz-Schmidt
A. Braun
F. Gekeler
U. Greppmaier
A. Schatz
A. Stett
T. Strasser
V. Kitiratschky
E. Zrenner
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-016-9557-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2016 Go to the issue

Clinical Case Report

Bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularisation in enhanced S-cone syndrome

Original Research Article

Comparison of photopic negative response measurements in the time and time–frequency domains

Original Research Article

Towards an electroretinographic assay for studying colour vision in human observers

Original Research Article

Variability of the multifocal electroretinogram based on the type and position of the electrode

Clinical Case Report

Successful scleral buckling of late-onset visual decrease in eye with retinal folds

Original Research Article

A late foveal response component of multifocal electroretinograms in healthy subjects